Mackenzie Rosman

Need a little help.

Now. Take a look at these two pics before hitting the jump.

We know Mackenzie Rosman has a penchant for taking personal pics (that end up on the internets).

So there’s no doubt that this is Mackie right?

Mackie.

Mackie with friend.

M… Mackie…?

Thanks for the heads up Ben.

34 thoughts on “Mackenzie Rosman

  1. Honestly her face looks a little off, don’t you think?

    #1 | Comment by Jimmy the Blade — December 16, 2006 @ 2:49 am

  2. Maybe she was auditioning for “Black Snake Moan”?

    #2 | Comment by Heywood Jablomi — December 16, 2006 @ 2:56 am

  3. Clearly she’s the next Jenny McCarthy.

    #3 | Comment by ZekeDMS — December 16, 2006 @ 3:05 am

  4. The hair is totally different and the face is similar but not quite right.

    I’d say different girl.

    #4 | Comment by Mart — December 16, 2006 @ 3:39 am

  5. Not sure bout the authenticity, but honestly, what type of chick lets people take pics of her on the pooper?

    #5 | Comment by KidGT — December 16, 2006 @ 3:40 am

  6. Once again KidGT, “the next Jenny McCarthy.”

    #6 | Comment by ZekeDMS — December 16, 2006 @ 4:39 am

  7. Of course I must clarify, I’d fap to Jenny McCarthy anywhere. Shower, beach, toilet, portapotty, I don’t care.

    Mackie? Meh. Not even naked and spread eagle on my bed.

    #7 | Comment by ZekeDMS — December 16, 2006 @ 4:41 am

  8. How do these pictures end up on the internet anyway?

    #8 | Comment by MrCreosote — December 16, 2006 @ 4:57 am

  9. The makeup is real/her.
    The third looks greatly like a fake, though.

    #9 | Comment by Cole — December 16, 2006 @ 5:25 am

  10. #9 – I have to agree. I think the girl in the 2nd pic has turned up in other Mac personal pics, so I’d say this is Mac. However, that last pic looks off. The way she’s sitting and the skin tone around her waist both look a little off to me.

    #10 | Comment by council24 — December 16, 2006 @ 5:32 am

  11. It’s a photoshop job. They took Mac’s chin and pasted it on someone elses face. That’s why the eyes are so much higher and the nose is longer. You can see the line where the skin tone changes. Not to mention the fact the hair color is different and it’s a different style.

    #11 | Comment by JohnnyBravo — December 16, 2006 @ 5:45 am

  12. Her mouth in the toliet pic is the exact same as in the one with her friend, only mirrored, resized and tilted.

    #12 | Comment by Geago — December 16, 2006 @ 5:47 am

  13. Clearly fake. the mack is WAY hotter then this skank. And, yeah, anyone with any knowledge of PhotoShop knows the third pic is as fake as a 7 dollar bill.

    #13 | Comment by Osama bin Laden — December 16, 2006 @ 6:01 am

  14. i think it’s her. if you look closely the jawbone is the same, and VERY closely if you look the eyebrows are the same, although its hard to see them in the third pic. i think the nose is also the same, it just looks different lengths because of the way her face is angled to the camera. this is an old photography trick often used before celebs get their nose jobs

    #14 | Comment by ham — December 16, 2006 @ 9:49 am

  15. Actually the whole face has been Photoshopped in. It’s the same face from picture #2, flipped horizontally and pasted on the body of some other skank backing one out.

    #15 | Comment by Rush Montgomery III — December 16, 2006 @ 11:39 am

  16. 3rd pic is a chop job…and not a very good one at that.

    i can tell from some of the pixels and seeing quite a few shops in my time.

    #16 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 16, 2006 @ 12:41 pm

  17. After those first two pics I thought the stuff you were hiding “after the jump” was a shocking, hard-to-read story about how she was horribly beaten about the head and face.

    #17 | Comment by zomg — December 16, 2006 @ 3:31 pm

  18. Third is obviously fake. And who photoshops someone’s head onto a toilet shot? I mean really? How sad.

    #18 | Comment by Tanzarian — December 16, 2006 @ 11:17 pm

  19. what’s w/ the small pics today tho?

    #19 | Comment by Taco — December 16, 2006 @ 11:41 pm

  20. Cute. These are just the thumbnails, though, right?

    #20 | Comment by tool — December 17, 2006 @ 3:01 am

  21. Who beat her up?

    #21 | Comment by prufock — December 17, 2006 @ 11:25 am

  22. I’d say it’s real. The black and blues above the eye in the third picture do not correlate with the black and blues above the eye in the second picture, which kinda rules out the photoshop flip so many people are suggesting. If you need more proof, the colorization on the chin also does not match up, meaning it was taken with the light at a different angle. Also not achieved with photoshop. Finally, she’s in the bathroom and the door is slightly open, kinda like she was talking to someone with the door closed, and then that person got the camera and opened the door and took a picture quick. Perhaps Mackenzie was drunk or out of it at the moment, or didn’t have enough time to react, or just didn’t care. All very likely scenarios.

    It’s just funny how people are so quick to discount things easier than it is to believe it, especially on the internet.

    #22 | Comment by rodijim — December 17, 2006 @ 12:20 pm

  23. actually, rodijim, i changed my mind. i am almost sure it was a shop job. i went ahead and flipped the second photo myself, resized it 90%, and then cut out bits and pieces of the face and pasted them onto the toilet photo to make the point. here’s the result:

    http://www.warboards.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=6121&stc=1&d=1166386008

    you can also see that in the second photo her neck is twisted because of the way she has her head turned. but you know the head was shopped on in the third photo because the neck is not twisted at all, when it should be, which implies that the original head on the photo was facing forward on the toilet, instead of looking to the side

    also, notice the fake drawn-in hair over the right side of her face.

    #23 | Comment by ham — December 17, 2006 @ 3:09 pm

  24. Yeah actually there is a trend going around where girls have their friends take pictures of them on the toliet and then they put them on their myspace.
    Sexy?

    #24 | Comment by ummm — December 17, 2006 @ 4:45 pm

  25. OK, maybe I’m not looking hard enough, but can someone explain why it looks like she got a baseball bat across the eyes? I did a quick look around online and didn’t see any recent news stories about her.

    #25 | Comment by exelis — December 18, 2006 @ 9:51 am

  26. ummmm, no clue whos this chic is, but, wuts up with the black eyes?

    #26 | Comment by THOR — December 18, 2006 @ 10:18 am

  27. whoaa… whats up with her face? can anyone summarize what happen here?

    #27 | Comment by JM — December 20, 2006 @ 10:40 am

  28. perhaps the work of the photoshop pedofile???
    >>>refer to “stephanie from lazytown” post

    #28 | Comment by skarastamonjamondudelee — December 20, 2006 @ 1:24 pm

  29. there are some more pix of her…. look at this:

    http://mackielove.free.fr/galerie/thumbnails.php?album=58

    #29 | Comment by Hotsauce — December 29, 2006 @ 9:28 am

  30. Mack or not, the girl looks like she got clocked upside the head.

    #30 | Comment by ooFoo — January 22, 2007 @ 9:33 pm

  31. A 17 year old on a weekly TV show photographed while on the toilet?

    #31 | Comment by brian robinson — April 18, 2007 @ 7:12 pm

  32. I DON BELIEVE “MAC” WOULD APPEAR IN SUCH A SITUATION THIS IS EXTREMLY DIGUSTING!!!!!!!!!! AND VERY SAD

    #32 | Comment by JAMES — April 21, 2007 @ 12:50 pm

  33. you are so sweet and sexy I like you

    #33 | Comment by arnes — October 19, 2007 @ 8:25 pm

  34. Last pic is not her. It is a really bad attempt at photoshop. Look closely, the face has been cropped in.

    #34 | Comment by FooFoo — May 13, 2011 @ 4:34 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *