54 thoughts on “Rachel McAdams”

  1. oh noes! alyssa milano’s cousin??

    to bad yep to bad

    1st!

    #1 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 15, 2005 @ 11:57 pm

  2. I’d suck off dat hair! Yo!

    #2 | Comment by fat monkey — December 16, 2005 @ 12:16 am

  3. Since her arms aren’t Alyssa Milano levels of hairiness, I’m going to claim that it’s something on the camera lens that was cleaned off after the first picture, that or a very strange lens flair. In any case, Rachel’s still hot and awesome.

    #3 | Comment by Elder Young — December 16, 2005 @ 12:40 am

  4. Is this the girl from Mean Girls? Looking at her reminds me of Lacey Chabert, which in turn gives me a boner which of course means I have to take a quick fap.

    BTW Justin, is King Kong out on bootleg in Brunei yet? If so, have you seen it and is it any good?

    #4 | Comment by Zahid — December 16, 2005 @ 12:42 am

  5. Ew. A hairy nip. No wonder why Ali G is dating her.

    #5 | Comment by buster fiji — December 16, 2005 @ 12:50 am

  6. Whatever, i’d totally stick my pee hole in her pee hole.

    #6 | Comment by Titleist — December 16, 2005 @ 1:34 am

  7. she isnt dating ali g. the other girl from wedding crashers is.

    #7 | Comment by whiskeypail — December 16, 2005 @ 1:35 am

  8. isla fisher = ali g’s fuckpiece

    #8 | Comment by turtle — December 16, 2005 @ 2:18 am

  9. yes it’s hairy nipplage. Not uncommon. I’m guessing she waxes the tache and isn’t a natural blonde either.

    #9 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — December 16, 2005 @ 2:24 am

  10. Mmmmmmm, furry glands.

    #10 | Comment by stank — December 16, 2005 @ 2:31 am

  11. Nothing a little “candle wax on the nipples” couldn’t take care of.

    #11 | Comment by El Payo — December 16, 2005 @ 2:52 am

  12. ^^^
    lolz…’weird science’ reference.

    #12 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 16, 2005 @ 2:57 am

  13. you would need more than candle wax for Kelly Lebrock these days.

    #13 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — December 16, 2005 @ 3:15 am

  14. Not only isn’t that hair on the nip but look at the middle pic on the Hi Res list and Check out that moustache.

    No matter what I’d hit it over and over again!!!!!

    #14 | Comment by EbolaBoy — December 16, 2005 @ 3:44 am

  15. I can’t STAND girls with hair on their bodies…oh,and bad breath…I’m sorry…give me anything else it’s fine…but hair and bad breath has gotta go.

    #15 | Comment by dumdadum — December 16, 2005 @ 4:29 am

  16. She looks better as a brunette.

    I never noticed how many moles she has on her face. Moley moley moley moley moley….

    #16 | Comment by The Pope — December 16, 2005 @ 5:02 am

  17. Ha, she wouldn’t pose nude and then POP goes the nipple.

    #17 | Comment by Eamon Angelface — December 16, 2005 @ 5:24 am

  18. Greatest recent development in fapping: Hi Res digital photography.

    Worst recent development in fapping: Hi Res digital photography.

    I’m guessing it’s fuzz or something from that dress. It just doesn’t seem right… wouldn’t she or someone helping her dress notice & pluck any hairs that obvious and long?

    #18 | Comment by al k holik — December 16, 2005 @ 5:26 am

  19. any hi-res shots of her boobies from the movie she was in ?

    #19 | Comment by fapper — December 16, 2005 @ 5:34 am

  20. I hope there’s less hair on the McMuffin.

    #20 | Comment by Smiley — December 16, 2005 @ 5:41 am

  21. If you can’t overlook a little nipple hair on a hot girl you’re a fag.

    #21 | Comment by kiko — December 16, 2005 @ 5:45 am

  22. She should go promote McNair to all the young n’s with pubic-y nipple hair.

    #22 | Comment by easydoesituniversity — December 16, 2005 @ 6:08 am

  23. #18 try plucking one of your hairs from your nippular area! I’d skip that as well.

    #23 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — December 16, 2005 @ 6:14 am

  24. Actually, I don’t think it is hair, I think they are blood vessels. I was a little rough on her the night before.

    Also, what the hell is wrong with you? I’m much more interested in her nipple than potential hair (which it’s not).

    #24 | Comment by Cloetus — December 16, 2005 @ 6:53 am

  25. Is it me or does her nipple seem kinda high, I mean they looked normal when she was naked in Tanino

    #25 | Comment by ninbw — December 16, 2005 @ 8:21 am

  26. Fake.

    #26 | Comment by Nerima — December 16, 2005 @ 8:57 am

  27. Eww.

    #27 | Comment by Wonderyak — December 16, 2005 @ 8:59 am

  28. I just farted and it smells like Rachel’s ugly, hairy breast.

    #28 | Comment by Nerima — December 16, 2005 @ 9:31 am

  29. Someone please photoshop the nipple hair out, for the good of all mankind.

    #29 | Comment by ricochet — December 16, 2005 @ 11:28 am

  30. sooner or later you’ll encounter a nipple hair … you have to face the harsh reality of real world breasts now because you can’t photoshop boobies in the flesh.

    Although you could pack some tweezers. She might kill you with them if you use them, but you have that option.

    #30 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — December 16, 2005 @ 12:42 pm

  31. #4…. I saw a free screening of King Kong in the same theater the premier was in the night before. It was by far one of the best action flicks of hte year. Of course the amazing picture and sound quality in the theater helped to (you could close your eyes and pinpoint a direction for any noise…. even the ones behind and above you). Naomi Watts was pretty in it also. Its a must see! And McAdams is gorgeous. I think I’ll go with the dust on camera lense theory…. she’s to perfect to imagine that beingn real nipple hair!

    Randy

    #31 | Comment by Randy — December 16, 2005 @ 1:49 pm

  32. Wow…. went dislexic in the last post. Well just incase you cant translate the first one was ‘the’ and the second ‘being’. Sorry

    Randy

    #32 | Comment by Randy — December 16, 2005 @ 1:52 pm

  33. Seriously dude…u don’t need to leave ur name after your posts…

    Back on topic…that nip hair is fugly and i would gladly pull it out if only she would let me…

    #33 | Comment by iamthedevil60 — December 16, 2005 @ 3:25 pm

  34. #23 – If my chest was on display for a bunch of freeloading downloaders, I’d be plucking all 700 of those muthafuckas.

    OUCH. FUCK. NEVER AGAIN SWEET JEEBUS.

    All 699 of those muthafuckas…

    #34 | Comment by al k holik — December 16, 2005 @ 5:02 pm

  35. to #29
    click

    #35 | Comment by testenk — December 16, 2005 @ 5:22 pm

  36. From now on Rachel McAdams shall be known as Agnes McHairy Nipples.

    Ach Nai!

    #36 | Comment by gulliver — December 16, 2005 @ 5:57 pm

  37. Rofl @ “mcnumnums”

    #37 | Comment by Eric W. — December 16, 2005 @ 11:02 pm

  38. Have you ever been with a human girl before?

    Human beings have hair. Even the hot ones.

    If they didn’t no one ever would airbrush photos, which they always do.

    Use your head, and get out and get with a flesh and blood girl.

    #38 | Comment by reality — December 16, 2005 @ 11:05 pm

  39. when you suck on the titties,
    you can floss at the same time.

    #39 | Comment by monkey...blah — December 17, 2005 @ 3:19 am

  40. Must be a side effect from birth control pills!

    At least We know she puts out! 🙂

    #40 | Comment by Crackpot Live — December 17, 2005 @ 8:00 am

  41. #38,

    You’re a big girl, aren’t you?

    #41 | Comment by Steampunk — December 17, 2005 @ 10:13 am

  42. What? Just because her Escort has a double axle and is banned from some backroads doesn’t mean a thing…GVW is only a number!

    #42 | Comment by bligityblah — December 17, 2005 @ 10:16 am

  43. Fake

    #43 | Comment by yawn — December 17, 2005 @ 1:26 pm

  44. woops

    #44 | Comment by yawn — December 17, 2005 @ 1:28 pm

  45. eew.

    #45 | Comment by Radman — December 17, 2005 @ 5:27 pm

  46. I didnt see in any nip-hair in this video…….

    http://wwtdd.com/index.php?type=box&p=rachel.shtml

    #46 | Comment by Willy — December 18, 2005 @ 2:42 am

  47. The photo if printed at that size would be bigger than her in real life, so on the upside, if it’s hair then it wouldn’t be so big and obvious as in that pic.

    #47 | Comment by ~vjay~ — December 18, 2005 @ 8:50 am

  48. hair today, gone tomorrow.

    Thank you. I’ll be here all week. Don’t forget to tip your waitress.

    #48 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — December 18, 2005 @ 9:06 am

  49. So, is it old news that she got naked in some movie a few years ago? (link is a few comments above)

    #49 | Comment by Willy — December 19, 2005 @ 4:07 am

  50. Yucky… Hairy nipples and at that resolution one realizes that there are less spots on your average cheetah than there are on her face.

    To be very cliché, she’s good from far, but far from good…

    #50 | Comment by exelis — December 28, 2005 @ 12:07 am

  51. Man, it’s a sad world when people can’t tell a nipple from a photoshopped one. If you compare photos, her nipple would be showing in every one. And aside from that, looking at her dress, her nipples appear lower rather than “breast implant” high or “dorks who’ll believe anything” high.

    #51 | Comment by Yogadude — December 30, 2005 @ 4:24 pm

  52. Rachel McHairynips

    #52 | Comment by uniquejuan — January 13, 2006 @ 9:34 am

  53. Publicity stunt

    #53 | Comment by carmen electra — January 23, 2006 @ 4:56 am

  54. #21

    You’re the fag. Please kill yourself.

    #54 | Comment by the flow — May 27, 2008 @ 10:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *