Lindsay Lohan

Fresh off her wildly successful Firecrotch Rehab ’07 tour, Teh Lohan will be making an appearance in the April issue of GQ. You may have already seen the cover shot, but here are some decidedly lo res pics of the spread inside.

My god…it’s full of freckles.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

What’s up with the wrist bandage? Carpal tunnel from the constant handjobs finally catching up to her?

51 thoughts on “Lindsay Lohan

  1. imo the pictures look kind a cheap for such magazine.
    And she’s ugly.

    #1 | Comment by louis — March 23, 2007 @ 3:22 pm

  2. too skinny for me i like my girls with a lil bit of meat on them. like this Lohan from 2004…only 3 years ago!

    #2 | Comment by Kahuna21 — March 23, 2007 @ 3:28 pm

  3. How the mighty have fallen… i want the old Lindsay back!

    #3 | Comment by Arlan — March 23, 2007 @ 3:45 pm

  4. i sitll love her. and i love her freckles too. i have more hope for her than someone like britney…whom ive never really liked.

    #4 | Comment by Xan — March 23, 2007 @ 3:53 pm

  5. Never cared for her, and has anyone at that magazine heard of an airbrush?

    I guess they might as well go with the freckles, no one’s going to be fooled that she looks young anymore anyway. And some people like freckles, which I can respect but not share.

    That second picture up there looks like holy hell.

    #5 | Comment by Kewtr — March 23, 2007 @ 4:19 pm

  6. all the pictures look the same and are boring.
    she can’t act. she can’t do a good photoshoot.
    shes only good for the Firecrotch (TM) .

    #6 | Comment by ssd — March 23, 2007 @ 4:55 pm

  7. With enough beers, and the right lighting in a bar, I’d nail her in the ass behind the dumpters.

    What?!

    She’ll just wake up there eventually anyways!

    #7 | Comment by MacDaddy — March 23, 2007 @ 5:08 pm

  8. Completely agree with #4, i love those freckles

    #8 | Comment by Pickman — March 23, 2007 @ 5:33 pm

  9. These pictures suck, and it’d be nice if she was actually hot. And apparently GQ doesn’t have an airbrusher on staff. Jeez, Laura Prepon got the shit airbrushed outta her photos so I know that GQ could’ve done better than this shit.

    #9 | Comment by Tony — March 23, 2007 @ 5:33 pm

  10. Brilliant 2001 reference. Well played.

    #10 | Comment by Davester — March 23, 2007 @ 5:34 pm

  11. better freckles

    #11 | Comment by zomg — March 23, 2007 @ 6:28 pm

  12. What an ugly fire crotch.

    #12 | Comment by P. Hilton — March 23, 2007 @ 6:39 pm

  13. I can’t decide if I find this Lohan hot

    #13 | Comment by sKetch — March 23, 2007 @ 6:41 pm

  14. #11

    Thanks, now I’m feeling sick. :S

    #14 | Comment by Franc — March 23, 2007 @ 6:43 pm

  15. Whatta swamp hag she’s become. And her vajayjay looks like a tiny auxiliary pair of lungs hanging out of a light bulb socket.

    Diseased, bony, drunk and disgusting.

    #15 | Comment by tex — March 23, 2007 @ 6:50 pm

  16. Guess I’m one of the few that still finds her hot. Oh well…

    #16 | Comment by alberach — March 23, 2007 @ 7:01 pm

  17. She looks okay here but nothing compared to a couple of years ago. 🙁

    #17 | Comment by dmavsfan41 — March 23, 2007 @ 7:36 pm

  18. For me to find her sexy again, she needs to wear a pair of those 8 inch clear lucite hooker heels and spread her naked ass cheeks wide open. And suck off a pygmy horse at the same time.

    It could happen.

    #18 | Comment by Smiley — March 23, 2007 @ 8:07 pm

  19. 11 you are so right Shawkat Freckles FTW.

    Plus, huuuge jugs never hurt, but I could swear she got a reduction at some point. 2nd season Arrested Development wardrobe spent half their time trying to hide them.

    #19 | Comment by Kewtr — March 23, 2007 @ 10:10 pm

  20. The pics are much hotter thumbnailed over when you actually click them :-S

    #20 | Comment by sKetch — March 23, 2007 @ 11:14 pm

  21. She’s dead to me

    #21 | Comment by Name — March 23, 2007 @ 11:32 pm

  22. I would bone her. I would eat cum from her used pussy. At least she has not become a fat cow like Britanny.

    #22 | Comment by beavereater — March 24, 2007 @ 12:50 am

  23. ‘My god…it’s full of freckles.’ – one of the more memorable taglines from 2007: a disgrace odyssey.

    Good commentary in the OP, cracked me up.

    #23 | Comment by Justin L — March 24, 2007 @ 1:08 am

  24. 22.

    Would that be your own cum or strange man cum? Personally, I’d be cumming in her ass.

    #24 | Comment by TAINT — March 24, 2007 @ 1:54 am

  25. freckles FTL.

    #25 | Comment by DoctorOfStyle — March 24, 2007 @ 3:21 am

  26. If you watched Mean Girls (one of the most faptastic fims of all time) and then saw these pics, you wouldn’t know it was the same girl. So sad. these pictures make my penis feels sad and unhappy. I shall fap to Mean Girls and jizz on the ground in memory of hot, exy LiLo. RIP, 2004.

    #26 | Comment by Osama bin Laden — March 24, 2007 @ 4:34 am

  27. lol @ #10

    “I GOTZ UR REFRNEZ”

    also: boy am i excited to see this girl starting to regain her hotness. i think a few of these pictures are definitely fappable as is, but give her time. when she reaches maximum capacity, i guarantee my dick becomes sentient and starts crying tears of joy.

    #27 | Comment by same — March 24, 2007 @ 4:37 am

  28. Freckles are yummy

    #28 | Comment by cory — March 24, 2007 @ 8:06 am

  29. Who is the crack whore?

    #29 | Comment by Grammaton_Cleric — March 24, 2007 @ 10:46 am

  30. Don’t bet on this being a sign of a return to form. Several months ago she did a shoot for … incidentally enough, GQ also. The pics looked kinda good, and you would’ve figured she’d’ve kept on moving back toward the hot side… but no! 🙁

    #30 | Comment by dmavsfan41 — March 24, 2007 @ 11:36 am

  31. Great.
    Tits.
    Fact.

    #31 | Comment by filthyfish — March 24, 2007 @ 12:53 pm

  32. Fallen from mighty heights indeed but still cute , freckles work for her somehow.

    She isn’t looking sickly anymore

    #32 | Comment by JonKing — March 24, 2007 @ 1:12 pm

  33. There are good freckles, like this, and bad freckles, like this. She looks diseased.

    #33 | Comment by Justin L — March 24, 2007 @ 3:45 pm

  34. HQ pictures

    http://www.hotcelebshome.com/lindsay-lohan-gq-magazine-april-2007/

    #34 | Comment by HCH — March 24, 2007 @ 5:45 pm

  35. Dear God she looks like a crackwhore! Oh .. my bad .. she is

    #35 | Comment by Arri — March 24, 2007 @ 6:56 pm

  36. The HQ images do her more justice. The scariest thing is the size of her pupils. People looking into a flash are NOT supposed to have that kind of pupil dilation!

    #36 | Comment by nevermindthat — March 24, 2007 @ 8:16 pm

  37. looks like she’s been to the Paris Hilton school of facial expressions. There must be something wrong with her mouth because she can’t seem to move it or close it.

    So … just like her legs then.

    #37 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 24, 2007 @ 10:49 pm

  38. Help! Help! My dick Caught Fire!!!!
    Hawt!!

    #38 | Comment by Charlioso — March 25, 2007 @ 2:24 am

  39. Such terrible lighting. Maybe the photographer was going for the “handicapped stall in the ladies’ room at the bar” look or something?

    Pupil dilation + expressionless mouth = burnt.

    #39 | Comment by whatever — March 25, 2007 @ 8:37 am

  40. Folks complaining about the look of the photography and lighting: It’s the signature style of world-class perv photographer Terry Richardson.

    Check out his Australian Lee Jeans campaign or just do a
    Google Image search
    .

    Direct flash, banal interiors, close ups, hot slutty chicks.

    #40 | Comment by Opus — March 25, 2007 @ 2:20 pm

  41. Black nails, biggest turnoff a girl can wear.
    Never, and I mean never put on black nailpolish

    #41 | Comment by Licking — March 25, 2007 @ 4:32 pm

  42. YUCK. She looks awful. And to think, during her “Mean Girls” stage, she was Grade A fapalicious.

    #42 | Comment by SpongeBob NoPants — March 25, 2007 @ 7:53 pm

  43. Thanks a lot Opus, I’m now screwed up by


    this Terry Richardson site
    !

    #43 | Comment by Bob's My Uncle — March 25, 2007 @ 8:56 pm

  44. this reminds me of an American Apparel photoshoot. The setting and clothes and whatever

    #44 | Comment by IAmNotAPC — March 25, 2007 @ 9:31 pm

  45. She’s gone pseudo-goth , upgrade

    #45 | Comment by JonKing — March 26, 2007 @ 11:22 pm

  46. This is what she looked like in 2004. She looked gorgeous compared to this, but I never thought she was hot.

    #46 | Comment by Flupke — March 27, 2007 @ 6:24 am

  47. Whoa, that’s a whole lotta Lohan.

    The GQ pics are just pathetic and sad. She looks like she’s trying really hard to be sexy, but has no idea what to do. As she gets older, she more and more like Lara Flynn Boyle. Ick.

    IMO, she would look best with her clothes off and face hidden.

    #47 | Comment by Jose — March 27, 2007 @ 1:25 pm

  48. i’ve stayed a lohan fan longer than most. i think her body is absolutely amazing, it screams out “sex”. and i like the freckles. but dang, her face has really gone down hill, it’s losing the personality and does nothing for me. but the bod still rocks. can’t wait until the next breast exposure. and i do think they ‘re real.

    #48 | Comment by jackeroffer — March 27, 2007 @ 7:29 pm

  49. What an attention freak.
    She’ll do anything for attention and money.

    #49 | Comment by Haru — April 4, 2007 @ 1:04 am

  50. I still luv her and will still luv her no matter what happens.She is the best 100times then britney

    #50 | Comment by Zayed etc — April 5, 2007 @ 8:37 am

  51. i love how all you people talk about how ugly she is… when in reality you would fuck her in a second. you act like you have or could ever get any better than her, when the truth is… most of you probably have never even had sex

    #51 | Comment by ryan — April 13, 2007 @ 1:25 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *