Isn’t there something the authorities can do to stop the Lohan family ? I mean at this point, Dina Lohan might as well be the ringleader of a 4 continent child porn ring. Seriously.
#8 |
Comment
by Rod Stiffington — January 31, 2009 @
11:01 am
C-thru dress FTW.
The hottest aspect is that she looks like Lohan’s sister while looking nothing like Lohan. Weird jailbait paradox.
#9 |
Comment
by cobalt — January 31, 2009 @
11:10 am
mmmm, altho – i’d rather look at Lindsay any day..
#10 |
Comment
by lamah — January 31, 2009 @
11:26 am
She’ll be in Playboy shortly after her 18th birthday. I’d put money on it.
#11 |
Comment
by Nobody — January 31, 2009 @
12:12 pm
FUGLY as HELL!
#12 |
Comment
by Pirho — January 31, 2009 @
12:17 pm
I really don’t know what to make of this…On the one hand, there’s a bit of cleavage, and she’s not BAD looking. On the other, jeez, she’s one old looking 15 year old (with scrawny 15 y/o girl legs from what I can see). And she’s 15….
…no thanks.
#13 |
Comment
by Phil says, "huh?" — January 31, 2009 @
12:22 pm
can….not….resist….lohan….fetish….
#14 |
Comment
by Xan — January 31, 2009 @
12:25 pm
This is screwing up everyone’s head. If we’re going to look at a 15 year old, should it be one that looks straight out of the Denny’s lounge at 3PM? Lindsay already looks like Sharon Stone, this one’s even worse. Back to Cyrus for some classic jailbait my head can understand.
#15 |
Comment
by Kewtr — January 31, 2009 @
12:42 pm
#14 – fo’ sho!
#16 |
Comment
by darkstar — January 31, 2009 @
2:10 pm
#15 – I agree. More Miley please. After yesterday’s post I am completely smitten.
#17 |
Comment
by jinjang — January 31, 2009 @
2:39 pm
Fucking horrible.
#18 |
Comment
by Jenesis — January 31, 2009 @
4:05 pm
ugggg, ali=fail. Even when her older sister turned all skeletor on us, she still looks better than this garbage.
#19 |
Comment
by lohan licker — January 31, 2009 @
5:26 pm
It’s got to be sad to have already peaked before 15. Unlike the young Spears, she doesn’t have the potential to equal her older hotter sister. But I’d still take this one over Watson or Miley.
#21 |
Comment
by evil monkey — January 31, 2009 @
7:51 pm
Speaking of younger sisters, why is it that the younger sisters always pale in comparison to their older sisters? Ashlee Simpson, Ali Lohan, Beyonce’s sister, they’ve all been NOTHING like their older, hotter sisters. It’s so disapointing because you always imagine that they will be like their older sisters but younger, thus better. But it never quite works like that.
#22 |
Comment
by evil monkey — January 31, 2009 @
7:53 pm
not hot, not cute and very sad.
More Emma Roberts.
#23 |
Comment
by roscoe — January 31, 2009 @
7:55 pm
#22 raises an interesting point.
the only younger sis > older sis comparisons i could come up with off the top of my head are zooey deschanel > emily deschanel and olivia d’abo > maryam d’abo
#33 |
Comment
by Nobody — February 1, 2009 @
4:32 am
#24
Olivia and Maryam are cousins, not sisters.
#34 |
Comment
by Jenesis — February 1, 2009 @
5:30 am
#33: Elle Fanning? Seriously? Isn’t she like 10? At least Dakota has hit puberty.
#35 |
Comment
by alberach — February 1, 2009 @
8:24 am
She’s not horrible but Bea Arthur has less bags and rings under her eyes than this chick, especially during a photoshoot.
#36 |
Comment
by Codefire — February 1, 2009 @
9:09 am
Ali: “Mommmmm, when do I get MYYYYY sexy photoshoot?”
Mom: “Listen, I’m sick of listening to this sh*t. Get a f*cking dress, and we’ll go outside and have some pictures taken, okayyyyy?”
Ali: “FIIIINNALLLLLLY!!!!!”
#37 |
Comment
by professor snip — February 1, 2009 @
9:29 am
i detest myself for thinking she looks ok.
but fast forward 10 years. that’s gonna be one wrinkly freckled drunk ass woman. it’s been demoed twice before.
but for now, tits will be tits. god bless em.
#38 |
Comment
by yesyesyall — February 1, 2009 @
10:26 am
#35 hahahaha
That’s fucked up even for this site!
#39 |
Comment
by cobalt — February 1, 2009 @
10:27 am
Am I looking at the same photos as everyone else? I think she looks hot enough…I’d hit it. Nothing to write home about, but…
I don’t know, she just doesn’t seem gross looking to me, but most of the other comments make her out to be some wretched disgusting tramp, or something.
Whatever, I guess…I’d hit it.
#40 |
Comment
by pyronuc — February 1, 2009 @
3:51 pm
#42 |
Comment
by Twirp — February 1, 2009 @
5:12 pm
15? damn, so i cant even say i’d pityfuck a smile on her face. too bad.
#43 |
Comment
by Lobster — February 1, 2009 @
6:50 pm
#25 & 33 – I guess I assumed Hilary was the younger one, being that she is the cute one. Wow that’s got to be really sad. Riding your YOUNGER sisters coattails!
#44 |
Comment
by evil monkey — February 2, 2009 @
2:07 am
It must suck to have the same fugly, freckly skin that your sister has, but without the hot, red hair and great tits.
But it must *really* suck to look like an older, drag queen version of her.
#45 |
Comment
by EmJee — February 2, 2009 @
3:08 am
Please tell me this a promo pic for the next season of Heroes!
Lohan firecrotch power > Unbreakable Cheerleader
#46 |
Comment
by Dr. Venkman — February 2, 2009 @
4:49 am
#45 the older drag queen lookalike would be her mother.
#47 |
Comment
by Pirho — February 2, 2009 @
7:02 am
What about those ugly fat patches by her armpits when she keeps her arms close. Yuck. Looks like a second set of boobs which weirds me out.
#48 |
Comment
by Smitty — February 2, 2009 @
9:38 am
#48, I blame those on the dress. Her breasts are pushed up, rather than falling naturally, and the “second set of boobs” can’t transition nicely into her figure.
#49 |
Comment
by Paragon — February 2, 2009 @
12:14 pm
Looks like Godzilla is nesting inside of her #46
#50 |
Comment
by Pirho — February 2, 2009 @
1:52 pm
She looks like 45, the milf´s looks more younger…
#51 |
Comment
by Focoxx — February 2, 2009 @
3:23 pm
Why is it with those sticking out, I still notice The Rock in Race to Witch Mountain in the background?
#52 |
Comment
by birdboy — February 2, 2009 @
8:41 pm
D I S G U S T I N G
unless she gets off a car with no panties on…
#53 |
Comment
by Jeff — February 2, 2009 @
11:42 pm
I wonder how much Dina Lohan paid for this one’s implants.
#54 |
Comment
by Tony — February 3, 2009 @
1:46 am
I’m betting nothing. She looks like an average-built teenager to me.
#55 |
Comment
by alberach — February 3, 2009 @
8:34 am
I asked two women that I work with to guess the age of the girl in the photo, one guessed late twenties, the other said, “Is that the model that is really 51 but looks 30?”
If she was actually 29 she’d be a pretty good looking 29 year old…
#56 |
Comment
by Dave — February 4, 2009 @
2:26 pm
Do not want. Ew.
#57 |
Comment
by dizzle — February 5, 2009 @
7:46 pm
I’d fuck her in the ass, but that’s about it
#58 |
Comment
by Dirty Young Man — February 6, 2009 @
2:37 am
#60 |
Comment
by OhMyDog — February 7, 2009 @
11:21 am
She already does look burned out. She also kinda looks like a tranny… tall, big hands, boobs definitely look fake.
BTW, what is that on the inside of her elbow? Is she on heroine or something, too?
#61 |
Comment
by what — February 14, 2009 @
6:52 am
Not a fan of the way that dress is making a crease between her boobs and her underarms. And she’s mostly just a manish version of Lindsay. Granted, the fact that she’s only 15 does make it sort of hot.
#62 |
Comment
by Todd Ham — February 14, 2009 @
8:47 am
first?
#1 | Comment by Titus — January 31, 2009 @ 9:45 am
Second? Gay?
#2 | Comment by Dildo — January 31, 2009 @ 10:11 am
i would do her! 🙂
#3 | Comment by texhorndog — January 31, 2009 @ 10:32 am
she looks like she already went through the strung-out model phase.
lindsay >> ali > dina (cup size)
#4 | Comment by zilch — January 31, 2009 @ 10:42 am
Yuck. ‘Nuff said.
#5 | Comment by Reilly — January 31, 2009 @ 10:48 am
ummm, no thanx. Some nice cleave I guess, but DAMN is she old looking! The best is #4 with Giant-Liam-Neeson-On-The-Phone-Head looming above.
ugly toes are ugly.
#6 | Comment by ron Dingleberry — January 31, 2009 @ 10:54 am
Yucky. She looks like she’s 35, and has been living on the street for a few years.
#7 | Comment by jason — January 31, 2009 @ 10:58 am
Isn’t there something the authorities can do to stop the Lohan family ? I mean at this point, Dina Lohan might as well be the ringleader of a 4 continent child porn ring. Seriously.
#8 | Comment by Rod Stiffington — January 31, 2009 @ 11:01 am
C-thru dress FTW.
The hottest aspect is that she looks like Lohan’s sister while looking nothing like Lohan. Weird jailbait paradox.
#9 | Comment by cobalt — January 31, 2009 @ 11:10 am
mmmm, altho – i’d rather look at Lindsay any day..
#10 | Comment by lamah — January 31, 2009 @ 11:26 am
She’ll be in Playboy shortly after her 18th birthday. I’d put money on it.
#11 | Comment by Nobody — January 31, 2009 @ 12:12 pm
FUGLY as HELL!
#12 | Comment by Pirho — January 31, 2009 @ 12:17 pm
I really don’t know what to make of this…On the one hand, there’s a bit of cleavage, and she’s not BAD looking. On the other, jeez, she’s one old looking 15 year old (with scrawny 15 y/o girl legs from what I can see). And she’s 15….
…no thanks.
#13 | Comment by Phil says, "huh?" — January 31, 2009 @ 12:22 pm
can….not….resist….lohan….fetish….
#14 | Comment by Xan — January 31, 2009 @ 12:25 pm
This is screwing up everyone’s head. If we’re going to look at a 15 year old, should it be one that looks straight out of the Denny’s lounge at 3PM? Lindsay already looks like Sharon Stone, this one’s even worse. Back to Cyrus for some classic jailbait my head can understand.
#15 | Comment by Kewtr — January 31, 2009 @ 12:42 pm
#14 – fo’ sho!
#16 | Comment by darkstar — January 31, 2009 @ 2:10 pm
#15 – I agree. More Miley please. After yesterday’s post I am completely smitten.
#17 | Comment by jinjang — January 31, 2009 @ 2:39 pm
Fucking horrible.
#18 | Comment by Jenesis — January 31, 2009 @ 4:05 pm
ugggg, ali=fail. Even when her older sister turned all skeletor on us, she still looks better than this garbage.
#19 | Comment by lohan licker — January 31, 2009 @ 5:26 pm
She´s the living prove that 13 is prime
#20 | Comment by walker4409 — January 31, 2009 @ 6:29 pm
It’s got to be sad to have already peaked before 15. Unlike the young Spears, she doesn’t have the potential to equal her older hotter sister. But I’d still take this one over Watson or Miley.
#21 | Comment by evil monkey — January 31, 2009 @ 7:51 pm
Speaking of younger sisters, why is it that the younger sisters always pale in comparison to their older sisters? Ashlee Simpson, Ali Lohan, Beyonce’s sister, they’ve all been NOTHING like their older, hotter sisters. It’s so disapointing because you always imagine that they will be like their older sisters but younger, thus better. But it never quite works like that.
#22 | Comment by evil monkey — January 31, 2009 @ 7:53 pm
not hot, not cute and very sad.
More Emma Roberts.
#23 | Comment by roscoe — January 31, 2009 @ 7:55 pm
#22 raises an interesting point.
the only younger sis > older sis comparisons i could come up with off the top of my head are zooey deschanel > emily deschanel and olivia d’abo > maryam d’abo
anyone got any others?
#24 | Comment by AngelBaby — January 31, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
Hilary Duff usually considered to be hotter than Haylie Duff
#25 | Comment by roscoe — January 31, 2009 @ 9:01 pm
Of course she looks old. Mommy’s riding her like a rented mule because she knows Lindsay isn’t bringing in her botox money anymore.
#26 | Comment by oofoo — January 31, 2009 @ 9:04 pm
There must be a “haggard” gene.
#27 | Comment by Mister — January 31, 2009 @ 9:13 pm
serena > venus
#28 | Comment by Metacarpal — January 31, 2009 @ 10:29 pm
^^^
i’m not sure i’d use the term “hot” to describe either one of these she-beasts.
#29 | Comment by AngelBaby — January 31, 2009 @ 10:38 pm
I might be in the minority, but I’ve always thought Ashlee Simpson > Jessica, the chubby mom-jeans wearing tranny … but neither one does much for me.
Emma Roberts on the other hand ? Yes, Ma’am !
#30 | Comment by Rod Stiffington — January 31, 2009 @ 10:42 pm
Needs more Taylor Momsen
#31 | Comment by Milhouse — January 31, 2009 @ 11:17 pm
Just like Indy said, “It’s not the age it’s the mileage”. Her Odometer has rolled over a couple of times already.
#32 | Comment by Assweipe — February 1, 2009 @ 2:19 am
Younger > older:
Hilary Duff > Haylie.
Jamie Lynn Spears> Britney (now, anyway)
Monica Cruz > Penelope
Ashley Judd > Wynona
Elle Fanning > Dakota
#33 | Comment by Nobody — February 1, 2009 @ 4:32 am
#24
Olivia and Maryam are cousins, not sisters.
#34 | Comment by Jenesis — February 1, 2009 @ 5:30 am
#33: Elle Fanning? Seriously? Isn’t she like 10? At least Dakota has hit puberty.
#35 | Comment by alberach — February 1, 2009 @ 8:24 am
She’s not horrible but Bea Arthur has less bags and rings under her eyes than this chick, especially during a photoshoot.
#36 | Comment by Codefire — February 1, 2009 @ 9:09 am
Ali: “Mommmmm, when do I get MYYYYY sexy photoshoot?”
Mom: “Listen, I’m sick of listening to this sh*t. Get a f*cking dress, and we’ll go outside and have some pictures taken, okayyyyy?”
Ali: “FIIIINNALLLLLLY!!!!!”
#37 | Comment by professor snip — February 1, 2009 @ 9:29 am
i detest myself for thinking she looks ok.
but fast forward 10 years. that’s gonna be one wrinkly freckled drunk ass woman. it’s been demoed twice before.
but for now, tits will be tits. god bless em.
#38 | Comment by yesyesyall — February 1, 2009 @ 10:26 am
#35 hahahaha
That’s fucked up even for this site!
#39 | Comment by cobalt — February 1, 2009 @ 10:27 am
Am I looking at the same photos as everyone else? I think she looks hot enough…I’d hit it. Nothing to write home about, but…
I don’t know, she just doesn’t seem gross looking to me, but most of the other comments make her out to be some wretched disgusting tramp, or something.
Whatever, I guess…I’d hit it.
#40 | Comment by pyronuc — February 1, 2009 @ 3:51 pm
It’s ok to have a comment.
#41 | Comment by dudeguy — February 1, 2009 @ 4:24 pm
F
U
G
L
Y
#42 | Comment by Twirp — February 1, 2009 @ 5:12 pm
15? damn, so i cant even say i’d pityfuck a smile on her face. too bad.
#43 | Comment by Lobster — February 1, 2009 @ 6:50 pm
#25 & 33 – I guess I assumed Hilary was the younger one, being that she is the cute one. Wow that’s got to be really sad. Riding your YOUNGER sisters coattails!
#44 | Comment by evil monkey — February 2, 2009 @ 2:07 am
It must suck to have the same fugly, freckly skin that your sister has, but without the hot, red hair and great tits.
But it must *really* suck to look like an older, drag queen version of her.
#45 | Comment by EmJee — February 2, 2009 @ 3:08 am
http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/alilohan/pages/image8.html
Holy %&^%!
Is her uterus glowing?
Fire crotch is hereditary and made of real fire?
Please tell me this a promo pic for the next season of Heroes!
Lohan firecrotch power > Unbreakable Cheerleader
#46 | Comment by Dr. Venkman — February 2, 2009 @ 4:49 am
#45 the older drag queen lookalike would be her mother.
#47 | Comment by Pirho — February 2, 2009 @ 7:02 am
What about those ugly fat patches by her armpits when she keeps her arms close. Yuck. Looks like a second set of boobs which weirds me out.
#48 | Comment by Smitty — February 2, 2009 @ 9:38 am
#48, I blame those on the dress. Her breasts are pushed up, rather than falling naturally, and the “second set of boobs” can’t transition nicely into her figure.
#49 | Comment by Paragon — February 2, 2009 @ 12:14 pm
Looks like Godzilla is nesting inside of her #46
#50 | Comment by Pirho — February 2, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
She looks like 45, the milf´s looks more younger…
#51 | Comment by Focoxx — February 2, 2009 @ 3:23 pm
Why is it with those sticking out, I still notice The Rock in Race to Witch Mountain in the background?
#52 | Comment by birdboy — February 2, 2009 @ 8:41 pm
D I S G U S T I N G
unless she gets off a car with no panties on…
#53 | Comment by Jeff — February 2, 2009 @ 11:42 pm
I wonder how much Dina Lohan paid for this one’s implants.
#54 | Comment by Tony — February 3, 2009 @ 1:46 am
I’m betting nothing. She looks like an average-built teenager to me.
#55 | Comment by alberach — February 3, 2009 @ 8:34 am
I asked two women that I work with to guess the age of the girl in the photo, one guessed late twenties, the other said, “Is that the model that is really 51 but looks 30?”
If she was actually 29 she’d be a pretty good looking 29 year old…
#56 | Comment by Dave — February 4, 2009 @ 2:26 pm
Do not want. Ew.
#57 | Comment by dizzle — February 5, 2009 @ 7:46 pm
I’d fuck her in the ass, but that’s about it
#58 | Comment by Dirty Young Man — February 6, 2009 @ 2:37 am
Super hot imo. Much better looking than Lindsay.
#59 | Comment by JTF — February 7, 2009 @ 5:30 am
@58, ditto
she’s fine to me
#60 | Comment by OhMyDog — February 7, 2009 @ 11:21 am
She already does look burned out. She also kinda looks like a tranny… tall, big hands, boobs definitely look fake.
BTW, what is that on the inside of her elbow? Is she on heroine or something, too?
#61 | Comment by what — February 14, 2009 @ 6:52 am
Not a fan of the way that dress is making a crease between her boobs and her underarms. And she’s mostly just a manish version of Lindsay. Granted, the fact that she’s only 15 does make it sort of hot.
#62 | Comment by Todd Ham — February 14, 2009 @ 8:47 am