Legend In The Making

This is where all the posts that appeared on the old front page (June '04 - January '05) are stored (back when the site was run using IPB Portal).
Post Reply
WP_LeGeNd
Posts: 163
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 14:34
Location: Amsterdam
Contact:

Post by WP_LeGeNd » 08 Sep 2004 17:11

do you honestly believe someone will read what you've been writing? that's just too much info!

J-Mah
Posts: 94
Joined: 20 Jun 2004 12:56
Location: Vancouver, BC
Contact:

Post by J-Mah » 08 Sep 2004 17:21

Cloudz wrote: ok yeah not nessicarily a newb, been checking this site out for close to a year and a half now. after reading through 18 pages of arguments over this girl i have decided to take it apon myself and finally become a member and start the research behind tracking down this girl much as i have seen the community do befor (i.e. the libby files). ok so from .......
Bla Bla Bla...

How many times did you watch that video? Shesh.

Cloudz
Posts: 3
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 15:18
Contact:

Post by Cloudz » 08 Sep 2004 17:23

bah just skip through it. pick a section read it then come back and read another section later. honestly the most important part is the begining it just states the ball needs to get roleing on the research part of this to make this girl an internet legend. i think 30 pages of yeah this girl is hot, libby is hotter, i would fuck her, i wouldnt fucker, etc. gets the point across. some in depth analysis was needed. hopefully some one can go from my start or correct me in my wrong statements. thats all. smile you never know whos watching you -=oP

-Cloudz

*edit* and i watched it enough times since release to have analyzed just about every detail in it, as well as have my friends analyze. just as i do most amature videos. finding if they are truely amature over very cleverly staged .com porn is very strategic my friend. this is obviously not .com porn.
Last edited by Cloudz on 08 Sep 2004 17:27, edited 1 time in total.

michlersoft
Posts: 140
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 14:06
Location: Bremerton, WA
Contact:

Post by michlersoft » 08 Sep 2004 18:00

Cloudz wrote:1) after reading through 18 pages of arguments over this girl .... ok so from what i understand you belive this girl to be 18 because she supposably has a tattoo on her arm. ok its not a tattoo it is a band-aid you can clearly see some sort of childish design on it. i

2) This is my annalysis of what i belive i have found in the video. sorry if it is long winded but i do make some very very very good points.

3)  (btw this was obviously made with a web cam).... this action obviously gives her enough time to clean up any evidance of what she was doing and to hid her current tape to be finished at a later time.

4)one thing i noticed that makes me belive she could quiet possably be a virgin is how tight her fingers are when she is trying to finger her self with 2 fingers. this shows she is not nessicarily exsperianced in the ways of self pleasure

5) ok the eagle in the picture on the wall is flying over a mountain range....

6)ok now im going to take a real shot in the dark with this one.
1)
QUOTE (Zabandula @ Aug 31 2004, 05:47 AM)
To bring up the bracelet/tatoo thing again, I think it's possible that it is in fact a band aid like one guy suggested. It's very possible she cuts herself... shell probably commit suicide when this all gets back to her. Poor girl  


Yes, I still say it is a band aid. I thought about the wrap braclet thing, but it doesn't go far enough around to hold on to her arm. I'm positive it is a band aid.
Nice work detective!

2) Where?

3) Webcams have tape?

4)Because we all know, in order to masturbate, you must not be a virgin!

5) WHAT?

6) "this one"? So far you have proven:
A. She has breasts
B. She has a vagina
C. She may or may not be under the age of 18
D. She may or may not live near mountains
E. You have no life.
F. Not much else.

Observant
Posts: 65
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 02:40
Location: Northern California

Post by Observant » 08 Sep 2004 18:41

michlersoft wrote: 6) "this one"? So far you have proven:
A. She has breasts
B. She has a vagina
C. She may or may not be under the age of 18
D. She may or may not live near mountains
E. You have no life.
F. Not much else.
G. You, Cloudz, are even lower on the food chain than Bob

Serra
Posts: 36
Joined: 28 Jun 2004 01:10
Location: Automated Reply Bot

Post by Serra » 09 Sep 2004 07:04

michlersoft wrote:
3) Webcams have tape?
FACT: "Tape" is a term used by older people in place of the word "Record." Deal with it.

yourealldouchebags
Posts: 1
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 10:10

Post by yourealldouchebags » 09 Sep 2004 10:27

youre all douchebags. the average response to this absurdly long thread is one of the following:

A. "shes fucking hot! id hit it!"
- You are young and naive. Go forth into the real world, and behold what women look like. Then, come back here and admit what a pathetic little twerp you were for drooling over little infant titties the size of cupcakes.

B. "shes fucking hot,too bad shes crazy or i'd hit it."
- You are young and even more naive. In reality, all women are crazy. Let's just pretend for a second that this child would allow you into her under-developed womb. You would end up being the crazy ones, posting your own version of this video when she left your ass for some other faggot with a nicer ride. Realistically, you wouldn't know crazy if it cornered you in an alley and fucked your little boy-hineys, because the vast majority of you have been raised and weaned on TV and internet. You have no concept of what the world is like outside of your upper middle class suburban homes.

C. "shes super hot d00d! id hit it from da back! supz!"
- you are the reason for this nickname.

D. "My name is Harold, im in my mid-thirties (or forties), and I really hope my wife doesnt catch me beating off to this video!"
- You're the worst of all. This little girl is 16, MAX. More like 14-15. Do you stand outside your daughters bedroom and beat off too? Someone should eviscerate you with a dull knife and put a video of your innards boiling in a pot of shit on the net for japanese perverts to jerk off to. I sincerely hope that you are eventually investigated for child pornography via some obscure freedom act loophole and then buttfucked by a gorilla-sized nigger daily for the rest of your miserable lives. Each and everyone of you should immediately report to your semen-stained bathrooms with a razor blade and cut your limp-ass wrists for being unable to be aroused by normal, healthy sexual interests such as females with hair on their cunts. If you want to fuck a child, fuck the physical embodiment of your I.Q.


in all seriousness, this thread is absurd and disgusting. sexual attraction to children is not normal behavior, or healthy behavior. it means that you should get your testicles snipped so that your future offspring don't suffer at your perverted little hands. the arab idiot that runs this garbage heap of a site is going to shit a brick when pennsylvania state troopers show up at his door and take his macintosh away because of some titless board of a bitch on his forum. (you can interpret that last statement as "i just narced you faggots out.") and then he will probably fulfill his islamic destiny by suicide bombing "justin"'s house.

you can all kiss my overaged and oversexed ass, im going to bed and screwing my adult girlfriend while youre on here crying for 5 minutes because your acne is terminal and then jerking off for 5 minutes because your penis is understimulated.

Zero
Posts: 14
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 21:32
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by Zero » 09 Sep 2004 11:57

Can you share this shithead's IP so we can ban it?

michlersoft
Posts: 140
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 14:06
Location: Bremerton, WA
Contact:

Post by michlersoft » 09 Sep 2004 15:11

Serra wrote:
michlersoft wrote:
3) Webcams have tape?
FACT: "Tape" is a term used by older people in place of the word "Record." Deal with it.
Learn to fucking read.
3)&nbsp; (btw this was obviously made with a web cam).... this action obviously gives her enough time to clean up any evidance of what she was doing and <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>to hid her current tape to be finished at a later time. </span>
Replace tape with record, and it still doesn't make sense fuckface.

Revolt
Posts: 12
Joined: 30 Aug 2004 01:38
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Post by Revolt » 09 Sep 2004 17:24

yourealldouchebags wrote: youre all douchebags...
Looks like someone's going on time-out. :o

sharpeningBeneath
Posts: 3
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 03:53

Post by sharpeningBeneath » 10 Sep 2004 04:01

michlersoft wrote:
Serra wrote:
michlersoft wrote:
3) Webcams have tape?
FACT: "Tape" is a term used by older people in place of the word "Record." Deal with it.
Learn to fucking read.
3)  (btw this was obviously made with a web cam).... this action obviously gives her enough time to clean up any evidance of what she was doing and <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>to hid her current tape to be finished at a later time. </span>
Replace tape with record, and it still doesn't make sense fuckface.
try using your elementary school english skills and using the proper form of the word to fit the context. hint: try replacing "tape" with "recordING" instead of just "record". it should look like this: <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>to hide her current recording, to be finished at a later time. </span> duhhhhh durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. genius.

Kaluriel
Posts: 1
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 04:00

Post by Kaluriel » 10 Sep 2004 04:04

Grinch,Aug 26 2004, 10:38 PM wrote:
m0tt0k4,Aug 26 2004, 10:24 PM wrote:
Edit:: The incident is not an isolated one. In June, a video showing two Scarsdale High School freshman girls in a sexual encounter, apparently taking direction from boys in the background, prompted an investigation by the Westchester County district attorney's office when a parent reported that students were sending it to each other by e-mail. A nude picture of a 15-year-old in Wycoff, N.J., taken with a camera phone, is still circulating after she sent it by e-mail it to her boyfriend and he forwarded it to his friends, other students said.

Where is that video?!

I KNOW good point, can someone with some free time look for that one?? :D
I think that video is the "Drunk Teens Stripping University of Victoria" video, seems awfully similar to what the article says about

michlersoft
Posts: 140
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 14:06
Location: Bremerton, WA
Contact:

Post by michlersoft » 10 Sep 2004 04:20

sharpeningBeneath wrote: try using your elementary school english skills and using the proper form of the word to fit the context. hint: try replacing "tape" with "recordING" instead of just "record". it should look like this: <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>to hide her current recording, to be finished at a later time. </span> duhhhhh durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. genius.
try reading the original post and realize that tape is being used as a noun.

sharpeningBeneath
Posts: 3
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 03:53

Post by sharpeningBeneath » 10 Sep 2004 05:23

michlersoft wrote:
sharpeningBeneath wrote: try using your elementary school english skills and using the proper form of the word to fit the context. hint: try replacing "tape" with "recordING" instead of just "record". it should look like this: <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>to hide her current recording, to be finished at a later time. </span> duhhhhh durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. genius.
try reading the original post and realize that tape is being used as a noun.
"recording" is also a noun. a recording. the recording. his recording. her recording. "they heard the recording on the answering machine." "this recording was made 2 days ago." etc etc etc.

Wombat
Posts: 197
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 09:48
Location: Under your bed...

Post by Wombat » 10 Sep 2004 05:33

Ok!! FIFTEEN FUCKIN DAYS IS ENOUGH!!!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests