so im standing in line at publix paying for my sub
and the bag boy is bitching about how his name is RICHIE. it says RICHIE clearly on his name tag. but people keep calling him by names that AREN’T HIS NAME. names that AREN’T ON THE NAME TAG. like chris, or greg.
and when they call him by some name that isn’t RICHIE, he points to the name tag with a vengeance, and gets pissed that they pissily respond with “ohhh, soooo sorry–RICHIE”
and i’m sitting here thinking to myself. my god man. does it really matter?
i mean a rose by any other name… a bag boy by any other name tag!
but he’s RICHIE and he’s ANGRY.
so he hands me my sub in a plastic bag
and he says “have a nice day” in that insincere way (like they’re programmed to do)
and i said
thanks, gary
and walked away
ha-ha-ha-ha-ha
#1 | Comment by Sounkyniss — October 7, 2003 @ 1:49 pm
crystal… I concur.
#2 | Comment by jb — October 7, 2003 @ 2:22 pm
Now I’m pissed off. First post you did without mentioning me. I’m crushed. 🙁 Now I’m going to have to start bugging you for hot pics of yourself or something. I’ll end up just being like every other guy on here.
#3 | Comment by smash — October 7, 2003 @ 2:34 pm
teehee, you silly humans.
#4 | Comment by kinkiekitten — October 7, 2003 @ 3:17 pm
Why to you Americans feel the need to address everyone by their christian name? Do you know the guy? Is there any requirement to name him? Does it make such a difference that you know the name of the guy who prepared your sandwich?
#5 | Comment by J — October 7, 2003 @ 4:31 pm
How do you know the guy is Christian? Why do all non-Americans feel the need to live their lives in sheltered hermitry, not knowing the names of anyone outside thier family members?
Remind me not to make friends with sour-asses like you in the future.
crystal- you should see how many times you can call this guy a different name, consecutively, before he flips out…
#6 | Comment by embus — October 7, 2003 @ 5:36 pm
what happened to the pics of drunk gurls?
#7 | Comment by Nimble — October 7, 2003 @ 5:50 pm
You realize if you weren’t a hot female, you couldn’t get away with that kind of stuff? Richie would be eating your spleen in the parking lot. He’s probably sitting at home, unloading and re-loading his shotgun, just fuming….tick, tock….
#8 | Comment by grud — October 7, 2003 @ 6:06 pm
gg
#9 | Comment by biz — October 7, 2003 @ 6:29 pm
embus
"Christian name" is the official terminology for what you probably call "first name".
Well done
#10 | Comment by Jenn — October 7, 2003 @ 6:35 pm
J-
You make no sense. By and large, every foreign nation considers Americans to be the most rude and inconsiderate culture on the planet. And yet, you are here saying ‘why do you Americans feel the need to address everyone by their christian name?’
Umm, because, it’s polite? Personally, I prefer people don’t talk to me at all when I am out in public beyond what is absolutely necessary for me to transact whatever business I am doing. But I act like that and I get called things like "A discompassionate bastard" which more than 1 person has called me to my face.
#11 | Comment by smash — October 7, 2003 @ 6:43 pm
God Jenn. You can’t be that dry, as to not notice blatant sarcasm, can you?
Well done, back to you.
#12 | Comment by embus — October 7, 2003 @ 7:24 pm
Can you possibly understand the concept whereby it is rude and impolite to refer to someone by their christian name when, in fact, you don’t know the person at all.
Can you maybe comprehend the frustration that a non-American feels to be asked constantly "How are you today?" and to be told to "Have a nice day" when the person you are conversing with doesn’t give a damn.
You don’t need to apologise, just do something about it.
#13 | Comment by J. — October 7, 2003 @ 7:56 pm
HOLY FINGER IN THE BUTTHOLE.
JENN IS BACK!
Banana! Let’s rejoice!
#14 | Comment by Justin — October 7, 2003 @ 8:24 pm
This might be more accurate, grud…
–snip–
You realize if you weren’t a hot female, you couldn’t get away with that kind of stuff? … He’s probably sitting at home, unloading and re-loading his wang, just fuming….tick, tock….
–snip–
#15 | Comment by Stink — October 7, 2003 @ 8:44 pm
Jenn-
You really think it is rude to call someone by their name if you don’t know them? I absolutly do not understand that concept… help me see where you are coming from…
#16 | Comment by embus — October 7, 2003 @ 9:04 pm
J. (mind if I call you J.?, thanks ;D)
That’s American culture. I could pretend to be very offended that you don’t respect this. American culture is not nearly as forward as some others, we are considered pretty standoffish in the grand scheme of things.
I personally take my own groceries out of the store, otherwise, the bag person might expect a tip.
#17 | Comment by Seriously — October 7, 2003 @ 9:33 pm
It is presumptious and intrusive to address me by my christian name without first developing some form of relationship.
By virtue of the fact that we are posting on this comment board attached to little Justin’s site, we are forming a basic relationship and also agreeing that we wish to communicate.
By visiting a grocery store, I am not agreeing to enter such an arrangement and as such I would expect to be referred to as "Madam"
#18 | Comment by J. — October 7, 2003 @ 9:42 pm
wow.
#19 | Comment by embus — October 7, 2003 @ 9:45 pm
I would not describe Americans as standoffish, I would describe them as insecure.
I like Americans.
#20 | Comment by J. — October 7, 2003 @ 9:46 pm
"By visiting a grocery store, I am not agreeing to enter such an arrangement and as such I would expect to be referred to as "Madam"
Posted by J. – 9:42pm October 7, 2003"
Ok. "Madam" Jackass. Sheesh, some people are sooo formal.
‘Stal its official. The votes are in. You rock. Congratulations.
#21 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 7, 2003 @ 9:50 pm
Did someone mention American culture?! Thought that was just a myth.
#22 | Comment by Carl — October 7, 2003 @ 10:04 pm
I have this friend who always insists on calling people a different form of the name they introduce themselves as.
If they go by Richie, she’ll call him Richard, or (of course), Dick. If they insist on being called Richard, naturally she will call him Richie.
Even though it’s a rather bitchy character trait of hers, it always amuses me to no end.
#23 | Comment by Amy — October 7, 2003 @ 10:34 pm
Dear madam Azz2002:
Yes, some people are indeed "sooo" formal.
Jennagain isn’t.
#24 | Comment by Kingolf — October 7, 2003 @ 10:48 pm
Hmmm… Incidentally. I have a friend who after 24 years of being named "Pat", decided that he wanted to be called "Darius" from this day on forth.
Of course I obliged.
I’ve called him "DELIRIOUS" ever since.
True story.
#25 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 7, 2003 @ 11:18 pm
Did someone mention American culture?! Thought that was just a myth.
Posted by Carl – 10:04pm October 7, 2003
That was me. Do something.
#26 | Comment by Seriously — October 7, 2003 @ 11:20 pm
Holy FUCKING FUCK…!
#27 | Comment by Will — October 8, 2003 @ 1:40 am
My name is Richie. But its pronounced like this "wilyem"
#28 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — October 8, 2003 @ 7:27 am
Damn you.
#29 | Comment by Richie — October 8, 2003 @ 12:42 pm
I hate to be a complainer but a new season of real world or road rules has started and they have there little face off of the two. You know that stupid "vote the person off crap" and the links you got in your archive to the playboy pics of veronica portillo and the others from the shows doesnt seem to work and i got this big obsession with her right now and i would love to see them. If you could fix them I would be enterally gratefull. Oh and i love the site 🙂
#30 | Comment by JACHching — October 8, 2003 @ 12:50 pm
Okay, this is just fucking hysterical. Working in a drive-thru as I do, no one knows my name. No one really cares. To most of them, I’m just Drive-Thru Guy. The regulars call the store to see if I’m there and see what act I’m pulling that day. But to the rest of them, I might as well be a hooker: They call me Bob, Jim, Steve, Pedro, you name it, and I don’t care, just so long as the money keeps rolling in.
#31 | Comment by Umgawa — October 8, 2003 @ 2:55 pm
Wha–? Jenn? And there she goes again, like the wind. Damn, that woman is too fast. Just like I like ’em.
#32 | Comment by Banana — October 8, 2003 @ 4:15 pm
Fast and furious, banana. Fast and furious.
#33 | Comment by embus — October 9, 2003 @ 7:09 am
Jaching why the hell watch mtv, its a gay channel that plays hip hop artists over and over if not hip hop isnt played out enough. And they brainwash little kids into wearing "the latest trends" which happen to be crappier than the piece shit clogging my toliet as we speak, and road rules and real world, if not reality shows are dumb enough (except that 1 episode of survivoer when the guys falls asleep in the fire) o and the joe schmoe show cuz that guy is making an ass out of himself so thats funny but anyways mtv is just dumb, i dont mean to be insensative, but why couldnt the TRL building been a target of the 9/11 attacks.
#34 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — October 9, 2003 @ 7:24 am
That wins the award for the longest sentence I have ever seen. I do, however, wholeheartedly agree with your ideas. MTV is the devil. Hip hop basically sucks (at least all the mainstream crap does), and I do believe that MTV is the greatest propagator of all times in regards to trend setting – however hideous and revolting they may be…
Case and point, the whole black trend with the one pantleg up and a towel over the shoulder. Lord, I hate that shit.
#35 | Comment by embus — October 9, 2003 @ 8:31 am
i like to see i have support, mainstream is the devils music because it makes money for big monopolizing companies, stay indepentant dont sell out ie, Avril, YES JUSTIN AVRIL, Good Charolotte(how ever u fucking spell it) and any other shit music. Excuse me while i have burn down my local Hot TOpic store because it makes little pimply 13 yr olds think they are cooler than me. And thats simply not possible.
#36 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — October 9, 2003 @ 9:03 am
I love MTV. I love REAL WORLD, I love NEWLYWEDS, and, hell, I even love "The Gauntlet". Hip Hop is fine with me as long as I get the required dosage of half-nekkid chicks grinding around some lease-happy wanna-be rapper sipping tap-water out of a crystal bottle.
Indeed. It is all good.
"Joe Schmoe" is a BRAVO show, which is also the channel that airs "QUEER EYE for the STRAIGHT GUY", figures that the biggest fag-haters would be religiously watching that very channel.
Who’s gay now?
#37 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 9, 2003 @ 9:22 am
Rupert Everett.
HA!
#38 | Comment by Seriously — October 9, 2003 @ 9:41 am
Sexually secure men don’t give a fuck if people think they’re gay.
…. just saying.
#39 | Comment by Amy — October 9, 2003 @ 9:44 am
Hey, if you were hung like Mr. Ed, you’d be insecure as well… …contrary to popular belief chicks don’t necessarily adhere to "bigger is better".
#40 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 9, 2003 @ 10:32 am
… and only a tiny man would think my previous comment had anything to do with size.
#41 | Comment by Amy — October 9, 2003 @ 11:18 am
Check and mate.
#42 | Comment by Stink — October 9, 2003 @ 12:07 pm
Go Amy
#43 | Comment by kao — October 9, 2003 @ 12:07 pm
Well, it was meant to be funny. Sort of like you’re infantile attempts at getting a rise out of me.
Here’s a dollar. Buy a clue.
#44 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 9, 2003 @ 12:35 pm
He loves REAL WORLD. He loves NEWLYWEDS. He used BRAVO as an adjective. THEN TO TOP IT ALL OFF, the requisite mention of QUEER EYE ON THE STRAIGHT GUY. Not that anyone else was talking about it… NO. He just pulled it right out of his hat and laid it on the table for everyone. And to top it all off, he said:
"Who’s gay now".
Granted he dropped in something about half naked women, but it REAKED of insincerity and cover-up.
AND IF THAT WERE NOT ALL YOU NEEDED, in his next post he let us all know that he (thinks he) has an abnormally large penis.
You see, I am straight. I am pretty secure in my sexuality, and I think that all of you are as well. The point: In all the fabric of my heterosexuality, NOWHERE does there exist a part of me that wants to discuss my penis with all of you sex starved men. Call me crazy…..
Amy:
Lets make babies. Two-point-five to be exact.
#45 | Comment by embus — October 9, 2003 @ 12:41 pm
Oh yah… to be more direct,
Sexcrazedweasel, you are an asshole. A total moronic ninny, whom nobody likes. If you have friends, they are all pretending. NOBODY could like a filthy gay prick like you. Not even other filthy gay pricks. I hope you die late in life…miserable and alone in your twilight.
#46 | Comment by embus — October 9, 2003 @ 12:44 pm
dumbfuck, or sexcrazedweasel isnt joe shomoe or whatever on spike or whatever they call it. What the hell is fun about watching people sit around and talk about dumb stuff like "imma get layed" but never do anythign about, i’d rather watch Power Rangers cuz at least people get the shit kicked out of them in that show, thats better than a bunch of people sitting around the house talking about soem football game they missed.
#47 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — October 9, 2003 @ 1:02 pm
All in favor of voting sexcrazedweasel off the the island?
#48 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — October 9, 2003 @ 1:06 pm
Power Rangers? I don’t even have to add anything to that. Hahaha…
Embus I love you too, you filthy little bitch.
#49 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 9, 2003 @ 11:01 pm
Weasel: I think you’re misunderstanding something here: Embus wasn’t kidding.
#50 | Comment by Kingolf — October 9, 2003 @ 11:43 pm
"’Here’s a dollar. Buy a clue.’
Posted by sexcrazedweasel – 12:35pm October 9, 2003"
Dude…
For all you know, she sells clues. And with inflation these days, a dollar probably isn’t enough.
Dude…
#51 | Comment by Seriously — October 10, 2003 @ 1:59 am
I like QEFTSG.
#52 | Comment by thess — October 10, 2003 @ 2:34 am
Allow me to ad *Thick-skulled* to my list of insults, Weasel.
As Kingolf said, there was not a scrap of humour in my post. I am serious. Nobody likes you. You are not funny. You give me a headache. I truly hope you live a long and miserable empty life, left for decades to rot and wallow in shallow pools of your own self-pity and loneliness.
#53 | Comment by embus — October 10, 2003 @ 2:46 am
Mihi ignosce . . . Cum homine de cane debeo congredi.
#54 | Comment by embus — October 10, 2003 @ 2:51 am
"Weasel: I think you’re misunderstanding something here: Embus wasn’t kidding.
Posted by Kingolf – 11:43pm October 9, 2003"
Well, clearly he has a point when he says, "NOBODY could like a filthy gay prick like you. Not even other filthy gay pricks." Considering you’re gay, you must admit he does know his demographic.
"For all you know, she sells clues. And with inflation these days, a dollar probably isn’t enough.
Posted by Seriously – 1:59am October 10, 2003"
lol. She might be selling burgers, fries, hotdogs on a stick, you name it, but "clues" she most certainly isn’t. I promise you. Unfortunately, a dollar is all its worth to me. Sorry.
Thess. Well, unless you’re a fan of Power Rangers, you might not go far with this crowd.
#55 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 10, 2003 @ 2:58 am
embus. Luckily, I don’t live for the approval of others. Least of all, little monkeys like you.
I’d suggest you attempt to ignore me, rather than continue to project your homo-erotic fantasies upon me. But that’s just me. Do as you wish.
#56 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 10, 2003 @ 3:02 am
PS: I still love you, you filthy little bitch.
#57 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 10, 2003 @ 3:11 am
OMG!!! It’s Thess!!!
#58 | Comment by grud — October 10, 2003 @ 3:38 am
I’ve never seen Queer Eye, is it good? I don’t even know what channel it’s on.
I could probably stand grooming tips.
#59 | Comment by Seriously — October 10, 2003 @ 3:44 am
I watched part of it one time. It wasn’t too bad. The straight guy I saw on it was a mess. He needed all the freakin’ help he could get.
#60 | Comment by grud — October 10, 2003 @ 3:46 am
"Considering you’re gay, you must admit he does know his demographic."
Indeed. I’m glad to see that you agree with us.
Now fuck off and go get a Darwin award.
#61 | Comment by Kingolf — October 10, 2003 @ 4:18 am
Did justin fall in?(the toliet) where the hell is he, update someone
#62 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — October 10, 2003 @ 6:02 am
Kingolf, embus, and Amy all need some form of mass communication. The visitors of fubar are simply too few (no offense Justin, I know there’s a lot of us) to merit their continued presence here.
buttsexcrazedweasel –
"I’d suggest you attempt to ignore me, rather than continue to project your homo-erotic fantasies upon me. But that’s just me. Do as you wish."
Yeah, I remember that from 3rd grade, too. "I am rubber, you are glue.."
Minus ten points, please try again.
#63 | Comment by zant — October 10, 2003 @ 9:54 am
"Kingolf, embus, and Amy all need some form of mass communication. The visitors of fubar are simply too few (no offense Justin, I know there’s a lot of us) to merit their continued presence here."
My 04:00 AM brain has chosen to view that as a clever compliment. Thanks.
#64 | Comment by Kingolf — October 10, 2003 @ 10:10 am
ZANT – Indeed. Next time you try to equate anything I post with your vast experience in 3rd Grade, I’d suggest you actually pick something that remotely relates to what I said. This may serve you better, than giving into the random firings of the 3 synapses that constitute "thought" on your part.
#65 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 10, 2003 @ 10:12 am
"I’d suggest you actually pick something that remotely relates to what I said."
Thus far, you’ve established that:
1: Amy is selling fries.
2: Some people are sooo formal.
3: While you may not be homosexual, you certainly embrace the stereotype.
4: The negative volume of your genitalia has given science the final clue to anti-matter. Congratulations.
5: Max is a female dog.
6: Thess doesn’t like us.
7: Embus knows that I’m gay and that I dislike you.
8: You don’t live for the approval of others, yet you keep crawling back for more flames.
9: You suggest that we ignore you, proving that even a lesser mind now and then will accidentally ejaculate a semi-coherent proposal.
10: You suck.
What I’m wondering is: whichever of these facts/falsii relates more to Zants rating?
#66 | Comment by Kingolf — October 10, 2003 @ 10:53 am
What the hell, is this site eVER updated?
#67 | Comment by Jesus — October 10, 2003 @ 12:10 pm
Kingolf… Sometimes you amaze me… that was a great comment.
Cheers.
#68 | Comment by embus — October 10, 2003 @ 12:14 pm
Kingolf, yeah, I didn’t finish that sentence. You people need to be able to spread your cleverness to others. Or something. My mind isn’t at full capacity right now either.
buttsexcrazedweasel –
Thank you. You have graciously confirmed for all to see that you are a long-winded, pompous jackass. You attempt to coat your posts with a facade of wit, yet you lack the requisite intelligence to do so. I’m sure there are some who are quite impressed with your abilities in the multisyllable realm, though I don’t think anyone here is. You will never be liked here. You will never win an argument for any extended period of time. You will never convince people that you are heterosexual. If karma exists, you will suffer a terminal disease centered in the small genitalia you insist on telling us all about.
#69 | Comment by zant — October 10, 2003 @ 12:21 pm
Oh, and I have to say that I liked Crystal’s original post. Like weasel says, "Some people are sooo formal."
#70 | Comment by zant — October 10, 2003 @ 12:24 pm
Whoops, my above post didn’t match things up. Like I said, I’m tired, but that’s no excuse. weasel, feel free to reword your response when you flame me for that reason. I think I’ll go to sleep now.
#71 | Comment by zant — October 10, 2003 @ 12:26 pm
Justin!!!!!!!!!! (or anyone else who can post and isn’t as tipsy as I am.)
We need an update from you. We’ve resorted to fighting among ourselves…
And while making fun of weasel was fun for about five minutes, even that has grown tired.
(If he were slightly more interesting it could have had a longer run.)
I need to sleep. I expect someone to have said something by morning.
If not… THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY.
Oh yes.
#72 | Comment by Amy — October 10, 2003 @ 2:14 pm
Thanks Embus.
300mgs of caffeine and I decided that I shouldn’t sleep tonight.
The result was two deaths and that post.
#73 | Comment by Kingolf — October 10, 2003 @ 2:47 pm
JUSTIN.
Two words. More boobs.
KINGOLF.
Well, since you’re danish let me help you out. Just this once.
>> 1: Amy is selling fries.
No. I said, Amy sells anything, but "clues". But truth be told, I’d say selling fries is probably right on the money. My apologies.
>> 2: Some people are sooo formal.
Ahhh. Sweet Sarcasm wasted on the english-impaired.
>> 3: While you may not be homosexual, you certainly embrace the stereotype.
Hey, you’d be the first one in this tired little hill-billy convention to actually think that I am NOT gay. Congratulations!
>> 4: The negative volume of your genitalia has given science the final clue to anti-matter.
>> Congratulations.
I do it all in the name of science.
>> 5: Max is a female dog.
Sure. If you say so.
>> 6: Thess doesn’t like us.
Not what I said. Read it again.
>> 7: Embus knows that I’m gay and that I dislike you.
Well, hardly a secret. I do however take a certain pride in not addressing others as "filthy gay pricks" based on assumed sexual orientations.
>> 8: You don’t live for the approval of others, yet you keep crawling back for more flames.
Lol. I think that in and of itself would prove that I do NOT give a flying f- about what others think.
>> 9: You suggest that we ignore you, proving that even a lesser mind now and then will accidentally
>> ejaculate a semi-coherent proposal.
Keep kidding yourself.
>> 10: You suck.
Indeed. But does that really make me gay?
>>
>> What I’m wondering is: whichever of these facts/falsii relates more to Zants rating?
Well, allow me to clear it up for you Corky. None of these were posted in response to a post that ZANT made. Get the difference? Of course not.
ZANT –
Contrary to what some may believe based on my posts here, I don’t like to take advantage of the mentally handicapped. So we’ll just let your post stand as the pinnacle of modern literary achievement that it clearly is.
AMY –
Here’s your post. Oh yes.
#74 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 10, 2003 @ 2:56 pm
You ARE a filthy gay prick. And I pride myself in being forthright enough to say so. It’s just the honest truth. Sorry to have to let you in on the secret so soon, but I am tired of your incessant drivel.
Speaking of tired:
"Hey, you’d be the first one in this tired little hill-billy convention to actually think that I am NOT gay. Congratulations!"
If us hill-billies are so tiresome to you, why am I still being bothered by your irksome presence here? Go away… Don’t let me get in your way of finding a LESS tiresome pastime. I happen to enjoy this community very much. You are a bastard sonofabitch. I truly have great disdain for you.
That being said, lets come to an agreement…. I will say whatever I want, and you can be the bigger man and ignore ME. I’d love to see you shut the fuck up, as you rightfully should… just shut the fuck up like the pansy-ass little bitch you know you are. You are an incredibly little man. I will even lower myself to your trashy level to make my point. THAT is the extent of my consternation.
#75 | Comment by embus — October 10, 2003 @ 3:11 pm
Did you know that "pinnacle of modern literary achievement" is a cliche? I bet you did.
And was it really worth quoting the entire post to retort to it line-by-line? If you were hoping for some completist effect, you failed, as that "wit" thing I mentioned is still woefully absent.
I wasn’t going to say anything about the gay thing but you just have to bring it upon yourself. "More boobs." God, man, give it up. This crowd’s abject hatred of you has very little to do with your sexual preference. Convincing them that you’re straight will not do anything to help your cause, whatever that may be.
Worth noting: Sarcasm is largely based on tones and facial expressions. Neither is present on the Internet. Whether or not your attempt at being sarcastic was registered has less to do with Kingolf’s abilities in English and more to do with your choice to try to be clever in the first place.
#76 | Comment by zant — October 10, 2003 @ 3:16 pm
uhhhhhhhhhh new topic please!!!
Let me post if you’re too lazy!!!!
#77 | Comment by radish01001 — October 10, 2003 @ 3:17 pm
Retort –> respond. Sorry, didn’t fall asleep like I wish I had. (Retort is a noun, thank you, I know :P)
#78 | Comment by zant — October 10, 2003 @ 3:18 pm
EMBUS –
>> You ARE a filthy gay prick. And I pride myself in being forthright enough to say so. It’s just the
>> honest truth. Sorry to have to let you in on the secret so soon, but I am tired of your incessant
>> drivel.
The fun part being that in all your insults hurled my way, you’ve called me among other things, "filthy gay prick", "faggot bastard", "ass loving fag", "digusting faggot", and my personal favorite "cum guzzling assbandit", and you really don’t think you have homo-erotic issues?
I suggest you bring this up next time you meet your shrink. I think I smell a break-thru coming on. Thank me later.
>> Speaking of tired:
>>
>> "Hey, you’d be the first one in this tired little hill-billy convention to actually think that I am NOT gay.
>> Congratulations!"
>>
>> If us hill-billies are so tiresome to you, why am I still being bothered by your irksome presence
You’re bothered because you are so deep in the closet that it’ll take a crowbar to get you out. Tust me on this one. Your shrink will explain it to you.
>> here? Go away… Don’t let me get in your way of finding a LESS tiresome pastime. I happen to
>> enjoy this community very much. You are a bastard sonofabitch. I truly have great disdain for you.
Well, I still love you, you filthy little bitch.
>> That being said, lets come to an agreement…. I will say whatever I want, and you can be the
>> bigger man and ignore ME. I’d love to see you shut the fuck up, as you rightfully should… just shut
Well, as mentioned previously I clearly am the "bigger" man. But I digress. I think I’ll continue to comment as I see fit. Thanks for the offer though.
>> the fuck up like the pansy-ass little bitch you know you are. You are an incredibly little man. I will
>> even lower myself to your trashy level to make my point. THAT is the extent of my consternation.
I wasn’t aware you could get any lower than attacking a persons sexuality. I do appreciate the effort though. So I suggest you continue calling me names, exhibiting your worldly understanding of tolerance, and I continue to exercise my right to free speech.
ZANT –
Another example of a post I’ll allow to speak for itself. I am tempted to respond, however I am certain the ASPCA would be at my doorstep faster than I could hit "post". (http://www.aspca.org/)
Let me just say you are truly brilliant. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. [See did it all without "tones" and "facial expressions"]
#79 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 10, 2003 @ 3:39 pm
"Next time you try to equate anything I post with your vast experience in 3rd Grade, I’d suggest you actually pick something that remotely relates to what I said"
What exactly should he have picked?
"I do however take a certain pride in not addressing others as "filthy gay pricks" based on assumed sexual orientations."
As opposed to what? Addressing others as filthy gay pricks based on assumed haircolours?
"I’d bet $1 you’re a queer. No straight guy could muster that much hate."
So proud you must feel.
#80 | Comment by Kingolf — October 10, 2003 @ 7:24 pm
sexcrazedweasel = limpweed….
Who else?
Justin, if weasel is your stooge, you need to pick better stooges.
#81 | Comment by Amy — October 10, 2003 @ 8:38 pm
Damn you Justin!!!! Hurry and get a Kill Bill bootleg review up!!! Unless you’re getting laid. If that’s the case, then take your time. But tell us all about it later.
#82 | Comment by grud — October 10, 2003 @ 9:38 pm
I see a little silhouetto of a man
Scaramouch, scaramouch will you do the fandango
THUNDERBOLTS AND LIGHTNING, VERY VERY FRIGHTNING ME
Gallileo, Gallileo,
Gallileo, Gallileo,
Gallileo Figaro – magnifico-o-o-o-o-o
But I’m just a poor boy and nobody loves me
HE’S JUST A POOR BOY FROM A POOR FAMILY!
Spare him his life from this monstrosity
Easy come easy go – will you let me go
Bismillah! No – we will not let you go – let him go
Bismillah! We will not let you go – let him go
Bismillah! We will not let you go – let me go
Will not let you go – let me go (never)
Never let you go – let me go
Never let me go – ooo
No, no, no, no, no, no, no –
Oh mama mia, mama mia, mama mia let me go
Beelzebub has a devil put aside for me
for me
for MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Eb. G. Ab. Bb. C-D-Eb. Eb. G. Ab. Bb-C-Bb. Eb. G. Ab. Bb. C-D-Eb. F. A. Bb. C-D-C.
So you think you can stone me and spit in my eye-e-e
Db!! C!!
So you think you can love me and leave me to die-e-e-e
Oh baby – can’t do this to me baby
Just gotta get out – just gotta get right outta here
Eb. G. Ab. Bb. C-D-Eb. Eb. G. Ab. Bb-C-Bb. Eb. G. Ab. Bb. C-D-Eb. F. A. Bb. C-D-C.
#83 | Comment by Seriously — October 10, 2003 @ 10:40 pm
…caaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnn…
…any-bod-eeeee…
…find me-e-e…
…somebody to-o…
…love…
(piano)
(drums)
Ooh, each morning I get up I die a little
Can barely stand on my feet
(Take a look at yourself) Take a look in the mirror and cry (and cry)
Lord what you’re doing to me (yeah yeah)
I have spent all my years in believing you
But I just can’t get no relief, Lord!
Somebody (somebody) ooh somebody (somebody)
Can anybody find me somebody to love ?
Yeah
I work hard (he works hard) every day of my life
I work till I ache in my bones
At the end (at the end of the day)
I take home my hard earned pay all on my own
I get down (down) on my knees (knees)
And I start to pray
Till the tears run down from my eyes
Lord somebody (somebody), ooh somebody
(Please) Can anybody find me somebody to love ?
(He works hard)
Everyday (everyday) – I try and I try and I try
But everybody wants to put me down
They say I’m going crazy
They say I got a lot of water in my brain
Ah, got no common sense
I got nobody left to believe in
Yeah yeah yeah yeah
Oh Lord
Ooh somebody – ooh somebody
Can anybody find me somebody to love ?
(Can anybody find me someone to love)
Got no feel, I got no rhythm
I just keep losing my beat (You just keep losing and losing)
I’m OK, I’m alright (he’s alright – he’s alright)
I ain’t gonna face no defeat (yeah yeah)
I just gotta get out of this prison cell
One day (someday) I’m gonna be free, Loooooooooooooooooord…
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love love love
Find me somebody to love
Find me somebody to love somebody somebody somebody somebody
Somebody find me
Somebody find me somebody to love
Can anybody find MEEEEEEEEEEEE….
…somebody to-oooo…
…love…
(Find me somebody to love)
Ooh
(Find me somebody to love)
Find me somebody, somebody (find me somebody to love) somebody, somebody to love
(Find me somebody to love)
Find me, find me, find me, find me, find me
Ooh – somebody to love
(Find me somebody to love)
Ooh
(Find me somebody to love)
Find me, find me, find me somebody to love
(Find me somebody to love)
Anybody, anywhere, anybody find me somebody to love love love!
Wooo somebody find me, find me love.
(plink)
#84 | Comment by Seriously — October 10, 2003 @ 10:50 pm
Don’t those songs just make you feel good?
Can’t we all just get along?
#85 | Comment by Seriously — October 10, 2003 @ 10:52 pm
fact: my best friend and i made a very dramatic music video to queen’s bohemian rhapsody when we were about nine years old. i remember a lot of stage presence, head banging, air guitar, and my parents cracking up because it was the funniest thing they had ever seen, apparently.
i wonder whatever happened to the video tape of it.
but seriously, seriously- justin (or someone) needs to post, clearly. before you go any more insane 😉
———–
note sent to justin:
———–
post something godamnit. the natives are restless ;p
psykotik2k signed off at 10:51:59 AM.
thats just not right. 🙁
#86 | Comment by crystal — October 10, 2003 @ 11:02 pm
hehe
#87 | Comment by Amy — October 11, 2003 @ 12:06 pm