25 thoughts on “Natalie Portman

  1. Mowhawk pubes?

    Never seen that, althought her head mowhawk isn’t all that big, so her pubes could just be a landing strip.

    Hot

    #1 | Comment by radish01001 — August 29, 2005 @ 1:01 am

  2. gross…didnt she used to be hot?

    #2 | Comment by Jacked — August 29, 2005 @ 1:12 am

  3. i blame the wachowskis

    #3 | Comment by Justin — August 29, 2005 @ 1:28 am

  4. Natalie portman is beautiful even without hair

    #4 | Comment by ZaZen — August 29, 2005 @ 2:06 am

  5. Yes, I do think the drapes match the carpet. Still hot even though the Wachowskis screwed up her hair. V for Vartan

    #5 | Comment by DUDEMASTER — August 29, 2005 @ 2:07 am

  6. What pisses me off is that by the time her hairs grows back and she ceases to be ugly because of her hair, shes gonna be ugly on account of the fact that shes old. She literally wiped out her few remaining years of hotness.

    This is why i hate women, they can’t even be trusted to deal with their own bodies in a sane and logical way.

    Who else thinks women should be required to get a permit any time they plan do anything drastic to their hair? People have to do it for their houses.

    #6 | Comment by guy — August 29, 2005 @ 2:10 am

  7. landing strip. ahem.

    I think Justin is the only person in the history of ever to think ‘Mohawk. Mohawk Pubes. Hmmmmm.’

    #7 | Comment by lessthanzero — August 29, 2005 @ 2:26 am

  8. Not hot.

    #8 | Comment by kiko — August 29, 2005 @ 2:37 am

  9. #6 is gay

    #9 | Comment by Ryan — August 29, 2005 @ 3:21 am

  10. #9 is on to something.

    #10 | Comment by stank — August 29, 2005 @ 4:13 am

  11. C’mon people – her hair, her life.
    Yes, personally this new haircut doesn’t do much for me, compared to previously.
    And let’s face it guys me with Natalie Portman, or you with Natalie Portman, never likely to happen anyway, now was it?

    #11 | Comment by Matt — August 29, 2005 @ 4:49 am

  12. curtains and carpet

    need the alliteration

    #12 | Comment by heineken — August 29, 2005 @ 5:07 am

  13. I think she’d be dead in bed.

    #13 | Comment by rosco — August 29, 2005 @ 6:07 am

  14. The point isn’t whether we think she’s hot or not. The point is that Natalie Portman is clearly a badass, and as such she’d be great in bed – she’d be totally open minded about all the stuff normal girls think is “disgusting”.

    #14 | Comment by ScarJoLover — August 29, 2005 @ 6:31 am

  15. * Go Time.

    #15 | Comment by ScarJoLover — August 29, 2005 @ 6:32 am

  16. natalie portman > john madden.

    I STAND BY THAT.

    #16 | Comment by hamster — August 29, 2005 @ 8:11 am

  17. What movie did you she do that she had to shave her head?

    #17 | Comment by Fandango — August 29, 2005 @ 10:17 am

  18. #17, V for Vendetta, watch the trailor.

    #18 | Comment by lswalker — August 29, 2005 @ 10:37 am

  19. well natalie portman is clearly more punker than avril

    #19 | Comment by Justin — August 29, 2005 @ 10:52 am

  20. #16, TheChef bows to you and tips his toque.

    Natalie… Met her once in NYC, very nice girl, has a little of a gleam in her eyes when cameras aren’t pointed at her, so I wouldn’t be surpised if she’s a little firecracker in bed.

    And as far as the pubes… I’m thinkin’ a barely there muff.

    #20 | Comment by TheChef — August 29, 2005 @ 12:08 pm

  21. Unbald Natalie > Bald Natalie

    #21 | Comment by Bronson — August 29, 2005 @ 4:24 pm

  22. avril > john madden > portman

    #22 | Comment by rosco — August 30, 2005 @ 4:44 am

  23. she looks nice, no doubt inspired by sinead o connor.

    #23 | Comment by bowwow — August 30, 2005 @ 6:02 am

  24. I’d still hit it, but I prefer a little bit more hair.

    Ballsy of her, I’ll give her that. I mean, it’s one thing to shave it for a role, but to not allow it to immediately start growing back is another.

    Also, #6, besides being gay, obviously has no concept of how long it takes to grow hair. I mean…years?!?!

    (Tard)

    #24 | Comment by ButterscotchStallion — August 30, 2005 @ 3:28 pm

  25. natalie>me>you

    #25 | Comment by Titleist — September 1, 2005 @ 4:06 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *