33 thoughts on “AMANDA BYNES

  1. Your a married man now, make sure the wife doesnt catch you!

    First!

    #1 | Comment by Viva Himself — August 18, 2007 @ 6:20 am

  2. First!

    #2 | Comment by Unbelievable — August 18, 2007 @ 6:20 am

  3. Always liked this girl. Attractive, funny, sexy…

    #3 | Comment by Unbelievable — August 18, 2007 @ 6:21 am

  4. love Amanda

    1st!

    #4 | Comment by ocho-cinco — August 18, 2007 @ 6:24 am

  5. Unbelievable!! i can never get first.

    #5 | Comment by ocho-cinco — August 18, 2007 @ 6:25 am

  6. Kinda low quality, or am I just seeing things?

    #6 | Comment by Wizzle — August 18, 2007 @ 6:29 am

  7. I have no idea who this chick is, but these pix coverted me, she’s hot. Now we just need them in non-pixel-o-vision. Hi-Res my ass!

    #7 | Comment by thiessen — August 18, 2007 @ 7:43 am

  8. And yes, I appreciate that wouldn’t be pleasant…

    #8 | Comment by thiessen — August 18, 2007 @ 7:43 am

  9. wow. these pics really ARE pixelly. will replace them with proper hi res pics if they ever show up.

    /needs to check non thumbnailed versions before posting next time!

    #9 | Comment by Justin — August 18, 2007 @ 8:03 am

  10. @thiessen
    Have you never noticed that she is the girl in the left corner of the banner? You must have seen her many times already…

    Nice pix, what a pity that they are low res and blown up.

    #10 | Comment by Cane — August 18, 2007 @ 8:07 am

  11. I refuse to post on this topic.

    #11 | Comment by dex — August 18, 2007 @ 8:14 am

  12. lol, dex you just did.

    #12 | Comment by Cane — August 18, 2007 @ 8:20 am

  13. I’d love to mess up at least one of those dresses Bill Clinton Style

    #13 | Comment by Charlioso — August 18, 2007 @ 8:28 am

  14. I hate to naysay the adorable mandabear, but lately she’s been going to the Pamela Anderson School of Whore-makeup and looking down right trashy in the grill. Less makeup, and a fresher look would stiffy up my harddrive like she used to. She’s practically teetering a slide down the jenna Jameson slope

    #14 | Comment by johnny5 — August 18, 2007 @ 9:28 am

  15. jenna jameson ftw!

    this boy/girl thing known as bynes is definitly dull. i get no spark. maybe if we could see the brown eye… but even then, prolly not.

    #15 | Comment by MrShadow — August 18, 2007 @ 9:38 am

  16. chipmunk cheeks FTL

    However, I might start to change my tune of AB once I see her nakid!

    #16 | Comment by MacDaddy — August 18, 2007 @ 10:28 am

  17. AB = Amanda Bines OR AngelBaby….Wouldn’t mind seeing either one nakid at this point! 😉

    #17 | Comment by MacDaddy — August 18, 2007 @ 10:33 am

  18. man, Justin is really trying with all these Amanda Bynes posts, its starting to get ridiculous and sad. i wish youd get a better crush,Justin….seriously.

    i bet you cant wait for that Syndey White movie to come out…

    http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoID=14782064

    ^^^
    like that primus hasnt been done before…

    p.s.

    amanda bynes FTL!

    #18 | Comment by Xan — August 18, 2007 @ 11:21 am

  19. Don’t know if you know this, but here goes.

    http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/Artists/B/Biel_Jessica/2007/08/16/4422711-ca.html

    JESSICA BIEL FTW!

    #19 | Comment by DaRk_4n6eL — August 18, 2007 @ 5:13 pm

  20. She’s just looked like a Barbie doll of late.

    #20 | Comment by Tank — August 18, 2007 @ 7:04 pm

  21. Those pics are a solid “meh”

    #21 | Comment by Tony — August 18, 2007 @ 8:49 pm

  22. Never been obsessed with her like Justin…

    But I did get roped into seeing “Hairspray” with the wife (it was her birthday) and one of the few highlights was Amanda Bynes, in a schoolgirl outfit, sucking on a lollipop. Quite regularly.

    #22 | Comment by Jaquio — August 18, 2007 @ 10:54 pm

  23. in response to #19’s post:

    “she will play a stripper trying to earn money to raise her terminally ill son.”

    If that doesn’t scream OSCAR for Biel, nothing ever will.

    #23 | Comment by Sampson — August 18, 2007 @ 11:51 pm

  24. Nice choice on the couch pic to front the series. It is fantastic IMHO.

    #24 | Comment by Fubarvet2 — August 19, 2007 @ 12:54 am

  25. #20- And that’s bad?? Are you gay like #21?

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that… but your opinion on women doesn’t mean much then.

    #25 | Comment by Ike — August 19, 2007 @ 12:55 am

  26. Amanda FTW!!

    She just gets hotter and hotter

    #26 | Comment by Ron Dingleberry — August 19, 2007 @ 1:43 am

  27. #22

    Yes, seeing Amanda Bynes sucking on a lollipop through the movie certainly didn’t make me like it any less…though she seriously needs to stop thinking she’s fooling everyone into thinking her eyes aren’t kinda close together by parting her hair in the middle.

    #27 | Comment by yay — August 19, 2007 @ 2:33 am

  28. #10 Ah, didn’t know it was her. She looks cute. Love that banner pic

    #28 | Comment by thiessen — August 19, 2007 @ 1:12 pm

  29. are her eyes close together?… i did a double take after i read that complaint because i never considered it… they seem nicely spaced… but then again maybe that’s because my eyes are close together and no one ever told me. if anything annoys me it’s the buckets of whore paint she slops on herself. makes it look like she’s trying to hide a hideous skin condition.

    #29 | Comment by rottingwiener — August 19, 2007 @ 2:58 pm

  30. i would murder my wife for her.

    #30 | Comment by filthyfish — August 19, 2007 @ 5:46 pm

  31. I don’t think her eyes are too close together… the bridge of her nose is relatively wide, though and tends to make them look that way.

    Her legs look great in the one where she sitting on the back of the couch – her body in general!

    #31 | Comment by wannaramble — August 20, 2007 @ 9:53 am

  32. Worst. Resolution. Ever.

    #32 | Comment by Comic Book Guy — August 20, 2007 @ 3:13 pm

  33. All I gotta say is the first pic did it for me…she has those eyes like she wants to get it…HARD…and BAD!

    #33 | Comment by SoWhatNow — August 20, 2007 @ 7:32 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *