31 thoughts on “Hi Res Charlize Theron”

  1. Dude. She’s like. Pretty and stuff. But the thing is. She’s one of those girls who knows it. I don’t like those girls.

    #1 | Comment by JC — January 28, 2004 @ 2:24 am

  2. A Monster? Bwa-ha…! Oh, dude, that’s funny. Or maybe it’s not, because it took like five minutes for that picture to download. Just, please, no pictures of Cate Blanchett. She looked scary for some reason, other than because she’s pregnant.

    #2 | Comment by Umgawa — January 28, 2004 @ 2:27 am

  3. Dude, how could you not like Charlize Theron? I mean, just the movie 2 Days in the Valley should put her on the Top Five list. And, if you haven’t seen it, I’ve got four words for you: Catfight With Teri Hatcher.

    #3 | Comment by Umgawa — January 28, 2004 @ 2:29 am

  4. Girls who know they’re hot think they’re the shit. I like my girls humble pie.

    #4 | Comment by JC — January 28, 2004 @ 3:01 am

  5. Yuck. I do not like her.

    #5 | Comment by kinkiekitten — January 28, 2004 @ 3:41 am

  6. Charlize has a nice face and ass.

    Am I alone in thinking the likes of Brittany Murphy and Lara Flynn Boyle resmble Max Hardcore girls? Between the crazy eyes and anoxeric frames. Max makes some twisted videos:
    http://www.maxhardcore.com/index2.html

    #6 | Comment by yayo — January 28, 2004 @ 3:47 am

  7. I meant anorexic.

    #7 | Comment by yayo — January 28, 2004 @ 3:49 am

  8. and resemble

    #8 | Comment by yayo — January 28, 2004 @ 3:50 am

  9. no need to bother having a fap there ..

    #9 | Comment by Josh — January 28, 2004 @ 5:27 am

  10. I think shes fugly. Justin enough posting fugly women get back to the decent stuff. We want airbrushed non-pore shots! We don’t want to see some bitch that looks 35 holding a hunk of plated gold thinking shes the shit with big ass ugly moles all over her! AIRBRUSH I SAY.

    #10 | Comment by Dom — January 28, 2004 @ 7:16 am

  11. shes pretty…

    but seriously – does anyone know if this is real or not?
    http://fun.from.hell.pl/2004-01-14/britney_gilette.jpg

    #11 | Comment by NGEddie — January 28, 2004 @ 9:31 am

  12. Completely fake, you were joking about wanting to know right?

    #12 | Comment by Opfrion — January 28, 2004 @ 9:34 am

  13. i love this site. but why the hell does every posted picture come up to a page that says file not found? hook a cowboy up.

    #13 | Comment by farmboy — January 28, 2004 @ 10:30 am

  14. how is she ugly? she’s hot and imho, the pics dont really do her justice. she was hot in movies like "italian job" and especially in "the devil’s advodcate"…

    #14 | Comment by william — January 28, 2004 @ 10:44 am

  15. Dude! I just saw Monster last night. How did they manage to make such a hottie, as Charlize Theron, look so haggard??? btw, don’t go see Monster, it sucked donkey dick.

    #15 | Comment by Chief Barley — January 28, 2004 @ 11:19 am

  16. Pores rock the Casba!

    #16 | Comment by bligityblah — January 28, 2004 @ 11:19 am

  17. All the hype I’ve heard concerning Monster pertained to the new Ricci nude scenes. From what I’ve seen, they are quite lacking in comparison to the shots from Prozac Nation. I think I’d rather watch my PN files than sit through Monster.

    #17 | Comment by Kei — January 28, 2004 @ 11:40 am

  18. farmboy, what browser and OS are you using?

    #18 | Comment by pottedmeat — January 28, 2004 @ 11:44 am

  19. NGEddie, from what i hear the pic is real.

    #19 | Comment by Azrael — January 28, 2004 @ 11:56 am

  20. its fake. I’ve seen the original before, and all someone did was add in a little bush. When i find the original, i’ll post the link.

    #20 | Comment by kvl — January 28, 2004 @ 12:06 pm

  21. Oh. I get it. Cuz she was in the movie titled "monster". Can I steal that joke, Justin?

    #21 | Comment by Dex — January 28, 2004 @ 12:43 pm

  22. she’s so gorgeous ::swoon::

    #22 | Comment by stacia — January 28, 2004 @ 1:08 pm

  23. Wow.

    Not much has changed while I was gone…Justin can still be counted on for high res gawking. 😉

    #23 | Comment by RedEye — January 28, 2004 @ 1:51 pm

  24. test

    #24 | Comment by trenchman — January 28, 2004 @ 3:58 pm

  25. Someone is trying to kill his bandwidth so he doesn’t have to post over the weekend me thinks!

    #25 | Comment by bligityblah — January 28, 2004 @ 4:00 pm

  26. does anyone remember seeing uma thurman at the oscars last year? i don’t know how she deos it but she can make her boobs look huuge at award shows, same with this year at the globes.

    #26 | Comment by justin2 — January 28, 2004 @ 4:12 pm

  27. Now all we need is the Donna D’Errico sex tape

    #27 | Comment by tyreas — January 28, 2004 @ 4:16 pm

  28. Award show pics suck. they always where too much shiny crap.

    #28 | Comment by Dio — January 28, 2004 @ 4:42 pm

  29. **Now all we need is the Donna D’Errico sex tape**

    In the unlikely case that wasn’t joke:

    http://www.comicbookthemovie.com/donnavid2.shtml

    It’s supposed to be a gag, in case you have yet to be informed. You might chuckle once or twice watching it.

    #29 | Comment by Kei — January 28, 2004 @ 4:52 pm

  30. With those fucking shoulders she could play prop. Jesus! If she put on a bit of weight and did some training she’d be a damn good footballer with her build.

    #30 | Comment by Dom — January 28, 2004 @ 5:20 pm

  31. Was indeed a joke 🙂

    #31 | Comment by tyreas — January 28, 2004 @ 6:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *