This is where all the posts that appeared on the old front page (June '04 - January '05) are stored (back when the site was run using IPB Portal).
-
Justin
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:19
- Location: Brunei
-
Contact:
Post
by Justin » 25 Aug 2004 20:19
<CENTER><IMG SRC="/movies/amanda_bynes.jpg" border="0"> <IMG SRC="/movies/carly_pattersonsm.jpg" border="0"></CENTER>
<li><A HREF="/movies/hires/CarlyPatterson.jpg" target="_blank">Carly Patterson</A>
Last edited by
Justin on 04 Dec 2004 15:55, edited 1 time in total.
-
Osiris
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 26 Jun 2004 20:47
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Post
by Osiris » 25 Aug 2004 20:23
They don't really look alike, do they? patterson's.........too stoic. Still, must be brilliant in bed.
-
devnull
- Posts: 48
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004 15:19
- Location: Norway
Post
by devnull » 25 Aug 2004 20:36
Nah, looks to much like a little girl. Give me a woman with more curves I say.
-
Lock
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 19 Jun 2004 10:59
Post
by Lock » 25 Aug 2004 20:41
Yeah I agree, the resemblence is tiny. Plus Bynes is kinda cute and Patterson isn't. Actually, despite the fascination most people have with gymnasts (including me) most them are kinda ugly. Muscley dwarfs. Andrea Rudican was nice though.
-
JaPeX
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 17 Aug 2004 05:40
Post
by JaPeX » 25 Aug 2004 20:48
To me the comparison is pretty much "tank vs. voloptuous vixen with heather locklear'esque breastage" ... no contest imho.
-
pevee
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004 15:05
- Location: UK
-
Contact:
Post
by pevee » 25 Aug 2004 21:11
I personally don't dont see the attraction, then again, I may be gay
.
-
meatwad
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 22 Jun 2004 01:05
- Location: athens, ga
Post
by meatwad » 25 Aug 2004 21:28
I like em both. Amanda's face is better, Carly's ass is better
-
the_lone_bard
- Posts: 48
- Joined: 11 Aug 2004 21:26
Post
by the_lone_bard » 25 Aug 2004 22:01
I cant stand her voice, I'd go insane after 20 seconds with the bitch.
And I'm not sure if her being 5'0 is cool or scary.
-
keno
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 18 Jun 2004 22:56
Post
by keno » 25 Aug 2004 22:05
I think I'd agree with the rest of the posters on this topic so far. I just don't see what the fuss is about with Carly. She plainly just isn't that cute. She's too young. I could maybe see it happening though, when she in her early 20's.
-
Justin
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:19
- Location: Brunei
-
Contact:
Post
by Justin » 25 Aug 2004 22:13
you fags. she's the same age as hilary duff.
you'd hit hilary but not carly? fags!
-
reservrdg8
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 18 Jun 2004 03:36
Post
by reservrdg8 » 25 Aug 2004 22:19
Lock wrote: Yeah I agree, the resemblence is tiny. Plus Bynes is kinda cute and Patterson isn't. Actually, despite the fascination most people have with gymnasts (including me) most them are kinda ugly. Muscley dwarfs. Andrea Rudican was nice though.
Patterson isn't cute?! Are you gay?!
I'd hit it, many times over.
Until she was ruined for all men. Well maybe with the exception of Pang.
-
vultureug
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 21 Jun 2004 22:27
- Location: NYC, NY
Post
by vultureug » 25 Aug 2004 22:34
while carly would probably be better in bed (oh so flexable!!! and probably oh so tight!!!) amanda is seriously hotter. oh, what the hell, have both!!!
-
AcydPhreak
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 19 Jun 2004 13:52
Post
by AcydPhreak » 26 Aug 2004 00:18
meatwad wrote: I like em both. Amanda's face is better, Carly's ass is better
I agree
-
deadmeat
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 17 Jun 2004 17:27
Post
by deadmeat » 26 Aug 2004 00:47
Carly is all toned and flexable, as well as cute with a nice ass....
Im pretty sure she could kick my ass, but that shit is hot. I'd hit it, or she could hit me....either way.
Bynes... Very hot, but she loses because shes taller, Short chicks own.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests