I can’t believe there will be some Miley Haters come in here and say “this is Hot!”
To Each their Own, I guess
#3 |
Comment
by pwrdrive — January 30, 2009 @
2:51 am
mmm… EMMA. Damn, check out that ass in pic 3. Anybody else unaware she had that thing?
#4 |
Comment
by PerryBC — January 30, 2009 @
3:42 am
With that doll in 1st pic, she’s looking especially pedolicious! Yummy
#5 |
Comment
by Smilin' Bob — January 30, 2009 @
4:12 am
ugly
#6 |
Comment
by LazyTownFan — January 30, 2009 @
6:22 am
Funy, how shes dressed as a 1920’s fapper, err I meant flapper.
#7 |
Comment
by Pirho — January 30, 2009 @
7:10 am
She’s over 18 now, right ? So it won’t really be sicko creepy if I point out that I’d like to lick her asshole, would it ?
#8 |
Comment
by Rod Stiffington — January 30, 2009 @
7:41 am
I bet she’s fucked all of her Hairy Potsmoker costars already!
#9 |
Comment
by MacDaddy — January 30, 2009 @
9:57 am
Which do you guys think will happen first?
Emma topless on the beach or topless in a movie? Either way, we’re gonna see her boobs within the next few years. She is British, afterall.
#10 |
Comment
by Neal — January 30, 2009 @
11:04 am
topless in movie….harry potter maybe?
#11 |
Comment
by Xan — January 30, 2009 @
12:03 pm
I missed that part in the books…
#12 |
Comment
by alberach — January 30, 2009 @
12:21 pm
Even with all the silliness, these are still 100 times better than the surrounding beaver posts.
#13 |
Comment
by Dave — January 30, 2009 @
2:53 pm
I would just eat
her
up.
#14 |
Comment
by Jenesis — January 30, 2009 @
5:28 pm
I could retire with all the money I would have gotten if I would have brought all the sperm I jerked off with this little cunt to a sperm bank
Still zero amounts of sexy. Unless you are Michael Jackson.
#16 |
Comment
by DisconcertedGeorge — January 30, 2009 @
7:13 pm
I get disappointed when I don’t see bush in her pics
#17 |
Comment
by Tony — January 30, 2009 @
7:43 pm
Worth a million mileys. Thanks!
#18 |
Comment
by exelis — January 31, 2009 @
1:10 am
if those shorts were just a little bit tighter, we could tell if she had a “hairy” potter
#19 |
Comment
by Drone — January 31, 2009 @
5:48 am
^^^ she definately has a hairy pooter. We’ve all seen it before in the see-through panty paparazzi pic. It looked great.
#20 |
Comment
by Rod Stiffington — January 31, 2009 @
8:39 am
I’d like to Hermione her in the Granger.
Had to be said.
#21 |
Comment
by ron Dingleberry — January 31, 2009 @
10:56 am
#3 – you will be happy to know I don’t find either her or Miley to be hot.
I still maintain the only reason anyone is attracted to her is that they connect her to a role in a movie. Outside of that she has absolutely nothing going for her. Add to the fact, that she is now 18 and has lost her pedo potential, and she is completely useless.
#22 |
Comment
by evil monkey — January 31, 2009 @
7:46 pm
#24 |
Comment
by Jeff — February 3, 2009 @
3:57 pm
ron dingleberry, your post sucked…lamest ever ,not funny at all…did I mention how lame your post was?. not funny…now excuse me I hafta go fuck my little sister
I’d like to blow some bubbles in her domino.
lol wut
#1 | Comment by dex — January 30, 2009 @ 1:41 am
AB posts win as usual… Keep it up 😀
#2 | Comment by puny — January 30, 2009 @ 2:14 am
Gross! She looks like an 7 year old boy.
I can’t believe there will be some Miley Haters come in here and say “this is Hot!”
To Each their Own, I guess
#3 | Comment by pwrdrive — January 30, 2009 @ 2:51 am
mmm… EMMA. Damn, check out that ass in pic 3. Anybody else unaware she had that thing?
#4 | Comment by PerryBC — January 30, 2009 @ 3:42 am
With that doll in 1st pic, she’s looking especially pedolicious! Yummy
#5 | Comment by Smilin' Bob — January 30, 2009 @ 4:12 am
ugly
#6 | Comment by LazyTownFan — January 30, 2009 @ 6:22 am
Funy, how shes dressed as a 1920’s fapper, err I meant flapper.
#7 | Comment by Pirho — January 30, 2009 @ 7:10 am
She’s over 18 now, right ? So it won’t really be sicko creepy if I point out that I’d like to lick her asshole, would it ?
#8 | Comment by Rod Stiffington — January 30, 2009 @ 7:41 am
I bet she’s fucked all of her Hairy Potsmoker costars already!
#9 | Comment by MacDaddy — January 30, 2009 @ 9:57 am
Which do you guys think will happen first?
Emma topless on the beach or topless in a movie? Either way, we’re gonna see her boobs within the next few years. She is British, afterall.
#10 | Comment by Neal — January 30, 2009 @ 11:04 am
topless in movie….harry potter maybe?
#11 | Comment by Xan — January 30, 2009 @ 12:03 pm
I missed that part in the books…
#12 | Comment by alberach — January 30, 2009 @ 12:21 pm
Even with all the silliness, these are still 100 times better than the surrounding beaver posts.
#13 | Comment by Dave — January 30, 2009 @ 2:53 pm
I would just eat
her
up.
#14 | Comment by Jenesis — January 30, 2009 @ 5:28 pm
I could retire with all the money I would have gotten if I would have brought all the sperm I jerked off with this little cunt to a sperm bank
Delicious little fuck…..
#15 | Comment by al — January 30, 2009 @ 5:47 pm
didn’t she have a beard in another photo?
Still zero amounts of sexy. Unless you are Michael Jackson.
#16 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — January 30, 2009 @ 7:13 pm
I get disappointed when I don’t see bush in her pics
#17 | Comment by Tony — January 30, 2009 @ 7:43 pm
Worth a million mileys. Thanks!
#18 | Comment by exelis — January 31, 2009 @ 1:10 am
if those shorts were just a little bit tighter, we could tell if she had a “hairy” potter
#19 | Comment by Drone — January 31, 2009 @ 5:48 am
^^^ she definately has a hairy pooter. We’ve all seen it before in the see-through panty paparazzi pic. It looked great.
#20 | Comment by Rod Stiffington — January 31, 2009 @ 8:39 am
I’d like to Hermione her in the Granger.
Had to be said.
#21 | Comment by ron Dingleberry — January 31, 2009 @ 10:56 am
#3 – you will be happy to know I don’t find either her or Miley to be hot.
I still maintain the only reason anyone is attracted to her is that they connect her to a role in a movie. Outside of that she has absolutely nothing going for her. Add to the fact, that she is now 18 and has lost her pedo potential, and she is completely useless.
#22 | Comment by evil monkey — January 31, 2009 @ 7:46 pm
http://celebrities.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx?blogentryid=289921&showcomments=true&rss=yes
There’s hope just yet. Before she starts looking too old.
#23 | Comment by OIB — February 2, 2009 @ 2:06 am
…I want her
#24 | Comment by Jeff — February 3, 2009 @ 3:57 pm
ron dingleberry, your post sucked…lamest ever ,not funny at all…did I mention how lame your post was?. not funny…now excuse me I hafta go fuck my little sister
#25 | Comment by al — February 5, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
not the best pictures… pretty odd looking compared to the usual photos she does.
#26 | Comment by Hamish — February 5, 2009 @ 10:42 pm