Keeley is back with an appearance in the May issue of FHM.
She’s still got it. And by it, I mean them. And by them, I mean boobs.
Keeley Hazell
dont link this
WAUGH!
Keeley is back with an appearance in the May issue of FHM.
She’s still got it. And by it, I mean them. And by them, I mean boobs.
Last!
Still meh.
#1 | Comment by WhoMe — March 26, 2008 @ 6:53 pm
Oh… by “meh”, I mean hot, but generic.
#2 | Comment by WhoMe — March 26, 2008 @ 6:54 pm
Good Gawd! Hawt, but her face has been better though and that ass is still a little flat. Those tits are still faptacular though. I vote yes to Keeley ’08.
#3 | Comment by Dr. Phil mmkay? — March 26, 2008 @ 7:16 pm
Mmm Mmm Good 🙂
#4 | Comment by Darkstar — March 26, 2008 @ 7:54 pm
I would spray her like a sprinkler.
#5 | Comment by Kewtr — March 26, 2008 @ 8:46 pm
She’s alright. And by alright, I mean faptastic. And by faptastic, I mean I will masturbate to these pictures.
#6 | Comment by Nobody — March 26, 2008 @ 8:58 pm
thats keeley hazell? i guess…anyway, sign me up for some lucy pinder.
#7 | Comment by Xan — March 26, 2008 @ 9:03 pm
I didn’t know she was gone.
#8 | Comment by thetacokid — March 26, 2008 @ 9:31 pm
Still two of the best titties on Earth, but she’s definitely on the clock….
#9 | Comment by Ron Dingleberry — March 26, 2008 @ 11:08 pm
I noticed her face, too,. It’s like she’s become noticeably more fugly in a matter of months. I guess it could be bad plastic surgery. Either way, I was about neutral on her before, and I find her simply unpleasant now.
#10 | Comment by Justin L — March 26, 2008 @ 11:59 pm
#8 – Seems every month she appears in a magazine claiming that she’s back, but she’s never really been gone for longer than like a month anyways. Apparently we are supposed to see her every other day or something.
Oh, yeah. Definetly Fap. But maybe a little less than the last time she was back.
#11 | Comment by Evil Monkey — March 27, 2008 @ 3:48 am
Super, Duper, Hot.
But, on the last picture, I noticed something wrong.
She wrote “steeling”, referencing that she would thief some items. It should be spelled “stealing”. It made it past the FHM proofreaders though. They were probably looking at those boobies.
#12 | Comment by BabyEater — March 27, 2008 @ 10:24 am
when i cant see the tits, and by tits i mean nipples, i have a hard time caring
#13 | Comment by atlas — March 27, 2008 @ 12:44 pm
Boobs – yay!
Keeley releasing a pop record – fuck, not another one.
#14 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 27, 2008 @ 2:32 pm
Damn, I’d milk them titties dry.
#15 | Comment by Milhouse — March 27, 2008 @ 2:43 pm
A couple of candids of those lovely funbags au naturel:
click
click
#16 | Comment by devnull — March 27, 2008 @ 5:03 pm
^^^
i think i know the ones you were going for here, but the links aren’t working.
try again!
#17 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 27, 2008 @ 5:22 pm
I wish there was an appropriate internet meme to express my current level of sexual excitement.
#18 | Comment by ketch — March 27, 2008 @ 5:35 pm
Where’s the nip?
#19 | Comment by Tony — March 27, 2008 @ 6:35 pm
Here:
click
click
#20 | Comment by sportster — March 27, 2008 @ 9:17 pm
Look closely and you can see the scars on her nipples from her surgery
#21 | Comment by sportster — March 27, 2008 @ 9:18 pm
^^^
um…no you can’t, cuz Keeley is all natural.
#22 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 27, 2008 @ 10:09 pm
#21: I saw the same thing in those pics when I saw them a few days ago. My first thought was “doesnt Keeley say she’s natural?”
AB…dont be in denial. Britney and Adriana are not virgins and Keeley’s not natural.
#23 | Comment by Gage — March 27, 2008 @ 10:38 pm
^^^
you are obviously right about Brit, and who knows about Adriana, but if Keeley had fake boobs, I don’t think every lad mag on earth would be touting her natural knockers. it’s not as tho none of the numerous photographers who have seen them wouldn’t have noticed by now.
#24 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 28, 2008 @ 12:28 am
I don’t see any scars. Her boobs are one of the wonders of creation.
#25 | Comment by Milhouse — March 28, 2008 @ 12:36 am
according to anonymous commenters, there are no large good looking natural boobs in existence. If someone has beautiful Keeley-sized mammaries they have to be fake.
I feel sorry for those people. They must have never fondled an all natural big boob in their lifetime to leave them so suspicious.
Or seen the videos of Keeley bouncing them around.
#26 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 28, 2008 @ 1:15 am
^^^ Exactly. They are not common but they do happen, and when they do its a thing of beauty. Thats what makes this girl so special. Swap those titties with fake ones and she’s a dime-a-dozen internet chick on any pornsite.
Those are real..and I can only assume, Fantastic! Um, make that Faptastic!
#27 | Comment by Evil Monkey — March 28, 2008 @ 3:02 am
Denial. And #26, you are wrong. There is no almost such thing as good looking FAKE boobs. Apparently Keeley’s are the exception. But they are fake. Or she had a nipple replacement. The scars are right there.
And to AB: who says they haven’t noticed? We haven’t noticed because we hadnt seen candid, UNRETOUCHED photos before. The mags/Keeley need a selling point and there’d be no reason for me to say anything if I were the photog.
You say “obvious” about Britney, but that was her big selling point for years.
It wont surprise me at all if there is either a big scare defense/denial or augmentation reveal/admission in the next 6 months due to these shots. Then again, I wouldnt be surprised if the whole thing is ignored. As shown here, denial is pretty powerful.
#28 | Comment by Gage — March 28, 2008 @ 4:01 am
^^^
yeah, denial is powerful…one could just as easily say you are in denial that Keeley’s chest isn’t real. see how that cuts both ways?
her entire career is based off of her being natural, but it’s not as though she wouldn’t have made it big had she been surgically enhanced. the brit mags are FULL of girls with fake boobs, and it doesn’t seem to have slowed down their success. also, Keeley had her chest from day one in the mags, when she was just 18. i don’t think a girl from her humble background could afford the surgery on the off-chance she might become famous. most girls get implants after the fact (Pam Anderson, Jordan, etc.) finally, there are these “scars” you claim you can see. frankly, i just don’t see it, and i’ll be willing to bet i’ve seen a far larger sample size of breasts in my life than you. locker rooms can be just as amazing as the movies make them appear… ^_^
#29 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 28, 2008 @ 4:22 am
here’s some photographic evidence to back up my point…
http://www.chrudat.com/keeley_hazell/keeley_hazell13.jpg
http://www.chrudat.com/keeley_hazell/keeley_hazell16.jpg
fake boobs don’t flatten out like that when the owner is lying down.
and the BEST plastic surgeon in Beverly Hills can’t make implants the size that Keeley would have to have had hang like this…
http://www.chrudat.com/keeley_hazell/keeley_hazell10.jpg
#30 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 28, 2008 @ 4:28 am
What scars?
#31 | Comment by Nobody — March 28, 2008 @ 4:29 am
^^^
thank you.
anyone with any experience whatsoever with boobs knows that she simply has darker pigmentation around the edges of her areolae. scar tissue would be whitish, not darker.
#32 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 28, 2008 @ 4:34 am
#28 no you are wrong. I never said fake boobs were good looking. I said every great looking boob on the internet is always denounced as fake even if it isn’t. So if you think these are fake we can only assume that you have never seen a great looking rack anywhere and have never seen a real boob up close, or are in fact the greatest plastic surgeon in the world who can make fake boobs look like these.
Other fun fact. Keeley is still a Page 3 model. The law of Page 3 now states that all boobs have to be real or the implants are removed and thrown into a big pit, and the model is sent to MTV to do a reality show.
#33 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 28, 2008 @ 4:39 am
Personally, I think they are scars – from what, I don’t know. Could be an enhancement, could be something else. I guess only Keely and her doctor know for sure.
One thing is certain… at least some of the pictures posted of her topless have been touched up.
#34 | Comment by sportster — March 28, 2008 @ 11:44 am
A magazine touching up pictures? That’s crazy talk.
#35 | Comment by Nobody — March 28, 2008 @ 1:11 pm
#34: exactly. Only question now is that if she does have scares, but not implants, why are those scars exactly where implant scars would be?
#33: Dont be retarded. This is what you said:
“according to anonymous commenters, there are no large good looking natural boobs in existence.”
And you are wrong.
But then you prove you are retarded by pulling the “we can only assume that you have never seen a great looking rack anywhere and have never seen a real boob up close” defense. Oh yeah, I’m a “ghey” “virgin”. Retard.
AB: Do you seriously not see the scars? They are plain as day. And I dont pretend to know for a fact that she has implants, but those are implant scars.
#31: Okay. SD TV screen caps prove it over high res stills.
#36 | Comment by Gage — March 28, 2008 @ 4:41 pm
She had just her nipples worked on.
Probably reduced, girls with boobs like that hardly ever have nipples that small
#37 | Comment by Clearly — March 28, 2008 @ 6:48 pm
Keeley’s rack is real and it’s spectacular. fact.
anyone who can’t see that is a gigant dumb. true story.
#38 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 28, 2008 @ 7:07 pm
Sorry, AB, but you are stating your opinion, not fact. Unless you have access to her medical history, you don’t know for sure what she has or has not done. If you want to believe that we are so wrong, you have to be willing to admit that you may be wrong as well. Otherwise, you are just spouting off.
#39 | Comment by sportster — March 28, 2008 @ 8:15 pm
Uhhh…. except for the spectacular part. I’ll give you that one. 🙂
#40 | Comment by sportster — March 28, 2008 @ 8:16 pm
^^^
sorry, but it’s a fact until someone offers some proof to the contrary (besides OMG LOOK AT THOSE SCARS).
too many sources have called her natural for it all to be some huge global conspiracy. some of y’all need to buy a clue. there is NO reason for her (and the mass media) to lie about this for going on THREE YEARS now. none. use some common sense.
watch this and maybe you’ll learn something…if not, then you are beyond help.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/480609/keely_hazell/
#41 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 28, 2008 @ 8:28 pm
It’s nipple puff, sportster you freakin’ morons, not surgery scars.
If you think Kelley Hazell’s boobs are fake then you’ve clearly never seen real boobs in your life.
#42 | Comment by Tony — March 28, 2008 @ 11:48 pm
#36 – It’s a close up shot of her breasts. SD or not, surgery scars would show through. Especially since it’s a video, and therefore isn’t retouched as a spread in a magazine would be. I’m asking where the scars are, because I’m not seeing them.
#43 | Comment by Nobody — March 29, 2008 @ 2:05 am
As I’ve already said. I believe them to be scars. From what we don’t know. (That means all of you as well as me.) Could be an enhancement, could be something else. I’m not trying to convince any of you that I am right, just stating what I believe I am seeing. You are all welcome to believe what you wish, as am I. However, to believe that one’s opinion is actually fact is foolish at best.
Who knows, they may very well be real. After all, the mass media would never lie to us. And video cannot be retouched……
Peace / Out
#44 | Comment by sportster — March 29, 2008 @ 8:46 am
Yes, there is a mass conspiracy to hide Keeley’s breast surgery scars. Someone decided to go through and digitally erase her scars from all 15 minutes of a video.
#45 | Comment by Nobody — March 29, 2008 @ 2:58 pm
^^^
don’t bother trying to reason with some people. they will see what they want to see despite all facts to the contrary. after all, there are actually some idiots out there who think the CIA blew up the world trade center towers.
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/keeley-hazell-page-three-girl-becomes-face-of-green-movement-439364.html
but hey, i’m sure this is just more of the vast media conspiracy to hide the fact that a girl has fake boobs.
#46 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 29, 2008 @ 3:06 pm
They know she has fake ones, so they aren’t asking for the doctor’s certificate, so they can say they have no proof they are fake. ZOMG CONSPIRACY.
#47 | Comment by Nobody — March 29, 2008 @ 4:12 pm
^^^
lolz
#48 | Comment by AngelBaby — March 29, 2008 @ 4:18 pm
Scars???
Ok, own up – how long has Stevie Wonder been posting on here? Come on now, stevie boy, you’ve obviously never seen a breast before. It’s not your fault, of course – nobody’s saying that – but could you just, um, fuck off, maybe? There’s nothing for you here, dude, seriously. Go and jack off to that talking clock.
If you were to commandeer the Hubble Space Telescope and point it at Keeley’s mammary glands, you would not be able to locate these alleged scars.
#49 | Comment by cobalt — March 29, 2008 @ 8:21 pm
Why the hell is it that she started out by constantly showing her tits and now she barely ever shows them? I am not satisfied by her clothed boobies.
#50 | Comment by Kito — March 30, 2008 @ 10:19 am
#36 no Gage I think you are only proving that you can’t read. I’ll tell you again. According to the blind internet contingent there are no good looking real boobs in existence. Which you are once again proving to be true.
Since Keeley has a great natural rack, the argument about whether their are some fake boobs out there that look great is irrelevant. These are great looking boobs and they are not fake so QED.
And in conclusion, you clearly have never seen a real breast in person. And that’s not a lame attempt at an internets burn. It’s just obviously the fact.
However you should apply to The Sun as their resident boob expert because they’ll be interested to know that their boob examiner is the fail and has let two obvious fakies in.
#51 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 30, 2008 @ 3:38 pm
#37 wow this thread is really bringing out the amateur boobologists!
Small nipples on big boobs is hardly rare. Check out the azn model market or just take a look at Lohan doing the Marilyn.
Maybe we should ask our celebrity boob model expert – Kitty Lea. Ah wait, she says hers are real as well so that means she is obviously lying. Doh.
#52 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 30, 2008 @ 3:46 pm
boobs: 9.5
ass: 3
#53 | Comment by lawl — March 31, 2008 @ 7:38 pm
^^^
Horseshit! Her ass is fine.
#54 | Comment by Tony — March 31, 2008 @ 8:13 pm
i’m with you 53. needs more ass
#55 | Comment by shaggy23 — March 31, 2008 @ 8:30 pm
If those puppies are fake than that girl has got the greatest boobjob of all time. I’ve never seen titties that bounce like that, or hang at times depending on how she sits. It’s kindoff interesting, however. Being that she rose to fame through a talent search and yet had access to the world’s best plastic surgeon before that.
Additionally when it comes to an arguement about boobs I’m always going to side with the chick with the boob fetish. Not only does she have the same zest for titties as the rest of us, and not only did she grow up seeing titties in the locker rooms (completely jealous by the way. There is no enjoyement in seeing the skinny white kid’s schlong next to you in the male change rooms), but she also has access to a pair at all times!
Someone with Titties>Someone who only sees titties online.
#56 | Comment by Evil Monkey — April 1, 2008 @ 3:04 am
Keeley Is a Goddess
Don’t call it a comeback she;s still number 1 😉
#57 | Comment by jon — April 6, 2008 @ 11:27 pm
Let me refer you to –
http://www.asian-sirens.com/blog/comments.php?id=204_0_1_0_C
You are all perhaps ignorant of how easy it is to create ‘natural’ soft, squidgy implants that lie flat; like Keeley’s. You are all used to seeing over-filled capsule bags that result in hard stiff breasts.
If you watch any of her videos where she attempts to squeeze her boobs, she can see that she can only squeeze as far as the implant and no more.
And when she leans forwards, her boobs stay pretty much the same shape, and do not deform like real breasts do.
Plus, when she runs, the entire implant jumps around like a small soccerball in a sock.
“The Sun says…..” hahahahaha. So what if “The Sun says…”. hahahahaha
The Sun had a policy, it might even pretend that it implements it – but it doesn’t.
Open your eyes people. (c) Bill Cosby 🙂
#58 | Comment by vecuccio — August 4, 2008 @ 5:05 am
^^^
they are real.
you are an idiot.
case closed.
#59 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 4, 2008 @ 3:06 pm
Vecuccio you couldn’t be more right.
Quote: “there is NO reason for her (and the mass media) to lie about this”…errrr there’s every reason! The media do it every day… but ignorance is bliss, it’s much easier and satisfying to believe they’re natural.
Anyway, there’s nothing wrong with fake boobs; if they look good they look good! Just stop being in denial.
#60 | Comment by Avvv_IT! — March 27, 2009 @ 9:04 pm
Oh yeah, and as intelligent readers…we all believe/have faith in the Sun!
Get real.
#61 | Comment by Avvv_IT! — March 27, 2009 @ 9:06 pm
her breast are fake. there is a picture where she is on all fours and her breast hand down, you can see where the implant ends and her breasts begin. they are a good job, but she is not all natural.
#62 | Comment by chris — May 31, 2009 @ 2:18 pm
^^^
NO THEY’RE NOT FAKE
learn2spotrealboobs.
#63 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 1, 2009 @ 12:01 am