Justin emailed these pics to me tonight from the airport in Kuala Lumpur and asked me to post them up for everyone to examine.
Miss Lively’s camp has already issued a strong denial (“100 percent fake”) that these are pics of her, and issued this warning…
Blake will pursue legal action against the publication which initially published these photographs and any other outlets that republish them in any manner.
If these aren’t photos of her, then how can she demand that people remove them from websites? I are confused.
The first picture looks like she just got raped and now she’s taking photos of the bruises to give to the police.
#1 | Comment by Blumpkin — June 1, 2011 @ 3:37 am
i no longer believe all these celebrities has fake or accidently has photos leaked in the internet. there was a lawyer i saw on tv that claims that these celebs would hire a lawyer before they leaked the photos themselves, and then deny any wrong doing. and not to mention they always have some movie coming out within the week or month. blake lively = the green lantern
#2 | Comment by Jon — June 1, 2011 @ 3:52 am
@Blumpkin: If she’d been raped and needed photos of the bruises, the smart thing would be to go to a hospital emergency room and have them taken while she was being examined. And, if pictures of bruises are needed, there’s no need to be photographing her whole body in a mirror — just take close-ups of the bruises.
As to her legal rights… if they’re not pictures of her, she can’t prevent anyone from publishing them, but she can threaten legal action against anyone who publishes them *and* claims that they’re pictures of her — that would be libel against her.
#3 | Comment by RandomDude — June 1, 2011 @ 5:08 am
calm down mister seriousness pants
#4 | Comment by DandomRude — June 1, 2011 @ 7:51 am
her body is nicer than i thought it would be.
#5 | Comment by Xan — June 1, 2011 @ 10:37 am
blake is like a senior citizen round these parts
#6 | Comment by WestHamUtd — June 1, 2011 @ 12:47 pm
The most astounding part of this post is:
Who knew so much journalistic endeavor went into updating this site? I always assumed Justin simply created a thread every so often as something to do during his refractory period.
#7 | Comment by cobalt — June 1, 2011 @ 1:40 pm
^^^
funny, i always assumed Justin passed out promptly after a fapping session.
#8 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 1, 2011 @ 3:20 pm
justin sure lives in/visits a lot of shitty places
#9 | Comment by bobos? — June 1, 2011 @ 3:34 pm
#8 – I always thought that Justin sings the theme from Titanic, cries AND then passes out. At the Kuala Lumpur airport.
#10 | Comment by Smiley — June 1, 2011 @ 4:11 pm
I thought Seal Team 6 killed Justin?
#11 | Comment by Dex — June 1, 2011 @ 5:41 pm
Certain they are real and intentionally leaked. The perfectly place “let me discreetly cover my vag” pic with her arm in the way says to me she wants the “nude photo” press without showing all.
#12 | Comment by odietamo — June 1, 2011 @ 6:29 pm
@11
you owe Disney money now.
#13 | Comment by Xan — June 1, 2011 @ 6:46 pm
Not quite convinced…but the third pic, with her face covered, looks the most like her somehow.
And if I were as hot as whoever she is, I’d be posing like this all the time.
#14 | Comment by girlfetish — June 1, 2011 @ 7:11 pm
Not a doubt it’s her. Look at the moles on her face in the first pic.
#15 | Comment by Not a doubt — June 2, 2011 @ 12:40 am
Ryan Cook over at TJNR showed that here’s a pic of Blake Lively with the same phone and the same cover: http://i.imgur.com/3EzJ3.jpg
I say it’s definitely her. Don’t forget, she has a premiere to promote.
#16 | Comment by smash — June 2, 2011 @ 6:35 am
Apparently there’s more pictures http://bit.ly/mfZnYJ
#17 | Comment by Jamdez — June 2, 2011 @ 4:12 pm
I was inclined to say fake with the first batch, but now with the second batch that TMZ just released? I’m now convinced they’re real.
#18 | Comment by hitokirivader — June 2, 2011 @ 5:14 pm
That last pic makes me want to jump her bones HARD!
Also, #3 doesn’t know what libel is. For it to be libel, a) the pictures have to be of her, and b) their publication would have to cause her demonstrable harm. Good luck proving that, lawyer bitches!
But of course, obviously this was an intentional release, given that she has a film coming out very soon. Happens all the time.
#19 | Comment by EmJee — June 2, 2011 @ 6:59 pm
Well if they are hers then the tats will confirm it. Does Blake have any star tattoos, and that writing on her neck? Way to easy to spot. Guess we will have to wait for GL to come out.
#20 | Comment by pirho — June 2, 2011 @ 10:17 pm
tats for a movie she did http://thefilmnest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/The-Town-Movie-Stills-blake-lively-13989643-1000-762.jpg
#21 | Comment by yawn — June 3, 2011 @ 12:40 am
I looks like she has a birthmark on her face by her nose. That might be a clue. And I have to agree with #2.
#22 | Comment by pirho — June 3, 2011 @ 7:17 am
Just another shameless self-promoting whore. Glad to know she shaves, though.
#23 | Comment by I.M. Hung — June 3, 2011 @ 8:20 am
@#19 Libel: A published false statement that is damaging to a person’s reputation.
Since the pics are of her, saying they are is true, and thus, not libel. If they’re weren’t of her, saying they are would false, and thus, libel. So, you’ve got it exactly backward on your (a) part.
Thanks to freedom of the press, here in the US, if what you’re publishing is true, it doesn’t matter whether it harms anyone’s reputation or not. It’s only lying to damage someone’s reputation that’s illegal.
Now, though, since the pics are of her, and she took them herself, she (via her lawyers) can go after people who published them for copyright infringement, which is a whole other can of worms.
#24 | Comment by RandomDude — June 19, 2011 @ 6:25 pm