26 thoughts on “So it’s 4am in the morning..

  1. you know i think shes starting to grow on me

    i hate you justin

    *fap* *fap*

    #1 | Comment by Pump — September 17, 2003 @ 4:05 am

  2. I hope she becomes the next ‘big thing’ so that there will be more pictures of her floating around the internet; maybe even some where she doesn’t look sixteen or younger. I know she’s 24 (older than me) but I feel like a pedophile looking at pictures of her. Here at work I’ve had to justify myself to three different people and prove I’m not looking for kiddie pics.

    #2 | Comment by bill — September 17, 2003 @ 4:07 am

  3. older than me too! personally i prefer older chicks. but hey, i guess with alison, it’s the best of both worlds! ahahaha.

    #3 | Comment by Justin — September 17, 2003 @ 4:11 am

  4. She’s 24?
    This cannot be!

    #4 | Comment by Mr Blonde — September 17, 2003 @ 4:23 am

  5. Twenty-four years old, just looks young (which seems to be the preference around here).

    #5 | Comment by bill — September 17, 2003 @ 5:25 am

  6. WTF Justin….that chick is too old! Bring out the underage kids like that Samara from The Ring again.

    #6 | Comment by smash — September 17, 2003 @ 5:30 am

  7. Who is this again?

    And yes. More Samara. hehe.

    #7 | Comment by thefelinepunk — September 17, 2003 @ 5:51 am

  8. Who am I to question the Guy who introduced us to Avril?

    I was wondering, have you seen Underworld?

    With Kate Beckinsale?

    Thanks for the Alison L. info & pics…

    #8 | Comment by cujo — September 17, 2003 @ 7:51 am

  9. Next big thing? I didn’t know she was into wrasslin’. She isn’t as hot a Kirsten but I’d beg.

    #9 | Comment by bligityblah — September 17, 2003 @ 9:26 am

  10. cujo –

    nope. haven’t seen underworld yet. might pick it up on vcd today. i liked her in that serendipity movie. actually i liked the trailer more than the movie. used to play that thing over and over again. there’s this one frame in there where she’s running away from camera and hotdamn, her ass in that frame was just out of this world.


    she looks super hot in that first pic btw.

    alison is still better though. HARRR.

    #10 | Comment by Justin — September 17, 2003 @ 9:56 am

  11. 24? I’m 24. I know 24. And, she is not 24.

    #11 | Comment by Messenjah — September 17, 2003 @ 11:33 am

  12. Dude! I saw the same Underworld trailer today…lol

    I stopped the picture frame and zoomed in, but it was too blurry for a screen capture…

    #12 | Comment by cujo — September 17, 2003 @ 11:34 am

  13. not underworld! serendipity! but there’s probably some nice ass shots in the underworld trailer too. i tried making a screencap of that one ass frame in the serendipity trailer but apple.com/trailers doesn’t have the hi res trailer on there anymore. only a shitty tiny blurry one. wish i hadn’t deleted the hi res one i saved 2 years ago. that trailer was better than the movie.

    anyhow, alison lohman…

    *fap fap fap*

    #13 | Comment by Justin — September 17, 2003 @ 11:53 am

  14. Ok, Kate Beckinsale is easy on the eyes….but goddamn damn is she a HORRIBLE fucking actress.

    Go re-watch Pearl Harbor before disagreeing with me. I dare you to sit through that flaming turdball of a movie again.

    #14 | Comment by smash — September 17, 2003 @ 12:05 pm

  15. No thanks, once was more than enough with Pearl Harbor. I’d rather get runover by a truck again…maybe.

    #15 | Comment by bligityblah — September 17, 2003 @ 1:45 pm

  16. Ha… I recieved the Pearl Harbor DVD as a gift when it was first released…

    It’s still in its factory plastic wrapping.

    #16 | Comment by embus — September 17, 2003 @ 2:59 pm

  17. ever considered ebay?

    #17 | Comment by bligityblah — September 17, 2003 @ 3:13 pm

  18. i’d buy that for a dollar!

    #18 | Comment by Justin — September 17, 2003 @ 6:19 pm

  19. I wouldn’t

    #19 | Comment by Charles — September 17, 2003 @ 7:31 pm

  20. Embus –

    Me too! Someone got it as a thankyou after borrowing a crapload of dvd’s. I was like ‘oh you didn’t have to!’ (meaning not that shit bomb movie)

    Oh well. Someday some girl will want to watch it with me and get all cuddly maybe….at least that’s what I tell myself.

    #20 | Comment by smash — September 17, 2003 @ 10:52 pm

  21. holy shit!!!!!!!!! it’s stacie!

    #21 | Comment by m dog — September 18, 2003 @ 8:06 am

  22. http://www.deansplanet.com/images/celebs/no_makeup/kirsten_dunst.jpg

    OMG SO HOT!!!11one.

    #22 | Comment by ASL? — September 18, 2003 @ 10:31 am

  23. It always amazes me how famous women without makeup look so much like women without makeup. It’s the craziest thing…

    #23 | Comment by Amy — September 18, 2003 @ 10:58 am

  24. Amy….

    Your makeup comment is hilarious…was this harkening back to a recent post by a certain catlike person?

    #24 | Comment by smash — September 18, 2003 @ 3:35 pm

  25. smash — Maybe a bit. But more a reaction to ASL?’s link to "no makeup" Kirsten, and the "OMG SO HOT!"

    I think Kirsten Dunst is quite hot. (But I also decided she was a bitch after the MTV Movie Awards.)

    I wish women would give up cosmetics all together. Maybe if Hollywood started the trend, us regular folks would start to believe that piles of crap on a woman’s face is less attractive then a real chick with imperfections.

    Hell, the entertainment industry has convinced us that skeletons piercing through skin is sexy. They can do anything.

    #25 | Comment by Amy — September 19, 2003 @ 6:17 am

  26. I’d be afraid to touch Ms. Flockhart. ‘Cause how do you know what parts of her are not razor sharp? I don’t want to get paper cuts if I try to grab her ass.

    Not that’d I’d just go and grab someone’s ass, mind you, ’cause a gentleman would never do that, and coincidentally, I wouldn’t either.

    Ms. Flockhart’s ribs are like a cheese grater, I expect.

    #26 | Comment by Seriously — September 20, 2003 @ 2:46 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *