DLT FORUM

What is the sound of one foot tapping?

All of you are still waiting on pictures of barely legal lesbians, aren't you?

Yeah, you are. Perverts.

Well, I don't have access to their Myspaces, or Facepages, or Googles.
And I don't know whether I should post pictures of them up.

It's a weird moral line. Should I? Shouldn't I?

Seriously, you are wise and full of knowledge in philosophy and morality like Buddha, or Lennon, or even Lenin. What say you in the field of lesbians and picture posting?

I say let the publication of rug-munching commence post-haste.

Let nipples be licked by the deft touch of a young female tounge.

May the soft inner-thighs be carrassed by the index finger of an innocent jailbait.

No uggo's, fatties or hairy's or ye be castrated by The Deadly Superman's snot lasers.

When posting something 'dodgy' on a forum I always go by what the moderators/admins say.
None have said not to post it so i think you should.
Angelbaby has said post it so I think you have no choice!! - you should get penialised for not obeying an admin's command.

Angelbaby says yes, and Seriously say no*.

*I do know them personally. They are acquaintances; my girlfriend's friend, and my girlfriend's other friend's girlfriend**.

**(I had originally wrote this sentence "one being a friend of my girlfriend, and one being a girlfriend of a friend of my girlfriend. " but I decided that wording was too confusing after I confused myself for a moment.)

I hang out with 3 or 4 other lesbians too, but they aren't hot, so I wouldn't have bothered posting pictures of them anyway.


I find it odd that this thread all started because I wanted my own section like Seriously has, and now it is now everyone else who wants something from me.

The irony is not lost on me. Oh no, not at all.

If it helps...try pretending they've both wronged you in some way. Like made out with your girlfriend in secret so you don't insist on a 3 way.

Like what Angelbaby does.

I decided that this thread was slipping too far down the list. So I decided to make a worthless post.


So...um...So....I hope ya like it!

Indeed.

I still want my own thread.

I could do so much better than Seriously.

I said it!

Start your own.

But I don't have megahertz powurz.

The Deadly Superman wrote:Indeed.

I still want my own thread.

I could do so much better than Seriously.

I said it!

You mean forum. I think we should each have a forum where we can administrate. I think it would get a little crazy though

I think we're using words, and while our words have a meaning to us, the other has a different meaning in mind of the words the other is using, meaning our meaning isn't their meaning, which causes us to misinterpret what the other means by the words they use, you know what I mean?

To put it into a sentence that is comprehensible, I was using the word "thread", but what I meant was forum, yes. I want my own forum.

However, this leaves the question in my mind of what exactly is "thread" a synonym for, in the hierarchy of forums?

In the Forums hierarchy, (I'm talking of course about the actual structure of the Forums, not any kind of social heirarchy, which was ever-so-present and cliquish in that other Forums. You know the one. Yes, that one. Let us not speak any long of such things.) there's the Forums itself (in this case, Dont Link This Forums), and then there's the Categories..Fuck it, I'll put it in list form.


Forums (Dont Link This)
Category ( General Discussion, On Topic, Eye Candy)
Forum (Talk, Seriously, etc.)
Topic

Is a "thread" an individual topic? I'm guessing it's the individual topics. I thought that at some point, but then Seriously's sticky "Seriously starts a thread!" made me start to think it was on the Forum level (see list: 3rd one down)