Rachel was just named FHM’s Covergirl of the Decade. Congrats!
Hard to believe it’s been over four years since she was teaching guys how to check their testicles for lumps.
NOUGHTY! ^_^
Rachel Stevens
dont link this
WAUGH!
Rachel was just named FHM’s Covergirl of the Decade. Congrats!
Hard to believe it’s been over four years since she was teaching guys how to check their testicles for lumps.
NOUGHTY! ^_^
My testicles are still there.
#1 | Comment by seraphonica — December 6, 2009 @ 10:41 pm
Holy shit!
That is the hottest PSA I have ever seen!
#2 | Comment by EmJee — December 6, 2009 @ 11:21 pm
Way too old… jk, very hotttt ! ! !
#3 | Comment by BobBobson — December 7, 2009 @ 1:11 am
Hot, but cover girl of the decade? I’m just not seeing it.
#4 | Comment by flyboy — December 7, 2009 @ 2:15 am
I love her.
#5 | Comment by een — December 7, 2009 @ 2:20 am
she still got it!
god, i was in love with her when s-club was on tv.
#6 | Comment by benni — December 7, 2009 @ 5:36 am
Believe it or not, I’ve had sex with worse-looking girls than that.
#7 | Comment by Kewtr — December 7, 2009 @ 7:23 am
On purpose.
#8 | Comment by Kewtr — December 7, 2009 @ 7:23 am
Looks like a cross between Mariah Carey and Eva Mendez
#9 | Comment by Pirho — December 7, 2009 @ 8:41 am
Just in case any unfortunate soul hasn’t seen it yet:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1frsk_rachel-stevens-message-pour-krayzie_ads
#10 | Comment by cobalt — December 7, 2009 @ 8:51 am
#10 is fail… AB posted that…
#11 | Comment by coolstream — December 7, 2009 @ 10:27 am
No clue who she is…but HOT!
#12 | Comment by MacDaddy — December 7, 2009 @ 11:01 am
Who the fuck is Rachel Stevens?
Srsly.
#13 | Comment by dex — December 7, 2009 @ 11:09 am
^^^ somebody’s gay and doesn’t even know it… ^^^
#14 | Comment by Bob — December 7, 2009 @ 2:16 pm
^^^
oh no you di’int
#15 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 7, 2009 @ 2:58 pm
She’s got a face like a bastard pig
#16 | Comment by navigator — December 7, 2009 @ 3:06 pm
@15
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEbE3fGfF-o
#17 | Comment by coolstream — December 7, 2009 @ 3:10 pm
#10: the .swf wouldn’t load for me.
Although I now wish I had introduced the link by saying “WANNA SEE RACHEL DO HER THING?!”
#18 | Comment by cobalt — December 7, 2009 @ 3:13 pm
OH NO NIGGA DIDN’T:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p61mD558egA
#19 | Comment by cobalt — December 7, 2009 @ 3:16 pm
#4, I agree. “Covergirl of the Decade”? There were hotter girls in S Club 7 alone.
#20 | Comment by Guy Perkins — December 8, 2009 @ 12:00 am
WEWT!!! Site is back. I almost lost my shit this afternoon.
#21 | Comment by Yuu — December 8, 2009 @ 5:59 am
WAIT.
I didn’t post #13, honest to god I didn’t. But I just came here to say “who?”, so #13 is correct. But it’s not me.
I am so conflicted on how to feel…
#22 | Comment by dex — December 8, 2009 @ 10:16 am
Where’s the AnnaSophia Robb birthday post?
#23 | Comment by roscoe — December 8, 2009 @ 4:10 pm
she is lovely for an old girl but I say meh
#24 | Comment by lolilover — December 8, 2009 @ 6:18 pm
Okay, so first I have to say that Rachel Stevens = hot.
After that, am I the only one curious about the weird spelling of naughty? Both the magazine cover and AB’s post spelled it “noughty.” Is this some British spelling, like “colour” instead of “color” or something, or is it just a coincidental double typo? Sometimes I just get hung up on weird stuff, but I’m just curious. I don’t know, if there’s some deeper meaning behind the spelling, I guess I just don’t get it.
#25 | Comment by pyronuc — December 8, 2009 @ 7:19 pm
@ #25 The “noughty” this is the decade we’re in… the noughties. It’s like a pun, or play on words!
#26 | Comment by Maybonics — December 8, 2009 @ 7:26 pm
i didnt post 13 or 22…
…but i luv teh cock.
#27 | Comment by dex — December 9, 2009 @ 12:32 am
#26
It´s the wrong term for her anyway. She´s a latino-bitch that means she´s not noughty but greedy
#28 | Comment by walker4409 — December 9, 2009 @ 12:34 am
I’d fart in her face.
#29 | Comment by Mr. Methane — December 9, 2009 @ 2:06 am
#28: Latino? Er, no.
“Rachel Lauren Stevens…Born in London, United Kingdom to a middle class Jewish family…”
#30 | Comment by EmJee — December 9, 2009 @ 3:01 am
#20: “There were hotter girls in S Club 7 alone.”
Stop huffing the crazyglue. She’s by far the hottest of the four. The short, blonde one was sort of cute, but weird looking, the dark haired one has features far too big for her face, and the other blonde one looks like someone’s ugly sister. And none of them have aged well. Rachel, on the other hand, still looks fucking hot, just like she always has.
#31 | Comment by EmJee — December 9, 2009 @ 3:15 am
completely unrelated but I have to ask…noone at all finds lindsay lohan remotely attractive anymore right? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/07/lindsay-lohans-muse-photo_n_382335.html
I was tricked into viewing that garbage, and now need my eyes cleansed.
#32 | Comment by testzx — December 9, 2009 @ 3:24 am
^^^
to bad yep to bad
#33 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 9, 2009 @ 3:29 am
#31: Good analysis, but Tina became progressively hotter. Group shot from their movie premiere:
http://www.imagebam.com/image/6b0d7959215429
As for that dress she was wearing:
http://www.imagebam.com/image/c2d3c459215401
http://www.imagebam.com/image/a0eeef59215410
http://www.imagebam.com/image/6c9f7c59215413
http://www.imagebam.com/image/61b12159215416
http://www.imagebam.com/image/90ab7259215420
http://www.imagebam.com/image/99c87359215423
http://www.imagebam.com/image/5b9c9d59215424
http://www.imagebam.com/image/59b04a59215426
http://www.imagebam.com/image/6b0d7959215429
The 5th pic represents the theoretical limit for tit-tape.
#34 | Comment by cobalt — December 9, 2009 @ 8:14 am
fucking lmao @ #30
#28 pwnt
#35 | Comment by filthyfish — December 9, 2009 @ 8:32 am
Doesn´t matter where she´s born , a cat who is born in a pigsty is still a cat. Does anybody here know where her genes are from ? She looks like a latino bitch that´s all that matters
#36 | Comment by walker4409 — December 9, 2009 @ 2:06 pm
The site’s favicon hasn’t been fixed since the site went down. Just letting you know Justin.
#37 | Comment by Yuu — December 9, 2009 @ 8:50 pm
^^^
it’s working for me. did you try clearing your browser cache?
#38 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 9, 2009 @ 9:01 pm
hmm, well, she’s still fit.. and apart from the cuteness that is Hannah Spearrit, she was the best of the group.. but she doesn’t quite do it for me.
#39 | Comment by garth2k — December 9, 2009 @ 10:06 pm
In case anyone has any doubts about the magic of photoshop,look at these comparisons
http://egotvonline.com/2009/12/06/photoshop-wonders-before-and-after/
#40 | Comment by navigator — December 10, 2009 @ 3:06 pm
@ #38. Yes, I cleared my cache. It’s still not right. But now that I think about it, I have more hacks/plug-ins in this damn browser than should be allowed so maybe that’s the culprit.
#41 | Comment by Yuu — December 11, 2009 @ 3:59 am
thank god the site is back. havnt been able to get to it for a few days
#42 | Comment by hamish — December 11, 2009 @ 11:25 pm
For those wondering why she is the cover girl of the decade, it actually makes more sense than you think. First of FHM is mainly a british mag, where she is more well known (as opposed to all the “who the hell is this chick” posts over here). Secondly she has been on the cover many times over the decade. Someone like Keeley may have made sense, but she only got popular a couple years back, while Rachel was on the cover throughout the decade. And lastly, every single spread she has done in the mag has been smoking hot. Check her back-catologue. In fact, I’m pretty sure I’ve fapped to every issue she has been in. And this edition will most definetly not be an exception.
Feel free to make a pun out of “spread” or “back-catologue”. If you use them together you get extra points.
#43 | Comment by evil monkey — December 11, 2009 @ 11:28 pm
Nice! 🙂
#44 | Comment by Famous Boobs — December 30, 2009 @ 5:34 pm