Transformers is right around the corner, so it was inevitable that Megan would pop up in one of the lad mags. Personally, I think the girl is flat-out gorgeous, but it’s a shame she’s messed up such a lovely bod with all those gigant tattoos. WTF?
Everytime I get another tattoo, it’s like a little F-you to anyone who told me not to.
That’s a pretty juvenile reaction, if you ask me. I just hope she doesn’t have to say F-you to the point where she winds up looking like Leonard from Memento.
o_O
if those are tattoos it’s a shame :/
#1 | Comment by padda — June 24, 2007 @ 2:53 pm
^^^
they are, and it is.
#2 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 24, 2007 @ 2:55 pm
At Least their words not big pics
#3 | Comment by Mega Marty — June 24, 2007 @ 3:24 pm
Woo, I guess she showed ME up!
stupid cunt.
#4 | Comment by tool — June 24, 2007 @ 3:34 pm
#3 – except for that huge honkin pic of Marilyn Monroe’s face on her right forearm.
#5 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 24, 2007 @ 3:44 pm
I hate tattoos! I hate them even more on girls like that! Sad it is…
She has one of the prettiest faces I’ve seen in a while. It’s a shame she seems like a douche, with the I’m going to show them attitude… ugh…
#6 | Comment by Mike — June 24, 2007 @ 3:51 pm
Am I the only one who thinks words are worse than pictures? She’s got a fucking mother goose fairy tale on her side. =/
#7 | Comment by sketch — June 24, 2007 @ 3:54 pm
i literally just saw this issue sitting around the house and i came on to tell you about it. you already win
#8 | Comment by Evestay — June 24, 2007 @ 4:00 pm
i like tattoos… so fuck you all 😛
#9 | Comment by Coolstream — June 24, 2007 @ 4:06 pm
Tattoos are hot. I’m glad she has them.
#10 | Comment by Amedan — June 24, 2007 @ 4:20 pm
I actually think she is kinda butter faced. I do not get why everyone thinks she is so hot, I’d rather look at Rachael Leigh Cook. Fact.
#11 | Comment by Mick Hawk — June 24, 2007 @ 4:42 pm
well she fucked what career she would have had up. yup.
meagan fox
#12 | Comment by Xan — June 24, 2007 @ 5:16 pm
Tattoos suck. A small one in a discreet spot, I guess isn’t bad. But wtf is wrong with her?
Well, it’s good to know that she ruined her good looks. I won’t waste anymore time on her.
#13 | Comment by smash — June 24, 2007 @ 5:37 pm
A lot of hot chicks have tattoos(Angelina Jolie and Lena Headey off the top of my head) and that’s fine. But not these kind of tattoos. Not even pornstars can get away with something like that, because it’s just too distracting.
Megan must have been wasted at the time she got them, or maybe the tattoo artist couldn’t find his glasses or something.
Oh well, no bikini scenes for her, which pretty much means her career is over before it began.
#14 | Comment by Poster — June 24, 2007 @ 5:47 pm
Tattoos are easy to cover up. The Rock is covered in tattoos but you never see them in his movies.
What’s next for her, getting her grocery list tattooed on her ass?
I thought she looked good on that show she was on, but she’s way too high maintenance. It looks like it takes a team of make up people to make her presentable. Give me Emmy Rossum anyday.
#15 | Comment by The Pope — June 24, 2007 @ 7:02 pm
i love tattoos on girls but that one on her ribcage is fucking retarded. go back to your room and listen to my chemical romance, megan fox
#16 | Comment by HMMMM — June 24, 2007 @ 7:36 pm
Tattoos are a great way to be unique, rebellious and non-conformist, just like everybody else with a fucking tattoo.
#17 | Comment by Tanzarian — June 24, 2007 @ 10:13 pm
^^^
lolz true story.
#18 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 24, 2007 @ 10:19 pm
i got this in the mail (though it belongs to somebody else’s apartment) and looked at it. then i threw it in the trash. she is a trailer trash hooker.
#19 | Comment by wilderness — June 24, 2007 @ 10:38 pm
#17 is wise. That’s the whole absurdity of it.
#20 | Comment by smash — June 24, 2007 @ 10:39 pm
I’ve already tried to invest in tattoo removal places. They are going to be so huge. All the barbed wire rings and back tats…they’re either coming off or they’re going to look like complete shit in 10 years. The thing with this dumb bitch is that she’s only got a career because of her looks and she is hell-bent on destroying them. So tasty.
#21 | Comment by Sloan — June 24, 2007 @ 11:16 pm
^^^
srsly.
just imagine all these hipsters in their 70s and 80s…
“grandma, why is there a paragraph on your shoulder?”
#22 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 24, 2007 @ 11:26 pm
I wish tattoos weren’t so fucking trendy. I want several, but now all the retard hipsters want them. I want them as an expression of something very beautiful to me, not to be cool. But that’ll be the assumption.
And hell, I like girls with tattoos. But not those ones, those are…cheesy, mostly. If they’re great for her, well that’s fine, but not for me.
Meh, still better than piercings and big icky moles, anyway. But those are some emo-ass tattoos.
#23 | Comment by ZekeDMS — June 25, 2007 @ 1:16 am
21- they don’t come off. Not completely, not well.
#24 | Comment by tool — June 25, 2007 @ 2:02 am
What’s happend to this place lately? Too much time between articles posted and not that many, and the quality of the articles posted has really gone down the shitter these past 2 months :\
#25 | Comment by The_Abyss — June 25, 2007 @ 3:34 am
i like tattoos. i like girls with tattoos. i think she is hot, tattoos or not. her tattoos are retarted to me, but at the same time, its ok because they arent on me. they are hers and they mean something to her. very much in the same way that all mine mean something to me though im sure other people would find them cheesy or absurd.
as far as you halfwits who dont like chicks with tattoos; awesome, more chicks for me. its like not fucking a girl who has tits smaller than a D, sure you can have standards, but pussy is pussy in the end, tattoos (or D cups) or not.
one of the many problems with our society and country today is the over-importance we put on the visual. who gives a fuck if the guy has a tattoo on his fucking forhead of an egg with a smiley face, if he works harder than eveyrone else, why not give him a job?
fucking gimps, judge by the person, not by the looks.
#26 | Comment by MrShadow — June 25, 2007 @ 3:58 am
Dear Defenders of the Tats,
Not too long ago, I wore ripped jeans with pegged legs and bought Vanilla Ice cds. A lot has happened since. My tastes have changed considerably in the last 10 years, even the last 5. You get older and you realize you were stupid. SO WHY THE FUCK WOULD I PERMANENTLY WANT TO MARK MYSELF WITH SOMETHING THAT I WILL PROBABLY BE EMBARRASSED ABOUT IN 5-10 YEARS?! Like that stupid butterfly message and the stuff about her being a girl who had her heart broken. Believe me, kids, Panic at the Disco is C and C Music Factory. What you like now will not be what you like later.
#27 | Comment by Sloan — June 25, 2007 @ 4:23 am
I love Megan Fox, she is so hot. I agree that she’d be even better without the tattoos, and part of me wants to say she was even better without the tattoos and dangerously younger in all those Mary-Kate & Ashley / lindsay lohan / hilary duff style movies lol Prolly her hottest as the hot jailbait babysitter in 2 and a half men…
#28 | Comment by thiessen — June 25, 2007 @ 4:57 am
PS Oi 27 – Don’t diss C&C music factory! You’ll make me go ‘hmmmm’
#29 | Comment by thiessen — June 25, 2007 @ 4:58 am
Megan Fox is a smokin hot 10. Have you seen her interviewed though? shes kind of dumb, bitchy and full of herself. Not the personality of an A-lister. Gotta give props to that guy from Beverly Hills 90210 Brian Austin Green for finding this girl and banging her. Amen brother you are my hero!
#30 | Comment by Jack Mayhoffer — June 25, 2007 @ 5:07 am
I just hope she didnt got those precisely to tell people off…
if she did, i hope she starts hearing things like:
Dont do sex videos
dont you ever get naked in a film
dont have unsimulated sex on indie films…
u know
#31 | Comment by Charlioso — June 25, 2007 @ 5:24 am
Tatoos as a outward show of rebellion are so last decade. If she really wants to say “F You” to society, she should go all the way and decide to star in a hardcore anal porn film. With me. And Lacey Chabert.
#32 | Comment by Upchuck — June 25, 2007 @ 7:09 am
Hot girl.
Hot girl with tattoos.
Tattoos make girl hotter!
Fuck you all!
The reasons why she’s getting them is her business really, if you don’t like it you can just step off and go fap at that Crazy Town chick.
#22, your point being? If I’m sitting there, 80 some years old with tattoos all over me that would matter little. My body would have decayed to the point of saggy and wrinkled skin anyway, a few tattoos won’t make that look either better or worse. If my grandchild asks why at least I have another story to tell.
In the end of the life it’s always better to regret doing something (like a tattoo) than to sit there and regret not doing it at all. Live life, in any way you see fit. If you don’t want tattoos that’s your deal, if I want them that’s mine. I don’t really see what all the fuzz is about, as long as it’s not your body you could just as well stfu.
For a site riddled with questionable content (once again: fapping at minors) the lot of you sure are acting like a bunch of conformist conservatives.
#33 | Comment by BongoClown — June 25, 2007 @ 7:36 am
HQ Scans
http://www.hotcelebshome.com/megan-fox-maxim-magazine-hq-scans-july-2007/
#34 | Comment by HCH — June 25, 2007 @ 8:01 am
#33 – um…yeah, it would matter.
saggy wrinkled skin = gross
saggy wrinkled skin + a bunch of ink = EWWWWW
and getting tattooed in 2007 is soooooo non-conformist. yep.
ps. it’s LAZY town…what a dumb.
#35 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 25, 2007 @ 8:31 am
I am not a fan of tatoos. Especially on hot chicks. Why would a chick like Megan Fox want to take away from her natural beauty?!?!?!?!?!?!
#36 | Comment by Adam — June 25, 2007 @ 9:14 am
tattoos are like car body mods. Most people who have them know fucking nothing about design and the result is about as cool looking as Richard Simmons. She should get a tattoo of a huge cock on her forehead.
Works for me.
#37 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — June 25, 2007 @ 9:25 am
The X in Maxim gives her horns.
#38 | Comment by Scratch — June 25, 2007 @ 12:11 pm
33 – Is it really down to this choice? Getting tats or sitting on the couch doing nothing? Is there nothing in between? There’s not one person without tats who doesn’t have a more exciting life than a person with a tattoo? Of course not, don’t be stupid.
Also, nobody will care when you’re 80, you’re right. It’s when you’re 45 watching your kid play soccer on a hot day and you have to wear a long sleeve tee to cover up that stupid barbed wire thing on your arm because you don’t want to feel like an idiot something you did because you thought that looking tough was the bomb. That story you’d tell your grandkid: “Well I was 18 and retarded and all my friends got tattoos on the small of their back and I thought, hey, live a little, it’s not I ever regret anything I’ve done. And then I felt like an asshole for the next 50 years of my life, please don’t make the same mistake I did.”
#39 | Comment by Sloan — June 25, 2007 @ 2:26 pm
#35, Lazy Town, Crazy Town, so what…still fapping at minors. Not saying I’m above anyone fapping at minors (even though that’s not my thing), I’m still visiting this site after all.
The comparison you make between old skin versus old skin with tattoos is like a comparison between getting killed by the plague or the cholera. Doesn’t really matter, you’d die anyway – your skin will look like shit anyway.
If she thinks it makes her non-conformist that’s her deal, I’m not going to try to defend that since so many people from so many different walks of life get tattoos. However, I don’t get tattoos because of that, I have a genuine interest in the entire process and I take great care in what I choose to get tattooed on myself. It is somewhat like #37 says, I do agree with that to some extent, though he/she makes a big mistake. Thinking it’s only up to the person who gets tattoed what to tattoo is like saying that cows make milk and the farmer has nothing to do with the end product. Any good tattooist knows enough design and has enough experience to know what looks good and what works versus what doesn’t. The problem is more that people choose to get tattooed by hacks.
#39, of course it’s not, I never claimed that either. You can have plenty of interests other than tattooing, extreme or not. The point I was making was more that if the only reason you’re not getting tattooed, if you want it otherwise, is that you worry how it will look when you get old then you don’t have much to worry about. Your body will sag anyway, tattoos or not.
What most people can’t handle about tattoos is not the aesthethics, but rather the permanency, if that’s not your thing then don’t get tattooed, it’s that easy. I don’t get why people would have to slag people with tattoos though. People say that you should expect it if you’re tattooed. Well, as people who do verbally attack people with tattoos you’re not really making it any better. Saying that people with tattoos should expect it is really just a way of justifying to yourself that you can be mean to (or even discriminate) people depending on the color on their skin.
If that’s your story to tell when you get old that’s upto you. It certainly won’t be mine, I have a mind to act beyond what my friends choose to do. How does “I felt like an asshole for the next 50 years” go together with “it’s not I ever regret anything I’ve done” anyway? Your whole sentence is an oxymoron from beginning to end…but hey, let’s throw logic out the window, who needs it anyway?
Plus, if it REALLY is that extreme that you regret getting that barbed wire tattoo when you’re 45 there are ways of solving it. Tattoo removal, covering the tattoo with another better looking tattoo or using makeup to cover it (there are some really great product that covers tattoos completely and still looks like your natural skin).
#40 | Comment by BongoClown — June 25, 2007 @ 4:23 pm
#40 Balls.
Any tattooist will give you whatever you want, if you want it. If you walk in, pick out an image of an AK47 with the words “killa” and ask for it to run all the way across your chest, you’ll get it. Want a tat of a snake above your pussy? Just like Burger King, you got it.
People like to think their tattoos look Blade-cool when in fact they most look like Popeye. Just like Megan Fox. Crap design, badly integrated into the body and in a crap and unoriginal typeface.
People spend days in Home Depot trying to figure out what color to paint a wall to match the carpet, but when it comes to tattoos the majority go for some cheesy crap slapped on the nearest body part.
#41 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — June 25, 2007 @ 5:37 pm
Bongo,
You seem to really care about your tats, so I’m sure they look fine and you’ll be happy in 50 years. I’m talking about the average person who puts ugly generic shit that they will want to forget in a few years. Or: 75 percent of the people who get tattoos.
#42 | Comment by Sloan — June 25, 2007 @ 8:24 pm
#41, that’s bullshit and you obviously have no idea how the tattoo industry really works. Bad tattoo artists who need the money now more than they need to build up a good reputation to make them money in the future as well will indeed tattoo whatever you want (and often do it badly). Reputable tattoo artists will turn down tattoos which are stupid, racistic or malplaced. I’ve seen it happen far more than once. Many tattoo artists also refuses to tattoo anything above the neck or on the hands. A tattoo is not only a tattoo but also a walking portfolio of a tattoo artist, why should a reputable artist do bad work and thusly give himself a bad reputation? Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
Heck, you only need to see the TV-show Miami Ink to see that people DO get turn down from getting bad tattoos and that people DO (at least those that go to reputable artists) put thought into their tattoos.
#42, how you arrived at 75 percent will remain a mystery to me, but still, it’s their body and their choice (not to mention their money) so it’s their perogative to do what they want. If that decision is a bad or good one it’s still not you that has to live with it, only the person has to. In the case of Megan Fox I can’t see it being a bad decision considering that she got published in Maxim.
Though, it often is the case that people with visible body modifications need to work twice as hard to get half as far. It shouldn’t be that way, but when people have idiotic preconceptions about people with tattoos (seldomly based on anything more than prejudice) are unable to see further than the tip of the nose what are you going to do? Personally I don’t mind, I know the rules of the game, I don’t like it and I fight against it on a daily basis, but I do recognize that they exist.
Though, there’s something eerily familiar about discriminating people depending on the color on (or of) their skin. Hmm 😛
#43 | Comment by BongoClown — June 25, 2007 @ 10:18 pm
Well, if she ever gets amnesia, at least she’s got a system ready…
#44 | Comment by Sammy Jenkins — June 26, 2007 @ 12:36 am
43, you were starting to make sense until your last line. That was ka-razy dumb. The reason you’re not supposed to discriminate by color, kids, is because you can’t choose it. You chose the tats. Next thing you know we won’t be able to discriminate against people with mullets.
#45 | Comment by Sloan — June 26, 2007 @ 12:59 am
everyone shut up! quit whining about tattoos that you don’t have.
she’s freaking gorgeous and i wouldn’t mind what so ever to see her butt naked, showing off her tattoos. just be happy that it’s a hot girl, instead of some “dykes on bikes” type with “butch bitch” tattooed on her.
#46 | Comment by none — June 26, 2007 @ 4:26 am
Sloan, I guess you never heard of a sarcasm. See that little “:P” at the end, maybe…just maybe, I wasn’t entirely serious with that last paragraph. I was trying to lighten things up a wee bit. Not going to do that again I guess.
Though, at one time in history people were discriminated on because they had tattoos because the tattoos were marks that they were criminals. Somewhat similar to the sharia laws that some muslim countries employ, that you can get a finger or a hand cut off for a crime.
We shouldn’t discriminate people, period, regardless of tattoos, mullets or anything else. That’s my stance anyway. If you have to discriminate then do it based on the personality and not on what they choose to wear on the outside of their bodies. Personality cannot be read by the clothes one wears or how one chooses to groom one’s hair.
#47 | Comment by BongoClown — June 26, 2007 @ 7:47 am
#47: No one is discriminating because she has tattoos; lots of girls have lots of tats and look really good (visit Suicide Girls sometime). The problem here is that she has butt-ugly, stupid tattoos that do nothing to make her more attractive; they just make her look stupid. It only takes one high-profile idiot like her with really bad ink to make the general public dislike tattoos even more than they already do.
#48 | Comment by Violent Acres — June 26, 2007 @ 8:11 am
am i the only one who has no idea who this chick is?
not to mention, she’s completely generic. looks like your average playboy centerfold dumbass.
#49 | Comment by tehpunk — June 26, 2007 @ 9:37 am
I dunno about that last statement Bongo. I can judge personality by hair pretty well. If you have that hair shelf thing where the front of your head is a giant poofy thing and then straight back, but the rest is straight down on the sides, you’re possibly an idiot or a trendy douche. And if you have a fauxhawk, I know you’re a trendy douche. Like the 8302320 people with a chinese or japanese character they can’t read on their wrist.
#50 | Comment by ZekeDMS — June 26, 2007 @ 10:52 am
Hmm…chick with no tattoos. Tight.
Chick with tattoos. Tight.
I dunno. Both feel the same when I have them bent over the couch pounding them hard.
You seriously gonna discriminate? Or STFU and bust a nut across her eyes?
#51 | Comment by ThePenisThatAteNYC — June 26, 2007 @ 12:21 pm
Zeke, you just keep thinking that, while the rest of us keep living in a little place I’d like to call the real world. 😉
#52 | Comment by BongoClown — June 26, 2007 @ 3:31 pm
^^^
I agree.
When she’s naked and bent over in front of me, I’m not thinking about what her grandchildren will think of her tattoos.
#53 | Comment by Slim Harpo — June 26, 2007 @ 3:42 pm
I didn’t know about the verse on the side of her body. That seems kinda weird.
#54 | Comment by dmavsfan41 — June 26, 2007 @ 4:45 pm
I have stuff to say about this, but if I’m too clever my comments will get deleted… then reposted using my name and some really bad grammar… so why bother?
#55 | Comment by StrongBad — June 26, 2007 @ 7:46 pm
i guess in all honesty, the tats can be covered with make-up so thats it.
#56 | Comment by Xan — June 26, 2007 @ 8:33 pm
ok
#57 | Comment by Omega Marty — June 26, 2007 @ 10:02 pm
sure
#58 | Comment by Gamma Marti — June 26, 2007 @ 10:03 pm
to all you prudish little SOBs that don’t like tattoos;
YOU ARE THE ONES SHE IS SAYING ‘FUCK YOU’ TO.
I LOVE HER TATs THEY SHOW THAT NOT EVERONE IN HOLLYWOOD IS A LITTLE PUNK PREP ASS RICHY.
RIDE ON!!!
FTW, AND THE HORSE RULES!
#59 | Comment by Harkon Lucas — July 5, 2007 @ 10:26 am
she still hot to me
#60 | Comment by those annoying vh1 banner links are annoying as me — July 31, 2007 @ 9:28 pm
shes still hot with the tattos
#61 | Comment by Apples — July 31, 2007 @ 9:30 pm
hope she does more movie where she hot in wooo
#62 | Comment by Zzyzx — July 31, 2007 @ 10:24 pm