Still on tour promoting their new movie, the dynamic duo took the film to the country whose history it portrays.
Here are some photos from the London premiere.
The pic with Prince Charles gives me lulz as I have the following exchange in my head…
Scarlett: Why, your highness! Are you trying to cop a feel?
Chuck: HONK! HONK!
wow 1st?
fact: I suck
#1 | Comment by rwell1127 — February 20, 2008 @ 7:06 am
“Scarlett, dear, you work the shaft & knob and Natalie, won’t you be so kind as to pop my bollocks into your mouth?”
1st? 2nd! dammit!!!
#2 | Comment by Smiley — February 20, 2008 @ 7:07 am
Natalie makes Scarlett look like a hobbit with Downs Syndrome. You can’t tell me there isn’t “some” form of retardation in the johansson gene
#3 | Comment by texas_burner — February 20, 2008 @ 7:19 am
Ya, a Downs hobbit with nice ya-yas. I’d so tax that like an Enron accountant.
#4 | Comment by Dr. Phil mmkay? — February 20, 2008 @ 8:05 am
wouldn’t have either, but they’re both a big step up from alba
#5 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 9:23 am
natalie is great looking but for some reason in the last two sets she kinda of looked strung out to me. pretty sure she is doing a lot of coc at this point. i may be wrong but oh well.
#6 | Comment by lawl — February 20, 2008 @ 12:05 pm
nuttin but double Hotness!
#7 | Comment by MacDaddy — February 20, 2008 @ 12:39 pm
@6
Pretty sure Nat Nat doesn’t hit the cocaine, yo.
#8 | Comment by PimpDemHos — February 20, 2008 @ 2:20 pm
What is with that tattoo on Scarlets arm?
#9 | Comment by Kee Man — February 20, 2008 @ 2:46 pm
Well…………..at lest they look better in thees photos. If I was Prince Charles, I would try to cop a feel too. Ever do it with a Prince?
#10 | Comment by Ra — February 20, 2008 @ 2:56 pm
I find Natalie Portman creepy. I mean, I would find it scary if I were trapped somewhere alone with her. I wouldn’t want to sleep.
#11 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 3:02 pm
#10. No Ra, I haven’t. How is it?
#12 | Comment by Gage — February 20, 2008 @ 3:20 pm
#12 It’s OK, I’ve had better. lol
#13 | Comment by Ra — February 20, 2008 @ 3:30 pm
#11 = ghey
creepy = she’s 15 years too old for that douche… understood.
#14 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 4:51 pm
14: you’re silly.
#15 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 5:10 pm
#14 & 15- STFU.
Seriously, just ignore each other.
Or go ahead and tell me to also STFU and mind my own business and stop being gay or whatever the fuck you’re gonna say.
#16 | Comment by Nobody — February 20, 2008 @ 5:24 pm
14 – …but I’m correct.
16 – Nah, you have a right to speak your mind, this isn’t Nazi Germany. You don’t have to STFU. Nor do you have to pay attention to us. Want some advice from me? You can just as easily ignore us. ^_^
I’m just proving a point. And continue to prove it.
#17 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 6:16 pm
15 – but I’m correct.
fixt
#18 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 6:22 pm
neither of them brought their A game 🙁
#19 | Comment by Tony — February 20, 2008 @ 7:25 pm
#10. That’s because you touch yourself at night.
You wouldn’t be able to sleep anyway, your little 12 year old heart would be beating too fast.
#20 | Comment by texas_burner — February 20, 2008 @ 8:24 pm
Isn’t “some” form of retardation in the texas_burner gene???
#21 | Comment by Ra — February 20, 2008 @ 10:26 pm
well the irony is that natalie portman really has delicate, girlish features, and a firm body that looks fit and muscular, but with a feminine shape. I’d find her very attractive if she didn’t always look like she’s in the early onset of rabies.
#22 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 10:31 pm
in fact, I just did a search. if she always looked like this, she’d be at the top of my to-do list. I also noticed on imdb that we’re the same age.
#23 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 10:54 pm
21 – Ra, texas_burner was probably talking about Sick Fuck number 11, and just posted the wrong number. If you read what he said, it makes sense. 🙂
22- Fucking always making lame excuses for your extreme illness… sick fuck douchebag.
And now, before Justin the fag L turns this into another psychological discussion which no one gives a shit about, Kate Beckinsale!
#24 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 10:57 pm
image link didn’t work for some reason, probably my fault. here it is again
#25 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 10:58 pm
24, decent picture of kate, needs higher res
#26 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 10:59 pm
Kate can sit on my face any time that she wants… http://www.beyondhollywood.com/gallery/stills3/kate-beckinsale-080218/kate-beckinsale-esquire-2.jpg
#27 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 10:59 pm
26 – pfft, why do YOU need hi-rez? All that you’ll end up doing is shooping it, adding the Dakota Fannings body to Kate’s face.
#28 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:01 pm
I do love girls in the 13-18 age range, but not exclusively. also, not so fond of the B&W pic, it’s kind of sloppy looking
#29 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 11:04 pm
29 – sad…just fucking sad. I’d laugh if I didn’t know that you were serious. See a shrink, or do a penis enlargement, so you won’t slip out of girls your own age.
Enjoy the attention (albeit negative), douche. Eventually you’ll freak even the pedos out.
#30 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:10 pm
you’re so sure that you’re so pious, as if you know exactly how all humans “should” be. I find it narrow.
#31 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 11:12 pm
“also, not so fond of the B&W pic, it’s kind of sloppy looking”
Yeah right… sloppy looking? I wager that it has 99.999% more to do with her luscious woman sized titties not being 11 year old boy-like nubs. Be honest with yourself for a change, dummy.
#32 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:14 pm
31 – Awww… the little child rapist is getting offended… hahaha!
#33 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:15 pm
this pedo thing is getting tiresome, I’m finished responding, take your bible and preach to someone else
#34 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 11:15 pm
34 – Are you crying? You aren’t finished responding and you know it… douche.
Seriously… Angel Baby or Justin, if you can find more of that Kate Beckinsale/Esquire shoot (Hi-res maybe?) it would be appreciated. ^_^
#35 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:19 pm
no, it isn’t especially offensive, but I don’t like repeating myself, so I’m tired of responding to this simplistic autosuggestive moralistic ad nauseam garbage. broken record away, I’m not going to bother explaining again and again why the silly story is nonsense.
#36 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 11:29 pm
^^^ Translated: I’m sick, can’t admit it, and need help.
#37 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:30 pm
yep, it finally became true when you said it the 27th time
#38 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 11:32 pm
nope, it’s always been true. The fact that you stumble all over your lame self trying to deny it is proof enough. You don’t live by labels… ya’ riiiiight. Just another greasy way of yours to deflect the honest truth.
And btw, dumbshit, you’re also a liar. You’re still “responding”. hahahaha! Capital “D” Douchebag. ^_^
#39 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:35 pm
…and you know what’s really funny? I’m not attracted to Natalie Portman either…for a sane reason though: she reminds me of a boy.
#40 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:37 pm
no, I haven’t argued the point, and I don’t plan to. you can think and say what you like, I’m not going to correct you over and over.
#41 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 11:40 pm
…still responding…
#42 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:41 pm
yeah, didn’t say otherwise, I said I won’t feed a respond to your “is so” on that pedo crap. I made my point on the subject repeatedly, too many times as it was.
#43 | Comment by Justin L — February 20, 2008 @ 11:43 pm
Okay – seriously. Where the fuck are the hi-res Kate Beckinsale scans ? I swear to God, if Justin posts hi-res versions, he better also post coupons for a new monitor, because I’m going to blow a hole through mine.
#44 | Comment by Dr. Disgusto — February 20, 2008 @ 11:47 pm
^^^ lol stupid pedo is stupid…
Made what point??? Every other week you’re going on about Emma Roberts. You’re attracted to 13-18 year olds you stupid fag, you said so yourself (post 29). But when it comes to the ultimate moment for you to admit to yourself that you’re a ped’, you suddenly come up with “no labels” shit, and that I have a narrow view. Get a clue, idiot…you’re supposedly Portmans age, but you act like some 50 year old school teacher who’s afraid to get caught. Sick fucker…
#45 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:47 pm
44 – Doc, I have been scouring the interwebs for hi-res scans of that shoot, and all that I can find are those puny pics. 🙁
I here you about needing a new monitor. I may have to get one of those 30″ Apple monitors. 😀
#46 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:48 pm
btw, post 45 was in reply to 43, but Dr. Disgusto snuck in there… 😉
#47 | Comment by JRC — February 20, 2008 @ 11:49 pm
oh and yes, viva emma roberts
#48 | Comment by Justin L — February 21, 2008 @ 12:17 am
48 – In denial and shitty taste. 2 time loser… Do everyone a favor and just die alread, fuckhead.
#49 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 12:31 am
my mom thinks I’m a winner
#50 | Comment by Justin L — February 21, 2008 @ 12:31 am
50 – From the Lindsey Lohan thread, you’re a lying sack of shit. Your mom is ashamed of you as well. Probably caught you diddling the 8 year old neighbour girl…
84. Justin L (20:33:08) :
80, that’s a funny coincidence. I just went out to visit my mom, and I got the feeling she couldn’t care less either way. maybe I should introduce you two, since you have so much in common. you could watch golf and be in love with tiger woods together.
#51 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 12:35 am
no conflict. clearly she just doesn’t care to be around winners
#52 | Comment by Justin L — February 21, 2008 @ 12:37 am
Sugar coat it all you want, you sick disgusting child rapist fuck… But why am I surprised? You can’t admit that you get a hard-on looking at pre-teens, why should I expect you to admit that your own mother respects or likes you.
I almost feel sorry for you, assclown. The only responses you get here are negative. I at least get a couple of people who hold the same interests (not 11 year olds). If it isn’t me outing you, it’s texas_burner. And if it isn’t him, it’s the person who matters most, Angel Baby, who pretty much agreed that you’re a douche by telling you to tattoo your forehead with a cock (suitable).
Kate Beckinsale hi-rez scans plox!
#53 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 12:42 am
This is the funnies sh1t I have read in a long time. lollollollollol
#54 | Comment by Ra — February 21, 2008 @ 12:59 am
http://theblemish.com/2008/02/kate-beckinsale-does-esquire/kate-beckinsale-esquire-3/
#55 | Comment by Ra — February 21, 2008 @ 1:05 am
54 – hahaha! I know…if I weren’t involved in it, I’d be lmao. I still do. 😉
But alas, someone else will have to give that pathetic fag some attention in the future. I’ve got spring practices coming up real soon (baseball), and won’t have the time to continually ‘out’ the dildo.
#56 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 1:06 am
55 – You sir, are a legend.
fap fap fap fap fap…
#57 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 1:07 am
Kate Beckinsale 750×978
http://theblemish.com/2008/02/kate-beckinsale-does-esquire/kate-beckinsale-esquire-2/
http://theblemish.com/2008/02/kate-beckinsale-does-esquire/kate-beckinsale-esquire/
#58 | Comment by Ra — February 21, 2008 @ 1:09 am
58 – Awesomer! Just wait, now Justin (normal Justin) will post some 3 MB scans. ^_^
Did I mention that you were a legend?
#59 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 1:11 am
53: so many inaccuracies, so little interest. texas* was calling someone (not me) a 12 year old, not agreeing with your fixation on my sexuality. also, sorry to hear you won’t have as much time to bust out your dildo as you’d like.
#60 | Comment by Justin L — February 21, 2008 @ 1:27 am
Sorry little girl lover, but yes, it was extremely obvious that he was talking about you…
You said: “…I would find it scary if I were trapped somewhere alone with her. I wouldn’t want to sleep.”
He said: “You wouldn’t be able to sleep anyway, your little 12 year old heart would be beating too fast.”
No one else had mentioned ‘sleep’. Duh. You’re an idiot.
So little interest, yet you keep responding. Loser, go stalk another 8 year old flat chested girl, ya’ sick fuck. And wtf, you have a “sexuality”? Isn’t that a bit unfair to all of us normal people for you to steal that term? I mean hell, you’re a little too twisted to earn something like a sexuality.
#61 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 1:47 am
#32: “I wager that it has 99.999% more to do with her luscious woman sized titties not being 11 year old boy-like nubs.”
I dont know about all that, but she did look better before the implants.
#62 | Comment by Gage — February 21, 2008 @ 1:53 am
justin l guy… i don’t know if its just me but you are 100 times more annoying than jrc. it’s obvious that he is just dragging you along. why do you keep answering him?????? stfu and gtfo! when you weren’t here he was acting pretty decently. as soon as you come back, you feed him. maybe you should learn from this.
#63 | Comment by mai ling — February 21, 2008 @ 2:01 am
62 – It seemed that more than her tittles changed after the implants. Her whole personality.
63 – I’m annoying? :’-(
Nah, the douche will never stop responding. He’s friendless (can’t count the little girls that he baby-sits, they don’t have a choice) and since rarely anyone else comments on his lame posts, he’ll talk to anyone who gives him an ounce of attention.
#64 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 2:06 am
#64: no offense but your trying to be annoying aren’t you? at least you said so before. that other wank keeps saying that he’s done responding to you and gets all upset but he keeps going on about nothing. he is a bit thick if you ask me. i reckon that some people just don’t learn very fast. yep he’s a bit of a drag around here.
#65 | Comment by mai ling — February 21, 2008 @ 2:35 am
63, “why durr u keep unswuring heem??!?!?????” it’s fun to manipulate people into that fuck-me-now fixation on you. he’s the wrong gender, but still fun practice.
#66 | Comment by Justin L — February 21, 2008 @ 9:54 am
66 – That made absolutely no sense… stop using drugs, they’re bad for you. If you’re not under the influence, just another lame example of you attempting humor, toddler lover.
#67 | Comment by JRC — February 21, 2008 @ 7:30 pm