From the producers of Hellraiser and Heathers comes this creepy-looking film about a couple of high school losers (never made it with a lady) who decide to blow off some steam at the local abandoned asylum after school one day, and find something interesting in the tunnels underground.

This is teen horror that brings to mind movies like Teeth, but this one doesn’t look to have as much dark comedy involved.

36 thoughts on “Deadgirl

  1. Zombie sex? AB would let a zombie girl eat her.

    See wut I did thar?


    #1 | Comment by dex — July 3, 2009 @ 3:16 am

  2. kinky.

    #2 | Comment by demonoldperson — July 3, 2009 @ 3:41 am

  3. Interesante. Hadn’t heard of it.

    #3 | Comment by Kewtr — July 3, 2009 @ 3:53 am

  4. It’s a pretty damn good film. Doesn’t rely too heavily on gore or heavy musical score… there’s parts with absolutely no violence that will turn your stomach.

    #4 | Comment by Cpt Elliot Spencer — July 3, 2009 @ 5:48 am

  5. I don’t get it (the movie that is)

    #5 | Comment by pirho — July 3, 2009 @ 7:14 am

  6. I like Run-DMC references.

    #6 | Comment by Jenesis — July 3, 2009 @ 8:59 am

  7. This is just another version of a story that Stephen
    King wrote 20 years ago, no new ideas it´s sad

    #7 | Comment by walker4409 — July 3, 2009 @ 4:51 pm

  8. ^^^
    which story is that?

    #8 | Comment by AngelBaby — July 3, 2009 @ 5:09 pm

  9. yea, what story, it would probably be much more detailed and interesting than the movie, i wanna get it now

    #9 | Comment by Millard Fillmore — July 3, 2009 @ 6:26 pm

  10. I think he is referring to Stand By Me.

    #10 | Comment by pirho — July 3, 2009 @ 7:27 pm

  11. #10 – I think he was referencing a short story Stephen wrote in 1981 called ‘Joey Touched a Grey Poonany’. A true classic.

    #11 | Comment by Smiley — July 3, 2009 @ 9:54 pm

  12. #8 / #11
    No, i meant the movie “stand by me” from 1986
    which is based on the novella “the body” by King.
    “Deadgirl” is a primitive rip off compared with it.
    One needs a good backing story to make a corpse
    fascinating, only voyeurism is not enough and to
    steal an idea is poor. Without a good story a dead
    body means nothing, what would we do if we find
    one? We´d call the police and that was about it

    #12 | Comment by walker4409 — July 4, 2009 @ 1:30 pm

  13. If she is dead, then why am I the one getting stiff?

    Also, isn’t Stand by me about some kids who travel through the forest and find a dead body? Not about some kids who travel through the forest and fuck a dead body?

    #13 | Comment by evil monkey — July 4, 2009 @ 2:45 pm

  14. calling this movie another version of stephen kings “the body” is like saying that “weekend at bernie’s” is a similar rip off. about the only similarities that i can see is that they all have bodies in them that were discovered by a group of males (group meaning more than 1). aside from that, these stories bear no resemblance to each other and you are just a nay saying fucktard who wants to hate everything before giving it a chance.

    oh, and the chick in deadgirl… isnt dead.

    #14 | Comment by berkley — July 4, 2009 @ 3:48 pm

  15. I think wat hapens is tha the girl in deadgirl is killed by them or something and then comes back to haunt them. Is the dead body in stephen kings mentioned work come back to life or resuscitate like this one. Either way it seems interesting because of how fucked in the head the characters seem to be.

    #15 | Comment by Alexandredescendentededagente — July 4, 2009 @ 5:00 pm

  16. I downloaded it from demonoid and watched it, it was so creepy. basically, they are hanging out in a mental institution, and shes sort of like a mad science experiment (one of the characters makes that assumption). Its basically like an indirect version of a zombie. Because if she bites someone, they turn into something like her. Its a bit of a mind fuck movie near the end. Worth downloading, had me on the edge of my seat, at one point I had to close my eyes, lol. It was an interesting story too, some really funny parts.

    #16 | Comment by Millard Fillmore — July 4, 2009 @ 9:46 pm

  17. #12, what do you expect? there are no original movies these days, just directors and screenplay writers who remember old black and white films that they think no one will remember and then they rip it off. Nearly every movie from 2000 to 2009 can be traced back to a black and white or atleast 1950s movie. I never expect much from movies anymore, the only thing I look forward to in new movies are the advancements in special effects, just because its fascinating how realistic they make things look.

    #17 | Comment by Millard Fillmore — July 4, 2009 @ 9:51 pm

  18. i just saw ellen page at an outdoor concert in halifax. she’s the littlest thing i’ve ever seen.

    #18 | Comment by mzero — July 4, 2009 @ 10:44 pm

  19. #14
    But the quintessence is exactly the same, no
    matter how much the authors try to cover it
    with new “ideas” ( in fact new bullshit). Since
    you can´t respect a different opinion than yours
    YOU are the only fucktard in this thread…go
    and fuck a dead dog… barking berkley

    #19 | Comment by walker4409 — July 5, 2009 @ 11:55 pm

  20. Saw this movie based on the zombie sex reviews.
    It was a great sick movie.
    It gets 5 severed thumbs up.

    #20 | Comment by Leon Kennedy — July 6, 2009 @ 12:33 am

  21. Dode (sp) from Brick!

    #21 | Comment by Jimbo — July 6, 2009 @ 1:54 am

  22. your opinions that are contradictory to fact are the only opinions that i cant accept.

    because for you to say that this movie is based on “the body”, that is akin to saying any movie with a dead person in it or as a focus of it owes its inspiration to “the body”. that is not just moronic, but it is completely wrong. what about movies that were made before “the body” was written? do they owe homage to the future story they had never heard about simply because it was the most popular version of the story?

    you could just as easily say, this movies owes romero and “night of the living dead” because the chick is a zombie (of a sort).

    your baseless and moronic rationale is what gets you labeled the fucktard, fucktard.

    #22 | Comment by berkley — July 6, 2009 @ 11:42 am

  23. ^^
    Blow it out your ass tyke ! Whata hatrid puppy,
    come on bark some more

    #23 | Comment by walker4409 — July 6, 2009 @ 2:32 pm

  24. i can’t wait for robogeisha.


    #24 | Comment by yesyesyall — July 6, 2009 @ 3:44 pm

  25. ^^
    HAAAA!! Stop at 2.18, this is exactly what i want
    to do with barkingberkley

    #25 | Comment by walker4409 — July 6, 2009 @ 5:35 pm

  26. Ok so I waited 3 days before watching or responding to this post because I knew it was going to be shit.

    Did you Know?

    AB determines post content using a D20 with a -2 skill modifier:

    1-6 = shit movie trailer
    7-11 = fugly chick (Kim ‘Gul Dukat’ Kardashian or Kristen Bell)
    12-16 = hot chick (Hayden)
    17-19 = fap material (Smiley et all)
    20 (+19/20 on reroll) = FUBAR Gold (jrm, twogirls1cup, psycho girl)

    The only good thing about this post is Walker ripping it up. Singlehandedly ripping the motherfucker up.

    Walker’s the kind of psycho lunatic any Lieutenant would want in his platoon. You’d say “Walker, there is an elite batallion of VC guarding that village, and the only thing we have to take them down with is a knife, so if-”

    And suddenly Walker would be in there, ripping it up, and 5 minutes later he returns with 80 scalps and some jailbait.

    #26 | Comment by cobalt — July 6, 2009 @ 6:19 pm

  27. #26 – I’m thinking John Rambo or Francis ‘Don’t call me Francis’ from Meatballs.

    #27 | Comment by Smiley — July 6, 2009 @ 7:06 pm

  28. Oops, I meant Stripes.

    #28 | Comment by Smiley — July 6, 2009 @ 7:07 pm

  29. #26 – i beg your pardon, sir. i have never, I repeat NEVER, posted Kim Kardassian on this site. and i’m never breaking that covenant with God.

    #29 | Comment by AngelBaby — July 6, 2009 @ 7:42 pm

  30. Yeah you got to love that fag walker and the brilliant observations he pulls out his boyfriends asses.

    walker4409 response to AB’s topic

    oh noes this movies is same to stephen kings pet cemetary cuz there is an animal innit.
    Oh shit, fucking hollywoodz and same rehashing shit. blah blah blah
    put it in my ass again and again

    walker is this site’s blistering hemorrhoid that doesn’t go away even with meds

    #30 | Comment by walkersanasshat — July 6, 2009 @ 9:08 pm

  31. why isnt jennifers body trailer on here yet?

    #31 | Comment by Sleepless in Massachusetts — July 6, 2009 @ 10:43 pm

  32. ^^30
    Our new puppy starts changing names soon…but
    he can´t hide ´cause i found a pic of him

    There he is “berkley”…the new member in our club,
    let´s fry his ass

    #32 | Comment by walker4409 — July 6, 2009 @ 11:55 pm

  33. no JRM wll not watch

    #33 | Comment by LazyTownFan — July 7, 2009 @ 7:14 am

  34. This is what I imagine Walker to look like:


    You get the reference, you win.

    #34 | Comment by cobalt — July 8, 2009 @ 5:22 am

  35. #34 – Oooooo!! Me! Me!(raises hand like in special ed class)

    I’m going to say Watership Down!

    #35 | Comment by Smiley — July 8, 2009 @ 5:29 am

  36. “What were you thinking? This is the best you’re ever gonna have!”

    What a line to say about having sex with a cold rotting corpse. I’d rather stick my dick in a warm apple pie, than this. How about some ugly desperate chick who puts out? Maybe the guys could pool some money together and buy those silicone Real Dolls. ANYTHING would be better than a corpse, so what the hell does he mean “best you’ll ever have?”

    Personally, I think this movie is stupid. Original? Sure I suppose you can make anything up these days and think you’re being original. I could see guys sitting in a room saying “think of something original for a horror movie” and in a few seconds a guy says “how about a zombie gangbang? Nobody would see that coming!”… there we got a movie. I think the ending was supposed to be a ‘twist’, but I say it was expected. Not often do I watch a movie and desire to see the extermination of the entire cast. I’d feel satisfied if this badass character showed up and killed them all one by one. As for the zombies, throw them in a woodchipper because there’s no coming back from that and they ain’t the T-1000.

    #36 | Comment by Funny Shit — July 21, 2009 @ 3:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *