Here are some candids of Vanessa Hudgens being all un-Disney like. I love this one of her giving the finger.

I know there are some alleged butt shot/mooning pics that are supposed to be part of the set, but they’re apparently not her. So no inclusion.

31 thoughts on “VANESSA HUDGENS

  1. She’s actually pretty cute in some of these, she seems naturally pretty. She’s slowly starting to grow on me…I’m starting to grow, too? 0_o

    Primero, putas.

    #1 | Comment by Dr. Phil mmkay? — September 22, 2007 @ 11:35 pm

  2. Those are pretty nice.

    In unrelated news, Salma Hayek finally popped.

    #2 | Comment by sodapopinski — September 23, 2007 @ 12:00 am

  3. She makes my penis happy

    #3 | Comment by Sampson — September 23, 2007 @ 12:11 am

  4. vanessa hudgens “racy” photos make my day good

    #4 | Comment by person — September 23, 2007 @ 12:12 am

  5. Slutty poses with girl friends pics?…check, check, check, check
    Finger in mouth pic?…check
    Fishnet stockings pic?…check
    Secretary pic?…check
    Tit grabbing pic…check
    Visual profanity pic?…check
    Lead singer in rock/goth band pic?…check
    Leg jacked up with crotch facing camera but just out of range pic?…check
    Naked self taken photo?…check

    It appears this may be her audition album for the porn industry. I think we have much to look forward to from this one…

    #5 | Comment by Fubarvet2 — September 23, 2007 @ 12:30 am

  6. Aww, man! I was hoping for some more nude shots.

    No more nude shots=sad penis

    Although, some of these pictures were actually pretty hot, despite being clothed.

    #6 | Comment by Pyronuc — September 23, 2007 @ 12:46 am

  7. Amazing, a teenage girl acting like a teenage girl and not a Disney Stepford Teen.

    Wonder what we’d see if Disney exec’s private pics were published.

    #7 | Comment by zandozan — September 23, 2007 @ 12:59 am

  8. i am in love with her, can’t wait for the video to release in a couple months, then my life will be complete and will be the first celeb sex video that fully satisfies me, all the ones i’ve seen in the past have been a letdown from all my expectation of what i thought it would be like, most recently the kim kardishan one…

    #8 | Comment by thatwhitedude — September 23, 2007 @ 1:32 am

  9. shit and i just realized the reason i am prob so into her is cuz she looks alot like the chick i lost my virginity too. fuck i need to get laid. pwned.

    #9 | Comment by thatwhitedude — September 23, 2007 @ 1:33 am

  10. she’s won me over.


    so basically, she was a cam whore/ myspace slut before she got famous and now “the shits hitting the fan”. interesting.

    #10 | Comment by Xan — September 23, 2007 @ 5:25 am

  11. Photo 18 is not her. The one on the beach. You can tell it’s a completely different face. Unless she’s had plastic surgery already.

    #11 | Comment by Mentos Fresh — September 23, 2007 @ 6:55 am

  12. Some of these pics are really cute 🙂 I wouldn’t really say they’re slutty or particularly un-disney like they’re just a normal teenage girl messing around, its probably only the nude and possibly underwear ones that disney would be pissed off about.

    What do those trousers say? My best guess is “No looking” ? but due to the font and missing letters there’s other possibilities…

    #12 | Comment by thiessen — September 23, 2007 @ 8:11 am

  13. We need her to get together with Mackenzie Rosman for some nice g-g action pics!

    #13 | Comment by cheezstake — September 23, 2007 @ 9:49 am

  14. ^yes, please.

    #14 | Comment by Dr. Phil mmkay? — September 23, 2007 @ 12:45 pm

  15. My name is “Candi” (not my real name) and I had to work very closely and through long hours with Vanessa. I always thought she was really cool and nice, but then the shoulder thing started. She always had her hands on me, rubbing me, saying I look so tired. I didn’t think anything of it at first, but then she’d try to kiss me and then when I refused she said she was just joking. Then one day in the dressing room I thought she was just changing but she was completely nude and asked me if I was going to be nude too. I didn’t like her after that because I knew she was weird and a lesbian and I’m just not into that. But then she started texting me and calling me, which made me try to avoid her even more. And then she started emailing me these pictures and I told her to stop. But she kept sending racier and racier photos of herself until she finally sent a full nude pic!

    ^^ above is pure fantasy, but who knows, maybe she actually made this photo for a girl. Who knows what evil lurks in the heart of Vanessa? We can always hope.

    #15 | Comment by FapTastic — September 23, 2007 @ 2:59 pm

  16. Where the fuck is this sex tape I hear so much about?? Any truth behind this?

    #16 | Comment by Skarasta — September 23, 2007 @ 4:02 pm



    #17 | Comment by stolenfoot — September 23, 2007 @ 6:52 pm

  18. Ja she’s just a natural pretty chic , Awesome !

    #18 | Comment by JonKing — September 23, 2007 @ 9:31 pm

  19. thiessen, my guess is that they say ‘no peeking’ but yea, it’s hard to tell for sure…

    #19 | Comment by no peeking! — September 24, 2007 @ 1:41 am

  20. Ahh peeking, yeah thats a good guess. Either way, hot teen girls with stuff written accross low-riding trousers is always a good thing 🙂

    #20 | Comment by thiessen — September 24, 2007 @ 9:38 am

  21. #20 – I think it says ‘No Poking’ – with an arrow pointing to her ass crack.

    But then I am a pervert, so I’m probably wrong.

    #21 | Comment by Smiley — September 25, 2007 @ 1:50 am

  22. Thats a strong possibility. But if the hudg doesn’t nudge the fudge it’ll put me off her a lil. But onl a lil. She could always be pursuaded.

    #22 | Comment by thiessen — September 25, 2007 @ 8:13 am

  23. Without a doubt she has had lesbian sex.

    #23 | Comment by tomas — September 25, 2007 @ 1:58 pm

  24. Definitely had butt love. All girls who wear pants with slogans splashed across the butt have had it or are thinking about have it or have at least had a pinky or tip of a Barbie Doll or G.I. Joe action figure in there.


    *may not be actual fact.

    #24 | Comment by Smiley — September 25, 2007 @ 10:21 pm

  25. Behold these truths to be self evident.

    But just incase I wanna see the Hudge fudge nudge video, just to be sure.

    #25 | Comment by thiessen — September 26, 2007 @ 6:50 am

  26. Ha!

    #26 | Comment by Codefire — September 27, 2007 @ 8:11 am

  27. haha no way! Now they need to make one in teen/adult sizes… Cool set though, comes with a lot for the money by the look of it!

    #27 | Comment by thiessen — September 27, 2007 @ 2:56 pm

  28. #19
    Yeah it says “No Peeking” and the “e”s have pupils in them so it looks like a pair of eyes.

    #28 | Comment by Brad — September 30, 2007 @ 3:27 pm

  29. cool, thanks 🙂

    #29 | Comment by thiessen — September 30, 2007 @ 3:59 pm

  30. Vanessa is a BITCH BITCH BITCH.

    #30 | Comment by Anonymous — December 22, 2007 @ 1:36 am

  31. This is unbelievable. Nudity is the most natural thing and so many of you have turned it into the most perverted thing possible. We’re all born naked. If nudity is so bad, then from now on, to please you, babies should now be born fully dressed and…not out from the vagina, but cut open the mother’s stomach and pull it out that way. Now, who’s got the problem? Me for looking at nudity as natural and healthy? Or, people who see sex whenever they see nudity? Vanessa Hudgens is only showing herself as she was when she was born. Granted, she’s more developed and all, but it’s still the same person. It’s amazing how prudish and perverted so many of you are. I’m not saying every one of you is, but there’s more than enough of you that are. How can being nude be perverted and pornographic? I know what real pornography is since I’ve seen it more than enough times…and this picture does not fit into that category. The only way it could be pornographic is if Vanessa were fingering herself, touching herself in sexual ways, or licking her lips in a seductive manner. Since none of the above are in this photo, she is all natural and NOT sexual.

    #31 | Comment by David - the nudist — October 22, 2008 @ 2:23 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *