35 thoughts on “RIHANNA

  1. First maybe

    #1 | Comment by MyDogFap — February 1, 2008 @ 5:02 am

  2. second.

    she’s pretty hawt when wet.

    #2 | Comment by dizzle — February 1, 2008 @ 6:00 am

  3. Third

    Almost nudity makes it better, but otherwise, meh…

    #3 | Comment by JRC — February 1, 2008 @ 6:18 am

  4. Mega-Rofl … “Ich mag großen Hahn” … The 1:1 translation of the English “I like huge cocks” into German …

    #4 | Comment by Doitscher — February 1, 2008 @ 7:01 am

  5. if only she’d use the umbrella in the shower pics

    #5 | Comment by isthenumberfive — February 1, 2008 @ 7:26 am

  6. Hell, I’d make it rain on her!

    #6 | Comment by Darkstar — February 1, 2008 @ 8:47 am

  7. FAKE!!

    Real pics: http://www.hotcelebshome.com/rihanna-fhm-magazine-germany-january-2008/

    #7 | Comment by HCH — February 1, 2008 @ 9:28 am

  8. Boring

    #8 | Comment by TheMan — February 1, 2008 @ 10:16 am

  9. she has a fivehead, which makes her eyes look like theyre set far apart. id still give her a facial though.

    #9 | Comment by Xan — February 1, 2008 @ 11:44 am

  10. Yeah, not a fan of the head– and she hasn’t really got the curves they like to claim. Definite milquetoast.

    #10 | Comment by Kewtr — February 1, 2008 @ 12:51 pm

  11. not bad. best thing since the miley post. how about some emma roberts?

    #11 | Comment by Justin L — February 1, 2008 @ 1:02 pm

  12. why?
    not in the least bit interesting or attractive.
    i don’t understand all the hoopla…

    #12 | Comment by yawn — February 1, 2008 @ 1:09 pm

  13. Rihanna > most chicks on here.

    #13 | Comment by Gage — February 1, 2008 @ 1:41 pm

  14. Does it actually mean that in German?

    I wasn’t really looking at the writing the first time around.

    If I had done I would probably have read it as “I am going to fuck up the keyboard, big-style”.

    Prophetic or what?

    #14 | Comment by matt — February 1, 2008 @ 1:46 pm

  15. won’t be famous in a 3 months. And not that memorable in the body or booby department.

    Stupid hair.

    #15 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — February 1, 2008 @ 3:01 pm

  16. Agree with #3 and #8, and #4 is actually correct.

    Strongly disagree with #11 – I have no interest in seeing a post on a kid on Nickelodeon. Just keep providing pics of girls old enough that I won’t get arrested for looking at them and everything is fine. In fact, I’d rather watch a geriatric version of 2girls1cup than look for a nip-slip on Nickelodeon.

    So, yeah … Rihanna is boring.

    #16 | Comment by Bender — February 1, 2008 @ 4:29 pm

  17. She looks like a sort of cute alien girl. HOT, but kinda weird lookin.

    And FACT: boob job.

    #17 | Comment by Osi — February 1, 2008 @ 5:03 pm

  18. Wow, who makes fakes that DONT show nudity. What kind of half-ass photoshopping is that?

    She has many flaws (weird hair, not curvy and the FIVE head), but she knows how to make up for it with those sexy videos. Her music videos have to be some of the sexiest ones out there.

    The Umbrella song does kinda sound like she’s taking it up the ass though… Ey, Ey, Ey…

    #18 | Comment by Evil Monkey — February 1, 2008 @ 5:31 pm

  19. @#16 Bender = Fag FACT
    rihanna is hot but these pics are lame

    #19 | Comment by Billy Ray — February 1, 2008 @ 8:48 pm

  20. agreed…. she’s hot… especially in her music videos.

    these pics are tame.

    i bet she is a freak in the sack too

    #20 | Comment by DoctorOfStyle — February 1, 2008 @ 9:46 pm

  21. So which are the real pics, the ones with her clothed or naked?

    Anyway, whats up with that Aeon Flux haircut?

    #21 | Comment by birdboy — February 1, 2008 @ 10:49 pm

  22. You can tell these aren’t the newest pics because she’s recently been trying to hide the fivehead with different hairstyles. She’s actually pretty hot when she hides it well, although I’m surprised it took her THIS long to realize that she has a melon shaped like a sperm whale.

    #22 | Comment by Kelvin — February 1, 2008 @ 11:06 pm

  23. awful airbrushing

    #23 | Comment by Tony — February 1, 2008 @ 11:27 pm

  24. I agree w/ Xan, she could still get a throat baby or two, but I can’t decide if the retouches or the ACTUAL photos are more boring…damn, I’m disappointed…still “Supaman dat hoe” tho…

    #24 | Comment by MAGNIFICENT BASTARD — February 2, 2008 @ 5:41 am

  25. someone should search for the non-photoshoped-with-water ones. then i will decide if i like her or not.

    #25 | Comment by BabyEater — February 2, 2008 @ 4:11 pm

  26. i just translated the german caption in one of her pics and it supposedly says, “i like rough cock.” haha

    #26 | Comment by Brain Damage — February 2, 2008 @ 7:21 pm

  27. Holy fuck, you’re a buttholer sometimes. I cun’t believe you post this skite.

    #27 | Comment by Terman — February 3, 2008 @ 11:43 am

  28. #17: Those are not fake boobs. You need you fakeometer calibrated. 😉

    #28 | Comment by EmJee — February 4, 2008 @ 4:31 am

  29. #4 & #26: That text was photoshopped on. The original text is different:

    http://img191.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-32107/loc96/99599_Rihanna_122_96lo.jpg

    And it says, “I like ambitious types”. Bah, I would’ve liked her a lot more if she really had said she liked rough cocks. 😀

    #29 | Comment by EmJee — February 4, 2008 @ 4:34 am

  30. 29 – bad link…

    #30 | Comment by JRC — February 4, 2008 @ 5:44 pm

  31. Bah! You can get to it from #7’s link then:

    http://www.hotcelebshome.com/rihanna-fhm-magazine-germany-january-2008/

    It’s the second image.

    #31 | Comment by EmJee — February 4, 2008 @ 6:26 pm

  32. I’m having a tough time figuring out which is the actual German FHM magazine pics. I assume that number 7’s link are to the real pics… but Justin’s post states that his pics are from the same article… :/

    #32 | Comment by JRC — February 4, 2008 @ 9:54 pm

  33. That cant be the actual JRC. You are usually smarter than this. In your retarded 15 yr old way. (If you need proof of tampering, just look at the belly on the only clothed pic. Or open up any of the edited pics in a photo editor and turn up the gamma. The retouched sections will stick out.)

    #33 | Comment by Gage — February 5, 2008 @ 1:20 am

  34. #32: Justin’s been hoodwinked. Compare the third picture in my link versus the third picture at the top of this page.

    #34 | Comment by EmJee — February 5, 2008 @ 3:45 am

  35. 33 – Who cares if I’m not privy to all the lame internet shoop tricks? I don’t waste my time doing it, so I could care less how it’s done or how you fucking spot it. Afaic, anyone who sits in their basement shooping pics needs to get laid…

    34 – Thanks EmJee, that helped. ^_^

    #35 | Comment by JRC — February 5, 2008 @ 4:52 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *