Keeley Hazell

It’s been awhile since the best breasts in the West got some exposure here. Thank god for the May issue of FHM UK (and for Keeley’s rack).

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

And here are links for the good stuff…

Boobs 1
Boobs 2

FUN FACT: The March 2007 issue of FHM was the last in the States. Guess Maxim put them out of business.

22 thoughts on “Keeley Hazell

  1. I still kind of prefer Kelly Brook, but Keeley is great. The pics are so hi-res her nipples look a little weird, though. Probably just have never come across a breast of that quality before and I’m thrwon off. Great pics.

    #1 | Comment by Kewtr — March 31, 2007 @ 1:24 pm

  2. Maxim better have struck a deal with Keeley before FHM died. We need a steady supply of Keeley here in the States.

    #2 | Comment by El Payo — March 31, 2007 @ 1:46 pm

  3. Fun Fact: AngelBaby is a sucker for April Fool’s pranks.

    #3 | Comment by Brit — March 31, 2007 @ 3:04 pm

  4. nice rack fer sure

    #4 | Comment by sidewinder — March 31, 2007 @ 3:04 pm

  5. =/

    im still over her. and im still hopeing Lucy Pinder will grow up and pop a god damn BOOB!

    #5 | Comment by Xan — March 31, 2007 @ 3:40 pm

  6. *fap fap fap*

    #6 | Comment by Kito — March 31, 2007 @ 3:41 pm

  7. KH became completely over after that lameass sex vid was posted here. Plus, wasn’t she fucking a nigger in it? Yes…NEXT!!!

    #7 | Comment by Osama bin Laden — March 31, 2007 @ 8:33 pm

  8. IMO Keeley Hazell is overrated… sure he has big fucking breasts, and she is very attractive… but i still think she isnt all that she is cracked up to be… IMO there are better looking women (and girls :P) out there… we should be focusing on the lesser known hotties… of all ages (no one over 30 :S)

    we get it… Keeley Hazell is stacked and doesn’t change her facial expressions…

    #8 | Comment by FUCK — March 31, 2007 @ 10:12 pm

  9. ^^^

    indeed.

    #9 | Comment by Xan — March 31, 2007 @ 10:43 pm

  10. Boobs and body – still awesome.

    But after that lame video her fap level has gone a bit “meh.”

    #10 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — April 1, 2007 @ 12:24 am

  11. and FHM US is no loss.

    No nipples = lose.

    #11 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — April 1, 2007 @ 12:26 am

  12. I’m stoned on xanax. AngelBaby, come over here and show me your boobies. Forget about that Keeley slut, everyone. Yes!

    #12 | Comment by TAINT — April 1, 2007 @ 2:20 am

  13. BIG BOOBIES ARE GOOD

    #13 | Comment by cory — April 1, 2007 @ 8:09 am

  14. The worse her career gets, the more likely she is to do real porn! Everyone wins!

    #14 | Comment by BT — April 1, 2007 @ 10:28 am

  15. Keeley Hazell ,Great Girl

    #15 | Comment by JonKing — April 1, 2007 @ 12:44 pm

  16. Keeley reminds me of Erica Campbell, but a little less attractive for my taste.

    #16 | Comment by Justin L — April 1, 2007 @ 1:28 pm

  17. ^^^

    agreed.

    #17 | Comment by Xan — April 1, 2007 @ 2:08 pm

  18. Penis is bored. Seen her in 85 million bikini and topless pics already. These are just more of the same.

    #18 | Comment by whothis — April 1, 2007 @ 2:33 pm

  19. she needs to remake her sex tape… this time with another woman, and in hi def!

    just imagine how well that would sell… super hot lesbian celeb hi def sex romp…

    #19 | Comment by FUCK — April 2, 2007 @ 3:39 pm

  20. Lucy Pinder’s tits are better… by the way, she showed them finally…

    here

    #20 | Comment by Blackhole Cavalry — April 2, 2007 @ 9:36 pm

  21. MMMMM those do look yummy. but i still gotta say that I love her sex tape footage the best.

    she’s no Lucy pinder tho

    #21 | Comment by So What Now — April 3, 2007 @ 12:01 pm

  22. “sigh”
    I don’t care what anybody says, those are the sexiest tits I’ve ever seen.
    ( . )( . )
    I just wish I could find a picture of her completely naked.

    #22 | Comment by BoobLover — April 14, 2010 @ 12:59 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *