“Anyone who loves Lacey had also better love Trachtenberg, because they are basically the same chick.” – nerima
SURELY YOU JEST!!!!!!
Michelle ‘Clownface’ Tractenbusted is NOTHING compared to the oh so lovely oh SO fetch! Lacey “Sha-bear”.
Observe! Look at that! Michelle has a face only a carnie could love!


And you know it!
I’d hit it? First.
#1 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 12:21 am
i’d chop off its head first.
then i’d hit it.
#2 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 12:24 am
Well yeah thats what I meant.
Worthy of a donkey punch!
#3 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 12:26 am
Michelle Tractenberg is very very ugly.
Lacey Chabert is very very hot.
I don’t like shoes.
#4 | Comment by The Deadly Superman — June 8, 2005 @ 12:27 am
Oh, Sorry for double posting, but isn’t the “>” the wrong way?
#5 | Comment by The Deadly Superman — June 8, 2005 @ 12:28 am
exactly what I was about to say…
#6 | Comment by Sentinel — June 8, 2005 @ 12:33 am
curses!!!!!
in my clownface induced rage, i got the > all wrong!
#7 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 12:42 am
Don’t worry, the logical operator is relative.
So long as Clownface gets the pointy side then ClownfaceClownface (Sha-bear is greater than Clownface).
Trust me, I’m a nerdy scientist.
#8 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 1:04 am
Oh, Sorry for double posting, but that comment made no sense. Message got parsed for HTML tags or something. Second attempt:
Sha-bear > Clownface (Sha-bear is greater than Clownface)
means the same as
Clownface
#9 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 1:09 am
Bugger.
Clownface is less than Sha-bear:
Clownface < Sha-bear
#10 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 1:13 am
Both are ugly.
Girls have cooties.
#11 | Comment by Dex — June 8, 2005 @ 1:27 am
You’re skewing the evidence!
See, I can make one look hotter than the other too!
#12 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 1:33 am
Page cannot be found
#13 | Comment by V Chip — June 8, 2005 @ 2:09 am
Oh poot Should be
Page cannot be found < The Other
And if that doesn’t work,
Page cannot be found IS LESS THAN The Other
#14 | Comment by V Chip — June 8, 2005 @ 2:11 am
you sooooo fail at math and html. Try > or <. Not only that, but i can see the damn pics! you fail at posting 🙁
#15 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 2:11 am
Fuckity fuck fuck fuck!
#16 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 2:12 am
and it seems i fail at english, i meant “i can’t see the damn pics”
#17 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 2:13 am
pale = ugly
#18 | Comment by zecchino — June 8, 2005 @ 2:18 am
Chabes is getting too tan and so will look like a handbag pretty soon. Trachy looks too pale so will look like Michael Jackson soon.
I’d go for both of them depending on the lighting conditions.
#19 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — June 8, 2005 @ 3:04 am
they all look same to me!
#20 | Comment by WP_LeGeNd — June 8, 2005 @ 3:04 am
This whole post is based on a dirty lie.
#21 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 8, 2005 @ 4:39 am
I’d lick the sweat between sha-bears puppies. And trachktenburg can lick the sweat between my buns! 😮
#22 | Comment by devnull — June 8, 2005 @ 5:19 am
For once I agree with Justin
Chabert is the hot. I’d definitely hit it.
#23 | Comment by smash — June 8, 2005 @ 5:23 am
due to my perverted intentions and the fact it wont be happening any time soon, i would tap em both, at the same time- with brook burke also, in a panda pit..
#24 | Comment by Mr_SaMSA — June 8, 2005 @ 5:44 am
Hey, Carnies are nice people too.
*Did someone confirm if Trachenberg has two Toes yet?
#25 | Comment by Crackpot Live — June 8, 2005 @ 6:23 am
I beg to differ but imho Michelle > Lacey. Both are hot but Lacey has a little bit of a horsey face.
clownface > horseface
#26 | Comment by kiko — June 8, 2005 @ 6:27 am
I must be a carnie then, because I’d go with Trachtenberg.
#27 | Comment by Will — June 8, 2005 @ 6:40 am
#26 & #27 wtfmates! you’re both deluded!!!
#28 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 6:40 am
26 + 27 > 28
#29 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 8, 2005 @ 8:05 am
Trachtenberg allowed bikini shots and extreme closeups of her ass in “Road Trip.” She is all about full disclosure.
What are you hiding, She-Bear?
#30 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 8:22 am
!!!!!
It’s pronounced “SHA-BEAR”!!!
#31 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 9:04 am
michelle is quite hot, she’s just got bad taste in clothes. That’s probably the ugliest dress i’ve seen all year, i thought you were supposed to walk over the red carpet, not wear it and those shoes… good god! * shakes head *
ps: this form needs a “preview” button
#32 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 9:13 am
geek fact:
if you disable referrer on firefox (see about:config, network.http.sendRefererHeader), wordpress goes stupid on you after posting comments (ie: it will stop loading and leave you stuck on something-post.php).
what a dumb
#33 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 9:17 am
#32 – You’d better either be female or homosexual, because you’re critiquing dresses and shoes.
#34 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 9:27 am
Emma Watson in 3 years>ALL
#35 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 9:31 am
and you know emma will get naked too someday. she’s british!!!!!
#36 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 9:57 am
I love me some british!
#37 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 10:02 am
I saw some shot of clowngrill/girl and she looked exactly like Scarlett Johansson (sp). I was pretty shocked, because normally I’d say ‘I’d spank it like a bad stepchild” after saying, “ew, she’s so fuckin’ clownfaced, but ya know what? I’d hit it.” Lacey = teh hotness ya suckas
The chef is very, very stoned
#38 | Comment by TheChef — June 8, 2005 @ 10:53 am
stoned chef > sha-bear > trachtenberg
#39 | Comment by turtle — June 8, 2005 @ 11:11 am
You see this? Hahahaha!
http://unitedstatesofno.ytmnd.com/
#40 | Comment by TheChef — June 8, 2005 @ 1:22 pm
Michelle is ug in the face!
#41 | Comment by sammy — June 8, 2005 @ 2:39 pm
#32 is right… about needing a ‘preview’ button 😉
I wouldn’t show this to little children.
#42 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 3:56 pm
My heart hates uggos.
#43 | Comment by JustSumDude — June 8, 2005 @ 4:26 pm
#29 > Michelle > Lacey
#44 | Comment by kiko — June 9, 2005 @ 7:03 am
Go on its really good http://manprison.servik.com
#45 | Comment by prison horror stories — December 19, 2005 @ 8:35 am
Funny, interresting, nice, … this is your blog http://doctorhorny.servik.com
#46 | Comment by digital rectal exam pics — December 21, 2005 @ 5:12 am