Emma Watson

Okay, it’s time for me to come clean. I don’t see what the big deal is about Emma Watson. Meh.

I suppose if you’re into delicious flat chest, then Emma is probably teh hotness, but she just doesn’t rev my motor. Needs moar some boobs. And better posture. She always looks like she’s hunched over.

Pedos, better get your fapping in now, she turns 18 on April 15. But I’m sure all of you already knew that, and probably have one of those “countdown to legal” sites bookmarked.

Full disclosure: I don’t like the Harry Potter books either. Zzz.

55 thoughts on “Emma Watson

  1. Emma Watson is good.


    #1 | Comment by Paragon — February 12, 2008 @ 6:41 pm

  2. I meant the opposite of last… uh…. what’s it called…. uh…. first? First.

    #2 | Comment by Paragon — February 12, 2008 @ 6:42 pm

  3. hmmm cuter when she was younger.

    #3 | Comment by JRC — February 12, 2008 @ 6:53 pm

  4. Too boyish.

    #4 | Comment by The Pope — February 12, 2008 @ 6:54 pm

  5. Man, I don’t even know if I can come here anymore. Ellen Page is good but Emma Watson isn’t?


    #5 | Comment by the real slim timlin — February 12, 2008 @ 7:21 pm

  6. However, she does look horrible in most of these pictures. And look at the hair on her arms in picture 7. WOOF.

    #6 | Comment by the real slim timlin — February 12, 2008 @ 7:22 pm

  7. You disnt mention her 27 yr old BF. Gives us hope.

    #7 | Comment by Gage — February 12, 2008 @ 7:25 pm

  8. grrrrrr….. damn DLT non editingness….

    #8 | Comment by Gage — February 12, 2008 @ 7:26 pm

  9. “I don’t see what the big deal is about Emma Watson. Meh.”


    #9 | Comment by Xan — February 12, 2008 @ 7:30 pm

  10. She’s getting more attractive. Give her a couple more years…

    #10 | Comment by Mike — February 12, 2008 @ 8:06 pm

  11. ^^^^^ Agreed.

    She’s gonna look better when she gets older. You can just tell.

    #11 | Comment by Edward the DCLXVI — February 12, 2008 @ 8:16 pm

  12. #10/11 – wtf is she a bordeaux? she’s nearly 18, she should be pretty much at her peak. if she were 13 i could mebbe see your point.

    #12 | Comment by AngelBaby — February 12, 2008 @ 8:28 pm

  13. While Alba has always been hot, I think she peaked at about 24/25 as opposed to 16-18. I think that is closer to their point. Not that Emma is too young, she just isnt that hot for young.

    I, personally, think she will Paquin as she gets older.

    #13 | Comment by Gage — February 12, 2008 @ 8:49 pm

  14. ^^^
    oh, i got their point. for me, Alba peaked in Idle Hands. guess how old she was when that movie came out?


    she also looked quite yumby during Dark Angel, which she started when she was 19 and finished at 21. of course, there are some who feel she peaked in Flipper…


    #14 | Comment by AngelBaby — February 12, 2008 @ 8:57 pm

  15. Aaaaawwwhh but she’s got such purdy brown eyes 🙂

    But her posture does suck. And hi-res reveals yucky British teeth.

    Wait, there are Harry Potter BOOKS? WTF?

    #15 | Comment by Tony — February 12, 2008 @ 9:33 pm

  16. #15 She has the best brown eyes I’ve ever seen. And, yes, there are Harry Potter Books; but don’t bother, Emma isn’t in them. That is the reason I haven’t gotten around to reading the Shooter book (Point of Impact), Kate Mara isn’t in it.

    And what is wrong with most of the rest of you people? She is pretty. C’mon!

    #16 | Comment by Paragon — February 12, 2008 @ 10:02 pm

  17. I think she’s cuter now

    #17 | Comment by Me — February 12, 2008 @ 10:21 pm

  18. Fappable. Ellen Page isn’t fappable.

    #18 | Comment by Grammaton_Cleric — February 12, 2008 @ 10:22 pm

  19. #12: It wouldn’t be the first time it’s happened. Actually it’s happened more than you think. I could make a case for the following girls:

    – Evan Rachel Wood
    – Lacey Chabert
    – Eliza Dushku
    – Mila Kunis
    – Ali Larter
    – Erika Christensen

    Actually, mulligan on the last one. Erika looks as gorgeous and angelic as when she was a teenage, she just ended up growing some fuckin’ bazooka boobs. It would’ve been great if the same thing happened to Natalie Portman when she grew older.

    Anyway, I digress. The point is that’s a list off the top of my head and I could actually make a longer one if I put some time into it. So there’s hope for Emma Watson still.

    #19 | Comment by Tony — February 12, 2008 @ 10:23 pm

  20. She is starting to get boobies.

    And in some of those pics you can see the start of a FUPA. (Fatter Upper Pussy Area) She needs to lay off the beer.

    #20 | Comment by stucco — February 12, 2008 @ 10:24 pm

  21. #16: Oh man! Kate Mara’s dark brown areolas through that white tank top! Fuckin’ god damn I nearly blew my load in the theater when I first saw that.

    SHIT! I should’ve downloaded that scene during my Mr. Skin free trial. FUCK!

    #21 | Comment by Tony — February 12, 2008 @ 10:29 pm

  22. #19: Why would you want to ruin Natalie with big boobs?

    #22 | Comment by Gage — February 12, 2008 @ 10:42 pm

  23. #21 Indeed. Here is Kate Mara’s scene you are referring to: http://rapidshare.com/files/37924647/kate_mara_shooter_1.avi

    #23 | Comment by Paragon — February 12, 2008 @ 10:46 pm

  24. #19 – no wai Eliza Dushku belongs on that list. she was by far at her hottest during her first appearances as Faith on Buffy. do i even need to tell you how old she was at the time? yep, you got it…


    however, i am still very much looking forward to seeing her in Joss Whedon’s next series, The Dollhouse. hopefully the strike vote went well today and he can get back to work on it.

    #24 | Comment by AngelBaby — February 12, 2008 @ 10:55 pm

  25. I agree with little on the list. Eliza 18, Evan 17, Lacey 16-18 (Lost in Space to Not Another Teen Movie), Mila 15, Ali I agree with, Erika NEVER.

    #25 | Comment by Gage — February 12, 2008 @ 11:01 pm

  26. Hell, I’m totally into “delicious flat chest”

    #26 | Comment by Darkstar — February 12, 2008 @ 11:09 pm

  27. #22. “Why would you want to ruin Natalie with big boobs?”

    Ruin? What!?

    #27 | Comment by Tony — February 12, 2008 @ 11:13 pm

  28. #23: You’re the man!

    #28 | Comment by Tony — February 12, 2008 @ 11:16 pm

  29. Eliza Dushku was way hotter in True Lies…. actually has she changed that much in the last 10 years. She seems to be one of those people that never age.

    I too am looking forward to Dollhouse because Joss Whedon is a way good writer. Too bad its on Fox and will get canceled after 7 episodes.

    #29 | Comment by Kee Man — February 12, 2008 @ 11:25 pm

  30. #24: The point of the list isn’t when they were at their hottest, since even though I think she’s still got it, Eliza peaked like four or five years ago. The point of the list was girls who got hotter as they aged, so you gotta think further back than her Buffy years. Pop in True Lies again. Did you really think THAT Eliza Dushku was gonna turn into a hot, curvy piece of ass some day? Me neither 🙂

    #30 | Comment by Tony — February 12, 2008 @ 11:30 pm

  31. this post need more hermione song

    #31 | Comment by Justin — February 12, 2008 @ 11:59 pm

  32. #30- well, that was MY point. that girls hit their peak physical attractiveness around 17-20. believe me, i’d rather this not be the case, as i am turning 27 this year. to old yep to old.

    however, i don’t see how Eliza in True Lies compares to these pics of Emma. Eliza was 14 in that movie, Emma is almost 18 here. yes, a girl should get hotter as they age from 14 to 18, but typically not much hotter from 18 on. i’ve got more examples:

    Jennifer Connelly = 18 when The Hot Spot was filmed
    Scarlett Johansson = 18 in Eight Legged Freaks, 19 in Lost in Translation
    Jaime Pressly = 19 when Poison Ivy 3 was filmed

    #32 | Comment by AngelBaby — February 13, 2008 @ 12:11 am

  33. I’d say it can be any age under about 18, and it depends on the person, because some people look great before or for a while after puberty and then some hormonal thing happens and they fill out the wrong way in their face and/or body, but nobody improves after about 18 unless it’s just a matter of doing new things about their appearance that could have been done previously. nice post btw.

    #33 | Comment by Justin L — February 13, 2008 @ 12:56 am

  34. I don’t know what it is that makes me not like her. Something about the eyebrows, I think. Either they’re too big or too dark, or something. I can’t quite place it, but she just doesn’t look right to me. No thanks.

    Now I’m off to try and torrent Poison Ivy 3, thanks to AB reminding me about it.

    #34 | Comment by Nobody — February 13, 2008 @ 12:57 am

  35. Emma is hot, and I’d go for Bonnie Wright (the redhead in HP) also.

    #35 | Comment by Wulf — February 13, 2008 @ 2:19 am

  36. Personally. I agree with #12.
    There are lots of women that get better in their early 20’s.

    I think she is fappable.
    Of course Im not a “Big” boob fan anyways…
    Im more of a clam man… Boobs are nice to look at, but to me, the prize is a little lower…

    #36 | Comment by Twirp — February 13, 2008 @ 2:21 am

  37. right nipple pokie alert, pic #2

    #37 | Comment by Voyeurism — February 13, 2008 @ 4:01 am

  38. I’d fuck her. In 2 months, of course.

    I agree about the HP books, btw. They bored the shit out of me.

    #38 | Comment by Dr. Disgusto — February 13, 2008 @ 7:53 am

  39. 16 is the legal age for consensual sex in the UK.

    #39 | Comment by endangered — February 13, 2008 @ 8:44 am

  40. Eliza Dushku was hot back then, is hot now, and will continue to get hotter.

    And no way does Chabert belong on that bullshit list. Sheesh….

    #40 | Comment by JRC — February 13, 2008 @ 8:53 am

  41. this girl has the look of a goer.

    #41 | Comment by yawn — February 13, 2008 @ 11:51 am

  42. Spot-on with the hunched-over observation. What the fuck is she, a troll?

    #42 | Comment by matt — February 13, 2008 @ 5:15 pm

  43. ^^^ A “goer” like she’s “going” places in this industry, or she’ll “go” to bed with any guy who asks?

    #43 | Comment by JRC — February 13, 2008 @ 5:15 pm

  44. About as interesting as cardboard.

    And not that corrugated cardboard that is really fucking tough, the thin pieces of cardboard that you get inside packets of inkjet paper to keep it from bending.

    #44 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — February 13, 2008 @ 7:25 pm

  45. I’m going to have to go with M’eh. I’ve got to think the only reason anyone would be interested in a woman as average as she is, has to be some kind of connection to the character. Whether they want to admit it or not, their love of the movies has created a fantasy of being Harry Potter and banging her. It’s like how everyone had a fantasy of banging Princess Leia in her gold bikini eventhough Carrie Fischer is about as hot as Jabba the Hutt.

    #45 | Comment by Evil Monkey — February 13, 2008 @ 7:46 pm

  46. ^^^ You’ve hit the nail on the head, Evil Monkey. The only reason that she’s as popular as she is is because of the little girl Hermione character. It’s the pedo attraction. She would be nothing without the character.

    Seriously, if I saw her in the hall at school, or in a mall, I wouldn’t give this man-girl a second look…

    #46 | Comment by JRC — February 13, 2008 @ 8:39 pm

  47. I can’t stand harry potter, and all this gothic/medieval stuff like LOTR, and I haven’t seen the movies or so much as physically touched one of the books, but I think she’s pretty attractive. She has an inner light, nice eyes, and a nice smile, even though she doesn’t have a classically feminine look. I tend to gravitate to sporty girls and tomboys in real life, mainly for personality reasons, and I would notice someone like emma watson from a mile away.

    #47 | Comment by Justin L — February 13, 2008 @ 8:59 pm

  48. Mark my words, in the next few years you’ll be seeing all kinds of comparisons between her and another young, ultra thin, English hottie with not much of a rack – Keira Knightley. The girl just needs to grow into herself a bit more, work a couple non-Potter, stereotype-busting movie roles in there, and then just wait for the English tabloid press to beat a path to her door. Not that any of you pedos are gonna care having moved on to whoever the next hot 12-year-old will be. 😉

    #48 | Comment by Wait and see... — February 13, 2008 @ 9:54 pm

  49. ^^^ Only problem is, I don’t rate Knightley so high either, as well as other Brit celebs. I’ll take Keeley Hazell though… 😀

    “Not that any of you pedos are gonna care having moved on to whoever the next hot 12-year-old will be. ;-)”


    #49 | Comment by JRC — February 13, 2008 @ 10:02 pm

  50. I want her… so bad…

    #50 | Comment by Chuck — February 14, 2008 @ 2:05 am

  51. #32: Whoa, I call shenanigans on saying Scarlett Johansson peaked from 17-20. ScarJo is hotter NOW than she was in either Eight Legged Freaks — where she wasn’t hot at all — and Lost In Translation. She was such a plain Jane even into her late teens; she was a late bloomer or something. But right now she looks hotter than ever.

    I let you get away with Jennifer, but I say she looked like a friggin’ goddess in Mulholland Falls, even though she is with creepy old guys the entire movie. But she hasn’t looked that good ever since.

    #51 | Comment by Tony — February 14, 2008 @ 9:20 am

  52. She’s cute on her own AND she’s enhanced by her affiliation with Hermione.

    She was well cast.

    #52 | Comment by wannaramble — February 15, 2008 @ 1:43 pm

  53. #18… “Equilibrium” hu

    Great movie…!


    I want Emma..!

    #53 | Comment by Chuck — February 16, 2008 @ 10:58 pm

  54. http://glamzilla.com/view/10733/Emma-Watson—Upskirt—White-panties.html

    #54 | Comment by Voyeurism — March 17, 2008 @ 3:05 am

  55. Uuuu, white panties =)

    #55 | Comment by Drowned — November 27, 2008 @ 3:34 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *