PART OF THE BOARDS FORMERLY KNOWN AS TJNR

Q:  So why in the hell did we have to invade when we did?  Wait a couple months, then we either know they didn't have SHIT in the way of WMDs or we could go in with full UN blessing.  A: Because we had already waited roughly a year and a half through trying to get the Fre...

You're right, we're not gonna do any convincing. I'll be happy to let history sort it out. Until then, I have confidence that I'm right and you have confidence that you're right.

Now where are the boobies!?!

That was funny!

There has not been a solid link between Saddam and AQ. The gov't has not found a money trail that lead Saddam to Bin Laden.  Saddam praised 9/11 but said he had nothing to do with it. Dude, you're showing either your ignorance or your inability to face facts. Clinton's Justice Department d...

i wonder how many people commenting here have actually seen the movie Justin, I haven't criticized the content of the movie because I haven't seen it. I leave that to those who have. I don't have to see this movie to know it's full of inaccuracies and misrepresentations. That's his style. What I ha...

I would say that it is not OUR responsibility as the U.S. to force Sadaam out of power.  We aren't the world's police force and we can't come to the rescue every time there's a problem for the world. No, we're not the world's police force. We're not sending troops to Nigeria where muslims ...

The movie is Anti-Bush, not Anti-Troops.  He is trying to stop the war, and the killing so that the troops can come home to their families. Wakeup call time. You can't support the troops without supporting what they do. Can you support the firefighters and at the same time tell them to leave the fi...

Hmm... Iraq was funding, supporting and training terrorists. Saddam had been planning and undertaking offensive actions against the U.S. both abroad and inside our own borders. United Nations resolutions were being ignored (regarding those WMD's of which there was proof) and U.N. troops were regular...

I'm not sure in what universe one can call Christopher Hitchens a neocon. I'm not familiar with his writing, but seriously doubt The Nation would have employed him as such for 20 years. Yes, he is no longer a socialist and disagrees with The Left regarding the war on terror. The quick sample of his ...

I haven't seen it and don't plan to at this time. Michael Moore's history is of pushing his political agenda with very little effort at actual representation of fact. Now Slate is hardly what you'd call a neocon site... and they're even calling the movie a bunch of lies. <a href='http://www.slate.co...