#3 |
Comment
by Scott — September 25, 2006 @
5:42 am
oh i want to cream on them
#4 |
Comment
by Macktheknife — September 25, 2006 @
7:05 am
Am I the only one who thinks she’s absolutely unattractive? I mean, sure, if you’re into slashing your wrists and blogging about how much your life sucks, then sure, she might be your type… but really. A nice body doesn’t make up for being batshit fucking loco.
#5 |
Comment
by Duffman — September 25, 2006 @
7:40 am
Yeah, unfappable.
wooo look at me go, with my first ‘comment’
#6 |
Comment
by Ninja — September 25, 2006 @
7:40 am
wow thats a hot picture…thanks :p
#7 |
Comment
by Rappy — September 25, 2006 @
7:42 am
#9 |
Comment
by Justin — September 25, 2006 @
7:59 am
Surgery scars : probably boobs reduction job (or shape alteration)
#10 |
Comment
by PHL — September 25, 2006 @
8:15 am
With makeup she’s acceptable, but not like Scarlett J or some of the other current picks. And damn, if you’re going to do a topless shot and show off your boobs, why not at least have her face in the picture as well??
I noticed those scars, too. Ew.
#11 |
Comment
by JoeyinHollister — September 25, 2006 @
8:50 am
i believe i did read something somewhere sometime about christina having a boob reduction.
Yeah, those look like pretty classic reduction scars to me.
That’s going to be one sad bluebird 10 years down the road. Reduction or not, eventually they’re going to sag, Christina.
No problem with a few tats on a woman, but for crying out loud, think before you choose a location, ladies.
#13 |
Comment
by exelis — September 25, 2006 @
9:44 am
damn, she looks like an alien crack whore in those first two little photos.
#14 |
Comment
by DisconcertedGeorge — September 25, 2006 @
11:17 am
-Agrees, I don’t find this mustant attractive! we need Nakid Shakira Photos to resort this site to its glory!!!!
Shakira > all the women on the home page
#15 |
Comment
by THOR — September 25, 2006 @
11:41 am
i lover her,,, she look great
#16 |
Comment
by PETERSPICE — September 25, 2006 @
1:18 pm
Soleil Moon Frye is the boob reduction poster child.
#17 |
Comment
by El Payo — September 25, 2006 @
2:08 pm
I for one think that breast reduction is silly, especially in a little girl like Christina, I mean, they weren’t that big before, and now they are smaller.
Maybe its ok for a lady that has like 55 GGGGGG’s, but not for a normal D-cup (used to be) Christina. 🙁
#18 |
Comment
by Adam — September 25, 2006 @
9:34 pm
looks awful in those tattoo parlor pics, but bangin on that cover. ‘s the nature of makeup and whatnot.
#19 |
Comment
by samey sammy — September 25, 2006 @
11:02 pm
She has to have at least a fivehead, if not a six- or seven-head.
#20 |
Comment
by Birdboy — September 25, 2006 @
11:33 pm
Too bad on reduction, but even worse on the tattoo. I love her normally, this just destroyed her for me. Those things need to be full, smooth, and creamy. Get with it ladies 🙂
#21 |
Comment
by Kewtr — September 26, 2006 @
1:23 am
SMF really needed a reduction.
Ricci tats = ewwwww
#23 |
Comment
by tool — September 27, 2006 @
12:01 am
Very bald and unfappable
#24 |
Comment
by roscoe — September 27, 2006 @
8:00 am
Fake.
No-one else notice the disappearing mole between her breasts? Good Photoshop work though.
#25 |
Comment
by TG — September 30, 2006 @
5:50 am
Why is there always someone so quick to call “fake”, #25? Notice that both moles the nood’s chest are also present in the bikini photo. Or is that one fake as well? They ‘shopped out the mole for the magazine cover, that’s all.
#26 |
Comment
by EndlessMike — October 1, 2006 @
6:25 am
even more reasons for me to hate her. i use to fap to her hard too. oh wellz
#27 |
Comment
by Xan — February 21, 2008 @
9:25 pm
completely UNFAPPABLE…
and: FIRST…
#1 | Comment by The Bellguy — September 25, 2006 @ 4:04 am
WOW, have we seen her breasts before? I dont think I have.
Wow, that must have been an erotically painful tattoo
#2 | Comment by Adam — September 25, 2006 @ 4:11 am
2: She was naked in Prozac Nation..
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/movie.php/7946
#3 | Comment by Scott — September 25, 2006 @ 5:42 am
oh i want to cream on them
#4 | Comment by Macktheknife — September 25, 2006 @ 7:05 am
Am I the only one who thinks she’s absolutely unattractive? I mean, sure, if you’re into slashing your wrists and blogging about how much your life sucks, then sure, she might be your type… but really. A nice body doesn’t make up for being batshit fucking loco.
#5 | Comment by Duffman — September 25, 2006 @ 7:40 am
Yeah, unfappable.
wooo look at me go, with my first ‘comment’
#6 | Comment by Ninja — September 25, 2006 @ 7:40 am
wow thats a hot picture…thanks :p
#7 | Comment by Rappy — September 25, 2006 @ 7:42 am
[…] (Dontlinkthis) […]
#8 | Pingback by Rappys Gossip Page » Ricci has boob tattoo… — September 25, 2006 @ 7:52 am
anybody else see surgery scars?
#9 | Comment by Justin — September 25, 2006 @ 7:59 am
Surgery scars : probably boobs reduction job (or shape alteration)
#10 | Comment by PHL — September 25, 2006 @ 8:15 am
With makeup she’s acceptable, but not like Scarlett J or some of the other current picks. And damn, if you’re going to do a topless shot and show off your boobs, why not at least have her face in the picture as well??
I noticed those scars, too. Ew.
#11 | Comment by JoeyinHollister — September 25, 2006 @ 8:50 am
i believe i did read something somewhere sometime about christina having a boob reduction.
#12 | Comment by AngelBaby — September 25, 2006 @ 9:33 am
Yeah, those look like pretty classic reduction scars to me.
That’s going to be one sad bluebird 10 years down the road. Reduction or not, eventually they’re going to sag, Christina.
No problem with a few tats on a woman, but for crying out loud, think before you choose a location, ladies.
#13 | Comment by exelis — September 25, 2006 @ 9:44 am
damn, she looks like an alien crack whore in those first two little photos.
#14 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — September 25, 2006 @ 11:17 am
-Agrees, I don’t find this mustant attractive! we need Nakid Shakira Photos to resort this site to its glory!!!!
Shakira > all the women on the home page
#15 | Comment by THOR — September 25, 2006 @ 11:41 am
i lover her,,, she look great
#16 | Comment by PETERSPICE — September 25, 2006 @ 1:18 pm
Soleil Moon Frye is the boob reduction poster child.
#17 | Comment by El Payo — September 25, 2006 @ 2:08 pm
I for one think that breast reduction is silly, especially in a little girl like Christina, I mean, they weren’t that big before, and now they are smaller.
Maybe its ok for a lady that has like 55 GGGGGG’s, but not for a normal D-cup (used to be) Christina. 🙁
#18 | Comment by Adam — September 25, 2006 @ 9:34 pm
looks awful in those tattoo parlor pics, but bangin on that cover. ‘s the nature of makeup and whatnot.
#19 | Comment by samey sammy — September 25, 2006 @ 11:02 pm
She has to have at least a fivehead, if not a six- or seven-head.
#20 | Comment by Birdboy — September 25, 2006 @ 11:33 pm
Too bad on reduction, but even worse on the tattoo. I love her normally, this just destroyed her for me. Those things need to be full, smooth, and creamy. Get with it ladies 🙂
#21 | Comment by Kewtr — September 26, 2006 @ 1:23 am
What does the tat on her leg say??
#22 | Comment by NaughtyVoyeur — September 26, 2006 @ 10:28 am
SMF really needed a reduction.
Ricci tats = ewwwww
#23 | Comment by tool — September 27, 2006 @ 12:01 am
Very bald and unfappable
#24 | Comment by roscoe — September 27, 2006 @ 8:00 am
Fake.
No-one else notice the disappearing mole between her breasts? Good Photoshop work though.
#25 | Comment by TG — September 30, 2006 @ 5:50 am
Why is there always someone so quick to call “fake”, #25? Notice that both moles the nood’s chest are also present in the bikini photo. Or is that one fake as well? They ‘shopped out the mole for the magazine cover, that’s all.
#26 | Comment by EndlessMike — October 1, 2006 @ 6:25 am
even more reasons for me to hate her. i use to fap to her hard too. oh wellz
#27 | Comment by Xan — February 21, 2008 @ 9:25 pm