25 thoughts on “TheGammaddict on Amy’s posts

  1. Shy? What the fuck?

    That’s subtle, boy.

    #1 | Comment by Kingolf — October 3, 2003 @ 7:27 pm

  2. shy and kinky sounds hotter, though.

    #2 | Comment by lizzi — October 3, 2003 @ 10:29 pm

  3. i wish i was shy and kinky.

    no wait, that would be bad.

    #3 | Comment by Justin — October 3, 2003 @ 10:43 pm

  4. Is this guy reading the same posts as me?

    #4 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 3, 2003 @ 11:35 pm

  5. Heh.

    #5 | Comment by Amy — October 3, 2003 @ 11:56 pm

  6. weird that i found this site again. i was still checking on the old site. good to see you back justin. later

    #6 | Comment by uncle pauly — October 3, 2003 @ 11:58 pm

  7. I’ll have an order of Amy’s kinky shyness. Deep fried, golden and delicious, and oh-so-good.

    #7 | Comment by embus (manwhore) — October 4, 2003 @ 5:08 am

  8. Baked is healthier. Less calories, or something.

    #8 | Comment by Seriously — October 4, 2003 @ 9:40 am

  9. I’ll have an order of Amy’s shy kinkiness.

    #9 | Comment by grud — October 4, 2003 @ 12:04 pm

  10. ok. before you want it deep-fried, baked or sauteed – keep one thing in mind. There isn’t a full picture or amy anywhere on her site.

    I smell a schnauzer.

    #10 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 4, 2003 @ 1:06 pm

  11. Man. You are one funny "person". Golly.

    #11 | Comment by embus — October 4, 2003 @ 1:17 pm

  12. weasel — after I wrote this post, your first comment was something you imagined to be a clever response to my remark that my web host had gone down on me.

    And then you bitched twice that no one else credited your witty observation.

    What is so laughable about that is the fact that the innuendo was obviously deliberate. I had recognized the double entendre three separate times in the post. Hence, Seriously’s comment about the possiblity of some aspects being interpreted sexually. He was responding to my tongue-in-cheek comments with his tongue also in cheek. (His own, not mine. And not that cheek.)

    BUT, your much earlier instances that you have dated a lot of "hot chicks" (how you learned all about makeup and coloring) causes me to realize that I should pay attention to your schnauzer-by-scent detection method.

    And if you say so weasel … then *woof*, bitch. *woof*.

    #12 | Comment by Amy — October 4, 2003 @ 2:12 pm

  13. … and deep-fried sounds rather painful, but I’m already half-way to baked.

    #13 | Comment by Amy — October 4, 2003 @ 2:15 pm

  14. There actually was a picture of Amy on her website not too long ago. I thought the debate was actually whether she was "cute" or "pretty."

    #14 | Comment by Smartass — October 4, 2003 @ 2:16 pm

  15. "ok. before you want it deep-fried, baked or sauteed – keep one thing in mind. There isn’t a full picture or amy anywhere on her site.
    I smell a schnauzer.
    Posted by sexcrazedweasel – 1:06pm October 4, 2003"

    Alright, the idea was simply to ignore you so that you went away like the unliked ‘tard in grade school that you are, but…

    You retard. Apparently, you didn’t READ Amy’s website because the picture was there…if you read how to look for it.

    So to answer your last comment. How are you smelling schnauzzer? Or perhpas Amy needs a penis for you to find her appealing?

    #15 | Comment by smash — October 4, 2003 @ 2:37 pm

  16. amy. sorry for not recognizing your clever innuendo. I would argue that I must not have been alone, if there were two others that weren’t able to notice as well. Perhaps you should REALLY try to be obvious. Put up a poll, and lets see who "got it" and who "didn’t". In all honesty I would guess, most didn’t. The failure is yours. Not mine.

    Regardless, you couldn’t debate or argue your way out of a cardboard box. That’s a fact. I eat pseudo-intellectual lightweights like yourself for breakfast. I’d have to handicap my IQ to match your shoesize just to make it even.

    Of course, you’re too stupid to realize this. That seems to be the burden of the mentally handicapped.

    #16 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 4, 2003 @ 2:40 pm

  17. weasel — there is nothing more pseudo-intellectual then using the term "pseudo-intellectual". And it’s very silly that you think we’re debating.

    P.S. Don’t bother trying to find a picture. I took it down a couple days ago.

    #17 | Comment by Amy — October 4, 2003 @ 2:45 pm

  18. Smash. You fuckhead. I find reading Amy’s posts on THIS site to be unbearable. I think the last post alone is proof of that, and clearly I am not alone in this view. So asking me to read the musings of an imbecile is more torture than I can endure. I can’t even do it in order to appease your pathetic attempts to get into her pants. Hasn’t anyone ever taught you that you won’t get laid this way? It reeks of desperation.

    #18 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 4, 2003 @ 2:47 pm

  19. I find reading Amy’s posts on THIS site to be unbearable.

    Liar.

    You just want me to be more "obvious" so you can stroke yourself as you read me.

    #19 | Comment by Amy — October 4, 2003 @ 2:50 pm

  20. ROFL.

    Silly amy.

    Seeing your site once is more than enough. If you really think I would go there again you have to be deficient in more ways than I can count.

    I didn’t take the time to deconstruct any of your ridiculous posts. And I promise you won’t see me do so. Heck, I can’t even get trough half of them without falling asleep.

    #20 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 4, 2003 @ 2:52 pm

  21. Oh. And not having seen a pic of you I’d venture to say you’re caucasion, medium-length hair, medium-dark hair (not blond), and about a good 20 lbs. overweight. Right?

    Just a wild guess.

    #21 | Comment by sexcrazedweasel — October 4, 2003 @ 2:55 pm

  22. "Smash. You fuckhead. I find reading Amy’s posts on THIS site to be unbearable. I think the last post alone is proof of that, and clearly I am not alone in this view. So asking me to read the musings of an imbecile is more torture than I can endure. I can’t even do it in order to appease your pathetic attempts to get into her pants. Hasn’t anyone ever taught you that you won’t get laid this way? It reeks of desperation."

    So you are a liar, gay-Weasel? You find her posts unbearable, and yet every time you have the most comments to her. And you’ve been to her site enough to know that you couldn’t find a picture. But you claim to find her unbearable. Do you think about the things you say?

    I never made a comment one way or the other about the contents of Amy’s picture. So you are assuming some desperation on my behalf that is not there.

    In fact I stated back on Crystal’s last post, remember the one where you went on and on about how gay that you are? That I was no longer going to tell the women of fubar if they were attractive or not because I am not feeding their egos anymore.

    (That isn’t to say Amy isn’t attractive, it’s to say that I’m not going to tell her that, I’ll only make fun of her if she weren’t)

    #22 | Comment by smash — October 4, 2003 @ 3:14 pm

  23. Amy-

    Reread:
    "Oh. And not having seen a pic of you I’d venture to say you’re caucasion, medium-length hair, medium-dark hair (not blond), and about a good 20 lbs. overweight. Right?
    Just a wild guess.
    Posted by sexcrazedweasel – 2:55pm October 4, 2003"

    Please give him a picture. Can’t you tell he’s dying to give more fashion, lighting, and makeup advice.

    #23 | Comment by smash — October 4, 2003 @ 3:16 pm

  24. Vas?

    I count four pictures of Amy on her site, five if that’s her on the right corner of the banner. I searched exhaustively.

    #24 | Comment by Seriously — October 4, 2003 @ 11:09 pm

  25. Obligatory "sexcrazedweasel is gay" post.

    #25 | Comment by zant — October 5, 2003 @ 3:10 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *