Some news about those Miley Cyrus pics from the dude who sent them in:

TrainReq’s door is basically being beaten down by Disney lawyers. They’re scaring the hell out of him. He has 6 more pictures of Miley Cyrus, all of which were sent to Nick Jonas of The Jonas Brothers. He was trying to sell them, which probably is making matters worse. Hacking emails is illegal, afterall.

Anyway, I’ve seen the pictures. He showed them to me in person on his computer. He won’t risk sending them out. Miley’s not exactly naked in any of them, but as I said before everything can be seen.

I’ll break them down for you.

First picture: Miley in a black see-through babydoll with black panties. Thanks to the flash of the camera her nipples are clearly visible. I don’t know if she had the camera on a timer or a friend took it, because she’s standing free in front of a closet. The babydoll is probably this version (in black)

Second picture: Miley topless with her hands covering/cupping her breasts. She’s wearing white shorts. In front of the same closet as before. Still freestanding.

Third picture: This time she’s in a purple bra and panty set. The panties are see-through. She’s shaved. She’s in the same room as the other two, but in front of a dresser with a TV playing a Toyota commercial. Still freestanding.

Fourth picture: Back in the shower room as before. Pretty much the same shot as before, but this time we see a lot more of her ass with the wet t-shirt clinging to it.

Fifth picture: Still in the shower, this time facing the camera. She has her right arm covering her boobs, but the shirt is plastered to her bald crotch.

Sixth picture: Last one. And definitely my favorite. She’s facing the camera in the shower, one hand on her hip, the other by her side. Except for a few pockets where air got in her shirt is totally see-through. Both breasts with hard nipples and her crotch are clearly seen. She’s basically completely naked.

TrainReq sent these out to several potential clients, but I don’t know their status. With the lawyers going apeshit anything can happen. By the way, just so you know, I’m 17 years old, so even if these pictures are deemed illegal because of Miley’s age (15 in all of them), it’s still legal for me to see them. At least that’s my understanding. Since they’re not pornographic TrainReq has been assured that they are legal, since just seeing an underage girl naked is fine so long as it’s not sexual in nature.

Mmmm. Bald crotch.

129 thoughts on “THOSE MILEY CYRUS PICS

  1. FIRST! Dammit! No pics!

    #1 | Comment by Darkstar — July 14, 2008 @ 3:02 am

  2. pics or it never happened.

    #2 | Comment by AngelBaby — July 14, 2008 @ 3:19 am

  3. Seconding AB here. Granted I’m not sure I’m all that interested beyond raw curiosity, but tits or gtfo as they say.

    #3 | Comment by ZekeDMS — July 14, 2008 @ 3:29 am

  4. we’ve had the “lawyers involved” line before! IMO it’s an excuse to get us interested in an event or subject that may or may not have happen without actually providing any evidence of the said event. These pics sounds interesting if only because of who the involve due to her current level of fame and the family she is apart of. I seriously doubt that we will see them bit if do? Well…


    #4 | Comment by sliy — July 14, 2008 @ 3:58 am

  5. TrainReq is a complete & total TOOL!
    1) He put his watermark on the first one (so much for plausible deniability)
    2) He’s dumb enough to shop them around (as though anyone could publish them anyway).
    3) If Disney’s lawyers already know who he is then he never even tried to cover his ass in the first place.

    Sometimes smart people can be so fucking stupid!

    #5 | Comment by Brian — July 14, 2008 @ 4:13 am

  6. Oh and tell Josh they love 18 yo boys in prison.
    HAHAHA he better not drop the soap the dumb motherfucker!

    #6 | Comment by Brian — July 14, 2008 @ 4:26 am

  7. Why would “Disney Lawyers” be involved? It doesn’t involve any Disney license. She’s becoming a liability to them with her antics. They will probably drop her as soon as the rest of the pictures are released, so they won’t lend her any lawyers. Any lawyers involved would be hers, and due to the fact that they are trying to sell them she will have to claim copyright on them to stop them being published. She will go on taking nudes of herself and those will go online because she’s an idiot that doesn’t learn.

    #7 | Comment by JFetch — July 14, 2008 @ 4:32 am

  8. Josh’s ass is gonna be redder than his head!

    #8 | Comment by Brian — July 14, 2008 @ 4:41 am

  9. This may be the first non-image post from Justin that gave me a boner.

    #9 | Comment by dex — July 14, 2008 @ 5:09 am

  10. picture without tags.
    found on 4chan

    #10 | Comment by eber — July 14, 2008 @ 5:36 am

  11. Fuck I got a half sturgeon just reading that

    #11 | Comment by Lock — July 14, 2008 @ 6:19 am

  12. chances are we will never see them if hes that scared to post em

    #12 | Comment by hamish — July 14, 2008 @ 6:42 am

  13. ^^^
    chances are better that they don’t exist.

    #13 | Comment by AngelBaby — July 14, 2008 @ 6:58 am

  14. lol thats true

    #14 | Comment by hamish — July 14, 2008 @ 7:11 am

  15. She is certainly not shy in these..

    #15 | Comment by Whoopa — July 14, 2008 @ 7:35 am

  16. Amen to AB. This kind of stuff is often just bullshit.

    Personally I don’t see why some 17 year old kid would be too scared to even post the pictures. Internet privacy laws are in such a fucking mess these days that you can get away with pretty much anything.

    Plus Disney would be so embarrassed that you would go down in celebrity history. They’ve got so much to lose if the Hannah Montana phenomena goes off the rails that this would make the Hudgens scandal pale in comparison.

    #16 | Comment by cobalt — July 14, 2008 @ 7:38 am

  17. #9. dex
    Amen brother.

    #17 | Comment by TGM — July 14, 2008 @ 7:51 am

  18. Disney are protecting their assets. If the pictures get out, they’ll be a scandal that will lower the value of their property (Miley’s image as the virginal Hannah Montana), so they will do whatever they can to protect that property.

    Not to mention that disseminating child porn is illegal. Hell, Miley may do some time, as well, if it goes that far (not to mention whoever was holding the camera). Teenage girls have gone to jail before for distributing child porn after posting naked pics of themselves.

    By the way, just so you know, I’m 17 years old, so even if these pictures are deemed illegal because of Miley’s age (15 in all of them), it’s still legal for me to see them.

    Yeah, you just keep telling yourself that. Does that mean it’s also legal to do drugs, murder someone, or rob a liquor store if you’re underage? Protip: if it’s illegal, it’s illegal for everyone, regardless of age. What a tard. (Another protip: it’d be illegal for to post them, as well.)

    #18 | Comment by foibly — July 14, 2008 @ 8:38 am

  19. The last bit in the email is just stupid, for 2 reasons. a) it doesn’t matter the age of the person who holds the picture, only the content. It doesn’t matter if you are 12 or 50. And b) from the description it seems unlikely they would meet the standards for being illegal (but it may be close, depending on the judge/prosecutor.

    #19 | Comment by deadend — July 14, 2008 @ 8:41 am

  20. #18

    It’s really hard to say that they would be CP. Nudity of a minor is not the standard for CP. It must be ‘sexually explicit or suggestive’. That is why David Hamilton’s (and others) books can frequently be bought at a local Barnes & Noble.

    #20 | Comment by deadend — July 14, 2008 @ 8:44 am

  21. 18 >>Teenage girls have gone to jail before for distributing child porn after posting naked pics of themselves.

    Yeah, right. Please cite a specific case where this has happened, or you’re talking out of your ass.

    #21 | Comment by flyboy — July 14, 2008 @ 9:46 am

  22. The pics posted, and the ones described, would not be illegal.

    And, strictly speaking, if someone underage takes an illegal photo of themselves, they would be in possession of illegal photos. Enforcement would be problematic, certainly.

    #22 | Comment by tool — July 14, 2008 @ 9:59 am

  23. This is the stupidest post ever. And a HUGE “FAIL” to Justin for posting it!

    Nick Jonas is my ex-Gf’s cousin and I have the 7th Picture that our “wanna-be-17-year-old” doesn’t mention!

    In Pic #7, she is wearing the Black baby-doll, but this time, without panties, and sitting on the bed in a doggy-style position while looking back at the camera giving it a “fuck me” look!

    You see her ass clearly, but she has her one hand between her legs cupping it over her pussy so you can’t see that!

    Wow, see how easy it was to post Total Bullshit, and make it seem believable?

    How many of you started spanking it when I said “pic 7”?


    #23 | Comment by MacDaddy — July 14, 2008 @ 10:11 am

  24. Fuck Miley. I want me some AB neko!



    #24 | Comment by mao — July 14, 2008 @ 10:19 am

  25. Actually Tool, a couple of years back (2005 me thinks) a 15 year old girl was prosecuted AND convicted of child pornography. She posted the pics to HER OWN facebook account and was caught by an internet watch group who turned her into the cops.

    Being 15 I don’t think she served any prison time, but probably had severe probation. and I know her parents paid a fine.. Don’t ask me where I first read this, but it’s very likely searchable.

    #25 | Comment by Maniac Man — July 14, 2008 @ 10:40 am

  26. on a second note… My penis has been floating around FTP servers and the bowels of the net since 1993 (I was 16 at the time, Polaroid and a hand scanner… lol) I’m 31 now, is there a grandfather clause to the self abuse molestation law?? … lol

    #26 | Comment by Maniac Man — July 14, 2008 @ 10:46 am

  27. Manic Man, I really wish you hadn’t used penis and bowels in the same sentence!

    #27 | Comment by George Babar — July 14, 2008 @ 10:58 am

  28. if of this email is true, the joans brother guys are in trouble for posession of child porn, GG to them 😛

    the FBI would be involved, NOT Disney lawers…

    and Miley Cyrus would be in trouble for distribution!

    anywho, miley isn’t attractive OR tallented… this site has become to focused on too few people 🙁

    #28 | Comment by Coolstream — July 14, 2008 @ 11:36 am

  29. ^^^ i agree with you coolstream. too few idols here for us to worship. cmon justin. i remember a time when fubar had as many posts in a day as you do in a week. and as many different girls to boot!

    #29 | Comment by berkley — July 14, 2008 @ 12:21 pm

  30. I wonder if the Loch Ness monster knows about this?

    #30 | Comment by Goatmaster6 — July 14, 2008 @ 12:34 pm

  31. or the Yeti

    Miley epic loss. want fresh celebrity ass

    #31 | Comment by proud citizen of Masturbation Nation — July 14, 2008 @ 12:41 pm

  32. i agree that she’s not the most beautiful girl. but do not forget the most important thing about these pics – nearly naked JB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    after all, to those inclined to be excited about those pics that’s all that matters.

    #32 | Comment by ANON01 — July 14, 2008 @ 12:42 pm

  33. Disney’s lawyers are just trying to get exclusive rights. That would protect them from scandal, to a degree. Once no-one can see them, they can go back to denying that she is a slut. Hacking the email is probably the only prosecutable offense, but even that borders on terrorism thanks to the Patriot Act. The pornography line is jurisdictional. Those pics are definately porn in parts of the US.

    #33 | Comment by Dave — July 14, 2008 @ 12:49 pm

  34. didn’t realize DLT had so many lawyers lurking judging from all the coments.

    #34 | Comment by DoctorOfStyle — July 14, 2008 @ 1:24 pm

  35. > 21. flyboy (09:46:33) :

    >Yeah, right. Please cite a specific case where this
    >has happened, or you’re talking out of your ass.

    Google it, bitch.

    #35 | Comment by foibly — July 14, 2008 @ 1:57 pm

  36. vanessa hudgens naked pics were supposedly taken when she was underrage and those are out there now.
    i don’t see why these ‘supposed’ pictures shouldn’t be.

    #36 | Comment by faosdu — July 14, 2008 @ 2:10 pm

  37. The smart pervert learns where the lines are drawn to avoid arrest.

    #37 | Comment by Dave — July 14, 2008 @ 2:20 pm

  38. tl;dr

    #38 | Comment by Mike — July 14, 2008 @ 2:31 pm

  39. These pictures, IF they exist, will never be seen by any of you.

    Until I see the pics being posted somewhere, I’m not really going to give it much more thought.

    #39 | Comment by Jaquio — July 14, 2008 @ 2:37 pm

  40. Meh. She’s still a butterface.

    #40 | Comment by Nobody — July 14, 2008 @ 3:36 pm

  41. Must see pics, and please post if anyone finds any moar of the untagged ones

    #41 | Comment by Nugblaze — July 14, 2008 @ 3:48 pm

  42. >> Google it, bitch.

    I did, and you need to learn some basic reading skills. Of all the links, only 2 referred to teens actually being charged; information on convictions was sketcy, and none of them went to jail.

    #42 | Comment by Flyboy — July 14, 2008 @ 4:02 pm

  43. *sketchy

    #43 | Comment by Flyboy — July 14, 2008 @ 4:03 pm

  44. “I like that the past 3 posts have over 100 comments of people ‘not interested’…”

    “Frankly, as for the whole child porn thing; to draw such a thin line, is stupid… What happens between 11:59 on the night before your 18th birthday, and 12:01 the morning of, that makes you suddenly mature enough (or in reverse, why are you not mature until, but not the second before…) to handle your own body? Plus, how many people out there, under the age of, say, 25, lost their virginity after they turned 18? I’d imagine, if it’s not well over 50%, it’s pretty damn close. For that matter, how many of you have only has sex with one person, of your own free will? Of those, how many of you were married?”

    #44 | Comment by Ryu — July 14, 2008 @ 4:17 pm

  45. Does it make you a pervert if you’d have sex with the lovable Disney trash compacting robot, Wall-E?

    Where’s the line!???

    #45 | Comment by Mr. Useless — July 14, 2008 @ 4:42 pm


    #46 | Comment by Ryu — July 14, 2008 @ 5:29 pm

  47. She’s definitely white trash and not that good looking. That being said, I’ll still fap to it when they come out simply because she has more money than I can count and yet I can see her practically naked. I’m like that.

    Vanessa Hudgens is much better looking. Her pics should be in the friggin top logo of this place.

    #47 | Comment by The Pope — July 14, 2008 @ 5:30 pm

  48. “At least that’s my understanding. Since they’re not pornographic TrainReq has been assured that they are legal, since just seeing an underage girl naked is fine so long as it’s not sexual in nature.”

    So if i dont get a hardon looking at these photos of an underaged girl then its totally okay.
    Oh crap

    #48 | Comment by Psyper — July 14, 2008 @ 6:20 pm

  49. This guy is either a complete pathetic hacker, or a liar. If he’s a dumbass enough not to cover his tracks and already had lawyers beating down his door, what kind of moron is this? And who the hell PUBLICLY states to the world that they’re going to possibly sell off pictures of underage girls.

    She’s still bangin hot though. I’d tap it.

    #49 | Comment by Lurker — July 14, 2008 @ 6:25 pm

  50. “Second picture: Miley topless with her hands covering/cupping her breasts. She’s w–”

    She has boobs??!

    #50 | Comment by JM — July 14, 2008 @ 6:37 pm

  51. No pic links? I know you can buy them off digital gangster but its through one of those bs “sign up for other offers” sites. i wonder if i can just buy them from TrainReq directly.

    Bald crotch. I am pleased.

    #51 | Comment by Ben — July 14, 2008 @ 7:07 pm

  52. If the pictures exist and he’s already sent them out, I think they’ll end up on the ‘net anyway. I’m curious though if Justin would pay for them if they were offered to him exclusively?

    #52 | Comment by Creosote — July 14, 2008 @ 7:23 pm

  53. I agree I think the pics existing are a big scam. And for the record all TrainReq would have to do is work for the gov, and it would be totally legal for him to hack into her email under the guise of Homeland Security

    #53 | Comment by pirho — July 14, 2008 @ 7:41 pm

  54. idiots. pics are real. not cp. trainreq has said he was friends with miley’s bro. that’s prob how he had access to ‘hack’ the pw. he’s 19, so should be afraid of jail. should have leaked em anonymously instead. now he will be forced to delete, and in exchange, they won’t prosecute.

    ps. miley is talentless and ugly as hell.

    #54 | Comment by m — July 14, 2008 @ 8:14 pm


    #55 | Comment by Tanzarian — July 14, 2008 @ 8:31 pm

  56. Trainreq is a stupid little bitch who doesn’t have shit. We fucking know who he is now and he might as well show the rest of this shit. Jail and a beatdown is what this douche tease needs unless I GETS MY NAKED MILEY or something to that effect.
    Mickey is going up his ass.

    #56 | Comment by A Disney Lawyer — July 14, 2008 @ 8:48 pm

  57. 56= idiot and not a disney lawyer. yes trainreq is stupid. no you won’t see the rest. frankly, i don’t know why you’d want to, except for the lulz at her/disney and the tweeny ‘omg miley is my life!’ fans.

    #57 | Comment by m — July 14, 2008 @ 9:44 pm

  58. Jesus, why are we attacking trainreq and Justin for just putting out there what some of us would like to see?

    Why the fuck are you even on this site if you don’t agree with what Justin does or has did?

    Neither he nor trainreq took the pics or coheresed Cyrus to do them? If I take a dumb pic of myself ala this I face the risk it may come back to haunt me. Miley Cyrus has been reminded CONSTANTLY of this risk since Hudgens and her own brief problems posing for far tamer pics.

    She did it anyway. She will reap what she sows. It will NOT damage her carreer.

    As for legalities invloving Justin or trainreq, if you believe so strongly they’re fucked, why tell us? Just wait and be proven right, or else people like me will just asume you’re just trying to fuck with people’s heads.

    I personally ass-lickingly salute Justin and trainreq for putting their balls out there in the name of pussy.

    I hope trainreq for his efforts DOES get money! Why the fuck should’nt he? No-one’s gonna die and Cyrus’s career is assured one way or the other.

    And she’s learnt a lesson and all you moral pushers out there can be happy knowing due to Cyrus’s stupidity Jojo and co are probably deleating her naked pics that no one will ever see now as we speak for fear hackers will come get her next.

    Just the fuck are we complaining? That’s Disney’s job, let us enjoy the fruits amigos!

    #58 | Comment by borat4602 — July 14, 2008 @ 9:51 pm


    #59 | Comment by AngelBaby — July 14, 2008 @ 9:58 pm

  60. 58, justin has had nothing to do with this. he’s not connected to trainreq. he’s just reposting info he’s received.

    trainreq can’t post the rest because he’s openly admitted to hacking and stealing personal data. deleting the pics is his get out of jail free card.

    unless he grows a pair of balls, posts them and just says ‘fuck it’, which of course would be hilarious for everyone.

    #60 | Comment by m — July 14, 2008 @ 10:01 pm

  61. ps. and trying to sell the data he admits to stealing adds more crimes than just claiming credit to the list req’s likely being threatened with..

    i hope they leak though anyway just for the middle finger they send to the bible thumping moralists.

    but she’s definitely ugly. rich/famous, but ugly.

    #61 | Comment by m — July 14, 2008 @ 10:08 pm

  62. too much talk

    more neko

    smiley hoohoo where r u?

    #62 | Comment by mao — July 14, 2008 @ 10:10 pm

  63. STFU “m” when you don’t know from your ass to your poodle’s ass. Trainreq is the man and he’ll have someone else release it b4 August comes around. Miley thinks she’s in the clear for now but it’ll be release regardless. The shit will hit the fan for her soon.

    #63 | Comment by Jonas — July 14, 2008 @ 10:12 pm

  64. I have to agree with 63, charitably allowing for a valid theory that more such photos exist. If this Trainreq has them, somebody else either already does or very easily can have them, and not everyone’s coward enough or smart enough (I’m really not sure which it is at this point) to keep them secret-ish.

    If they exist, we’ll see them sooner or later. If they don’t, then we technically never missed out on anything in the first place.

    #64 | Comment by Tycho Brahe — July 14, 2008 @ 10:21 pm

  65. 63, wasn’t trying to insult your boyfriend or anything, but imo, when you commit an easily traceable crime, usually only fame-whoring morons bandstand about it.

    but anyway, i hope you’re right. props to him if he can pull it all off without jail time or a crushing lawsuit lol 😀

    i fucking hate the whole modern disney empire and all these vapid, worthless, artificial tweeny stars. so contrived.

    #65 | Comment by m — July 14, 2008 @ 10:29 pm

  66. Trainreq IS Miley

    #66 | Comment by The Pope — July 14, 2008 @ 11:00 pm

  67. Someone post more descriptions! What about pics 8 thru 15?? C’mon! I’m almost there!! Mmmm. Baldness.

    #67 | Comment by creepylurker — July 14, 2008 @ 11:49 pm

  68. I would imagine if anything here is fake it is “the dude” who passed the photos on to Justin. He probably found them from another source or website and passed them along. He probably made up the rest of the pics, because as Mac Daddy proved, it’s pretty easy to do.

    Also, the Disney Lawyers pounding on the door, does not seem likely. It would make more sense to send the FBI out first.

    #68 | Comment by Evil Monkey — July 15, 2008 @ 12:24 am

  69. the only way we get to see these pics is if someone hacks trainreq, or he at least goes by that story. while no judge would be able to call this CP (unless she’s spreading eagle or in a sexual act), hacking miley’s email is still the illegal part. he got greedy. if he simply would have created a new ID, he’d still be Anonymous enough to be able to get away with it all. since people know who he is, he probably will be hacked soon enough.

    #69 | Comment by TMZfan — July 15, 2008 @ 12:40 am

  70. Just like the Vanessa hudgens scandal, it wasn’t worth any money at all!

    So Trainreq’s crap is worth no money but is internet worthy!

    #70 | Comment by ANTHONY JACKSON — July 15, 2008 @ 1:02 am

  71. It was worth good money, but probably not from an American company. trainreq got greedy, for sure. it’s not legally cp, but the pix have to get out there. i’d bet one of them offshore online casinos would pay. they’ll do anything for more players

    #71 | Comment by perezhiltonisashitdick — July 15, 2008 @ 1:08 am

  72. It’s completely illegal for anyone to possess child pornography. If you’re 8, 15, 17, or 45. It’s all the same, and it’s completely illegal to clear you up on that.

    #72 | Comment by Chris — July 15, 2008 @ 1:13 am

  73. Chris
    see throughs/nudes do not equal CP anywhere.

    if they are explicit (spreading eagle, bating, or sex acts), that is CP.


    #73 | Comment by stevefromyellowstone — July 15, 2008 @ 1:17 am

  74. lets compare britneys bald crotch with mileys

    #74 | Comment by jsasalk — July 15, 2008 @ 1:55 am

  75. Who gives a shit about this no-talent whore? Stupid bitch will be doing anal gangbang in 5 years.

    #75 | Comment by Smilin' Bob — July 15, 2008 @ 4:11 am

  76. I give a shit. There will be a fapstorm, and world-wide kitten shortages for months to come.

    #76 | Comment by Lock — July 15, 2008 @ 4:14 am

  77. foibly (#18, #35) works for disney/ is billy ray/ was castrated.

    #77 | Comment by ted — July 15, 2008 @ 6:21 am

  78. I give a shit. There will be a fapstorm, and world-wide kitten shortages for months to come.

    Weightlifting friction glove anyone? Oh yes.. there will be blood…

    #78 | Comment by Whoopa — July 15, 2008 @ 8:25 am

  79. *sound of trainreq over-writing his harddrives 5,000 times and praying for death* 😉

    #79 | Comment by Renfen — July 15, 2008 @ 9:25 am

  80. Who gives a shit about this no-talent whore? Stupid bitch will be doing anal gangbang in 5 years

    hope she’ll take pictures of that too…

    #80 | Comment by Milton McFuck — July 15, 2008 @ 9:50 am

  81. this non-neko jail or no jail are teh bery boring.

    come on mr fbi

    post us sum da baby va-jay-jay

    share us sum the gubberment black label porns

    #81 | Comment by dikkok — July 15, 2008 @ 1:50 pm

  82. Post the other pics pls! She is hot but she’s got no talent. I want to fuck her!

    #82 | Comment by eortim — July 15, 2008 @ 1:57 pm

  83. All yall ain’t seeing me naked or with a wet shirt so you can quit it. This trainreq fellow is joshing you. I want to fuck you too eortim. (ROLLS EYES) Buy my merchandise. XOXOXO

    #83 | Comment by Miley — July 15, 2008 @ 7:11 pm

  84. It is spell “y’all”. Y – apostrophe – all.

    Second person plural, southern style.

    #84 | Comment by tool — July 15, 2008 @ 7:21 pm

  85. ^^^

    Hahaha. Getting him fucking told, dude.

    #85 | Comment by cobalt — July 15, 2008 @ 7:47 pm

  86. Can someone make a life size plush toy of her naked so I can have sex with it?

    #86 | Comment by hahaha — July 15, 2008 @ 8:14 pm

  87. I’m happy I’ve always hated Miley Cyrus and I alway knew that she was a whore and I have been waiting for a moment like this that could ruin her carrier. Please post the other pictures to the world so everyone will know what a sex loving whore she is and kill her carrier. Then the only job she might get is as prostitute. And I bet all you perverts who are asking for the rest of the pics for your pleasure (like making a life size plush toy of her naked, hahaha) will go and pay loads of money to fuck her.

    #87 | Comment by jo jo — July 15, 2008 @ 8:20 pm

  88. Why kill her carrier? Surely it’s not her drivers fault? 😉

    #88 | Comment by borat4602 — July 15, 2008 @ 8:30 pm

  89. I’m with Jo jo! Who’s with him and me?

    #89 | Comment by Jo jo — July 15, 2008 @ 8:38 pm

  90. new pics are out…….

    #90 | Comment by okire — July 15, 2008 @ 8:54 pm

  91. I’m sad I’ve always hated jo jo and I alway knew that he was an idiot whore who couldn’t spell and I have been waiting for a moment like this that could ruin his “career” at spelling carrier. Please open a dictionary so everyone will know what a spelling idiot whore he is and kill his carrier. where are the new pics? #92

    #91 | Comment by Proper Spelling — July 15, 2008 @ 9:06 pm

  92. In psuedo-pedophiliac limbo.

    #92 | Comment by Tycho Brahe — July 15, 2008 @ 10:31 pm

  93. Hey man that was uncalled for. Come on give a guy a break, its not like I broke the law or something. I never said anything to hurt anybody (exept for Miley Cryus). I’m sorry I just don’t spell very well its not a crime so please back off.

    #93 | Comment by jo jo — July 15, 2008 @ 10:41 pm

  94. Could someone please link the new pics

    #94 | Comment by Maja — July 15, 2008 @ 11:53 pm

  95. Mmmmmm… Teen bald crotch…!


    #95 | Comment by Vote for Pedro — July 15, 2008 @ 11:54 pm

  96. amazingly trainreq’s not backing down.

    so does this interview corroborate or refute the 6 pix descriptions above?

    #96 | Comment by m — July 16, 2008 @ 12:25 am

  97. Where are the new pics out? … in your head?

    #97 | Comment by Whoopa — July 16, 2008 @ 6:15 am


    #98 | Comment by Brian — July 16, 2008 @ 7:02 am

  99. Ha ha ha. Finally! I always knew that Miley Cyrus was gona crack it was just a question of when and in what way. But I never expected for her to rack this early in her fame. Wow she got a rough rode ahead of her. This is exactly why you don’t have children become movie stars, or tv stars, or pop stars, it corrupts their mind in one way or another!

    #99 | Comment by Face — July 16, 2008 @ 9:47 am

  100. for her to *crack* this early in the game (sorry)

    #100 | Comment by Face — July 16, 2008 @ 9:49 am

  101. “I like to think of myself as the girl that no one can get, that no one can keep in their hand. Even at my age, a lot of girls are starting to fall and I think if [staying a virgin] is a commitment girls make, that’s great.”

    ‘Starting to fall’?

    She sounds like a Victorian cock-tease.

    #101 | Comment by cobalt — July 16, 2008 @ 1:19 pm

  102. Nudes of under 18 people are almost always illegal. It’s VERY difficult to take the “artistic nude” defense, particularly for stolen pics like these.

    In theory she could be prosecuted just for taking them of herself; it’s happened before. Certainly, regardless of whether you’re 17 or not, you can be prosecuted for viewing them, and the “hacker” in this case will be prosecuted for acquiring them.

    tl;dr you’re all fools and you’re all screwed. upload the whole set to somewhere nice and public, then go into hiding forever.

    #102 | Comment by gahr — July 16, 2008 @ 6:14 pm

  103. 102, there’s also the ‘nonsexual nude’ defense. nudists take/distribute underage pics all the time.

    not my thing in general (plenty of 18+ pussy to go around), but just saying. these should be legal, even as described in op.

    #103 | Comment by m — July 16, 2008 @ 9:19 pm

  104. first off heres my thoughts. if they are deemed illegal in anyway. thens shes guilty of having taking said pictures. also nick jonas if they where sent to him would be guilty of receiving said pictures. i know there are a few cases that i heard of that girls got busted for taking pics of themselves and sending them out. why should miley be any different and thats the case? if they are not deemed illegal then. the only law broken would be the hacking into the email.

    #104 | Comment by johnny horner — July 16, 2008 @ 9:30 pm

  105. if miley cyrus went to juvie for production/distribution of cp that would be the greatest win in history.

    #105 | Comment by m — July 16, 2008 @ 9:41 pm

  106. people keep referencing venessa’s pictures and again my point if the pics where ever deemed cp, who really guilty the person that posted or the person that made them in the first place? i would think it very unfair to overlook the crime of the actually making the pics. if your gonna go after someone for posting.

    #106 | Comment by johnny horner — July 17, 2008 @ 1:02 am

  107. I don’t care if the bitch is butt naked, It is not child porn unless she is

    1.In a sexual position

    2. Touching her genitals, or sombody elses genitalia,

    learn the Laws before you go making claims about Child Pornography! Now you better run off and bitch about every Nudist website you see, because your an uneducated, Ignorant, brainwashed by North American fascism Retard!

    #107 | Comment by Lurker — July 17, 2008 @ 10:48 am

  108. “learn the Laws before you go making claims about Child Pornography!”

    The only people who would learn the laws about CP are the ones who would need to defend what they’re looking at

    #108 | Comment by Coach Dante — July 17, 2008 @ 11:32 pm

  109. ^^^ Calm down pedos and in the closet pedos.

    #109 | Comment by Feds — July 18, 2008 @ 12:22 am

  110. what a naughty lass ! if she were my daughter, i’d take her over my knee and give her a well deserved stinging bare-bottom spanking

    #110 | Comment by haha — July 18, 2008 @ 2:01 am

  111. Hey Smelly-Ray is on GMA Today.
    Looking leggy.

    #111 | Comment by Brian — July 18, 2008 @ 8:42 am

  112. is he going to put the rest on the internet?? i wanna see em

    #112 | Comment by Mike — July 19, 2008 @ 11:41 pm

  113. i fucking want to see these pics already! just post them, no one will buy them for legal reasons, disey lawyers are angry fucks

    #113 | Comment by davidspade — July 20, 2008 @ 2:42 am

  114. Damn it! Quit trying to sneak around and sell the damn things. Just leak the fuckers out already. Now, with all the legal shit going down, we probably won’t ever get to see them. All that (and a great stroke of luck I might add) and ruined over trying to earn some bucks on it. Couldn’t sell them anyway because of the child porn laws. Your ass has had it now that they know. Should have leaked them all over the damn place anonymously and the government and legal system would take a while to mop the shit up. Give everyone a chance to catch a peek anyways.

    #114 | Comment by The Lord — July 20, 2008 @ 5:43 pm

  115. hey does anybody have any contact info for TrainReq? and TrainReq if you see this please email me I have to talk to you about something a question if you will thanks

    #115 | Comment by Char — July 20, 2008 @ 10:17 pm

  116. I don’t think giving you TrainReq’s info would be particularly wise. For TrainReq.

    #116 | Comment by smash — July 21, 2008 @ 1:54 pm

  117. He’s got a “website” at

    #117 | Comment by Will — July 22, 2008 @ 12:40 am

  118. Here are Josh Holly’s real myspace accts: 97752 <—- even left a pic up to see.

    He claims responsibility in the comments on this page: 93387

    Enjoy. Or, if you prefer to play with his little sister Sue, you can check out either of her myspace pages: 06717

    LMAO…he’s just an 18 yo skiddie who used to live in Nashville and moved down to Largo, FL. So much for discretion…he’s left one HUGE footprint out there

    #118 | Comment by thisisit — July 22, 2008 @ 8:11 pm

  119. Not true

    #119 | Comment by anon — July 23, 2008 @ 2:06 pm

  120. How’s having a MySpace and then taking credit for doing something leaving a “HUGE footprint”? Judging that every person who’s ever been through junior high has or has had a MySpace at one point, and judging that every person who ever hacks some likely-unencrypted personal computer or a highly-public mail server tells everyone they know that they pulled it off, it seems like he left just as much a footprint as anyone else would have.

    #120 | Comment by Tycho Brahe — July 23, 2008 @ 7:59 pm


    Anyone think she’s leaking them? The 6th pic is to die for…..evil thoughts

    #121 | Comment by Me Dammit — July 26, 2008 @ 6:13 pm

  122. Anyone else see the gaping hole(s) in this story?

    The Jonas Bros. are FAGGOTS.

    They’re more likely to get nekkid pics of Shia LaBoof then Cyrus.

    p.s. Naked Bros. are also queer. And gay.

    #122 | Comment by Casey Aldridge — July 28, 2008 @ 10:41 pm

  123. hmmm no pics yet? ):

    #123 | Comment by Ra — July 29, 2008 @ 12:57 am

  124. I’d post the link if I weren’t so lazy, but trainreq on the digitalgangster forum said he’ll release the other pics on july 31st or august 1st.

    not sure if they’re anything like what’s described above though

    #124 | Comment by chris — July 29, 2008 @ 3:53 pm

  125. Well, if she really wants to bust out the nudity then Heff’s waiting.

    With a $1,000,000 check and spread for when she turns 18.

    #125 | Comment by foo — July 29, 2008 @ 8:23 pm

  126. MIley does not need Hef’s money. Not now and not when she turns 18. She made $18 Million last year. She can do it for free.
    For those who think Miley’s shower pictures, if they exist, would be pornographic. In major bookstores, at least in NYC, you can buy two books by Jock Sturges, published by Aperture, that picture photographs of nude young girls, most of them considerably younger than 15. They do not wear T-shirts, dry or wet. And, yes, they depict – to use the current popular term – full frontal nudity.
    You will find the books not under the counter but on the shelves in the art section. Because they are quite legal.

    #126 | Comment by Andre — July 29, 2008 @ 11:02 pm

  127. Hef is always offering a million dollars to the hottest young starlet that comes out. It’s like he doesn’t realize they are making millions on their own. It’s not the sixties anymore, these actesses aren’t working for minimum-wage here. He’s as out of touch as Dr. Evil when he would ask for 1-million dollars. Come on Hef, step up to the big boy table and put up a sizable offer, you know you’ve got it. Let’s for once see one of these chicks naked when we care, and not 5 years past their expirary date. Which is what Playboy usually gets.

    Oh and when you do get them, don’t airbrush the fuck out of them either (unless they are 5 years past their expirary date).

    #127 | Comment by Evil Monkey — July 30, 2008 @ 2:19 am

  128. I think she is hot and I want to have sex with her!!

    #128 | Comment by Will Hirsch — November 9, 2008 @ 1:29 am

  129. forget this cunt she had her time bring on the naked pics of dakota and her sister
    its cherry popping time! we demand the tight ones

    #129 | Comment by lostboy — March 4, 2009 @ 6:09 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *