Import "Ricers" vs. Old Skool Muscle

BlackMage · Post by **BlackMage** » 04 Mar 2006 06:48

Ah....such a fantasy shall never come true for me.

inplainview · Post by **inplainview** » 12 Mar 2006 13:55

JustSumDude wrote:I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all. Especially the interior. Hideous. The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though. I'd consider buying one.

mmm yeah you're right...

BUT the challenger DOESN'T improve upon the old style...

Good or Bad?

JustSumDude · Post by **JustSumDude** » 12 Mar 2006 14:23

inplainview wrote:Good or Bad?

Yeah, probably one of those two.

inplainview · Post by **inplainview** » 12 Mar 2006 14:37

JustSumDude wrote:
inplainview wrote:Good or Bad?

Yeah, probably one of those two.

*cough* one or the other...

Eamon Angelface · Post by **Eamon Angelface** » 14 Mar 2006 13:23

JustSumDude wrote:I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all. Especially the interior. Hideous. The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though. I'd consider buying one.

What's the difference between retro and "flashback"?

Not bein a dikhed, it just seems like the same thing to me.

JustSumDude · Post by **JustSumDude** » 15 Mar 2006 09:46

Eamon Angelface wrote:
JustSumDude wrote:I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all. Especially the interior. Hideous. The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though. I'd consider buying one.

What's the difference between retro and "flashback"?

Not bein a dikhed, it just seems like the same thing to me.

That's because, technically, it is the same thing. The Challenger bears a much stronger resemblance to the classic pony car designs of the sixties than any previous model "rebirths"... so I used what I felt was a stronger adjective, that's all.

steampunk · Post by **steampunk** » 16 Mar 2006 05:30

If you wanted a stronger adjective than "retro" or "flashback" you should've used "Smash-like". :ph34r:

JustSumDude · Post by **JustSumDude** » 16 Mar 2006 12:10

The "Smash is old" thing has been done to death. I quitter that joke.

Titleist · Post by **Titleist** » 16 Mar 2006 18:33

steampunk wrote:If you wanted a stronger adjective than "retro" or "flashback" you should've used "Smash-like". :ph34r:

JustSumDude wrote:The "Smash is old" thing has been done to death. I quitter that joke.

I'm turning 27 soon. You can use "Titleist".

steampunk · Post by **steampunk** » 19 Mar 2006 02:46

Titleist wrote:You can use "Titleist".

Is Dex through using you?

BlackMage · Post by **BlackMage** » 20 Mar 2006 09:19

Eamon Angelface wrote:
JustSumDude wrote:I don't like the look of the Camaro concept at all. Especially the interior. Hideous. The Challenger concept is more "flashback" than "retro"... I still like it, though. I'd consider buying one.

What's the difference between retro and "flashback"?

Not bein a dikhed, it just seems like the same thing to me.

I would actually equate it to this:
Flashback - within recent memory with little or no change.
Retro - older style with improvements to original design.

Eamon Angelface · Post by **Eamon Angelface** » 24 Mar 2006 01:50

Ah I see.

Well then I prefer retro cars.

thanks

UncleMao · Post by **UncleMao** » 31 Mar 2006 12:47

Bugatti Veyron > all.

Watch the "Top Gear" episode. You know it to be true.

Eamon Angelface · Post by **Eamon Angelface** » 01 Apr 2006 01:27

Well we weren't including supercars were we?

I've seen that new Bugatti in action and it's pretty cool.

Stepping into that range I'll go for style over function and say TVR Sagaris. Not as fast as the bigger balled Ferraris and what not but the best looking car around IMO.

</a> This one is a thumbnail.

inplainview · Post by **inplainview** » 17 Jul 2006 07:24

Muscle.

Not exotic.

PART OF THE BOARDS FORMERLY KNOWN AS TJNR

Import "Ricers" vs. Old Skool Muscle

Who is online