Fill in the blank!

This is where all the posts that appeared on the old front page (June '04 - January '05) are stored (back when the site was run using IPB Portal).
Post Reply
AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 08:27

sheepdog wrote:
AngelBaby wrote: <span style='color:blue'>And neither can you apparently, since this represents your third answer to a single question.

Wait a sec... John Kerry? Is that you??</span>
Thank you, Miss, for proving my point. Not only have I not answered the question three times, but rather five, but any dolt with basic reading comprehension skills can see that no limit on the number of times one can play the fill in the blank game was given. Now if only you possessed the ability to write in sentence form and follow directions, you might figure out how the game works, and actually fill in the fucking blank in your post. Same goes for bw25.




disrupting the balance of power and in US politics in an attempt to push it into a one-party system as seen in Mexico in the latter part of the 20th century.



(To help with your counting, AngelBaby, that was blank-filled-in number six)
<span style='color:blue'>Sorry, I wasn't really paying that close attention to your whiny attempts to spew your liberal bile in this thread. Call it a case of mind over matter. See, I don't mind, because you don't matter.

Thank God we gained independence from you limey, tea-sipping ponces two centuries ago, or we might be as pathetically fucked-up and irrelevant as your little island.

Cheers! :P </span>

shiftomnimega
Posts: 21
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 21:36
Location: Virginia

Post by shiftomnimega » 04 Nov 2004 08:27

sheepdog wrote: disrupting the balance of power and in US politics in an attempt to push it into a one-party system as seen in Mexico in the latter part of the 20th century.
I think that's a being a little too rash. The Democratic party is the oldest party in the world and it will have its down moments *points to post-reconstruction*.

The success of the US governmental system can be highly attributed to our two party system. I doubt that the American people will let it die.

User avatar
Justin
Posts: 1228
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 09:19
Location: Brunei
Contact:

Post by Justin » 04 Nov 2004 08:28

AngelBaby wrote:
bw25 wrote:
shiftomnimega wrote: He's British, dude.
Even worse!
<span style='color:blue'>BWAHAHAHAHAHA!! :lol:

Now I really feel sorry for the poor bastard! :) </span>
<a href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections20 ... 58,00.html' target='_blank'>poor brits</a> =(

joemizzle
Posts: 63
Joined: 05 Jul 2004 16:52

Post by joemizzle » 04 Nov 2004 08:28

responsible for the following:

Watching Social Security disappear, a re-institution of the draft, the deficit getting so bad foreign countries will start calling in their notes, homelessness and poverty increasing, a never-ending state of war, further erosion of the bill of
rights, the environment continually being ignored, Roe v Wade eventually being overturned... Other than a complete rollback of the last 75 years or so of progress, things will probably be real peachy!!

Praise the Lord!

Thanks Bush voters! :superangry:

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 08:29

WP_LeGeNd wrote: Americans... plain and simple. everybody knows that americans are ignorant. this is just proof.
<span style='color:blue'>Funny, everybody here in the States knows that the rest of you are just desperately jealous you weren't born here... B) </span>

bw25
Posts: 12
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 10:15

Post by bw25 » 04 Nov 2004 08:30

shiftomnimega wrote: I think that's a being a little too rash.  The Democratic party is the oldest party in the world and it will have its down moments *points to post-reconstruction*.

The success of the US governmental system can be highly attributed to our two party system.  I doubt that the American people will let it die.
Nicely put, but I'd also like to add that the democratic party of today is definitely not the democratic party it used to be. Look at democrats like FDR and JFK, they are nothing like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, or Tom Daschle.

The system has worked great for us so far, it won't fail us now. God bless America.

efilflah
Posts: 119
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 21:15

Post by efilflah » 04 Nov 2004 08:31

AAAHAHAHA, you sir, are an IDIOT

If we believed the media, we'd all be super crazy left wing radicals.
I'm british too so I could give a fuck tbh, but you sir are an idiot for thinking that the media promoted just Kerry...the media spread the FEAR that gets all you complete retards voting for a texas redneck who would have you believe there is a network of terrorist sleeper agents that are waiting to strike. Al Qaeda is made up of speculation, hell, even usama bin laden didn't even start referring to this network until after the government had planted the seeds. In short, the media do what they are told. Use yer fucking brain, you inbred mongoloid.

**sorry for thread hijack**
Last edited by efilflah on 04 Nov 2004 08:32, edited 1 time in total.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 08:32

Justin wrote:
AngelBaby wrote:
bw25 wrote: Even worse!
<span style='color:blue'>BWAHAHAHAHAHA!! :lol:

Now I really feel sorry for the poor bastard! :) </span>
<a href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections20 ... 58,00.html' target='_blank'>poor brits</a> =(
<span style='color:blue'>That link is AWESOME!

Probably goes a long way toward explaining why Ohio went for Bush. It seems I owe you Brits an apology and a vote of thanks... Now go get your fucking teeth fixed! :lol: </span>

shiftomnimega
Posts: 21
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 21:36
Location: Virginia

Post by shiftomnimega » 04 Nov 2004 08:32

I just don't get this draft BS. Why is everyone so concerned about this? There always was a draft available to the President. Men, remember those selective service cards you had to fill out?

Do you all think the Commander in Chief can just inact this draft without at least running it by Congress? Call your congressman, write him, SUCK HIS COCK, do something instead of whining on forums so that your ass don't get drafted... if it even comes to that.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 08:34

joemizzle wrote: responsible for the following:

Watching Social Security disappear, a re-institution of the draft, the deficit getting so bad foreign countries will start calling in their notes, homelessness and poverty increasing, a never-ending state of war, further erosion of the bill of
rights, the environment continually being ignored, Roe v Wade eventually being overturned...  Other than a complete rollback of the last 75 years or so of progress, things will probably be real peachy!!

Praise the Lord!

Thanks Bush voters! :superangry:
<span style='color:blue'>OMG...did you get all the liberal conspiracies in that one post, loser?

Wait a sec... Michael Moore? Is that you?? :rolleyes: </span>

dogolopee
Posts: 44
Joined: 22 Jun 2004 12:22
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Post by dogolopee » 04 Nov 2004 08:39

Justin wrote: Bush won. Americans who voted for him are _______________.
choosing the lesser of two evils


At least it wasn't republicans that pushed for a draft. It was two democratic senators that lost horribly.
On October 5, 2004, the House of Representatives voted 402 - 2 to defeat H.R. 163, the bill cited as proof that the Selective Service was preparing to reinstate a military draft. The vote made official what has been a reality since January 7, 2003, when H.R. 163 was introduced despite nearly total opposition in Congress to restoring the draft. Without Congressional support, the draft cannot be reinstated. A similar bill languishes in the Senate.

Mr. Buttfister
Posts: 49
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 05:33
Location: DFW, TX

Post by Mr. Buttfister » 04 Nov 2004 08:43

uninformed, misled, doped up, afraid, and hopeless...

no wonder the weather is shitty and cold in TX.

sheepdog
Posts: 125
Joined: 11 Sep 2004 07:01

Post by sheepdog » 04 Nov 2004 08:44

AngelBaby wrote: <span style='color:blue'>
Thank God we gained independence from you limey, tea-sipping ponces two centuries ago, or we might be as pathetically fucked-up and irrelevant as your little island.

Cheers! :P </span>
Yup, that's right, I'm a limey tea-sipping ponce from the fucked-up irrelevant little island of... OHIO, for which I cast my vote for Kerry. The UK is where I currently am, not my home.

Go two posts without being either wrong or stupid, I dare you. I bet you can't.





religious morons trying to get the 'End of Days' to come faster.


(and that's number seven)
Last edited by sheepdog on 04 Nov 2004 08:44, edited 1 time in total.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 08:44

Mr. Buttfister wrote: uninformed, misled, doped up, afraid, and hopeless...

no wonder the weather is shitty and cold in TX.
<span style='color:blue'>Gee...bitter much? ;) </span>

shiftomnimega
Posts: 21
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 21:36
Location: Virginia

Post by shiftomnimega » 04 Nov 2004 08:47

sheepdog wrote: The UK is where I currently am, not my home.
Actually that's my fault, I made the poor assumption that you were a brit.

I'm sorry :cry:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 8 guests