So i was sitting on the bus on the way back from class and then this chick sits down in the empty seat in front of me. Didn’t really get a good look at her face or anything but i did notice that she had this thing slung around her neck. You know, that thing that can hold a backstage pass or a cell phone or your college ID kinda thing. Whatever the fuck it’s called. Anyhow, i noticed that the thing had words on it.


Cute. Anyway, it wasn’t the first time i’d seen that phrase. I remember seeing it on some other chicks bag or something. Or maybe on a shirt or a button.

I figured i’d type the phrase into google and see what happens. Anyhow, i ended up on this site and i discovered there was this whole controversy surrounding said phrase and the clothing line it was originally featured on. There are a bunch of links to other news stories about the whole controversy. Pretty interesting reading.

Oh and speaking of controversy

57 thoughts on “What!

  1. yesss…i an able to take this space away from someone who would say ‘yeah first comment’….swwweeet

    #1 | Comment by hitek — March 20, 2004 @ 7:03 pm

  2. 2nd comment

    #2 | Comment by jeaneye — March 20, 2004 @ 7:07 pm

  3. i hate you all…

    #3 | Comment by PacManJesus — March 20, 2004 @ 7:17 pm

  4. gee, that reminds me of that tagline i saw for men

    Women are stupid cunts, ass rape them and leave’em face down in a ditch.

    oddly enough it didn’t ignite any controversey.

    #4 | Comment by ruger — March 20, 2004 @ 7:22 pm

  5. that misogyny-central dude has some issues. maybe he was abused by his mother. or sister. or aunt. or the girl next door. or any female.

    #5 | Comment by booger — March 20, 2004 @ 7:52 pm

  6. You’re about 3 months later on the ‘controversy’…

    #6 | Comment by xrzdwzl — March 20, 2004 @ 8:04 pm

  7. if you think i’m late on this one, wait till you read my next post about the watergate scandal. controversy like omg!!!!!!!!

    #7 | Comment by Justin — March 20, 2004 @ 8:11 pm

  8. Hahahhahaha. Owned! Hey gay weasel, next time stfu if you got nothing better to add. Not everyone knows about it yet you stupid fucking fag. Go read Drudge or CNN.com if you can’t stand old news. -throws rocks at you-

    #8 | Comment by shutyerhole — March 20, 2004 @ 8:17 pm

  9. girls are bitches. kick them like the dogs they are.

    #9 | Comment by ChicksSuck — March 20, 2004 @ 8:25 pm

  10. these are some of my personal favorite lines from the forementioned website:
    ‘Girls are like Footballs. Punt the Cunt!’
    ‘Kill a Chick with a Brick!’
    ‘Girls Make Me Hurl!’
    ‘Girls are Annoying. Shove a Broomstick up their Cunt till it Comes out their Mouth!’

    who the fuck is this guy and why is he allowed to walk among us?

    #10 | Comment by Lee — March 20, 2004 @ 8:25 pm

  11. Very sunburnt, want to die. Nothing funny to say so I’ll just say this:

    Nerds Away!!!

    #11 | Comment by bligityblah — March 20, 2004 @ 8:39 pm

  12. does anyone remember a cam girl like 5 years ago that went by the name "question girl" she never really got naked but was cute and whatnot…but then she disappeared.

    #12 | Comment by Lee — March 20, 2004 @ 8:47 pm

  13. way to stay on topic, guy

    #13 | Comment by Lee (different one) — March 20, 2004 @ 9:20 pm

  14. It’s obvious a Lesbians came up with that slogan…Not those "Hottie" lesbians like in movies or in pornos, but the Lesbians that hate men kind…You know where one chick is the "Male" of the couple and has a mullet and wears flannel and the other girl of the couple is bald and fat?

    #14 | Comment by Ex — March 20, 2004 @ 10:05 pm

  15. you are a little late on this one…but thats ok

    girls rock, they make me horny

    ps: web1000 was down all day 🙁

    #15 | Comment by ryan — March 20, 2004 @ 10:26 pm


    #16 | Comment by stacia — March 20, 2004 @ 10:38 pm

  17. if you think i’m late on this one, wait till you read my next post about the watergate scandal. controversy like omg!!!!!!!!

    #17 | Comment by Justin — March 20, 2004 @ 10:38 pm

  18. THe repeat come-back was a little lame…

    #18 | Comment by DarckkorioN — March 20, 2004 @ 11:44 pm

  19. if you think i’m late on this one, wait till you read my next post about the watergate scandal. controversy like omg!!!!!!!!

    #19 | Comment by Justin — March 20, 2004 @ 11:47 pm

  20. BTW – she didn’t actually sign off. She just blocked me on AIM.

    #20 | Comment by sexcrazedweazel — March 21, 2004 @ 1:01 am

  21. brain damage from having wigger friends?

    #21 | Comment by not canadian — March 21, 2004 @ 1:16 am

  22. lol, she looks nothing like avril, she isn’t cute, she isn’t nice and she is unsane

    the nip was cool tho 😉

    #22 | Comment by vhw — March 21, 2004 @ 1:23 am


    #23 | Comment by Derek — March 21, 2004 @ 1:30 am

  24. misandry = bad, too. he does have a point, doesn’t he? a similar anti-girl slogan would have been hyped up and called misogynistic whereas the ‘boys are stupid..’ thing is considered ‘cute’.

    either women need to chill the fuck out when anti-girl things are said, and take what they dish out or they should stop being anti-men if they don’t want men being misogynistic.

    double standards suck.

    #24 | Comment by Sarah — March 21, 2004 @ 2:24 am

  25. is the video of the women getting shot real?

    #25 | Comment by sway — March 21, 2004 @ 3:58 am

  26. Anyways, back to Nina… I still think she hotttt. So she got a little peevd about her tit floating about in the states. Can’t really fault her for at least trying to keep it contained. Obviously she just doesn’t quite get the whole "boobs spread across the internet like wildfire" phenom. And the whole "the internet is global" phenom. But in the end, doesn’t her ignorance and futile efforts just make her all the cuter?

    #26 | Comment by dr.einstein — March 21, 2004 @ 4:08 am

  27. she doesn’t like Canadians, she likes Candians from Candyland

    #27 | Comment by kobasew — March 21, 2004 @ 4:11 am

  28. Canadians gave us Jeff Foxworthy.


    #28 | Comment by Morgasm — March 21, 2004 @ 4:48 am

  29. "what if he’s just some short asian dude in brunei…?!?"

    Brilliant! That was the funniest part of a surreal conversation. Bet she had no idea what/where Brunei is.

    #29 | Comment by h3 — March 21, 2004 @ 6:17 am

  30. sexcrazedweasel I salute you!

    #30 | Comment by WP_LeGeNd — March 21, 2004 @ 9:13 am

  31. Yes this is off-topic…
    Justin, if you love Kirsten Dunst so much…why haven’t you talked about Eternal Sunshine for the Spotless Mind yet?
    Not only is it an incredible movie…but it has some choice Dunst scenes.

    #31 | Comment by Greg — March 21, 2004 @ 12:08 pm

  32. boobs we need boobs

    #32 | Comment by merr — March 21, 2004 @ 12:18 pm

  33. i got some new kiki. not from eternal sunshine though. but it’s kiki.

    Kiki 1
    Kiki 2
    Kiki 3
    Kiki 4

    and there are boobs in the comments of the wonderfalls post.

    #33 | Comment by Justin — March 21, 2004 @ 12:23 pm

  34. Watergate? Is that some kinda pantyshield?

    #34 | Comment by Fnug — March 21, 2004 @ 12:29 pm

  35. This is the chick that posted that many people thought she looked like AVRIL, but she didn’t think so… seems like she has an unhealthy obsession with canada.




    sexcrazedweasel: you so don’t look like avril lavigne…
    sexcrazedweasel: /movies/em.jpg
    sexcrazedweasel: that chick does…
    ninapalucci: no shit
    ninapalucci: i never said i did
    sexcrazedweasel: lol
    sexcrazedweasel: I know
    ninapalucci: who the fuck is this\
    sexcrazedweasel: nobody you’d know
    ninapalucci: where did you see my pic anyway
    sexcrazedweasel: dontlinkthis.net
    ninapalucci: well i cant find it
    ninapalucci: but i never gave that site to have my pic
    ninapalucci: is this site mostly candians
    ninapalucci: they list my aim to?
    ninapalucci: thats fowl
    ninapalucci: anyway if u could tell the guy tat made the site to please take my pic down
    sexcrazedweasel: sorry I can’t… you’d have to tell him yourself
    sexcrazedweasel: you are cute tho
    ninapalucci: yeah but i dont want my pic on some dudes site
    ninapalucci: who mostly goes to this site
    sexcrazedweasel: well, tell him then — I’m not your messenger
    ninapalucci: i mean is it candian
    ninapalucci: cause if it mostly is candians then thats fine i dont care
    sexcrazedweasel: I seriously doubt it
    sexcrazedweasel: what do you care if its canadians or not
    ninapalucci: are you candian
    sexcrazedweasel: nope
    ninapalucci: do u know the guys aim
    sexcrazedweasel: yup
    ninapalucci: could i have it please
    sexcrazedweasel: he’s not canadian…
    ninapalucci: okay
    ninapalucci: could i have his aim please
    ninapalucci: ?
    sexcrazedweasel: look you obviously hate all "non-canadians" — that’s pretty shallow of you… but that’s your thing
    ninapalucci: haah no i dont
    sexcrazedweasel: I really don’t see the point…
    ninapalucci: i am saying if his site is candian
    ninapalucci: i dont care my pic is up
    ninapalucci: cause i dont know any candiands
    sexcrazedweasel: what difference does it make.. what if he’s just some short asian dude in brunei…?!?
    sexcrazedweasel: what difference does that make?
    ninapalucci: out of privacy i want my pic down
    ninapalucci: thers no beef
    sexcrazedweasel: then don’t post your pic online silly
    sexcrazedweasel: once you do – you don’t control it anymore.
    ninapalucci: so basically you aimed me to give me shit
    sexcrazedweasel: heck – your nipple is all over
    sexcrazedweasel: no I didn’t…YOU are yelling at me
    sexcrazedweasel: I think you’re cool
    ninapalucci: no im not
    ninapalucci: yelling
    ninapalucci: haha
    sexcrazedweasel: "standoffish"?
    ninapalucci: i m asking nicley for the dudes aim
    ninapalucci: that is all
    sexcrazedweasel: I’ll gladly give it to you… but I’d like to get this entire canadian thing first
    sexcrazedweasel: are you canadian?
    ninapalucci: i like candians
    ninapalucci: geez
    ninapalucci: i dont know any
    ninapalucci: if i did
    ninapalucci: i wouldnt have a problem with thme
    sexcrazedweasel: soooo you just don’t want your pic posted on an US site?
    ninapalucci: i just dont know the guy okay
    ninapalucci: so i dont want my pic on his site
    ninapalucci: that is all
    sexcrazedweasel: so what’s this whole thing about canda… sounds like an unhealthy obsession to me…
    ninapalucci: are you trying to get some argumentitive convo off me so you can post it on the site?
    ninapalucci: thats really lame
    sexcrazedweasel: I’m not.
    sexcrazedweasel: I really really don’t get it
    sexcrazedweasel: call me slow
    sexcrazedweasel: you’re the one who mentioned damn canadians
    sexcrazedweasel: not me
    sexcrazedweasel: I don’t give a crap about canadian
    sexcrazedweasel: especially about FRENCH canadians
    ninapalucci: can i just have the aim name

    *** ninapalucci signed off at Sat Mar 20 21:05:59 2004.

    #35 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — March 21, 2004 @ 12:29 pm

  36. what’s that aboot??!?

    #36 | Comment by stacia — March 21, 2004 @ 12:45 pm

  37. she signed off. must’ve had to go buy a bag of milk.

    #37 | Comment by scentless — March 21, 2004 @ 12:57 pm

  38. I would have never posted the fucking thing until she gave me that "really lame" idea…

    …what the fuck is wrong with her?

    #38 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — March 21, 2004 @ 12:58 pm

  39. Wow, that dude is way of the deep end. I considered myself a bit on the misohynistic side…not anymore.

    #39 | Comment by bligityblah — March 21, 2004 @ 1:01 pm

  40. anyone heard anything about this ebook thats out… Double Your Dating? ivana post it somewhere but i need a hoster person 😉

    #40 | Comment by mojo — March 21, 2004 @ 1:16 pm

  41. mojo, i can host it –what is it?



    #41 | Comment by stacia — March 21, 2004 @ 1:34 pm

  42. its a book for men that teaches men how to become more successful with women… its advertised… sorta on Newsfilter


    email me with some info and we’ll get the ball rolling

    #42 | Comment by mojo — March 21, 2004 @ 1:51 pm

  43. Fran Drescher did Porn!

    #43 | Comment by Will — March 21, 2004 @ 2:18 pm

  44. One of my girlfriends at school had this shirt, I busted out laughing the first time i saw it.

    #44 | Comment by Victor_Vega — March 21, 2004 @ 2:38 pm

  45. right i guess you’ll need an address 😉


    #45 | Comment by mojo — March 21, 2004 @ 3:05 pm

  46. I want a Fran Drescher did Porn! T-Shirt…

    #46 | Comment by DarckkorioN — March 21, 2004 @ 3:06 pm

  47. what a wank

    #47 | Comment by dammit — March 21, 2004 @ 3:45 pm

  48. I’m lazy. Someone email me.


    #48 | Comment by stacia — March 21, 2004 @ 3:53 pm

  49. Justin needs a car.

    So we can avoid posts like this.

    #49 | Comment by PacManJesus — March 21, 2004 @ 5:04 pm

  50. sarah is so smart. i heart her.

    #50 | Comment by lizzi — March 21, 2004 @ 6:09 pm

  51. edit: the fucking url is too long and fucks up the page. use HTML to link next time

    don’t look at this link if you’re about to eat…

    #51 | Comment by sexcrazedwzl — March 21, 2004 @ 6:10 pm

  52. I know im not the first to think this, but…

    somebody find either a vid or vidcaps of jolie’s boobies in taking lives.


    #52 | Comment by zombielunch — March 21, 2004 @ 7:50 pm

  53. hwatt heppend 2 kei’s webbcite? i wuld lyke 2 g0 ther butt its tempararrily dissabled…enyone no?

    #53 | Comment by An0nomus — March 21, 2004 @ 8:20 pm

  54. sexcrazedweasel had a lot of fucking potential……sigh!

    #54 | Comment by Discommode — March 21, 2004 @ 9:03 pm

  55. That Leslie Segrete is hot, from WHILE YOU WERE OUT, on TLC. Oh yeah, women and power tools, Oh yeah…

    #55 | Comment by Ex — March 21, 2004 @ 9:50 pm

  56. yeah, wtf happend the blog guh guh deal? and if i saw i chick with a throw rocks shirt i would laugh.
    and this site better not die from me posting it here, oh and i am a n00b and suck at hyperlink shit so sorry ab00t that

    #56 | Comment by formalhaut — March 21, 2004 @ 10:41 pm

  57. As a canadian, i am wondering exactly what that Nina chick is going on about canadians. is that chick doesn’t like canadians, or does she like canadians, or thinks that if this was a canadian site maybe only other canadians would be able to get to it or something?
    Maybe she thinks that because canadians use the metric system that it doesn’t matter that a canadian site has her picture up, because our computers show things differently.
    Maybe Canadians are magical people from a far off land like Oz or middle earth, and that makes it OK for this site, if canadian, to post her picture.
    maybe shes a dumb bitch, who really doesn’t understand that by posting her likeness on the internet without any type of copyright on it that her likeness can be used without her permission and she doesn’t really have any legal discourse unless the pictures were stolen from her or taken without her knowledge. Judging by the presesnce of the sign, i think she knew, and by postin it on the net it is now public domain.

    Yup, i’m going with the dumb bitch theory.

    #57 | Comment by kvl — March 22, 2004 @ 12:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *