The burning question? No the OTHER burning question

eamon angelface · Post by **eamon angelface** » 30 Sep 2006 02:07

I'm pretty sure the answer is yes, but in case there is any doubt...

Post by **Seriously** » 02 Oct 2006 01:25

I'd actually thought I had.

Back in the day, maybe even a year or so ago, she had a personal picture that I (possibly foolishly) assumed was her, even though it was a picture of a girl without a shirt.

EDIT:

Ah,

So...I guess that's option 5?

eamon angelface · Post by **eamon angelface** » 02 Oct 2006 01:51

I don't think the topless girl in jeans picture was actually her.

Maybe I'm wrong? Or maybe all the people who voted option number 5 are?

Post by **Seriously** » 02 Oct 2006 01:54

Well, then

The Plot Thickens.

But I doubt it would make me post more.

Post by **smash** » 02 Oct 2006 05:50

Nope.

UncleMao · Post by **UncleMao** » 02 Oct 2006 13:43

At the moment, I can sleep fine without a picture of AngelBaby's testicles.

It is a MAN. And if it bleeds, we can kill it.

Whad Arrr Yooo waidin' Foooaaaaarrrrr???

Post by **Dex** » 02 Oct 2006 13:57

Nope.

Post by **AngelBaby** » 02 Oct 2006 14:55

UncleMao wrote:At the moment, I can sleep fine without a picture of AngelBaby's testicles.

just in case you get insomnia...

to bad yep to bad

UncleMao · Post by **UncleMao** » 02 Oct 2006 15:19

:O

Smash, I think your Christmas came early...

...erm.... twice.

Post by **smash** » 02 Oct 2006 20:21

those balls were blued

DLT FORUM

The burning question? No the OTHER burning question

Would you post more if you saw a real picture of Angelbaby?

The burning question? No the OTHER burning question

Who is online