I was reading about how these waterpark slides can literally remove tops and bottoms due to the intense rush of water.
It’s just too bad the water didn’t remove Katy Perry’s top, as opposed to her bottom.
I’m actually slightly horrified yet intrigued by DAT ASS.
1st … On pic3 it looks as if she’s got a buttcleavage-piercing!
#1 | Comment by Germanist — August 13, 2012 @ 12:35 pm
She’s just a slight butterface when she’s not made up like a freak.
#2 | Comment by Ryozenzuzex — August 13, 2012 @ 1:41 pm
it did remove her top partially
third.
#3 | Comment by iLurk — August 13, 2012 @ 1:51 pm
sir mix-a-lot approves of this post
#4 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 13, 2012 @ 6:22 pm
I like her normal-looking face
#5 | Comment by a — August 13, 2012 @ 6:30 pm
I’d hit that big fat ass. Why not ?
#6 | Comment by Rod Stiffington — August 13, 2012 @ 9:09 pm
La-ish face with a oaktown-like booty.
#7 | Comment by evil monkey — August 13, 2012 @ 10:54 pm
I don’t understand this post. Is there supposed to be something wrong with her buttocks that I am not seeing?
#8 | Comment by Horatio — August 14, 2012 @ 6:45 am
Apparently, SOME people think she’s fat. I’m not one of them.
#9 | Comment by alberach — August 14, 2012 @ 7:47 am
ehhh…not impressed. She’s no Kate Upton!
#10 | Comment by MacDaddy — August 14, 2012 @ 12:44 pm
I so would. Without make-up she’s actually more attractive.
Also, it looks like we might’ve been in some nip-slip photos if the camera had been in a different spot for pics 3 & 4. Damn.
#11 | Comment by Fry — August 14, 2012 @ 1:11 pm
I think the reason her ass looks so huge in these pictures is that she’s wearing a grannykini.
#12 | Comment by whosbeenknocking — August 14, 2012 @ 4:02 pm
if only her manface wasn’t on top of that body.
#13 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — August 14, 2012 @ 7:34 pm