Miley Cyrus

Posted on by

Hot on the heels of the green bra pics, Miley is evidently not finished giving the pervy public more fuel for jailbait fantasy fap sessions.

She was apparently snapped topless by famed photographer Annie Leibovitz for Vanity Fair clutching a sheet to her blossoming chest, and when the news of the spread recently broke, it set off a storm of recriminations and apologies.

Initially, Miley said of her sexy shoot,

“Annie took, like, a beautiful shot, and I thought it was really cool. That’s what she wanted me to do, and you can’t say no to Annie. I think it’s really artsy. It wasn’t in a skanky way.”

But after seeing the finished product and getting wind of the early reactions to it, she had this to say,

“I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be ‘artistic’ and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about.”

Disney’s official position on the matter?

A Disney spokeswoman, Patti McTeague, faulted Vanity Fair for the photo. “Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year old in order to sell magazines,” she said.

Vanity Fair’s take?

Beth Kseniak, a spokeswoman for both Vanity Fair magazine and Ms. Leibovitz said, “Miley’s parents and/or minders were on the set all day. Since the photo was taken digitally, they saw it on the shoot and everyone thought it was a beautiful and natural portrait of Miley.”

But the story doesn’t end there…

Evidently, not long after Smiley said sorry to her fans for the new racy pics, someone posted what they claim is an actual topless candid of the 15-year old star to numerous Facebook pages. The censored pic was posted on a well-known celeb blog, and I’ve seen the non-starred goods for myself and don’t know whether I believe it or not. I’ll leave it to the expert eyes of the fubar audience to decide…

O_O

95 thoughts on “Miley Cyrus”

  1. I might or might not have seen that final pic without the stars on it.

    I also may or may not be fapping to it as I type this.

    I gotta clean my keyboard now.

    fyi – first

    #1 | Comment by dex — April 28, 2008 @ 5:05 am

  2. omfg faperific

    #2 | Comment by Jesus — April 28, 2008 @ 5:09 am

  3. I feel dirty. But in a clean way.

    #3 | Comment by frank the dolphin — April 28, 2008 @ 5:21 am

  4. It’s so weird, because that’s maybe the least attractive pictures of her I’ve ever seen.

    #4 | Comment by Earl Brutus — April 28, 2008 @ 5:26 am

  5. I think the picture is artistic and looks good as for topless pic yeah that big star really spoils it anybody got one without it would be appreciated.

    #5 | Comment by sliy — April 28, 2008 @ 5:27 am

  6. go check out the facebook groups…it was reported to have been posted on a few groups…I saw it but when i clicked it, they said it was removed….sorta hit and miss

    #6 | Comment by Jesus — April 28, 2008 @ 5:41 am

  7. It’s weird, it’s not even a sexy picture. More “Way to go, America…” This is naughty, but not the whole culture that surrounds it. It’s news for a reason.

    #7 | Comment by Earl Brutus — April 28, 2008 @ 5:44 am

  8. Don’t visit this group…
    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10125015675

    #8 | Comment by MIley — April 28, 2008 @ 5:51 am

  9. Liebowitz is usually good at making people look their best…, but this is maybe the worst Miley picture I’ve ever seen, and I don’t usually think much of her. I really think it says more about how stupid Americans are than anything else, re: a teenage girl in a blanket causes an uproar.

    #9 | Comment by Earl Brutus — April 28, 2008 @ 5:52 am

  10. the funniest thing is that facebook groups spelling of the word “addict” attic… lmao, i don’t think miley cyrus will turn into a room below the roof of a house.

    #10 | Comment by DoctorofStyle — April 28, 2008 @ 6:18 am

  11. Wheres the unstarred picture?

    #11 | Comment by Whoopa — April 28, 2008 @ 6:38 am

  12. nowhere near as hot as Emma Watson

    #12 | Comment by Re:no — April 28, 2008 @ 6:54 am

  13. WELL….
    twinkle twinkle little stars…

    #13 | Comment by JM — April 28, 2008 @ 7:46 am

  14. ok so the topless pic could be her but its a lil difficult to tell.

    #14 | Comment by sliy — April 28, 2008 @ 7:51 am

  15. It’s her.

    #15 | Comment by dex — April 28, 2008 @ 8:10 am

  16. Topless pic is definitely not her.

    #16 | Comment by YoungFTW — April 28, 2008 @ 8:13 am

  17. I see reports of Miley apologizing for pictures on CNN. Immediately I think “MUST CHECK WITH JUSTIN!”

    Clearly I was right.

    Also, topless pic doesn’t look like her to me, though we do know she has significant nipples from a past dog walking. Plausible I suppose.

    #17 | Comment by ZekeDMS — April 28, 2008 @ 8:17 am

  18. well the eyebrows are the same. I dont think that an amateur trying to discredit miley would remember that detail

    #18 | Comment by bty3 — April 28, 2008 @ 8:25 am

  19. I say it’s a fake. The lines on the face, especially with the blue thing around her head, arn’t right. And seriously, does that look like what you think her bedroom would look like?

    #19 | Comment by Lock — April 28, 2008 @ 8:42 am

  20. What makes you think it’s her bedroom? Isn’t that the way she’s headed – to a life of “bedroom pics” like Paris?

    BTW, it sure looks like her but I have my doubts.

    Where’s daddy in all this controversy? Do they let their fifteen year old daughter do whatever she likes?

    #20 | Comment by iron — April 28, 2008 @ 8:53 am

  21. Looking at the starless version.. I’m not so sure. They’re some nice jail-bait titties whoever they belong too!

    #21 | Comment by Lock — April 28, 2008 @ 8:54 am

  22. YES. Where is daddy in all this?

    <_<

    #22 | Comment by dex — April 28, 2008 @ 8:58 am

  23. Oh, you mean…

    http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6171/mileycyrusnakedlf4.jpg

    !

    #23 | Comment by Stomper — April 28, 2008 @ 9:16 am

  24. By the way, link’s not mine.

    #24 | Comment by Stomper — April 28, 2008 @ 9:26 am

  25. It’s not her, if you look at the 2 small moles on this girl’s face (instead of staring at the tits) you would notice them, Miley doesn’t have birth marks like his on her face in the old candid pictures. or the old facebook pics.

    And it hasn’t been photoshopped because why would you be adding elements or leaving elements on the face the celebrity doesn’t have…

    It’s NOT Miley, close resemblance but not her.

    #25 | Comment by Maniac Man — April 28, 2008 @ 9:28 am

  26. Nope that is no way miley cyrus. you would be a jackass to believe that.

    #26 | Comment by Whoopa — April 28, 2008 @ 9:34 am

  27. -refuses to click till she is 18! (or at least 16 in KY!)

    #27 | Comment by MacDaddy — April 28, 2008 @ 9:38 am

  28. Check the earlobe in the two pics:

    http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6171/mileycyrusnakedlf4.jpg
    http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/mileycyrus6/pages/image4.html

    That’s not something that changes with time or makeup or anything. It’s not the same girl.

    #28 | Comment by Fa fuh fuh fa fa fa — April 28, 2008 @ 9:50 am

  29. It’s probably for the best. If it actually HAD been her, it probably would have broken her Dad’s heart.

    And we all know what that leads to. Fukken LINE dancing.

    #29 | Comment by Anonymous — April 28, 2008 @ 9:55 am

  30. Yea its not her. ears dont match and nose structure is a bit different in the 2 pics #28 posted.

    #30 | Comment by eber — April 28, 2008 @ 10:04 am

  31. i would say it wasn’t her cause there is no mole by her lip

    go figure a slooth take there time and inspect some earlobes that are tied down by the head band so would be really hard to compare and miss that fact that even makeup can’t cover up a mole are freckle by her lip as seen in the two pics

    i must say thou it sure as hell looks like her.

    #31 | Comment by no homo — April 28, 2008 @ 10:09 am

  32. 10: Hahahaha! Especially not a “drug attic”.

    #32 | Comment by Tycho Brahe — April 28, 2008 @ 10:37 am

  33. Yeah. Last Pic is deffinatly not her…too bad though.

    #33 | Comment by Pawluk — April 28, 2008 @ 10:40 am

  34. @29 Well played, sir.

    #34 | Comment by Double D — April 28, 2008 @ 10:43 am

  35. Doesnt everyone know that, if you’re a girl, artistic is just code for topless?

    #35 | Comment by guy — April 28, 2008 @ 11:14 am

  36. #28 great posting!

    OK so its not her: A shinny penny to the first guy that find the topless pic of Miley! 3..2..1! G…oh shit FBI! RUN!

    #36 | Comment by Sliy — April 28, 2008 @ 11:27 am

  37. WIN

    #37 | Comment by Xan — April 28, 2008 @ 11:33 am

  38. Her “blossoming chest”, lol.

    Did you come up with that AB? That’s fucking poetry, man.

    #38 | Comment by cobalt — April 28, 2008 @ 11:37 am

  39. #29 – that comment wins.

    lollercoaster.

    #39 | Comment by AngelBaby — April 28, 2008 @ 11:55 am

  40. Is not her. Unless she has a BIG forehead

    #40 | Comment by jordan — April 28, 2008 @ 11:56 am

  41. This is so obviously a publicity ploy. Especially with such willingness to comment from all parties.

    #41 | Comment by ham — April 28, 2008 @ 11:56 am

  42. She doesn’t look attractive at all in the VF pics. Not biting on this jailbait.

    And I don’t believe a word she says. She’s just prepping for her post-“Hannah Montana” career, when she can cash in on skankiness. I have no doubt Billy Ray is all behind this.

    #42 | Comment by Milhouse — April 28, 2008 @ 12:30 pm

  43. 20 bucks says half the posters are fapping are still fapping to the uncensored fake miley pic imaging it’s her.

    I know I am…

    #43 | Comment by The Kyle — April 28, 2008 @ 1:02 pm

  44. Her or not hot perky boobz is hot perky boobz

    #44 | Comment by KidGT — April 28, 2008 @ 1:23 pm

  45. She looks like an underage hooker…

    Topless chick’s not her. She’s hotter than Miley… bring on the rest of her pictures…! Let’s make her famous!!!

    #45 | Comment by Vote for Pedro — April 28, 2008 @ 1:26 pm

  46. The last photo is not Miley. Fact.
    Its the same girl as the one with the green bra a few posts ago. Fact.
    The star on the pic is Egotastic’s star so they probably have the uncensored ones. Fact.
    According to most news sites including vanity fair the other pics are of Miley. Fact.

    Dont give me a chance to say I told you so.

    Oh and would I frap to topless pics of a miley looky likey. Yes I would. Frap Fact.

    #46 | Comment by Psyper — April 28, 2008 @ 1:41 pm

  47. titty pic not her, obviously; Miley has a distinct nose, short and small, a nose kind of like Melissa Georges’, titty girl has full sized nose. you can change your eyebrows, you may even be able to cover/remove moles, but you can’t change the size of your nose….at least not without the name of a good jewish doctor in beverly hills, just look for a “-stein” or “-berg”, you’ll be fine.

    –i like the “artistic” picture anne took. she took away Miley’s bubblyness(?), her…snap, crackle, and pop. and that is art is supposed to do right, make you appreciate reality all that much more?

    #47 | Comment by boblabla — April 28, 2008 @ 2:18 pm

  48. I LOVE this site.
    thank you
    last pic…..not her, but VERY nice 🙂

    #48 | Comment by Ra — April 28, 2008 @ 2:59 pm

  49. Vanity Fair seems to have real difficulty hiring decent photographers these days. Even I could make Miley Cyrus look better than that.

    The last really good Vanity Fair photograph is the one that heads this very website.

    #49 | Comment by cobalt — April 28, 2008 @ 3:05 pm

  50. Green bra is Miley. I’ve seen a comparison w/ control Miley pic at Bastardly. Go convince yourself.

    #50 | Comment by tool — April 28, 2008 @ 3:21 pm

  51. 49: Annie Leibovitz isnt a new a photographer.

    #51 | Comment by guy — April 28, 2008 @ 3:22 pm

  52. Its not her you can tell in this picture of the same girl.

    http://i26.tinypic.com/29xhk54.jpg

    Here is on more of the girl.

    http://i28.tinypic.com/2cfva6e.jpg

    #52 | Comment by KtWTupac — April 28, 2008 @ 4:02 pm

  53. Very easy to tell it is a fake.

    Look at the (fake) Miley in the above starred picture. Look at her ear lobe.

    Now look at a picture of the real Miley:

    http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/mileycyrus6/pages/image4.html

    #53 | Comment by Confuzzled — April 28, 2008 @ 4:03 pm

  54. #52. KtWTupac
    got anymore? 🙂

    #54 | Comment by Ra — April 28, 2008 @ 5:01 pm

  55. Enough with this earlobe shit. The “real” Miley also doesn’t have insanely devilish red eyes… or does she?

    #55 | Comment by Tony — April 28, 2008 @ 5:38 pm

  56. WHERE ARE THE UNSTARRED PICS

    #56 | Comment by Dubbles — April 28, 2008 @ 5:47 pm

  57. That “starred” pic is as old as the internet and is not miley.
    Fail.

    #57 | Comment by cinnemon — April 28, 2008 @ 6:52 pm

  58. #29 – It takes a lot to make me laugh out loud, and you, sir, made me LOL!!! 🙂

    #58 | Comment by MizzouRah! — April 28, 2008 @ 7:06 pm

  59. I think we’re all getting a little desperate here. We’re getting pics of random skinny girls and pretending they’re miley. That girl looks nothing like her. Don’t force it, it’s only a matter of time.
    But the rest of them are win.

    #59 | Comment by murderface — April 28, 2008 @ 7:35 pm

  60. I’ve seen the unstarred (is that a word now) picture. And I really don’t believe that it’s her.

    #60 | Comment by MizzouRah! — April 28, 2008 @ 7:47 pm

  61. Where can we see the unstarred?

    #61 | Comment by abbb — April 28, 2008 @ 8:35 pm

  62. M, I, C…See you real soon!

    K, E, Y…Why? because we love you nude!

    #62 | Comment by Mickey — April 28, 2008 @ 9:04 pm

  63. M,O,U,S,E!!!!!!!!

    Waiting to find out if it’s real to fap

    #63 | Comment by Mouse — April 28, 2008 @ 9:23 pm

  64. can someone please post it again i havn seen it

    #64 | Comment by help — April 28, 2008 @ 10:15 pm

  65. #54
    nope sorry thats all I got. I mean I have the unedited one. I edited it so it would last longer.

    How ever the first picture does look like her, Its scary. Its easy yo tell its not tho for the second picture I posted.

    #65 | Comment by KtWTupac — April 28, 2008 @ 10:41 pm

  66. links to the unstarred last pic would be nice, just to make sure its fake….

    #66 | Comment by J — April 28, 2008 @ 11:04 pm

  67. Pfft all the doubt makes the topless pic unfappable.

    ?????????

    ????????????????

    #67 | Comment by Haruka — April 28, 2008 @ 11:19 pm

  68. To all the idiots asking for the unstarred pic… read through the comments above you.

    #68 | Comment by Nobody — April 28, 2008 @ 11:44 pm

  69. all the links are dead

    #69 | Comment by abbb — April 29, 2008 @ 12:08 am

  70. hey look, KtWTupac is blogging again. aint that cute.

    #70 | Comment by filthyfish — April 29, 2008 @ 12:23 am

  71. http://i32.tinypic.com/24qkg94.jpg

    #71 | Comment by Nobody — April 29, 2008 @ 12:23 am

  72. #71 – Thank you for that. Been waiting for someone to pick up on that….

    #72 | Comment by JZ — April 29, 2008 @ 12:52 am

  73. I hit the link from #71 and it went to a 404?

    #73 | Comment by confused — April 29, 2008 @ 12:57 am

  74. unstarred ones gone again

    #74 | Comment by boo — April 29, 2008 @ 1:46 am

  75. Funniest thing about these “Leaked candid” shots is if her people try to get them ripped down.

    That would be pretty much the same exact thing as saying “Yeah, that’s her, but don’t look.”

    In reality the best way they can get around this would be to say it’s not her and that they feel very sorry for the girl impersonating her in these pictures and degrading herself in this way while harming some one elses reputation.

    Then do NOTHING, save of course taking little Miley’s Digicam the fuck away.

    #75 | Comment by oofoo — April 29, 2008 @ 2:58 am

  76. http://imagesocket.com/view/794e63.jpg

    #76 | Comment by Anonymous — April 29, 2008 @ 4:44 am

  77. Reup un-edited this time of the second picture of the girl that is not here.

    http://imagesocket.com/view/120367857046_anonib258.jpg

    #77 | Comment by KtWTupac — April 29, 2008 @ 10:41 am

  78. That girl looks older and nothing like her. Weird.

    #78 | Comment by THR — April 29, 2008 @ 12:25 pm

  79. any large unstarred one. Cheers

    #79 | Comment by gibsongu — April 29, 2008 @ 1:02 pm

  80. #77: Oh My Word
    fap…fap….fap

    #80 | Comment by Psyper — April 29, 2008 @ 3:04 pm

  81. got to love Miley =P

    I hope she keeps showing off

    Star pic 100% isnt here. Its been on the net for at least 6 month to a year.

    #81 | Comment by Jailbait — April 29, 2008 @ 3:38 pm

  82. Miley cheerleading…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Uuu04LfE8k

    #82 | Comment by wannaramble — April 29, 2008 @ 5:58 pm

  83. The “earlobe” remarks are pure bullshit, because her ears are covered by her hair and her headband. I say it does look like her.

    #83 | Comment by I-AintTellingUWhoIAm — April 29, 2008 @ 11:56 pm

  84. what i say goes! and i say the starred pics arent her. case closed.

    #84 | Comment by BrainDamage — April 30, 2008 @ 1:25 am

  85. America lamer by the second

    #85 | Comment by jon — April 30, 2008 @ 2:47 am

  86. 83: You understand the concept of ear LOBE, right? The bottom dangly bit of an ear? In some humans, it has a curved portion that dangles below the eventual insertion into the side of the face, like a little U-shape. In other people, it melds into the side of the face, sloping in without the dangly bit… it’s a monogenic mendelian trait in humans, and it’s really fucking obvious in post 28 where the BOTTOM of the ear is clearly visible in both pics.

    What the fuck is wrong with your education that you can understand lolspeak but you don’t understand what part of the ear is the lobe? Fuck.

    #86 | Comment by Anonymous — April 30, 2008 @ 5:12 am

  87. If anybody needed anymore proof, the earlobe thing is certainly definitive. You can’t fake that.

    She does bear a passing resemblance to Cyrus from the right angle though; there’s no doubt about that.

    #87 | Comment by cobalt — April 30, 2008 @ 8:23 am

  88. That topless fake miley pic has been on certain dark corners of the internet since at least summer 07.

    #88 | Comment by Chris Hansen — April 30, 2008 @ 3:02 pm

  89. #55 – Demonic red eyes? That can only mean one thing…. Miley is a Terminator, sent from the future to destroy the future leader of the resistance. Clearly she has been built as jail bait as the future leader is probably a pedo or pervert.

    But wait, that could make it anyone one of us.

    #89 | Comment by John Connor — April 30, 2008 @ 5:19 pm

  90. All the links are dead, and part of me still wants to verify the fakeness of that image…

    Anyone?…

    …Sorry to be a pain…

    #90 | Comment by wetlegs — April 30, 2008 @ 7:15 pm

  91. idk guys its not her its photo shopped but its her head the “mole” is probably makeuped to hell and back during most of her life

    #91 | Comment by the cumbucket from hell named chuck norris — May 2, 2008 @ 4:59 am

  92. so we obviously know its not the real miley cyrus, but i wanna know who the girl is and where all these pics are from? anybody got a link to the set where all these pics are being pulled from?

    #92 | Comment by arik — May 6, 2008 @ 8:31 am

  93. http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v236/165/62/723241601/n723241601_437970_794.jpg

    Found another unstarred.

    You know, I’m pretty sure that’s not a word.

    #93 | Comment by Avaddon — May 14, 2008 @ 9:17 pm

  94. The ‘starred’ one is not here it’s easily distinguishable by looking at several pictures of the real miley and inspecting the bottom of her ear, and then comparing to that image. However that girl with the stars is way hotter than miley no doubt. lolo 😀

    #94 | Comment by lawl — June 2, 2008 @ 6:21 pm

  95. OMG

    BRB, FBI!

    #95 | Comment by omg — July 2, 2008 @ 9:52 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *