Carly Patterson

This is where all the posts that appeared on the old front page (June '04 - January '05) are stored (back when the site was run using IPB Portal).
Post Reply
User avatar
Justin
Posts: 1228
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:19
Location: Brunei
Contact:

Post by Justin » 25 Aug 2004 20:19

<CENTER><IMG SRC="/movies/amanda_bynes.jpg" border="0"> <IMG SRC="/movies/carly_pattersonsm.jpg" border="0"></CENTER>

<li><A HREF="/movies/hires/CarlyPatterson.jpg" target="_blank">Carly Patterson</A>
Last edited by Justin on 04 Dec 2004 15:55, edited 1 time in total.

Osiris
Posts: 2
Joined: 26 Jun 2004 20:47
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Post by Osiris » 25 Aug 2004 20:23

They don't really look alike, do they? patterson's.........too stoic. Still, must be brilliant in bed.

devnull
Posts: 48
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 15:19
Location: Norway

Post by devnull » 25 Aug 2004 20:36

Nah, looks to much like a little girl. Give me a woman with more curves I say.

Lock
Posts: 14
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 10:59

Post by Lock » 25 Aug 2004 20:41

Yeah I agree, the resemblence is tiny. Plus Bynes is kinda cute and Patterson isn't. Actually, despite the fascination most people have with gymnasts (including me) most them are kinda ugly. Muscley dwarfs. Andrea Rudican was nice though.

Image

JaPeX
Posts: 52
Joined: 17 Aug 2004 05:40

Post by JaPeX » 25 Aug 2004 20:48

To me the comparison is pretty much "tank vs. voloptuous vixen with heather locklear'esque breastage" ... no contest imho.

pevee
Posts: 74
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 15:05
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by pevee » 25 Aug 2004 21:11

I personally don't dont see the attraction, then again, I may be gay :(.

meatwad
Posts: 25
Joined: 22 Jun 2004 01:05
Location: athens, ga

Post by meatwad » 25 Aug 2004 21:28

I like em both. Amanda's face is better, Carly's ass is better

the_lone_bard
Posts: 48
Joined: 11 Aug 2004 21:26

Post by the_lone_bard » 25 Aug 2004 22:01

I cant stand her voice, I'd go insane after 20 seconds with the bitch.

And I'm not sure if her being 5'0 is cool or scary.

keno
Posts: 33
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 22:56

Post by keno » 25 Aug 2004 22:05

I think I'd agree with the rest of the posters on this topic so far. I just don't see what the fuss is about with Carly. She plainly just isn't that cute. She's too young. I could maybe see it happening though, when she in her early 20's.

User avatar
Justin
Posts: 1228
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:19
Location: Brunei
Contact:

Post by Justin » 25 Aug 2004 22:13

you fags. she's the same age as hilary duff.

you'd hit hilary but not carly? fags!

reservrdg8
Posts: 134
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 03:36

Post by reservrdg8 » 25 Aug 2004 22:19

Lock wrote: Yeah I agree, the resemblence is tiny. Plus Bynes is kinda cute and Patterson isn't. Actually, despite the fascination most people have with gymnasts (including me) most them are kinda ugly. Muscley dwarfs. Andrea Rudican was nice though.

Image
Patterson isn't cute?! Are you gay?!

I'd hit it, many times over.

Until she was ruined for all men. Well maybe with the exception of Pang.

vultureug
Posts: 11
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 22:27
Location: NYC, NY

Post by vultureug » 25 Aug 2004 22:34

while carly would probably be better in bed (oh so flexable!!! and probably oh so tight!!!) amanda is seriously hotter. oh, what the hell, have both!!!

AcydPhreak
Posts: 13
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 13:52

Post by AcydPhreak » 26 Aug 2004 00:18

meatwad wrote: I like em both.&nbsp; Amanda's face is better, Carly's ass is better
I agree

deadmeat
Posts: 16
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 17:27

Post by deadmeat » 26 Aug 2004 00:47

Carly is all toned and flexable, as well as cute with a nice ass....
Im pretty sure she could kick my ass, but that shit is hot. I'd hit it, or she could hit me....either way.
Bynes... Very hot, but she loses because shes taller, Short chicks own.

lyk.omgz
Posts: 17
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 12:50

Post by lyk.omgz » 26 Aug 2004 00:51


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests