Fill in the blank!

This is where all the posts that appeared on the old front page (June '04 - January '05) are stored (back when the site was run using IPB Portal).
Post Reply
AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 16:32

MathGuy wrote:
Justin wrote: Bush won. Americans who voted for him are _______________.
Self-righteous, convinced that they, and they alone, know the truth, (whatever the truth happens to be to them), feel that the loss of personal freedoms is a viable price to pay for the protection of personal freedoms(I don't understand that one), view people who exercise the American right to speak against the president as un-American, and don’t seem to realize that Hitler was elected in by a majority vote.
<span style='color:blue'>You wanna know what the truth is to me? The truth is my guy won, your guy lost. Now suck it up, walk it off, get over it, grow up and move the fuck on...or move to Canada, whichever.

Oh, and your characterization of Bush voters as "self-righteous" is absolutely laughable. Pot. Kettle. Black. Not too far above your enlightening post is one that pretty much sums up the view of Middle America by the smug, elitist pricks in New York and California who pinned their hopes on a complete loser with nothing to run on except the fact that he wasn't Bush:

"Jesus-fucking morons who live in rural Nowhere, USA whose ill-informed vote will only affect us in urban America when our jobs continue to disappear and terrorists attack our citizens and blow up our buildings."

Very nice. And pretty much the definition of self-righteous if I ever saw it. Those of us blessed enough to live in NYC and LA know everything about everything, and the rest of you out there in the sticks are just ignorant rednecks who shouldn't even be allowed to vote. Well, perhaps if the so-called leadership of the crumbling Democrat party didn't also think this way they wouldn't have seen their Great White Dope get his ass handed to him by a 3.5 million vote margin... <_< </span>

MathGuy
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 15:47
Location: somewhere between the ninth ring of Hell, and seventh Heaven

Post by MathGuy » 04 Nov 2004 16:43

AngelBaby wrote:
MathGuy wrote:
Justin wrote: Bush won. Americans who voted for him are _______________.
Self-righteous, convinced that they, and they alone, know the truth, (whatever the truth happens to be to them), feel that the loss of personal freedoms is a viable price to pay for the protection of personal freedoms(I don't understand that one), view people who exercise the American right to speak against the president as un-American, and don’t seem to realize that Hitler was elected in by a majority vote.
<span style='color:blue'>You wanna know what the truth is to me? The truth is my guy won, your guy lost. Now suck it up, walk it off, get over it, grow up and move the fuck on...or move to Canada, whichever.

Oh, and your characterization of Bush voters as "self-righteous" is absolutely laughable. Pot. Kettle. Black. Not too far above your enlightening post is one that pretty much sums up the view of Middle America by the smug, elitist pricks in New York and California who pinned their hopes on a complete loser with nothing to run on except the fact that he wasn't Bush:

"Jesus-fucking morons who live in rural Nowhere, USA whose ill-informed vote will only affect us in urban America when our jobs continue to disappear and terrorists attack our citizens and blow up our buildings."

Very nice. And pretty much the definition of self-righteous if I ever saw it. Those of us blessed enough to live in NYC and LA know everything about everything, and the rest of you out there in the sticks are just ignorant rednecks who shouldn't even be allowed to vote. Well, perhaps if the so-called leadership of the crumbling Democrat party didn't also think this way they wouldn't have seen their Great White Dope get his ass handed to him by a 3.5 million vote margin... <_< </span>
No self righteousness there. And I refer you to my comment on the truth.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 16:45

deadmeat wrote:
AngelBaby wrote:
its cold wrote: the ones that would likely not be able to beat him at Scrabble.

Liberal media? Here I was, a stupid Canadian, under the impression that every single member of the FoxNews staff was fed and sustained (whether literally or figuratively) by Bush' excrement.
<span style='color:blue'>Hey stupid Canadian? Don't you have some hockey or something you could be watching on TV? Oh, that's right...we took that away from you along with every other facet of your pussy nation's manhood. Now go bake me a quiche or something you little he-bitch... :P </span>
Will some one please shut this cunt up..
<span style='color:blue'>Don't whine about me to other people...step up and do something about it yourself, asshole. :veryangry: </span>

MathGuy
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 15:47
Location: somewhere between the ninth ring of Hell, and seventh Heaven

Post by MathGuy » 04 Nov 2004 16:47

I love how political debates turn immediately to mudslinging.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 16:48

MathGuy wrote: I love how political debates turn immediately to mudslinging.
<span style='color:blue'>Yeah, cause God knows YOU sure haven't stooped to that... :rolleyes: </span>

MathGuy
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 15:47
Location: somewhere between the ninth ring of Hell, and seventh Heaven

Post by MathGuy » 04 Nov 2004 16:50

AngelBaby wrote:
MathGuy wrote: I love how political debates turn immediately to mudslinging.
<span style='color:blue'>Yeah, cause God knows YOU sure haven't stooped to that... :rolleyes: </span>
LOL-- oh noooooooo, not me! hehehehehehe

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 16:54

ruprechtjones wrote:
AngelBaby wrote:<span style='color:blue'>...I LIVE IN GEORGIA YOU RETARDED ASS-RAMMING COCK-MASTER! :veryangry: </span>
...That explains so much. How's your uncle... er, husband doing these days?
<span style='color:blue'>And where might you live, you stereotyping coward? <_<

P.S. Don't you know us dumb Southern girls marry our brothers, not our uncles? Idiot...</span>
Last edited by AngelBaby on 04 Nov 2004 16:56, edited 1 time in total.

zorq
Posts: 4
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 16:47

Post by zorq » 04 Nov 2004 17:02

bw25 wrote:
A little over 1,000 people have been killed in the war on terror.  Around 3000 innocent Americans died in one day from terrorist attacks (9/11).  We've freed around 50,000,000 people who are holding their own democratic elections.  In Vietnam around 200 people died A DAY.  Shut your hole, you got owned.
Get real, more than 100,000 Iraqi civilians have been killed in Iraq thanks to the US invasion. The United States visited what amounts to the fatalities of thirty three 9/11 attacks on a country with the population less than that of the state of Texas.

Think about that. 33 September 11'th attacks hitting Texas. You think that might piss some people off?
You think that half of those 100,000 people weren't women and children?

All hail the MORAL choice. The one who conned his constituents into supporting the deaths of one hundred thousand innocents.


<a href='http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996596' target='_blank'>Link</a>



(fill in the blank)
... are willfully ignorant.

MathGuy
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 15:47
Location: somewhere between the ninth ring of Hell, and seventh Heaven

Post by MathGuy » 04 Nov 2004 17:03

The one I heard was that a southerner could show you a picture of his aunt, his mom, and his sister, and there would only be one person in the picture.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 17:10

MathGuy wrote: The one I heard was that a southerner could show you a picture of his aunt, his mom, and his sister, and there would only be one person in the picture.
<span style='color:blue'>Oh, now come on, MathGeek...I know you can't be THAT stupid. Even with the massive inbreeding down here, how could someone have ONE person as their mother AND sister? Think about that one for a little bit before you answer... ;) </span>

MathGuy
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 15:47
Location: somewhere between the ninth ring of Hell, and seventh Heaven

Post by MathGuy » 04 Nov 2004 17:14

if their father fucked thier mother, who was really the father's daughter, then that person's mother would also be his half-sister from his father side.

zorq
Posts: 4
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 16:47

Post by zorq » 04 Nov 2004 17:16

AngelBaby wrote:
MathGuy wrote: The one I heard was that a southerner could show you a picture of his aunt, his mom, and his sister, and there would only be one person in the picture.
<span style='color:blue'>Oh, now come on, MathGeek...I know you can't be THAT stupid. Even with the massive inbreeding down here, how could someone have ONE person as their mother AND sister? Think about that one for a little bit before you answer... ;) </span>
Easy, your father marries his daughter, your sister.

Or you (male) mary your mother who was in turn the child of your father.

She is now your sister (Through your father), your mother, and your wife.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 17:16

MathGuy wrote: if their father fucked thier mother, who was really the father's daughter, then that person's mother would also be his half-sister from his father side.
<span style='color:blue'>Wow, you're really good at that. You sure you're not from around these parts? :P </span>

MathGuy
Posts: 15
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 15:47
Location: somewhere between the ninth ring of Hell, and seventh Heaven

Post by MathGuy » 04 Nov 2004 17:18

AngelBaby wrote:
MathGuy wrote: if their father fucked thier mother, who was really the father's daughter, then that person's mother would also be his half-sister from his father side.
<span style='color:blue'>Wow, you're really good at that. You sure you're not from around these parts? :P </span>
I was born a Texan, I'll die a Texan, and in-between I'll live in Texas.

AngelBaby
Posts: 556
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 11:36
Location: Cloud 9
Contact:

Post by AngelBaby » 04 Nov 2004 17:19

zorq wrote:
AngelBaby wrote:
MathGuy wrote: The one I heard was that a southerner could show you a picture of his aunt, his mom, and his sister, and there would only be one person in the picture.
<span style='color:blue'>Oh, now come on, MathGeek...I know you can't be THAT stupid. Even with the massive inbreeding down here, how could someone have ONE person as their mother AND sister? Think about that one for a little bit before you answer... ;) </span>
Easy, your father marries his daughter, your sister.

Or you (male) mary your mother who was in turn the child of your father.

She is now your sister (Through your father), your mother, and your wife.
<span style='color:blue'>I'm talking BIOLOGICAL mother here, dummy. Now, explain to me how a male child can have the same woman as his mother and sister by blood... :huh:

On second hand, you know what? Don't explain it to me, I'm proud not to be able to figure shit like that out. Some of you are scaring me with the ease at which you can determine such things... :o</span>
Last edited by AngelBaby on 04 Nov 2004 17:22, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests