AmngStarz: doode that pic you put on the left up top
AmngStarz: scary as fuck
AmngStarz: she looks too perfect
AmngStarz: psycho
AmngStarz: scary
AmngStarz: like shes gonna bite me
AmngStarz: im serious
Dionysus742: the top left pic of bynes on the site is starting to freak me out
Dionysus742: its looks doctored or some shit, her eyes look soul-less or some crap
Dionysus742: evell i tell you
Vassilios10420: i dont like seeing that chick when i pull your site up
Vassilios10420: she looks to young man
—————
To: psykotik@gmail.com
Subject: Avril Withdrawls
From: “Nick” dionysus187@msn.com
Date: Sun, Apr 6 2003 7:29:56 PM -0400
Apparently thanks to your site I’m developed an addiction to seeing avril. Now that you changed your site layout (had your page as homepage) its really fucking with my head. I’ve had to get a massive collection of avril pictures and look at them 3 times daily to stay sane. Seeing bynes isn’t cutting it either. Especially that picture at the top left of her smiling, she’s fcking possessed. Bring back avril or I’ll have to take drastic measures that have yet been conceived by man.
—————
Update:
PacManJesus: now that people mention it, that picture in the upper left is thuroughly frightening
PacManJesus: she looks like she can see into my soul and suck all that is good straight out of me
Amanda Bynes wants me, but I want my Avril. I wonder if Avril wants Bynes? So, that would mean Avril was a switch hitter eh? What position does she play? Does she have decent power? Can she steal at least 30 bases in a season? Is she an injury risk? Can she play the whole season, or is she more of a part time player? I am so easily confused… ='(
#1 | Comment by Bubba — April 6, 2003 @ 10:29 pm
i told you i wasn’t the only one who was scared of that pic. ::raspberrie::
and honestly…i’d like to see someone of legal age on the damn page.
#2 | Comment by lizzie — April 6, 2003 @ 10:47 pm
Avril is legal, bring her back.
#3 | Comment by Bubba — April 6, 2003 @ 11:03 pm
Crazy girls are hot.
#4 | Comment by Onan — April 6, 2003 @ 11:04 pm
im not for bringing avril back but i am for losing the young buck with the drastic overbite
#5 | Comment by vass — April 6, 2003 @ 11:20 pm
The picture is evil… EVIL I TELL YOU!
#6 | Comment by PacManJesus — April 7, 2003 @ 2:04 am
I leave for three fucking days and you guys let him change the layout?
Pft!
#7 | Comment by Kingolf@jubiipost.dk — April 7, 2003 @ 2:26 am
First of all, I am 67 years old. I don’t think that picture is evil, in fact, it makes me feel young again. I would love to ravage her underaged Hollywood ass. And I kill babies…
#8 | Comment by IronChef — April 7, 2003 @ 4:14 am
I’ll quote myself:
She’s kind of cute, but I think her left eye drifts. It makes me dizzy when I see her film trailers. Freaks me out. Mutant. Please no more of her google eye.
Posted by grud – 5:44am April 5, 2003
#9 | Comment by grud — April 7, 2003 @ 7:24 am
I think she looks like she is drunk, you know that look of peace you get in you just before you’re about to blow chunks… that brief moment of pure happiness.. then ..
#10 | Comment by Dave Marshak — April 7, 2003 @ 8:20 am
then … BARF …
thats what I think she is about to do… too many underage layouts… if your going to do underage you might as well do the olson twins layout.
#11 | Comment by Dave Marshak — April 7, 2003 @ 8:23 am
I myself have no problem with Ms. Bynes, but if the masses really want underage, you shoud give them a Deveigh chase layout.
#12 | Comment by Seriously — April 7, 2003 @ 10:20 am
But with her last name capitalized as well.
#13 | Comment by Seriously — April 7, 2003 @ 10:21 am
hmmm if only I was oh… half a decade younger.
#14 | Comment by charles — April 7, 2003 @ 11:16 am
This Bynes chick isn’t naked enough. Anyone have any pswds for Brunob or Mike’s Apartment (or anything else) they’d be willing to share?
#15 | Comment by RedEye — April 7, 2003 @ 12:21 pm
change the layout to T.A.T.U.
they r girls,they r legal and on a brighter note they r lesbians!
wat better than them
#16 | Comment by luke — April 7, 2003 @ 12:40 pm
I’m always fascinated when reputedly straight boys drone on about ‘lesbians’. Don’t you get it? The whole point of real lesbianism is that they DON’T NEED (or want) YOU.
The idea of two chix who are ‘lesbians’ getting it on so a ‘straight boy’ can watch is an urban myth. Tatu has built their marketing machine on this myth.
What you are really wanting Luke is two straight chix willing to act ‘bisexual’ for your masturbatory pleasure with the thought that after they have got you up, they will then turn their attentions to you. In other words, you want a 2F/1M scene with ‘lesbian fantasy play’. And you can go buy that for yourself, amigo. It just costs more money for the extra whore.
#17 | Comment by RedEye — April 7, 2003 @ 1:53 pm
I bet you’ll tell your kids there’s no Santa Clause.
#18 | Comment by Seriously — April 7, 2003 @ 2:02 pm
I disagree with RedEye…
Women are the most visually perfect creature god has created, for the most part they are smooth, curvy, soft, and very easy on the eyes. Man a rough not so visually appealing creature likes to stare at the more attractive creature. Having 2 of these visually appitizing creatures maul each other sexually is having double the visual pleasure, groups are not exempt. Them being lesbians means you can not join in, however many females who partake in same sex fun tend to swing both ways. Now when you can find 2 of them that are both attractive that is a bonus. The idea being you can stare at 2 wonderfully beautiful creatures doing wonderful things and the idea being you in theory could join in and have fun. Some people are voyeurs and would rather just watch, it does not have to be 2 women, it can be a woman and a man, groups, sheep, etc, doesn’t matter different peoples brains like different things, and visual stimulation is a very popular one, just because you do not enjoy the visual aspects of 2 women coupling in fun ways does not mean other people do not enjoy it, even if they can not join in.. Its all good fun, have an open mind, your opinion is not that of other people, hell you might be in the majority, but is there really a majority when there are so many different choices to choose from? I don’t think so.
#19 | Comment by Dave Marshak — April 7, 2003 @ 2:21 pm
I’d do her. Two times.
#20 | Comment by tdpriest — April 7, 2003 @ 2:21 pm
By the way, I don’t like the underage or just near age layouts personally, they may be attractive but what I really like is a woman who has passed puberty and has a shapely body, Gina Gershon, Elisabeth Shue, Jennifer Connelly, etc.. But I realize Justin and I have different tastes so I highly doubt I will see anyone over 20 as the layout… but if he does… I got a huge list for him 😉
#21 | Comment by Dave Marshak — April 7, 2003 @ 2:25 pm
I wonder if lesbians sweat under their boobs?
#22 | Comment by grud — April 7, 2003 @ 2:30 pm
Check out Elsie Lee from the HarrisDirect Yahoo ads. That girl is fine. My father created women in her image. Jesus Spoke.
#23 | Comment by Jesus — April 7, 2003 @ 2:33 pm
Dave,
Here’s what I have to say to you: http://www.lolli.org/PLAY/opentoy.asp?ID=25
#24 | Comment by RedEye — April 7, 2003 @ 2:57 pm
Amanda you are cute i wacth the amanda show every
day just to see your beutiful face.And i love that moivie big fat liar!I went to Theaters to see it four times.And i wish i could meet you i person.So i hope you can respond back to me even without the homepage. Love Ryan Tyndall.
#25 | Comment by Ryan Tyndall — January 28, 2004 @ 7:45 pm