#12 |
Comment
by The People's Ass — August 25, 2005 @
10:10 pm
If I wanted to watch pretty visuals from first person perspective, I’d play Doom 3.
BTW where’s this jessica biel’s ass in blue bikini =O
#13 |
Comment
by supher — August 25, 2005 @
10:45 pm
What a great idea. Let’s take the most popular example of the most repetitive genre of game (first person shooters), and make a movie out of it. And actually FILM it in first person. Plot? Who needs it?
#14 |
Comment
by Kthulhu — August 26, 2005 @
1:13 am
the trailer didn’t say anything about opening a portal to hell, just that they unlocked the last 10% of the human genome…or some bs.
#15 |
Comment
by radish01001 — August 26, 2005 @
2:54 am
I don’t know much about Doom and have never played it, but the movie looked ok. We’ll see, I guess.
The Rock rules.
Stealth on DVD = Jessica blue bikini clip (which probably lasts about 20 seconds, 15 of which were in the trailer) on the internets. Me can’t wait!
#16 |
Comment
by ButterscotchStallion — August 26, 2005 @
3:33 am
dwayne johnson smokes chodes
FACT!!
#17 |
Comment
by turtle — August 26, 2005 @
3:56 am
I also think the FPS sequences are pretty sweet, but I don’t know have a good feeling about how this movie is going to turn out. Video game movies almost always suck, the ones that take themselves seriously are the worst. At least the ones that know they are a complete joke, like Resident Evil Apocalype, are really fun to watch and laugh at with a group of friends, even though the movie is still crap.
No matter how bad this movie is, it can’t be as bad as the live-action Super Mario Bros. I saw that movie with my friends for my 10th or 11th birthday, and even at that age we all knew it sucked.
#18 |
Comment
by Elder Young — August 26, 2005 @
4:58 am
Looks bad ass. The FPS perpective looks cool but…
1. They probably over did it and run it into the ground (I can only take so much FPS)
or
2. They showed all the FPS sequences in the trailer thus diluting the “ooo and ahh” value of using this perspective in the first place.
But usually for action movies bad ass trailer=bad ass movie so I’m sure it will be a worthy flick.
#19 |
Comment
by inplainview — August 26, 2005 @
9:44 am
nah, the FPS part only lasts for one relatively short section of the movie. i dont think they use it throughout the whole thing. from what i’ve read at least.
ps: the guy who did this movie did cradle 2 the grave, romeo must die and exit wounds.
[The following written while extremely high for a journal (not blog; I’m old-school, and have a sense of modesty) I keep, and have decided to copy and paste, here (I’m not /so/ sad that I’d type out an epic like this for no one to read, in an old thread on a random-ass website); as such, please excuse the rambling stonedness and impossible grammatic devices]
Dude! ‘Doom’ trailer! Was disgusted by, more pessimistic about the Hollywood copping out that so utterly ruined the concept. But, seeing what became so familiar, that I subconsciously identify as /me/, playing the game –the monsters, the architecture and lighting, the interface paradigm and skinning, the weapons and effects and the point of view — as well as a phenomenon similar to but much stronger than geek Referenctial Euphoria, made me giddy. And, I think, the extended first person (but better, because dramatically directed instead of algorithmically and relatively boringly contrived, and also better graphics) scenes convey the extremely palpable, utterly trrrifying horror that made me quit the game after the second level, which no movie, no matter the style, has ever begun to approach, are an incredible, unprecedented cinematic device. And, strongly [but, inherently, seperately, conceptually], both and about equally, a teacher(benevolently)’s and pioneer(superiorly; AKA Indier-than-thou)’s pride don’t hurt, either: having the masses experience what we few, we proud, we loser gamers so strongly have. Of course, the plot and character and dialogue and basic premise will still be worse than dead, but these cinematic devices, alone, will make it a good movie (I think it could easily, concievably, be among the best of all time, if they hadn’t so thoroughly copped out on the actual “Doom” part). If they even hint at the E1M1 music, I’ll cum in my fucking pants, then immediately have a massive stroke and die happy.
Like…duh.
Didn’t you see this before ‘Stealth’?
1st.
#1 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 25, 2005 @ 12:50 pm
i don’t think anybody saw stealth. did you see those box office returns?
#2 | Comment by Justin — August 25, 2005 @ 12:54 pm
Did you see Jessi Biel’s ass in that blue bikini?
yumb.
#3 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 25, 2005 @ 12:56 pm
i’d rather stare at the rock’s ass?
yumb?
#4 | Comment by Justin — August 25, 2005 @ 12:57 pm
fag
#3 [Did you see Jessi Biel’s ass in that blue bikini?]
In Stealth? I’m going to miss that. I guess I’ll have until the clip is available for downloading.
#5 | Comment by kiko — August 25, 2005 @ 1:04 pm
Justin, if you’re anything, you’re consistent!
#6 | Comment by fubarvet — August 25, 2005 @ 1:06 pm
Coo.
#7 | Comment by JustSumDude — August 25, 2005 @ 2:16 pm
Doom the movie looks like shit.
Why did they veer from the original story line anyway?
#8 | Comment by radish01001 — August 25, 2005 @ 4:54 pm
No.
If i wanted to watch first-person sequences, i’d play the game…its actually interactive.
video game movies are NEVER good*
*except The Wizard(I
#9 | Comment by Jacked — August 25, 2005 @ 8:12 pm
*
#10 | Comment by Jacked — August 25, 2005 @ 8:13 pm
actually they didn’t veer from the storyline at all. it’s still mars, there’s still demons from hell.
#11 | Comment by Justin — August 25, 2005 @ 8:20 pm
Why thankyou Justin.
All this man-rasslin paid off. O_o
#12 | Comment by The People's Ass — August 25, 2005 @ 10:10 pm
If I wanted to watch pretty visuals from first person perspective, I’d play Doom 3.
BTW where’s this jessica biel’s ass in blue bikini =O
#13 | Comment by supher — August 25, 2005 @ 10:45 pm
What a great idea. Let’s take the most popular example of the most repetitive genre of game (first person shooters), and make a movie out of it. And actually FILM it in first person. Plot? Who needs it?
#14 | Comment by Kthulhu — August 26, 2005 @ 1:13 am
the trailer didn’t say anything about opening a portal to hell, just that they unlocked the last 10% of the human genome…or some bs.
#15 | Comment by radish01001 — August 26, 2005 @ 2:54 am
I don’t know much about Doom and have never played it, but the movie looked ok. We’ll see, I guess.
The Rock rules.
Stealth on DVD = Jessica blue bikini clip (which probably lasts about 20 seconds, 15 of which were in the trailer) on the internets. Me can’t wait!
#16 | Comment by ButterscotchStallion — August 26, 2005 @ 3:33 am
dwayne johnson smokes chodes
FACT!!
#17 | Comment by turtle — August 26, 2005 @ 3:56 am
I also think the FPS sequences are pretty sweet, but I don’t know have a good feeling about how this movie is going to turn out. Video game movies almost always suck, the ones that take themselves seriously are the worst. At least the ones that know they are a complete joke, like Resident Evil Apocalype, are really fun to watch and laugh at with a group of friends, even though the movie is still crap.
No matter how bad this movie is, it can’t be as bad as the live-action Super Mario Bros. I saw that movie with my friends for my 10th or 11th birthday, and even at that age we all knew it sucked.
#18 | Comment by Elder Young — August 26, 2005 @ 4:58 am
Looks bad ass. The FPS perpective looks cool but…
1. They probably over did it and run it into the ground (I can only take so much FPS)
or
2. They showed all the FPS sequences in the trailer thus diluting the “ooo and ahh” value of using this perspective in the first place.
But usually for action movies bad ass trailer=bad ass movie so I’m sure it will be a worthy flick.
#19 | Comment by inplainview — August 26, 2005 @ 9:44 am
nah, the FPS part only lasts for one relatively short section of the movie. i dont think they use it throughout the whole thing. from what i’ve read at least.
ps: the guy who did this movie did cradle 2 the grave, romeo must die and exit wounds.
hey, at least it’s not uwe boll.
#20 | Comment by Justin — August 26, 2005 @ 10:02 am
#1, this is a NEW trailer. noob!
#21 | Comment by Justin — August 26, 2005 @ 10:13 am
STFU IH8U!
grrrrrrrrrrrr…
#22 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 26, 2005 @ 10:19 am
^
it’s disheartening to see lovebirds quarrelling…
#23 | Comment by turtle — August 26, 2005 @ 10:30 am
Anyone that would direct DMX loses any respect I might have for them.
#24 | Comment by radish01001 — August 26, 2005 @ 10:44 am
oh and did i mention that rosamund pike is in this movie? she’s only like, really fucking hot!!!!
i’ve been wanting to fap to her ever since i saw her in die another day.
#25 | Comment by Justin — August 26, 2005 @ 11:11 am
[The following written while extremely high for a journal (not blog; I’m old-school, and have a sense of modesty) I keep, and have decided to copy and paste, here (I’m not /so/ sad that I’d type out an epic like this for no one to read, in an old thread on a random-ass website); as such, please excuse the rambling stonedness and impossible grammatic devices]
Dude! ‘Doom’ trailer! Was disgusted by, more pessimistic about the Hollywood copping out that so utterly ruined the concept. But, seeing what became so familiar, that I subconsciously identify as /me/, playing the game –the monsters, the architecture and lighting, the interface paradigm and skinning, the weapons and effects and the point of view — as well as a phenomenon similar to but much stronger than geek Referenctial Euphoria, made me giddy. And, I think, the extended first person (but better, because dramatically directed instead of algorithmically and relatively boringly contrived, and also better graphics) scenes convey the extremely palpable, utterly trrrifying horror that made me quit the game after the second level, which no movie, no matter the style, has ever begun to approach, are an incredible, unprecedented cinematic device. And, strongly [but, inherently, seperately, conceptually], both and about equally, a teacher(benevolently)’s and pioneer(superiorly; AKA Indier-than-thou)’s pride don’t hurt, either: having the masses experience what we few, we proud, we loser gamers so strongly have. Of course, the plot and character and dialogue and basic premise will still be worse than dead, but these cinematic devices, alone, will make it a good movie (I think it could easily, concievably, be among the best of all time, if they hadn’t so thoroughly copped out on the actual “Doom” part). If they even hint at the E1M1 music, I’ll cum in my fucking pants, then immediately have a massive stroke and die happy.
#26 | Comment by Louis — August 26, 2005 @ 12:30 pm
I have a feeling this film will have a very high cheese factor.
Much like the majority of your penisssessssessss!
#27 | Comment by gulliver — August 26, 2005 @ 3:43 pm
Balls. Looks like. Resident Evil 2 with The Rock.
I will be utterly amazed if this sucks less than an Uwe Boll movie.
#28 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — August 26, 2005 @ 5:44 pm
So who’s gonna play Duke Nukem?
#29 | Comment by LeisureSuitL — August 27, 2005 @ 5:44 am