My oh Miley!
Seems more and more of those candid pics she’s been snapping of herself are turning up on the series of tubes that Al Gore invented to bring us photos of nubile starlets gettin naughty.
I threw in some older ones from early 2007 that were lying around the hard drive, three photos of her out on the town in a slinky red dress, and a couple shots of her in one of her concert costumes.
Easy boys…remember, she’s only 15.
she may be 15, but
so is my girlfriend 🙂
#1 | Comment by sidewinder — January 28, 2008 @ 2:42 am
-_-
too old
#2 | Comment by dex — January 28, 2008 @ 2:58 am
this reminds me of the vanessa hudgens thing.
so you’re a girl, you get a lil goofy with your friends and take goofy pics. it’s part of being a goofy chick, isn’t it?
too bad.
hope disney doesn’t ruin her for some stupid phone shots.
i think at 15 i traced my dick for my friends onto paper and it got passed around. and it wasn’t a big hit.
but yeah, i’m throwin mad heat now.
#3 | Comment by tehpunk — January 28, 2008 @ 3:01 am
Now this is fucking win!
#4 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 3:04 am
no sir, i don’t like it.
#5 | Comment by Uncle Rico — January 28, 2008 @ 3:10 am
doesnt really do anything for me. though the hard nipple pokie on the hello kitty sheets was a nice touch…
#6 | Comment by MrShadow — January 28, 2008 @ 3:12 am
5 – Grandma just called and said you’re supposed to go home. >.<
#7 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 3:16 am
I’d do her, sure. If I was still in high school.
#8 | Comment by tool — January 28, 2008 @ 3:40 am
i still think selena wins, but these are hottt. see, three “t”‘s. that means she’s super hot.
#9 | Comment by Xan — January 28, 2008 @ 3:45 am
p.s.
she has some sexy ass abs. and im not even an ab guy.
#10 | Comment by Xan — January 28, 2008 @ 3:47 am
Okay, these are pretty awesome, and likely better than even the best Emily Osment post.
#11 | Comment by zomg — January 28, 2008 @ 4:02 am
This is so wrong……
#12 | Comment by Kee Man — January 28, 2008 @ 4:28 am
dat sum cp?
#13 | Comment by 2 — January 28, 2008 @ 4:37 am
Not even close number 13. This is more soft core MySpace type shite.
And whoa dude. I’m supposed to be the adamantly against anything resembling pedophilia guy around here. These pics pass my litmus test.
#14 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 8:31 am
TOO OLD
#15 | Comment by dex — January 28, 2008 @ 9:05 am
I guess she’s got a decent body for a 15 year old, but that face is just… ugh.
#16 | Comment by Nobody — January 28, 2008 @ 9:13 am
what is with young girls and the ridiculous pouty lip face they make in every single picture???
When will they realize this is not attractive?!
#17 | Comment by MacDaddy — January 28, 2008 @ 9:24 am
And im 17 so its ok. Either way you read my mind because i was just about to ask you to put some up because i cant stop looking at her. mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
#18 | Comment by Bob — January 28, 2008 @ 9:44 am
And im 26 so its extra ok. I think image2 warrants the rare honor of a place in my saved images folder. image10 is nice, too, but not intimate enough, and she’s suffering from some bizarre fashion disorder from waist to ankles.
#19 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 10:39 am
AB FTW
#20 | Comment by WhoMe — January 28, 2008 @ 11:23 am
i knew i would find these here.
fap
thanks!
#21 | Comment by filthyfish — January 28, 2008 @ 11:28 am
i want to leave dna evidence on hello kitty sheets
#22 | Comment by filthyfish — January 28, 2008 @ 11:30 am
reminds me of a joke I heard recently:
Q: how do you ruin a little girl’s day twice?
A: wipe your bloody cock on her teddy bear.
#23 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 11:33 am
^^16, I agree something about this girl just totally disgusts me. I have spent the last 10 minutes or so trying to pin point it. I apologize in advance for this btw.
I think it’s either her face, no neck in some pics, or the expression she has on her face when she is smiling. The smile on this girl is so god damned full of shit that I just hate her. sorry no offense to the post =[.
#24 | Comment by lawl — January 28, 2008 @ 12:41 pm
That pouty lip thing looks stupid. Is it supposed to be cute? To make lips bigger or something? Looks duck-ish to me and stupid.
#25 | Comment by blahbert — January 28, 2008 @ 12:57 pm
#23 FTW
#26 | Comment by filthyfish — January 28, 2008 @ 2:19 pm
Oh god do I want her, In the worst way.
#27 | Comment by Orlandpark77 — January 28, 2008 @ 4:36 pm
settle down.
#28 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 4:38 pm
this sucks for all you older guys, now you can actually be classified as pedos. i’m only a couple years older than her so i’m safe
17/2=8.5
8.5+7=15.5
yup she’s old enough for me
she’s one of those people you know is gonna be hot when she gets older i just pray she doesn’t take the same route route as hillary duff (she used to be so hot)
#29 | Comment by Tom Foolery — January 28, 2008 @ 4:53 pm
You don’t think that Hilary Duff is still hot, Tom? She was cute when she was younger, but always though that she was odd looking, like she had no neck. It seems that she is finally growing into her body. When she got her hair darker she was ultra hot.
Only thing wrong with Miley’s looks is that her eyes and mouth are a little out of proportion. There are worse girls out there… meh
#30 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 5:16 pm
american laws are funny. fully grown 5’6″ girls with breasts and pubes are children. copying files without permission means you’re a pirate. trying to blow up a country’s military, economic, and administrative nerve centers, and a naval destroyer is terrorism.
#31 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 5:30 pm
^^^ Al-Qaeda humor…
#32 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 5:37 pm
yep, the good stuff. by the way, here’s a pic of me from first thing this morning. a friend from work asked for a new one, so I happen to have a current one handy.
#33 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 5:44 pm
WELL DONE!
Hats off to you.
Here’s hoping she keeps it up.
#34 | Comment by melvin_udall — January 28, 2008 @ 5:46 pm
33 – lmao! The face of a pedo?
Work??? I thought that you were laid off and wasting away on unemployment?
#35 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 5:50 pm
I lived in a work lodge and dealt with hundreds of coworkers every day until dec. 13. I met up with a few in vegas, and I have some email contacts. isn’t technology great?
#36 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 5:57 pm
Work lodge? Is that like a bath house – with beds?
#37 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 6:03 pm
…all kidding aside, I probably need to thank you for at least making this interesting. I was pretty disillusioned after the holidays, regarding my contributions to the big Lazytown thread. The morons posting in there are reaching new heights of retardation. I go back there every few days and read the useless “stalkeresque” banter still going on in there. I’m thinking that the total IQ in that thread is about 45.
#38 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 6:07 pm
no, more like a hotel. private rooms, hdtv, daily maid service, buffet, bag lunch room, starbucks-like station, workout rooms, games rooms with things like pool and foosball, all free. I have a short video of my room at the lodge on youtube. and np, though I never saw that thread.
#39 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 6:10 pm
Damn – that’s one tiny room they stick you in.
Believe me, if you survive the1-2 minute loading time of that thread page, you’ll be amazed at how far advanced on the evolutionary scale you’ll feel. lol Make one post, commenting on their obsession, and they’ll swoop on you like flies on shit.
#40 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 6:14 pm
get a room you two
#41 | Comment by dex — January 28, 2008 @ 6:16 pm
41 – Jealous, sweetheart?
#42 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 6:22 pm
hah. brought to mind this turd that I never thought I’d find myself searching for.
#43 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 6:33 pm
I support these pictures
#44 | Comment by the real slim timlin — January 28, 2008 @ 6:45 pm
43 – ugh do not want… >.<
#45 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 6:45 pm
#29- You don’t think she’s hot any more?
#46 | Comment by Nobody — January 28, 2008 @ 6:59 pm
46: she looks like the sort of tired, angry waitress I’d expect to see at the olive garden.
#47 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 7:05 pm
Mmmm… I need to go to Olive Garden soon.
#48 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 7:38 pm
I’d eat at the Olive Garden every day if this was my waitress
#49 | Comment by Nobody — January 28, 2008 @ 7:54 pm
better, but I still wouldn’t notice her or want her if I walked by her
#50 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 8:01 pm
Bad angle. Looks like she’s rockin’ a fivehead.
#51 | Comment by Tony — January 28, 2008 @ 8:06 pm
Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
#52 | Comment by Nobody — January 28, 2008 @ 8:25 pm
Don’t worry about it Nobody – you keep posting those hi-res Hilary pics to proof your point and I won’t complain… very fappable! I’m still waiting for her Britney/Lindsey pantiless moment. :^D
#53 | Comment by JRC — January 28, 2008 @ 9:42 pm
no. futile. there’s no right way to cook a rotten tomato. find better stuff, like: this or this or this.
#54 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 10:27 pm
These kids today … they sure do make it hard not to have Chris Hansen show up in your kitchen.
#55 | Comment by Dr. Disgusto — January 28, 2008 @ 10:33 pm
that’s the thing about highschool girls (and middleschool too!): I keep gettin’ older and they just stay the same age.
#56 | Comment by Justin L — January 28, 2008 @ 10:39 pm
54 – 3rd pic very very fappable !! 🙂
#57 | Comment by Jambo — January 28, 2008 @ 10:57 pm
And on the 3rd day, God made the Disney Channel…
Keep up the good work Miley
#58 | Comment by Osi — January 28, 2008 @ 11:06 pm
#53 …mmm Miley and Hilary getting off a car with no panties…
Let´s hope that happends very soon…!
#59 | Comment by Chuck — January 28, 2008 @ 11:56 pm
#54: Love the girl next to Emma Watson…! Very hot!
#60 | Comment by Chuck — January 29, 2008 @ 12:01 am
As THE authority on underage poon herebouts, I can say the girl does it for me, especially the stomach and legs but she does need to grow a bit more, but she has the trailer trash in her blood and it’s only a matter of time before she becomes Britneyfied. Enjoy, fellas. Before she’s 21 she” be knocked up twice and married maybe more than once, probably to a loser jerk or two even.
#61 | Comment by Osama Bin Laden — January 29, 2008 @ 12:23 am
maybe I should get in touch with her people, just in case she’s already looking for a federline of her own
#62 | Comment by Justin L — January 29, 2008 @ 12:29 am
54 – JL, do you even like girls older than 17? :/
1st pic = two “girls” who could easily be homely boys. I have never liked Emma Watson. Fucking 4channers drool all over this chick. Emma Roberts, meh, okay I guess. A bit cock-eyed. She has blue eyes: one blew this way, one blew that way. Still, neither of these girls would turn my head in a mall.
2nd pic = duh, this is a Miley Cyrus thread ya’ know… no complaint there. Just think that Hilary is miles ahead of her in hotness. Maybe Miley will lose the giant deformed mouth when she grows up, like Hilary gained a neck.
3rd pic = an ugly overrated cow who the Admins. seem to be obsessed with here. Take off the gallon of make-up, and you have a girl that I would completely overlook in a Mall full of normal girls. If she falls off of her diet, she balloons to 200 lbs. yep, she’s fucking sexy as hell /sarcasm
59 – damn would that be newsworthy or what!?! lol
#63 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 12:31 am
“JL, do you even like girls older than 17?” of course. there are some simply gorgeous women in their 20s and 30s. in fact, I would probably never date a teenager.
#64 | Comment by Justin L — January 29, 2008 @ 12:41 am
Well that’s comforting… I guess that my little sister can go outside again. 😉
One of the most beautiful women I rate very high is in her 40’s (I think), Catherine Zeta Jones.
#65 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 12:46 am
Correction – she’s 38.
#66 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 12:48 am
yeah, she’s not bad, though she’s clearly not mentally sound, given her choice of life partner. how old is your sister?
#67 | Comment by Justin L — January 29, 2008 @ 12:53 am
What, she’s married to Tom Cruise as well? =p
“how old is your sister?”
Younger than me, and I’ll just leave it at that… 😐
#68 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 1:03 am
what a tease.
#69 | Comment by Justin L — January 29, 2008 @ 1:05 am
Miley and Hilary together.
The last one should be hi-res but it keeps getting resized by imageshack, and I’m too lazy to try and fix it.
#70 | Comment by Nobody — January 29, 2008 @ 1:40 am
^^^
old.
#71 | Comment by AngelBaby — January 29, 2008 @ 1:53 am
Hilary definitely > Miley
She just oozes hawt. Miley still looks like a goofy kid next to this “woman”. I love how pushed up Hilary’s boobettes are in the last pic. Billy Ray probably wants to hit it. 😀
Just crop Hilary out of the 3rd pic. and upload the hi-res version of her!
#72 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 1:55 am
hilary > hayden > miley
thoughts?
#73 | Comment by qwerty — January 29, 2008 @ 2:03 am
Miley’s show is getting axed, it was just announced, to make way for new Disney Stars… hopefully, she will be able to live off of her concert dough from now on
#74 | Comment by Lita — January 29, 2008 @ 2:28 am
73 – hilary > miley > hayden
Just my .2, but I place MIley ahead of Hayden not just because I can’t stand Hayden, but I just feel that HP has to work too hard to look presentable (for me). Miley has more potential methinks. As soon as she grows out of the goofy look she’ll be fine. Plus, she’s probably not a republican like HP… lol
#75 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 2:33 am
Wasn’t trying to offer them as new, just as visual support for my argument.
The argument being, Hilary > Miley.
Personally, I’d say Hilary > Hayden > Miley, with Hayden having potential to move ahead, if she slutted it up more.
#76 | Comment by Nobody — January 29, 2008 @ 2:43 am
The most potential Hayden has is hitting 200 lbs before she turns 25.
#77 | Comment by Gage — January 29, 2008 @ 4:19 am
IMO Miley appears to have the most potential for “slutting” up. You can tell by her MySpace-like pictures she took with her friend. Plus she’s what, still around my age? Hayden looks one miss-step close to turning into a frumpy housewife. I can almost picture her campaigning for George Bush if he could run for a 3rd term. Don’t get me wrong, Hayden isn’t an ogre, she’s just not as hot as everyone makes her out to be. To each his own I guess…
77 – lol
#78 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 6:37 am
I’d say hayden’s face on miley’s body, and hilary nowhere to be found, would be the ideal combo of the 3.
#79 | Comment by Justin L — January 29, 2008 @ 10:18 am
*ejaculates*
Seriously, man, those first three were clearly taken for one purpose. And it wasn’t to make Billy Ray proud.
#80 | Comment by matt — January 29, 2008 @ 12:29 pm
I smell epic’ness in the making.
ANGELBABY GIVE SPAWN MAOR!!!!
#81 | Comment by Spawn — January 29, 2008 @ 2:41 pm
maybe i failed to fully articulate myself
hillary duff was hot the she lost a bunch of wait and got ugly, she hit rock bottom in the video the beat of my heart and now she is slowly getting her looks back
#82 | Comment by Tom Foolery — January 29, 2008 @ 2:42 pm
Way to be a hypocritical douche, AngelBaby; You seem to take the moral high-ground by warning others of her age, but yet you,/i> are the one who posts the pics. If her age were any kind of issue at all (for you or anyone else), you wouldn’t have posted the fucking things in the first place. Clearly, it’s not an issue though, you fucking parasite.
#83 | Comment by Name (required) — January 29, 2008 @ 3:45 pm
more parasitic hypocritical douche posts of half-naked jailbait, please.
#84 | Comment by Justin L — January 29, 2008 @ 3:50 pm
82 – I can agree with your timeline, Tom Foolery. She was cute, but squatty looking when she was on Lizzie McGuire. Then when she got older, she did lose too much weight. She looked very haggard. I don’t know why she felt the need to get so skinny, as unlike Hayden P., she isn’t one donut close to being a fat hag.
That said, she has rebounded real well, and I just love Hilary to death. She can sit on my face anytime.
83 – Sheeeesh, chill out Bill Clinton!
#85 | Comment by HJRC — January 29, 2008 @ 5:04 pm
#83 – normally i’d say LURK MOAR NOOB, but a quick IP search reveals you’ve been lurking here for quite some time from Colorado…isn’t that right, clash/apogee?
ZOMG OUTED
#86 | Comment by AngelBaby — January 29, 2008 @ 6:21 pm
As much as i think she is good looking, I don’t think this is something to be posted on the net, like the vanessa hudgens pictures, I mean seriously. . . How many little kids want pictures of High school musical or Hannah montana crap and whatnot? and these are the first to come up!!!! What is that telling little kids to do?
#87 | Comment by Justin S — January 29, 2008 @ 6:23 pm
^^^
if little kids are browsing fubar, their parents should be locked up.
to bad yep to bad
ps. i just googled ‘miley cyrus’ and ‘hannah montana’ and didn’t see a dlt link on the first page of results.
#88 | Comment by AngelBaby — January 29, 2008 @ 6:27 pm
In all honesty if your that famous and you do stupid things like Vennesa Hudgens, and doing naked candid is VERY STUPID (but also very funny) you deserve what you get.
Conclusion: Famous people are stupid. Fact of Life (Case Point: Tom Cruise)
P.s. Miley Cyrus’s pitctures arent that bad (Not as bad as Vennesa).
AngelBaby keep the goodz comming, I want more lulz
#89 | Comment by Spawn — January 29, 2008 @ 7:37 pm
86 – lol 83 has been officially pwned!
Holy tits, you whiners… get out more often. She’s what, 15? Girls in my school do these kind of pictures all of the time for their Facebook or MySpace accounts. It’s not like they’ll suddenly become pregnant or hooked on crack because they “flirt” with the camera…
It’s the old fuckers that make sexual remarks about minors who should be locked up as well. If they can’t control their fucking pedo urges, it’s their problem, not the hot 15 year old showing off her body. So to the Quakers bitching to AB, get your stories straight.
#90 | Comment by JRC — January 29, 2008 @ 8:12 pm
yeah yeah, if you don’t pretend anyone under 18 is a “child” then you’re a pedo. that slogan is getting real tired, save it for church. I mean, you’re supposedly under 18, so are you a child? would it be molestation if a 19 year old woman had sex with you? though, I do agree that those self pics are normal and harmless.
#91 | Comment by Justin L — January 29, 2008 @ 11:51 pm
I stopped reading after #71 because I was busy laughing at AB’s ability to swoop in and make people feel bad about themselves (See #70 &71).
Miley looks hot in these. I would definitely hit it.
#92 | Comment by sodapopinski — January 30, 2008 @ 1:07 am
Want Emily Osment pics.
#93 | Comment by Milhouse — January 30, 2008 @ 1:48 am
Want away, Milhouse, it’s no use.
#94 | Comment by zomg — January 30, 2008 @ 2:38 am
I just went searching for Emily Osment pics on my own and… I officially retract my requests on the subject.
#95 | Comment by zomg — January 30, 2008 @ 2:47 am
92 – How did that make Nobody feel bad about himself? He explained everything in post 76. Maybe you should have read beyond bost 71, eh? :-S
I agree with you though, Miley looks hot. I wish that HIlary Duff would do this kind of shit. 🙂
What are you trying to justify, 91? Whenever I bring a topic like post 90 up, you get all defensive and shit. Fuck me, one day you’re funny and shit, and the next you’re all pissy. You’re like a 14 year old bi-polar chick…
And for the record, I don’t go to church… plus, a 19 year old woman wanting to fuck me isn’t molestation, it’s a fantasy. I’m perfectly happy with girls my own age, thank you very much. I mean, you’re posting in a thread about a 15 year old chick that is symbolically “fucking the camera”, so you must be happy with girls this age too? :-/
#96 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 2:47 am
95 – wtf zomg? You were all demanding Emily Osment pics in another thread. You had to know what she looked like to request them. Has she suddenly become ugly???
#97 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 2:49 am
Well if that show wasn’t so horrible and I could watch more than a minute of it at a time, perhaps I would have had time to realize she looks just like her brother. Back in the day I could watch nearly an entire episode of The Amanda Show, and that was much worse than Hannah Montana. Of course, that was when I was young and strong. Also, it didn’t have Billy Ray Cyrus.
#98 | Comment by zomg — January 30, 2008 @ 2:57 am
When you were young and strong? What, are you elderly and weak now??? Nevermind, I don’t want to know…
Yeah, I kind of remember the Amanda Show and it was pretty bad. I can’t even watch Hannah Montana, even for Miley Cyrus. It’s horrible.
LOL She’s better looking than her brother… :p
#99 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 5:59 am
96, I’ll criticize the act of name calling by others, but that isn’t justifying. I don’t justify myself. I find moralistic arguments about as unrealistic and childish as an argument about who would win in a fight between batman and spiderman. it’s batman, by the way, and I’m super right for fucking whoever I want because the bible says so. but anyway, there are more compelling ways to make a point against having sex with 15 year olds than throwing around the words pedo and child as if trying to tack on those labels proves something. as if making some contrived comparison to these dangerous people who are obsessed with little kids is evidence of anything but that you lack the substance to make an actual point.
#100 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 9:37 am
I turned on Fox News today and they were postulating upon some allegedly ‘racy’ pics of Miley Cyrus.
Are these the pictures in question? This constitutes news these days? And they said she was shown in just her underwear, which is stretching the truth somewhat.
#101 | Comment by matt — January 30, 2008 @ 10:35 am
Maybe it’s just me, but the yellow plaid skirt pics make me want to bone her even if she is only 15. I like the knee-socks, too, even if the whole outfit does kind of look like something Avril Lavigne would’ve worn.
#102 | Comment by Pyronuc — January 30, 2008 @ 12:19 pm
I almost forgot, but I like the pokie nipple picture as well. Somehow it feels kind of dirty, with her laying on Hello Kitty sheets, though. I feel unclean, now.
#103 | Comment by Pyronuc — January 30, 2008 @ 12:21 pm
how many of you are actually under 18?
#104 | Comment by Justin S — January 30, 2008 @ 4:43 pm
I farted and it smelled like milk
#105 | Comment by billybob — January 30, 2008 @ 4:46 pm
100 – LOL You tell me to save my comments for church, yet you justify your argument by allying yourself with somethiing in the Bible. What’s wrong with that picture?
Whatever dude… if you still don’t realize that I was saying shit just to jerk your chain, you’re as out of touch as Channel Zero… your reaction is telling…
#106 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 6:43 pm
104 – Moi for one. I turn 16 in April…
#107 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 6:43 pm
106- oh the irony of failing to comprehend the beat-you-over-the-head satire in that bible comment, and then pulling the tired, tired crap that is “yeah well now that I realize I sounded like a retard I guess I didn’t mean it but ur dumb too cuz u didn’t know I didn’t mean it!”
#108 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 6:54 pm
108 – riiiight…
#109 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 6:59 pm
I’m not gonna draw you a picture, think what you must.
#110 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 7:02 pm
Seriously dude, I can see your point if this was like your first post here at DLT, but fuck me… you’ve been posting in here for a couple of weeks, and it isn’t like you’ve read any of my posts. So get a clue, m-kay?
#111 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 7:02 pm
…
#112 | Comment by Justin L is in denial — January 30, 2008 @ 7:03 pm
I don’t indulge up-is-down games. I don’t acknowledge the weak premise that it’s a trap that proves people aren’t smart enough to realize you’re playing the fool. I don’t feel embarrassed if someone says “bananas are rich in magnesium” and “laughs at my expense” when I respond literally and say it’s potassium. I don’t find it witty or funny or worth worrying about. I don’t waste my time making sure I explicitly question the sincerity of every ignorant viewpoint so the moron can’t say “yeah well I was pretending to be stupider than I am and you didn’t know!” Though, I could, and I could use perfect formal english so grammar trolls can’t play a similar game over that, and I could do a lot of stupid things to try to combat the fallacious-logic-based insults of less intelligent people, but I normally act is if these sad tactics just don’t matter, because they don’t.
#113 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 7:45 pm
113 – lol what a cop out…
No, what you do do is try and act (act?) like a pedo, and when you’re called on it, you get all defensive…and then hide behind a shitload of convoluted and twisted statements.
At least the other pedos on this site don’t see themselves about everyone else. They wholeheartedly embrace what they are. They don’t throw out sleazy innuendo, and act all slimey (like you), and then become defensive when called out. I’ll give them that.
If none of this mattered to you, you would have just stfu in the first place and not have been so “insulted” – like everyone else.
Go find a pedo’s anonymous forum dude – your really beginning to be a drag…
#114 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 7:54 pm
………
#115 | Comment by Justin L is still in denial — January 30, 2008 @ 7:55 pm
It’s true, I don’t like labels, and I find your label hurling tiresome. Your main 2 seem to be pedo and virign, both of which are silly and way off the mark. Other would-be character assassins have come up with some much better ones for me, much more insightful and revealing, with some real bite by way of doing what you think and wish you were equipped to do.
#116 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 8:05 pm
Again, another cop out… How convenient to not be labeled, eh? And don’t be a hypocrite douchebag, you’ve thrown out labels as well. You just slide it into your comments with your own slippery/sleazeball style that I can see right through. Give me that much credit. I may fuck off 99 % of the time, but I’m not stupid…
“Virign”? I take it that you meant virgin? And no, for the second time in as many weeks, you’re pulling that one out of your ass.
Face facts, you have so many fucking secrets that you think that you’ve hidden, but are really oh so transparent. You really are an idiot, despite your attempts at being a pseudo intellectual.
Please go away – you’re destroying the fubar atmosphere.
#117 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 8:14 pm
101 – matt, these pics are prolly the ones that Fox Noise are going on about. I googled and came up with an article that sounded like the pics that DLT have posted:
http://www.thecelebritycafe.com/features/13402.html
#118 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 8:18 pm
Typing on the TV in 720p. Find something better than a mistype to play the self-superior game with. So you weren’t playing the fool again when you said you never called anyone a virgin because you didn’t exclude men, animals and inanimate objects? You really went there, and meant it? Yikes. I had outgrown that sort of thing by the age of 10.
#119 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 8:25 pm
LOL, ffs if anyone has tried to come across as superior, it’s YOU. You just can’t seem to muster up the courage to take responsibility for anything can you? And anytime I state (for the hundreth) time that I’m just reeling you in, you take the stance that I’m really serious. hahaha
http://www.mensacanada.org/
There you go, dipshit. There’s a membership fee, but since you’re so financially successful, it should just be a drop in the bucket for you. I’m not sure if they accept child predators, but that’s the chance you’ll have to take. Just take your babbling with you please and don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out, m’kay?
#120 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 8:31 pm
……………………
#121 | Comment by Justin L please STFU — January 30, 2008 @ 8:32 pm
Shot any Jews lately, Hitler?
#122 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 8:36 pm
Yes yes, each time you realize you said something stupid, which happens constantly, you don’t retract, you claim that you were being facetious and that other people were the real fools because they didn’t realize it. How not clever, not original, and completely childish. Also, what is this strange word MENSA you speak of?
#123 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 8:47 pm
Go find a fucking chatroom
#124 | Comment by zomg — January 30, 2008 @ 8:48 pm
Fool – lol the only time that I’m serious at this site is when I compliment, or disparage a girls looks. What do I need to detract then? I’ve admitted on a zillion occasions that I’m fucking around and baiting retards. Your attempts at trying to say otherwise are the most tiring thing, ya’ know? Well, that and you taking 15 minutes to reply because the Thesaurus website is slow…
And aren’t you the dumbass who posted something about being facetious, after you had a petulant outburst (post 100 & 108)? lmao you’re accusing me of doing the same thing that you’re doing… what a tool.
Really, old man – I find this a little disturbing. Someone as old as you feeling the need to fight online with someone 10 years or more younger than you. I’ll keep replying of course, because you’ve already “labeled” me as some dumb kid in the past. But what is your excuse? Are you a dumb kid too? Nah, you’re just a hypocrite…
#125 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 8:55 pm
124 – No way… that perv. will probably request nude pictures of me. I’m not sure if that Pedo goes both ways or not…
#126 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 8:56 pm
sorry to disappoint, but no
#127 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 8:57 pm
You are right though, Zomg…this is getting ridiculous. I’m done with this loser.
/hijack of thread… ^_^
#128 | Comment by JRC — January 30, 2008 @ 8:58 pm
nobody cares.
#129 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 9:06 pm
PIC Number 3 = OMG
#130 | Comment by Milky White Residue — January 30, 2008 @ 9:22 pm
#129
I care!
Wait. What? No I don’t care.
Then again maybe I do care.
Or do I?
No I don’t think I do.
What are we caring about?
More Eliza Dushku! It’s been too long.
#131 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — January 30, 2008 @ 9:44 pm
#129
well I fucking care. shut the hell up already and get a motel room for you and your little boyfriend. I don’t remember this site being called msn.
^^^ yeah! eliza dushku rockz!!!
#132 | Comment by queefer — January 30, 2008 @ 9:51 pm
all the ‘mos are out tonight.
#133 | Comment by Justin L — January 30, 2008 @ 9:54 pm
130 – pic 1 > pic 3 > pic 2
#134 | Comment by zomg — January 30, 2008 @ 11:20 pm
Oh…My achey breaky heart…she’s too young for me but I can wait a couple of years!
Comparing her to others when they were that age, I still reckon Mandy Moore was effing hot when she was younger!
#135 | Comment by Viper — January 31, 2008 @ 9:58 am
Somewhere a pedo is fapping, and elsewhere Billy Ray is loading his achey Breaky shotgun.
#136 | Comment by oofoo — February 2, 2008 @ 3:49 am
Billy Ray Cyrus must be totally wierded out by now, his 15 year old daughter is more famous than he ever was.
As for the fotos, eh, toss her back and wait 3 years until she’s done growing, then I might want to see a bikini shot. Until then its just a dumb little girl being used by the corporate media whores to get money from the 8-16yr old market.
#137 | Comment by Rick Cain — February 11, 2008 @ 5:38 am
tom foolery: yeah like you would ever get the chance….. loser asshole
#138 | Comment by al — September 25, 2008 @ 4:42 pm