That’s definitely a tit.
Hm… interesting…
So apparently:
Timberlake said he did not intend to expose Jackson’s breast.
“I am sorry that anyone was offended by the wardrobe malfunction during the halftime performance of the Super Bowl,” Timberlake said in a statement. “It was not intentional and is regrettable.”
‘Wardrobe malfunction’. Hehe.
Hmm.. wonder if she’s wearing one on the other nipple! Guess this means I can look forward to junk mail peddling viagra and porn from "JannniP" instead of "PARIShilton"…
#1 | Comment by Ali — February 2, 2004 @ 1:03 am
i knew i could count on this site to have that pic. thanks for making my life so easy.
#2 | Comment by Juan Valdez — February 2, 2004 @ 1:11 am
My first question under cross-examination….So Mr. Timberlake, do you know if it is Ms. Jackson’s normal attire to wear large stars on her breasts when NOT planning on exposing them? What kind of shit is this, do these people have any ides how freaking stupid they look spewing this kind of shit out of their mouth?
#3 | Comment by AKA Postal — February 2, 2004 @ 1:51 am
b*llsh*t.
"wardrobe malfunction"? I’m gonna have a dick malfunction right up his ass if he keeps this shit up.
#4 | Comment by sexcrzdwezl — February 2, 2004 @ 1:59 am
If she did not intend on showing her nipple, why the fuck would she wear such a "fancy-uncomfortable" gay piece of shit on her dumb-ass nipple?
I think it was cool seeing a tit on TV just for the fact that it’s not a normal day occurrence; although, why the hell it had to be her and not Britney Spears (when she performed the half-time show) is beyond me…Janet Jackson looks like a black Michael Jackson; nevertheless, it was still good that a boob was seen on TV for any reason whatsoever.
P.S. This site kicks ass, for bringing this discussion up in such a timely matter.
#5 | Comment by Kevin — February 2, 2004 @ 2:02 am
The Janet Jackson thing was great, livening up a semi-boring game up to that point. But what I’m curious about is that streaker that stormed the field before the second half, and if anyone has footage of that.
Unfortunately CBS got the hint from all the European incidents with streakers that showing the guy would get them letters from "offended" viewers. It’d be funny to see that streaker get beat down by that Patriot player, as it sounds like he was.
#6 | Comment by Don Juan — February 2, 2004 @ 2:10 am
Um. So what was he trying to do then?
And do expect at least three subpar parodies of Outkast’s "Ms. Jackson" in the following weeks, from such predictable sources as: Mad TV, some guy with a lot of time on his hands on a random message board, and some guy with even more time on his hands who will find the other guy’s lyrics and record the actual MP3. Can hardly wait…
#7 | Comment by jobe — February 2, 2004 @ 2:12 am
And "wardrobe malfunction" is the funniest thing I’ve heard in a long time. Kinda like saying her chest plate went "on the fritz" for a brief second, allowing it to be removed…
#8 | Comment by Don Juan — February 2, 2004 @ 2:13 am
i think he was trying to rip off the black leather piece to expose the red brar.
ah fuck it, he’s full of shit. he wanted nubian titty.
#9 | Comment by scentless — February 2, 2004 @ 2:16 am
"i’m sorry, ms. jackson
i am for real
never meant to show the world your tit
if it helps, they photoshopped my dick"
#10 | Comment by Jamie — February 2, 2004 @ 2:18 am
‘Wardrobe malfunction’
classic stupidity 🙂
#11 | Comment by Derek — February 2, 2004 @ 3:22 am
damn that nipple piercing is the size of a hubcap…
#12 | Comment by Jason — February 2, 2004 @ 5:07 am
I think I saw that design on a custom rim for one of the "American Chopper" bikes…no?
#13 | Comment by Dead Sanity — February 2, 2004 @ 5:30 am
ugly breast/piercing. that was a rather unappealing start to my morning. thanx.
"b*llsh*t.
"wardrobe malfunction"? I’m gonna have a dick malfunction right up his ass if he keeps this shit up.
Posted by sexcrzdwezl – 1:59am February 2, 2004"
I think he’s gay.
#14 | Comment by eve — February 2, 2004 @ 5:40 am
Justin looks like a maniac in some of the pics. "HA, BITCH, LET’S SEE…that’s supposed to be a goddamn tit?! What’s with the fuckin’ nipple? Shit, yo’ who’ family’s fucked up, ain’t they?"
#15 | Comment by Dead Sanity — February 2, 2004 @ 6:15 am
LMAO
#16 | Comment by tyreas — February 2, 2004 @ 6:16 am
Janet’s kick startin’ the career. Playboy in 6 months. 😉
#17 | Comment by grud — February 2, 2004 @ 6:49 am
OMG I saw this during half time and I was like wth? is that a booby… well guess it was staged after all… too bad.
#18 | Comment by WP — February 2, 2004 @ 6:57 am
Here is the ugly american streaker…
yuch!
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/default-384×302.jpg
#19 | Comment by WP — February 2, 2004 @ 7:12 am
Don Juan: CBS and all other networks have had a policy of not showing people who run onto the field and barely discussing what happened to try and discourage people from doing it. It greatly reduces their publicity.
I watched the halftime show. I don’t know how I missed that. They were saying it was a "pastie". but that’s a nipple ring.
Costume Malfunction my ass…
#20 | Comment by Anonymous Bastard — February 2, 2004 @ 7:30 am
Ohw just figured out it was mark roberts again! the pro streaker!
http://www.thestreaker.org.uk/streaks/sbowl/sbowl.htm
#21 | Comment by WP — February 2, 2004 @ 8:43 am
hehe
it would almost have been worth watching the superbowl to see that tit live, but then again i hate football, so it wouldn’t have been.
Oh yeah, thats not a nipple ring. Its a nipple adornment, because there is no peircing involved. It just kinda fits onto the nipple, like a ring on a finger….. well i guess it is a nipple ring of sorts then i guess. Not one in the typical nipple ring way though.
#22 | Comment by kvl — February 2, 2004 @ 10:03 am
"oh shit yo, your titty" – Scarface (Half Baked)…pretty much sums that whole situation up.
#23 | Comment by Will — February 2, 2004 @ 11:12 am
"The tearing of Janet Jackson’s costume was unrehearsed, unplanned, completely unintentional and was inconsistent with assurances we had about the content of the performance. MTV regrets this incident occurred and we apologize to anyone who was offended by it."
Yeah Right, It was all plained out by Janet and Justen. And knowing how MTV is for ratings they might have been in on it too.
#24 | Comment by Falcon204 — February 2, 2004 @ 11:26 am
I guess it was unrehearsed and unplanned, and justin was just lucky that janet wore her corset with removable tit-coverings.
I wore mine yesterday, too, coincidentally.
#25 | Comment by babalu — February 2, 2004 @ 11:37 am
If this was all so UNPLANNED then what was his hand doing over there.
How stupid do they think we are.
#26 | Comment by Ryan — February 2, 2004 @ 11:42 am
163 ppl on this site at the moment. Unbelieable!
Anyway, on an unrelated matter, apparently heidi and jenna from survivor posed for playboy. Anyone happen to have thier pics? Hehe…i know i’m slow.
#27 | Comment by survivor — February 2, 2004 @ 11:55 am
Horrible. Yet, Hilarious.
I like the "Wardrobe malfucntion." Great use of words there bucko.
I am so pleased that the clips and pictures were up even before the game ended. And I didnt have to watch a minute of football for that. Booya!
#28 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 2, 2004 @ 12:34 pm
"Later it was confirmed that CBS, which broadcasts the Super Bowl and half-time show, had approved the tear-of strip, but were forced to apologise to their audience after a flood of complaints from family viewers about the smutty sing-along."
http://entertainment.news.com.au/story_page/0,4459,8560.html
sure it was unplanned, doesn’t matter does it!? 😛
#29 | Comment by wilder — February 2, 2004 @ 12:36 pm
An accident?? Yeah, seems kinda fishy. What has Janet Jackson done recently? Nothing! Seems like she needed some publicity, and damnit! Thats exactly what she got! And good for her. Its always nice to see some titties on network tv, and she has some nice titties (even if they were kinda covered, making it more obvious that it wasnt an "accident" after all). Nice work on getting footage of it on this site within mintes of it happenning though.
#30 | Comment by KB — February 2, 2004 @ 12:47 pm
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news/fbn_super_bowl_jackson_5
#31 | Comment by rob — February 2, 2004 @ 12:55 pm
Why is she stuffing her bra with sushi? That whole Jackson clan must be fucking nuts!
#32 | Comment by bligityblah — February 2, 2004 @ 12:57 pm
thats one gay ass nipple ring. i dont see what is so special about this she looks like micheal jackson and he looks like a women and she looks like a man and…..ahhh fuck i’ve confused myself she looks like an alien just like her brother
#33 | Comment by The Dark One — February 2, 2004 @ 12:59 pm
thats one gay ass nipple ring. i dont see what is so special about this she looks like micheal jackson and he looks like a women and she looks like a man and…..ahhh fuck i’ve confused myself she looks like an alien just like her brother
#34 | Comment by The Dark One — February 2, 2004 @ 12:59 pm
You guys are making me laugh in the middle of my computers class! Great way for me to get kicked out and look *real* good in front of the professor! 😀
I bet Justin Timberwhore did it on purpose. He is always trying to be the publicity whore, doing anything possible to get attention(such as flicking off on the cover of random European magazines–yeah you’re cool, Justin!) Stupid ugly schmuck he is.
#35 | Comment by Becca — February 2, 2004 @ 1:12 pm
I’m just glad Janet’s clothes came off and not Michael’s…….
#36 | Comment by grud — February 2, 2004 @ 1:17 pm
If I were one of the entities that paid 3.2 million for ad time during the game I’d be a bit pissed of that Janet not only stole all the attention, but got the publicity for her new CD and got paid for it.
Boobies are the advertising format of the future.
#37 | Comment by Kei — February 2, 2004 @ 2:35 pm
kvl: It is a nipple shield and it is held on with a piercing.
#38 | Comment by Anonymous Bastard — February 2, 2004 @ 2:43 pm
this has nothing to do with janet-titties…
http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2004/0-9ABC/Catwoman/clip/
But its quite gay…
#39 | Comment by sexcrazdwezl — February 2, 2004 @ 3:22 pm
all you people who post on this site are fucking idiots
#40 | Comment by you guys are such losers — February 2, 2004 @ 3:59 pm
Hey bucko, you posted here too, so your colling youself a fucking idiot as well.
🙂
#41 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 2, 2004 @ 4:26 pm
I may be a fucking Idiot…but atleast I’m fat.
#42 | Comment by pangwinking — February 2, 2004 @ 4:44 pm
That catwoman clip is just shameful.
I think we all know that that movie is going to be unrepentantly horrible. The costume is about as dumb as they come, the actress isn’t very good at acting, and the movie just sounds plain bad.
Oh yeah, the nipple is still cool. I hope she does do playboy before her boobs sag any more. I heard there were some topless photos of her around on the net. Anyone know where to find them?
#43 | Comment by kvl — February 2, 2004 @ 4:52 pm
So this is what I got from the whole Justin/Janet tit thing.
My mom and I were watching it and it was quite obvious that Mr. Timberlake was having a good time rubbing his body up and down Janets. They did that throughout the whole show…and then, at the end, when he meant to runs his hands across her chest, he pulled off a plate, by accsident or not. BUT, many people are not only upset at THAT, but at the fact of how dirty they were dancing…This is a show watched by kids as young as 3! If not younger…..
And "wardrobe malfuntion"? This boy needs to shape up or ship out…perferably the ship out part.
#44 | Comment by Puck — February 2, 2004 @ 5:10 pm
I’m thinking something along the lines of "Gigli", the nipple slip was boring and its not worth the fuss thats become of it.
#45 | Comment by bligityblah — February 2, 2004 @ 5:10 pm
you need to get some video links for the underwear game that went on yesterday
#46 | Comment by tito — February 2, 2004 @ 5:18 pm
Americans are fucking stupid. It was a breast. Big fucking deal. A 40 year old breast was shown on network TV! WOW! It’s not like he fucking shot her in the head. Although that would have been even cooler.
#47 | Comment by DarckkorioN — February 2, 2004 @ 5:19 pm
Yea, that might have been cooler…but I find this really funny.
I used to be a teenybopper…screaming my lungs out for the all mighty J Timberlake…THANK GOD those years are past! I have absolutly no respect for Justin Timberlake and when I saw this, I just smiled..hoping it would put a big dent in his career. Maybe I shouldnt wish something like that on someone..Or not.
#48 | Comment by Puck — February 2, 2004 @ 5:25 pm
Oh, I think it’s hillarious. But what I’m saying is the people getting pissed off over this are blowing it way out of proportion. When I said my first comment I sounded anti-boobie. I love boobies, but showing them on the air isn’t a bad thing and it doesn’t hurt anyone.
#49 | Comment by DarckkorioN — February 2, 2004 @ 5:36 pm
"That celebration was tainted by a classless, crass and deplorable stunt," [U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael] Powell said in a statement that was echoed by others on the panel. "Our nation’s children, parents and citizens deserve better."
It really does make you wonder where the hell our priorities are. My 8-year-old missed the boobie flash, because he was downstairs playing nice wholesome video games, where people beat each other up.
It is indeed, just a tit.
#50 | Comment by Amy — February 2, 2004 @ 6:28 pm
I laugh with Justin about what Justin said:
"Wardrobe malfunction"
WTF!? Any person can see how he groped Janet and pulled away his hand before releasing the boob. Methinks it was calculated between them. All i can say is playboy aint far off for Janet. And Justin’s gonna get some booty.
#51 | Comment by barlow — February 2, 2004 @ 6:32 pm
Its just a loverly tit, although it seems slightly defective with that hell dodgy nipple star thing
#52 | Comment by Josh — February 2, 2004 @ 6:36 pm
I feel sorry for Timberlake I really do .. he idnt have to degrade his standards so much after Aguilera and Spears ..
#53 | Comment by Josh — February 2, 2004 @ 6:38 pm
***** typos
#54 | Comment by Josh — February 2, 2004 @ 6:42 pm
http://joshsti.fasthost.tv/itwasreallymj.jpg
#55 | Comment by Josh — February 2, 2004 @ 6:50 pm
364 ppl on the site. MOTHER FUCK. YOU GUYS NEVER SEEN A BLACK TIT before????
google "black porn"
#56 | Comment by dammit — February 2, 2004 @ 7:30 pm
I still can’t make myself care….and I love breasts. I’d like to see some video from the Panty Bowl though. Justin?
#57 | Comment by ocho — February 2, 2004 @ 8:06 pm
oh yea, forgot about that. to dammit, it’s not just a black tit, its a "big celebrity black tit". there’s only 2 other people with big black tits like that (that i can think of): pam grier and halle berry. so yea, its a little hyped up. Oh, the whole boob thing was staged. look at a zoomed in pic, and you can see the breast covers button in. WHO THE FUCK WEARS A THING WITH BUTTON BREAST COVERS AND DOESN"T EXPECT THEIR BOOBS TO BE SHOWN?!
#58 | Comment by barlow — February 2, 2004 @ 8:43 pm
That is nasty. It looks like Michael Jacson with a fake white boob. Guh. Who the hell wants to see that? And it was totally planned by the two of them, I doubt the network knew it was going to happen. Sick. I’d rather see Justin’s penis with a sun piercing on it…
#59 | Comment by Dex — February 2, 2004 @ 8:48 pm
Oh yeah, that article at http://www.foxsports.com/content/view?contentId=2105940
says "At the White House, President Bush said he missed the show." Cuz he was watching the Lingere Super Bowl on pay-per-view
#60 | Comment by Dex — February 2, 2004 @ 8:50 pm
JANET JACKSON’S BOOB IS MAKING OUR CHILDREN CRAZY
#61 | Comment by The United States of America — February 2, 2004 @ 9:22 pm
Why camera phones were invented:
http://www.babespotter.com/publics.php?id_client=52
#62 | Comment by Perv Ert — February 2, 2004 @ 9:33 pm
Oh yeah, that article at http://www.foxsports.com/content/view?contentId=2105940
says "At the White House, President Bush said he missed the show." Cuz he was watching the Lingere Super Bowl on pay-per-view
Wrong – He didnt want to choke on a pretzel
again so he just decided to stay away all together.
#63 | Comment by DarckkorioN — February 2, 2004 @ 10:13 pm
Perv Ert…
WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN? That is a poser site with no users. The action is at MOBOG.com…brought to you by the genius PUD of FuckedCompany.com.
#64 | Comment by RedEye — February 2, 2004 @ 11:12 pm
Oooo, a titty… so what?! I was sucking em back at 10 months old so who cares if a 3yr old sees it?!
#65 | Comment by BillyBob — February 2, 2004 @ 11:20 pm
Sheeez….I’ve seen more titty on "Benny Hill" when I was growing up. That didn’t seem to phase people that much back then. Ol’ (RIP) Benny was the king of showin’ us young boys boobies on late night TV. (Damn…I’m showing my age).
I think the stunt was inappropriate for the SuperBowl. For an individual MTV awards show or something….just fine. But THE biggest show in the nation? They are gonna get SO fined!
#66 | Comment by Gus — February 2, 2004 @ 11:28 pm
Schizo much?
#67 | Comment by Jamie — February 2, 2004 @ 11:45 pm
She looks too much like micheal
#68 | Comment by jason — February 3, 2004 @ 1:04 am
i missed this whole boob hoopla (and the streaker dammit) cos i was watching the queer eye marathon… thats what i get, eh?
anyway, after seeing the footage of justin whateverhisnameis talking about ‘giving [us] something to talk about’ i think he is a complete and utter tool
first post by the way 🙂
#69 | Comment by tonguey — February 3, 2004 @ 1:04 am
with boobs
#70 | Comment by jason — February 3, 2004 @ 1:06 am
what happened to her boobs anyway, i thought she got them inflated
it looks like my boob… that makes me a bit more confident now
#71 | Comment by tonguey — February 3, 2004 @ 1:09 am
minus the dark skintone due to the winter months
#72 | Comment by tonguey — February 3, 2004 @ 1:10 am
lol
#73 | Comment by Jason — February 3, 2004 @ 1:16 am
I have mirrored all half decent files I’ve come across – http://joshsti.fasthost.tv/ , I take no credit for other peoples work, I’m merely hosting the shit
#74 | Comment by Josh — February 3, 2004 @ 1:49 am
i killed three kittens to these photos.
#75 | Comment by scab — February 3, 2004 @ 2:42 am
no way man, i keep seeing michael whenever i look at her. And that ugly piercing…someone put it best as, "don’t look into the sun or you’ll go blind!"
#76 | Comment by Jason (a different one) — February 3, 2004 @ 2:59 am
http://entertainment.msn.com/news/article.aspx?news=148561
I dunno, for an older lady Janet’s booby wasn’t nearly as saggy as one might imagine. And I mean, she’s pierced. That’s always pretty trendy and/or cool. Right?
*dances to "if"*
#77 | Comment by thefelinepunk — February 3, 2004 @ 3:28 am
There are currently 691!!! pedophiles visiting this site right now
thats insane
#78 | Comment by Derek — February 3, 2004 @ 4:40 am
well of course there’s tons of people visiting, a lot of em probably missed the game (well, the first half), and are curious/want clips, pictures, etc. the keywords for "janet jackson super bowl" show this site on the first page of Google.
#79 | Comment by maja — February 3, 2004 @ 5:06 am
btw, kvl is full of shit. it’s obviously a nipple ring, seeing as there’s a BARBELL adorning it. deeerrrrp.
#80 | Comment by maja — February 3, 2004 @ 5:08 am
There are currently 824 people visiting this site right now
Sheesh people…aaaaannnnd…."I may be a fucking Idiot…but atleast I’m fat.
Posted by pangwinking – 4:44pm February 2, 2004"
Gyahahahhhaaa!
#81 | Comment by Bubba — February 3, 2004 @ 7:05 am
JESUS!
"There are currently 1020 pedophiles visiting this site right now"
#82 | Comment by eve — February 3, 2004 @ 7:23 am
"There are currently 1079 pedophiles visiting this site right now"
This is getting ridiculous. I know what I’ll do! I’ll go to sleep…yum.
#83 | Comment by Bubba — February 3, 2004 @ 7:27 am
1119, you’re just racking them up.
i’m just waiting for the site to tumble down.
#84 | Comment by David — February 3, 2004 @ 7:31 am
1174!!!!!
everyone wants a peek at janet’s tit!
#85 | Comment by Sarah — February 3, 2004 @ 8:07 am
1202
Holy crap for crap
#86 | Comment by DeeK — February 3, 2004 @ 8:14 am
it looks like one big fu**ing contest in the jac(ass)kson family to prove to the world who’s the most fuc**d up. sad part is they are all just about tied for first
#87 | Comment by lostmymind — February 3, 2004 @ 8:29 am
Publicity stunt!
#88 | Comment by Football fans — February 3, 2004 @ 8:30 am
"There are currently pedophiles visiting this site right now"
^ the counter broke HAHA
#89 | Comment by NGEddie — February 3, 2004 @ 8:52 am
mine just says people. It used to say pedophiles, but did something change or did I break something?
#90 | Comment by DarckkorioN — February 3, 2004 @ 11:05 am
this is why us non-americans thiny you lot are odd.
All this hoopla………….y’all voted for an alleged cocaine sniffing, DUI driving, deserter for President, and JJ’s breast causes a morality hardon?
We see breasts on tv everyweek in most countries.
Just watch a cricket match.
#91 | Comment by Discommode — February 3, 2004 @ 11:40 am
If Justin had taken a shotgun and blew her boob off, the scene would have been repeated over and over on all news broadcasts.
"News at 11 – watch Junstin blow Janets breast clear off her chest. We will show this more than any other newscast because we care!!!"
#92 | Comment by quartz — February 3, 2004 @ 12:03 pm
There are currently 1308 pedophiles visiting this site right now
Way to go Justin
#93 | Comment by Falcon204 — February 3, 2004 @ 12:13 pm
malfunction my ass
#94 | Comment by Jason — February 3, 2004 @ 12:21 pm
In a related note: Who cares about this anymore?
#95 | Comment by bligityblah — February 3, 2004 @ 12:23 pm
1397 now
#96 | Comment by charlies — February 3, 2004 @ 12:31 pm
Apparently the whole nation. It was all over the news tonight.
#97 | Comment by DarckkorioN — February 3, 2004 @ 12:37 pm
thankyou for the pics. awsome shots and just what i was looking for. goooo janet!!!!!
#98 | Comment by wow — February 3, 2004 @ 12:44 pm
Janet…37yrs old…and still hot as bitch.
Do not hate the body playaz, but you gotta question her judgement.
Loved it just the same – all together, this Superbowl will go down as the best ever because of the teams and JANET <- Don't fool yourselves!!
#99 | Comment by Bretski — February 3, 2004 @ 12:56 pm
In the words of Bender "We’re boned!"
#100 | Comment by bligityblah — February 3, 2004 @ 12:57 pm
Wow, I’m sure it was an accident. I am a boob man myself and that was horrid. I think her breast would look more at home down on the farm. Yuk.
#101 | Comment by ray — February 3, 2004 @ 1:01 pm
Sometimes you feel like a tit sometimes you don’t!!! Come on now you know that Ms. Jackson just needed a jump start back into the limelight of the public eye and what an eyeful we all got. It would have been more tasteful on latenight TV not during the primetime of the Superbowl. Now Janet are you Ms. Nasty as your past song noted.
#102 | Comment by Michelle — February 3, 2004 @ 1:15 pm
wow, there are 1300 visitors on this site right now. 1294 different users. i saved a pic of it if you want justin. email me for it
#103 | Comment by Jimmy Knuckles — February 3, 2004 @ 2:23 pm
So if Michael Powell and Paul Tagiabue are really so HORRIFIED that their kids might see a womans breast on tv…maybe they should take their kids outta their million dollar mansions and private schools and walk them down a street in DC or Detroit – see the kids that live on the streets and eat outta garbage cans in this GREAT COUNTRY that they are creating for our KIDS to grow up in !
Not to mention – how do they explain to their kids why its ok to pay millions of dollars to spoiled, uneducated athletes, and to worship these morons with rap sheets that include assault, possession, trafficking, drunk driving, sexual assault and murder ?
YOU horrify ME Mr. Powell – you and the rest of your upper class, bullshit morality preaching cronies horrify me.
#104 | Comment by Coz — February 3, 2004 @ 2:45 pm
1300+ visitors right now, I’m gonna cry when FUBAR goes down in two more days…I don’t want to go get a real life….:-(
#105 | Comment by bligityblah — February 3, 2004 @ 2:56 pm
wtf is this site, friend gave me the link by accident
#106 | Comment by rukka rukka rukus — February 3, 2004 @ 5:44 pm
i would’ve rather seen justin’s dick… i can look at my own boobs anyday
actually the lingerie bowl was probly better entertainment and hey, at least they kept their bras on
— didnt they?
#107 | Comment by tonguey — February 3, 2004 @ 6:00 pm
You have to understand that the parents across the country that are "horrified" and complaining are pissed, not because their child saw a bare breast for 2 seconds, but because they might actually have to take a moment out of their precious time to actually do some parenting.
Had they taken the time to explain to their children what a breast is, as well as it’s purpose (I’d probably leave the recreational uses of the breast out) then they would have nothing to worry about.
#108 | Comment by Kei — February 3, 2004 @ 6:09 pm
i think dat was juz sick…
i was laughin…like mad.. i was like,"wat the fuk is this happenin in a superbowl??"
n for the nipple ring?? how did she get dat on??
in most pics i saw… she so looks like michael jackon! lolz
#109 | Comment by Taro_BB — February 3, 2004 @ 6:47 pm
i think dat was juz sick…
i was laughin…like mad.. i was like,"wat the fuk is this happenin in a superbowl??"
n for the nipple ring?? how did she get dat on??
in most pics i saw… she so looks like michael jackon! lolz
o yeh… doesnt dat nipple ring hurt??
#110 | Comment by Taro_BB — February 3, 2004 @ 6:50 pm
Seriously, does anyone else find janet very ugly!?
DAMN!
#111 | Comment by Vishnu — February 3, 2004 @ 8:02 pm
she’s f*cked her face up so much with plastic surgery she looks like an alien….so why in the name of christ didn’t she get a boob job before showing them to 150,000,000 people. it looked like a half sucked milk dud
#112 | Comment by drools — February 3, 2004 @ 8:05 pm
here are some ideas for britney to get some shock value points…
*be trendy, make a sex video
*go against the grain, pose for hustler (not playboy, thats fer pussies)
*get thee to a nunnery
*get fat
*get an oscar
any other suggestions? 🙂
#113 | Comment by tonguey — February 3, 2004 @ 8:52 pm
all i can say is.. she looks like a man
#114 | Comment by lilme24 — February 3, 2004 @ 9:04 pm
It is called a nipple shield and it is connected with a piercing through the nipple. There are more attractive nipple shields this one is not.
#115 | Comment by steve — February 3, 2004 @ 9:10 pm
im getting pwnd
2.77 gigabytes served
Domains Referring Traffic;
: 2,860
Neraly 9,000 file hits 0_o
#116 | Comment by Josh — February 3, 2004 @ 9:24 pm
well i’ll be damned, there is a peircing involved with that sun thing on her tit (which a few people have gladly corrected me on). yes there is a barbell holding it on. Yes i am wrong. And yes, i have already become bored with this, and am looking foreward when to when we all get back to doing the respectable thing, and get back to finding are sharing pictures of naked HOT girls, and not freaky attention whores.
I blame my mistake on peer pressure and drugs…. mostly the drugs though.
#117 | Comment by kvl — February 3, 2004 @ 9:39 pm
http://www.staticusers.net/janet-jackson-superbowl-breast/
mmmmm
#118 | Comment by Craig — February 4, 2004 @ 10:37 am
you should add the GIF to your site! link it back to mine, though! it’s at http://revulsion.net
#119 | Comment by Josh — February 4, 2004 @ 11:34 am
First Michael dangle’s his kid…eventually gets arrested again for fucking children. Then Howard Dean seems to flip out. And now we see boob (Janet’s…coincidence? I think not) at Super Bowl. It was bound to happen. The past year has been good for sites like this, am I right? Good stuff.
#120 | Comment by Dead Sanity — February 4, 2004 @ 2:05 pm
I think the whole thing was set up. If thats a nipple ring, then I am mickey mouse. There is no way his arm would just go to that spot and rip her "shirt" off without it being planned out. Its bogus and they are all liars! They just wanted to push the TV limits as if they aren’t pushed enough. Simple Solution:Don’t wear clothing that can peel off in any way shape or form if you are on national TV with the entire nation watching your every move!
#121 | Comment by HummingBird — February 4, 2004 @ 3:44 pm
Jesus Christ … why do Americans have to make such a big deal of seeing a (staged) tit! Just take a look at Italian TV at 6pm and you’ll see shitloads of tits over and over again. Ahhhh … I love Europe.
#122 | Comment by BrainDEAD — February 6, 2004 @ 3:20 am
http://www.q102.com/chio/janet2.jpg
interesting. sewn on bra simulator.
#123 | Comment by scentless — February 6, 2004 @ 11:10 pm
You guys suck!
#124 | Comment by kylie — February 10, 2004 @ 12:32 pm
If anyone wants to see the cover of her new cd you can find it here:
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0001EFV2W.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
#125 | Comment by joejoetheidiotboy — February 12, 2004 @ 1:44 am