Bill O'Reilly vs Michael Moore

This is where all the posts that appeared on the old front page (June '04 - January '05) are stored (back when the site was run using IPB Portal).
Post Reply
User avatar
Justin
Posts: 1228
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:19
Location: Brunei
Contact:
Contact Justin

Post by Justin » 31 Jul 2004 08:44

I want to slap O'Reilly.

<li><A HREF="http://67.19.85.90/~richard/oreilly_moore.htm" target="_blank">The interview</A>
Last edited by Justin on 04 Dec 2004 16:09, edited 1 time in total.
Top
The Zot
Posts: 62
Joined: 20 Jun 2004 18:57
Location: Alaska

Post by The Zot » 31 Jul 2004 08:55

O'reilly is the biggest Fucktard to come along since Rush Limberger. We should send him to Iraq instead...for some 'Live' coverage of breaking news.
Top
reservrdg8
Posts: 134
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 03:36

Post by reservrdg8 » 31 Jul 2004 08:56

I've said it before and I'll say it again "FUCK MICHAEL MOORE"

Fat lying asshole. GIVE YOUR OSCAR BACK.
Top
Silphe
Posts: 3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004 11:28
Location: Piscataway, NJ

Post by Silphe » 31 Jul 2004 08:59

This was a contest of who could spin the facts better. Michael Moore will always out smart Bill O'Reilly, because he's the better spinner. He's so good that he says "this is biased and my opinion" and people still see it for fact. O'Reilly bless his cold heart can only do that for.....well no one.
Top
captainpony
Posts: 10
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 11:51
Location: Western Canada

Post by captainpony » 31 Jul 2004 09:02

I've said it before and I'll say it again "FUCK BILL O'REILLY"

Stupid asshole.

Neither of them came out the winner. Their arguement gone done made me unsmarter. We all lose.
Top
bligityblah
Posts: 185
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:45
Location: Dallas TX

Post by bligityblah » 31 Jul 2004 09:03

Moore really came out looking like a dipshit on that one. Usually I hate O'Reilly cause he's a nut but that was funny.
Top
User avatar
Justin
Posts: 1228
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:19
Location: Brunei
Contact:
Contact Justin

Post by Justin » 31 Jul 2004 09:04

michael moore wins!
Top
reservrdg8
Posts: 134
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 03:36

Post by reservrdg8 » 31 Jul 2004 09:38

In reality I hate them both. Why do people believe Michael Moore? 9 times out of 10 he's spinning the truth to meet his agenda. Thus, it is no longer truth. I will never understand this.
Top
Dex
Posts: 287
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 07:21
Location: Long Beach, CA
Contact:
Contact Dex

Post by Dex » 31 Jul 2004 10:01

reservrdg8 wrote: In reality I hate them both.&nbsp; Why do people believe Michael Moore?&nbsp; 9 times out of 10 he's spinning the truth to meet his agenda.&nbsp; Thus, it is no longer truth.&nbsp; I will never understand this.
Because you're gay.

Even if your hypothetical statistics were correct (and we all know you just made them up), 1 time out of 10 is better than spinning the truth 10 times out of 10, which all politicians do. Not that I agree with your little theory.

Moore might embelish on the truth, but he's not a liar. He just takes proof and facts, and tries to make it entertaining, and is beacuse of this, he is sometimes found out to be "filling in the blanks".

[edit] I'd still vote for him. MICHAEL MOORE 2093!
Last edited by Dex on 31 Jul 2004 10:02, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Observant
Posts: 65
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 02:40
Location: Northern California

Post by Observant » 31 Jul 2004 10:21

Moore is a liar, O'Reilly kicked his ass, end of story. I am so tired of Michael Moore and his bullshit I wish everyone would learn to ignore him already. He's a pleague of lies infesting the weak minds of America's dumbed down youth.
Top
kennypua
Posts: 6
Joined: 21 Jun 2004 21:45
Location: Syracuse, NY

Post by kennypua » 31 Jul 2004 10:24

Observant wrote: He's a pleague of lies infesting the weak minds of America's dumbed down youth.
He's got Justin in his back pocket, or so it seems.


Edit: Where'd my post about Moore changing the headline of the Bloomington newspaper go???
Last edited by kennypua on 31 Jul 2004 10:25, edited 1 time in total.
Top
reservrdg8
Posts: 134
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 03:36

Post by reservrdg8 » 31 Jul 2004 10:25

Dex wrote:
reservrdg8 wrote: In reality I hate them both.  Why do people believe Michael Moore?  9 times out of 10 he's spinning the truth to meet his agenda.  Thus, it is no longer truth.  I will never understand this.
Because you're gay.

Even if your hypothetical statistics were correct (and we all know you just made them up), 1 time out of 10 is better than spinning the truth 10 times out of 10, which all politicians do. Not that I agree with your little theory.

Moore might embelish on the truth, but he's not a liar. He just takes proof and facts, and tries to make it entertaining, and is beacuse of this, he is sometimes found out to be "filling in the blanks".

[edit] I'd still vote for him. MICHAEL MOORE 2093!
Don't you dare say I'm gay Dex. I'll fight you! I'll lose but I'll put up a valiant effort!
Top
The Colonel
Posts: 48
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 12:02

Post by The Colonel » 31 Jul 2004 10:27

Dex wrote:
reservrdg8 wrote: In reality I hate them both.  Why do people believe Michael Moore?  9 times out of 10 he's spinning the truth to meet his agenda.  Thus, it is no longer truth.  I will never understand this.
Because you're gay.

Even if your hypothetical statistics were correct (and we all know you just made them up), 1 time out of 10 is better than spinning the truth 10 times out of 10, which all politicians do. Not that I agree with your little theory.
So you made fun of him for making up statistics and tried to prove your point by making up your own? smooth move dick face. Get a clue

Michael Moore is merely entertainment, and as far as labeling Farenheit 9/11 or Bowling for Columbine "Documentaries" I would tend to disagree...unless they were documentaries on how to stretch truths and molest statistics to prove your own point of view...

Edit: And wasn't Hitler Wolrd War <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>II</span> ??
Last edited by The Colonel on 31 Jul 2004 10:46, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Dex
Posts: 287
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 07:21
Location: Long Beach, CA
Contact:
Contact Dex

Post by Dex » 31 Jul 2004 10:35

The Colonel wrote:
Dex wrote:
reservrdg8 wrote: In reality I hate them both.  Why do people believe Michael Moore?  9 times out of 10 he's spinning the truth to meet his agenda.  Thus, it is no longer truth.  I will never understand this.
Because you're gay.

Even if your hypothetical statistics were correct (and we all know you just made them up), 1 time out of 10 is better than spinning the truth 10 times out of 10, which all politicians do. Not that I agree with your little theory.

So you made fun of him for making up statistics and tried to prove your point by making up your own? smooth move dick face. Get a clue
It's called SARCASIM. Look it up.

Anyone can come up with a statistic.. 8 out of 10 people know that.
Top
The Colonel
Posts: 48
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 12:02

Post by The Colonel » 31 Jul 2004 11:09

Did anyone else see the easy argument to Moore's ever-present question "Would you send your kid??" Is it just my imagination or do people still voluntarily join the military at the age of 18 when they're legal adults who agree their job is to fight where ever and whenever needed? I have yet to see one service man or woman say they shouldn't be there. I actually know several marines who have not only been in Iraq but fought there and they have never questioned (and I have asked) if they should have been there. So everyone else who speaks for "the kids we're sending off to war" should possibly shut the fuck up until they have actually spoke to these "kids" they're so worried for.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Front Page Posts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests