ZOMG!!!!! SCARLETT!!!! NO!!!!!


What the……


More pictures here.


SCARLETT JOHANSSON’s trip to California theme park Disneyland ended in disaster yesterday afternoon (19AUG05), when her Mercedes hit another car as the paparazzi chased her.

According to eyewitnesses, the LOST IN TRANSLATION beauty was driving near the tourist attraction’s entrance with two pals, when she swerved to get away from pursuing photographers and hit another vehicle containing a woman and her two young daughters.

An onlooker says, “The front of Scarlett’s Mercedes damaged the side of the other car pretty badly.

“Scarlett looked really shaken up and when both cars pulled over in a safe spot, she apologised profusely to the other woman. After that, they spent around 40 minutes on their phones, sorting out all of their insurance and legal paperwork.”

A Mercedes representative arrived soon afterwards with a new car for the actress to drive home.

Johansson’s publicist MARCEL PARISEAU states, “The fender bender was induced by the paparazzi, who chased her for 45 minutes.”

In June (05), fellow Hollywood actress LINDSAY LOHAN was leftwith minor injuries after photographer GALO RAMIREZ allegedly drove into her car deliberately. Ramirez was subsequently arrested on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon. The case is pending.

And just last week (ends12AUG05), REESE WITHERSPOON got the disappointing news that a group of paparazzi who “besieged” her in April (05) will not face criminal charges of false imprisonment.

15 thoughts on “ZOMG!!!!! SCARLETT!!!! NO!!!!!

  1. So? Am I supposed to care that an overrated actress was in a fender bender?

    #1 | Comment by Kthulhu — August 22, 2005 @ 12:56 pm

  2. but look at the damage! she could have DIED!!!!!!!

    oh well, at least she got a new replacement car for FREE!


    #2 | Comment by Justin — August 22, 2005 @ 12:59 pm

  3. Damn it man how are the tits, did they make it out ok?!

    #3 | Comment by Knocturnal — August 22, 2005 @ 1:31 pm

  4. Anyone who threatens the health and safety of ScarJo’s tits must DIE.

    #4 | Comment by Nerima — August 22, 2005 @ 1:33 pm

  5. Wasn’t Lindsay Lohan in a car accident shortly before she went completely coke whorish? Is this a bad sign of things to come?

    #5 | Comment by JessicaChobotSucks — August 22, 2005 @ 1:44 pm

  6. I wouldn’t worry about Scarlett, unless I saw pictures of her pole-dancing with Paris Hilton. Now THAT would be a bad sign.

    #6 | Comment by al k holik — August 22, 2005 @ 1:52 pm

  7. did a honda representative bring a car for the other person to drive home in after the accident?

    #7 | Comment by adrock_420 — August 22, 2005 @ 4:27 pm

  8. A mercedes rep came by with a new car for her to drive? THAT IS SO COOL! Sort of like the old game ‘Spy Hunter’, where as soon as your car explodes a giant truck drives up onscreen and you roll-out the back of it in a new car, ready for more…uh…spy hunting.

    #8 | Comment by Puzzlehead — August 22, 2005 @ 7:00 pm

  9. STFU #1! YOU SUCK!! GTFO!!!

    #9 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 22, 2005 @ 9:19 pm

  10. This makes me think that any well known celebrity can blame any accident whatsoever on the paparazzi.

    #10 | Comment by Ricochet — August 22, 2005 @ 11:20 pm

  11. I am all for paparazzi when taking topless or nude photos, but am against them causing accidents, unless topless or nude photos result.

    #11 | Comment by Dairy — August 23, 2005 @ 1:17 am

  12. Damn, Dizzyland guests where denied that day. Imagine all the candid pics people would have taken of her if she actually made it into the place. Assholes

    #12 | Comment by DUDEMASTER — August 23, 2005 @ 1:55 am

  13. #12 I’m imagining the possibilities from a Scarlett vs. water ride encounter…


    #13 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 23, 2005 @ 2:30 am

  14. Whenever I get in a car accident, Dodge quickly brings me another ’82 Colt so I can go about my way. Isn’t this normal?

    #14 | Comment by Ruprecht Jones — August 23, 2005 @ 3:24 am

  15. Are her tits insured?

    #15 | Comment by kiko — August 23, 2005 @ 7:15 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *