It’s been almost a year since we’ve had a Petra post. To long yep to long.
Here she is in an icy hot photoshoot from April’s issue of D Magazine in Italy.



I figured it might be better to do a NSFW post on the weekend when most people aren’t at W. Amirite?
No idea who she is, but nice ass π
#1 | Comment by Mark Forster — May 2, 2009 @ 3:12 am
These pics are somewhat old. I’m guessing D magazine is recycling them from another source. That’s fine with me: Petra + Wet + Cold = Sticky keyboard.
#2 | Comment by evil monkey — May 2, 2009 @ 3:28 am
Oo, nice!
#3 | Comment by Phil says, "huh?" — May 2, 2009 @ 6:57 am
I love her.
#4 | Comment by een — May 2, 2009 @ 7:16 am
ditto no idea who she is, but yes very nice ass.
#5 | Comment by Pirho — May 2, 2009 @ 7:30 am
that’s hot
#6 | Comment by Mike — May 2, 2009 @ 10:01 am
agree with 1 & 5.
#7 | Comment by roscoe — May 2, 2009 @ 10:15 am
…mmh she does nothing for me
#8 | Comment by Milton McFuck — May 2, 2009 @ 10:36 am
I would tap that until it bled. Even then I might keep going.
#9 | Comment by cobalt — May 2, 2009 @ 11:21 am
I busted the formatting , thatΒ΄s why i post again:
I surfed around the net last weekend and i found
a page named YNC = Young News Channel, this
page shows the most cruel accidents and crimes
that happening around the world and has no
problem to show mangled people who are still
alive. I thought hey whata nice place but then i
read the rules of these people : 1) Use your
common sense. ( ThatΒ΄s funny since this is
demanded from people without common sense
at all) 2) No nudity of minors, a minor is a person
under the age of 18, we donΒ΄t care if itΒ΄s legal in
your country, itΒ΄s illegal in ours and even if it
were itΒ΄s repulsive, so donΒ΄t do it. This is a state
-ment that is really impressive since it was made
by people who show mangled and mutilated
accident-victims each day, bodies ripped apart,
intestines spread all over the street, they show
public executions and people who are lynched by
the mob and having not the slightest problem
with it, but showing a nude under 18 year old
person is repulsive for them. This is what i told
these assholes : IΒ΄ve just read the shitty rules of
this site and iΒ΄m surprised that the amount of
brainfucking idiocy in this world is still to top,
but you guys made it. Citation : 2) Free speech
rules here..but we will flag each illegal fart and
pass it on to the relevant authorities. 3) No
nudity of minors, we donΒ΄t care if itΒ΄s legal in
your country, itΒ΄s illegal in ours ( Did you mean
America or Afghanistan ? ..but relating to the
existing hypocrisy in both countries there isnΒ΄t
much difference anyway ) A minor is a person
under the age of 18, itΒ΄s repulsive to post a vid
of a girl who is 17 years and 11 month old , itΒ΄s
perfectly okay if sheΒ΄s a month older, and if you
ask why, itΒ΄s because we are hypocritical narrow
minded idiots. ItΒ΄s perfectly okay to post a vid
showing crushed school kids whose brains are
spread over a square mile btw. Dan and Mike or
whatever your real names are, you or the other
nerds can ban me for lifetime. ITΒ΄S AN HONOUR
FOR ME TO BE BANNED FROM THIS HEAP OF SHIT
YOU NAME A FORUM. ThatΒ΄s what i answered
them, and i repeat that as often as necessary till
they ban me. I donΒ΄t like the temptation to
comment on such vids, itΒ΄s better to be banned
from this place of lowbrow assholes
#10 | Comment by walker4409 — May 2, 2009 @ 12:35 pm
lol @ #10 ?
#11 | Comment by lawl — May 2, 2009 @ 2:29 pm
hunh?
#12 | Comment by Pirho — May 2, 2009 @ 2:37 pm
wow she is perfection, thx ab and post this kind of stuff as soon as you have it =)
#13 | Comment by Evestay — May 2, 2009 @ 3:34 pm
Fucking hell, for a minute people, for a minute, I thought Walker had finally lost it. But it actually makes perfect sense when you read it.
Don’t you know? Girls Magically Change! when they turn 18!
Is there a smiley for sarcasm? I’d be typing it now if there was.
#14 | Comment by cobalt — May 2, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
http://asware.net/gallery/d/4741-10/petra_nemcova_4.jpg
she doesnt shave.
booh
#15 | Comment by john stagliano — May 2, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
I love this site π
#16 | Comment by darkstar — May 2, 2009 @ 6:15 pm
I bet she tastes like strawberries.
#17 | Comment by Marcus — May 2, 2009 @ 7:59 pm
To walker4409 –
A disclaimer – I have no idea what website you’re talking about. I don’t surf the Internet like I used to so, odds are, I’ve never been there. However…
You’re falling into the classic “What’s the difference between 18 years old & 17 years old, 11 months?” argument that a lot of pedophiles use. I’m not accusing you of pedophilia but this one of their classical arguments.
What is important is that society needs to establish objective criteria for the application of law.
Let’s use drunk driving, for example – What is “drunk”? How do you define “drunk” so that you can safely remove people in an unbiased manner from the transportation system so that they do not potentially harm themselves or others?
The establishment of drunk driving laws is not meant to oppress people but keep the majority of people safe from the minority of people who would otherwise commit harm.
The same holds true with pedophilia laws – There needs to be an objective criteria for the application of laws that are meant to protect the majority of young females from the minority of males who would exploit or otherwise harm those young females.
In the case of the United States of America, a young female legally becomes an adult at 18 years of age.
One question you might ask of this website is where the servers are being held that operates that website. There is legal precedent that, where the servers are located, those are the laws that the website needs to adhere to. This may be why they have set the laws that they have.
As for the “Nudity is not OK but [some other display] is OK” argument… This is another argument used by pedophiles in an attempt to justify their practices.
Please understand that nudity is very quantifiable, meaning that it is easier to establish objective criteria for it’s regulation as opposed to something more abstract such as “gore” or “violence.” Spoken obscenities are also easily quantifiable so that they, too, can be more easily regulated (See George Carlin’s “7 Words You’ll Never Hear on Television,” now outdated but very relevant for it’s time).
I hope that these explanations have helped you understand some of the reasoning behind the issues that you face. These explanations were not meant to force a change of opinion on yourself; Only you can change your own outlook upon these types of topics.
Thank you for expressing your opinions. Only you can help yourself become a better person.
#18 | Comment by Anonymous — May 3, 2009 @ 7:24 am
^^^
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.._,,-~βββΒ―Β―Β―ββ~-,,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦..,-ββ ; ; ;_,,—,,_ ; ;ββ-,β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.._,,,—,,_
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.,β ; ; ;,-β , , , , , β-, ; ;β-,,,,—~~ββββββ~–,,,_β¦..,,-~ββ ; ; ; ;__;β-,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.| ; ; ;,β , , , _,,-~ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Β―ββ~β-,,_ ,,-~ββ , , β, ;β,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.β, ; ; β-, ,-~ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;ββ-, , , , , ,β ; |
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β, ; ;,ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;β-, , ,-β ;,-β
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.,β-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;ββ-β ;,,-β
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦..,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;__ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β-,β
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-ββΒ―: : ββ-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ; ;β,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦..,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;| : : : : : ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-ββΒ―: Β―ββ-, ; ; ;β,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β-,_: : _,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | : : : : : ; ; ; |
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Β―Β― ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;β-,,_ : :,-β ; ; ; ;|
β¦β¦β¦β¦..,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-~ββ , , , , ,,,-~~-, , , , _ ; ; ;Β―Β― ; ; ; ; ;|
..β¦β¦β¦β¦,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,β , , , , , , ,( : : : : , , , ,ββ-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;|
β¦β¦β¦.,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;β, , , , , , , , ,β~—~ββ , , , , , ,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;β,
β¦β¦.,-ββ ; _, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ββ~-,,,,–~~βββΒ―βββ~-,,_ , ,_,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β,
β¦.,-ββ-~ββ,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | ; ; | . . . . . . ,β; ,ββΒ― ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,_ ; β-,
β¦β¦β¦.,β ; ;,-, ; ;, ; ; ;, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β, ; ;β, . . . . .,β ;,β ; ; ; ;, ; ; ;,β-, ; ;,β ββ~–βββ
β¦β¦β¦,β-~β ,-β-~ββ β, ,-β β, ,,- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β, ; ; β~-,,,-ββ ; ,β ; ; ; ; β, ;,-ββ ; β, ,-β,
β¦β¦β¦.,-ββ ; ; ; ; ; ββ ; ; ;ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ββ-,,_ ; ; ; _,-β ; ; ; ; ; ;β-ββ ; ; ; ββ ; ;β-,
β¦β¦..,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Β―Β―ββΒ― ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;ββ-,
β¦β¦,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; |, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β-,
β¦..,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;|..β-,_ ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; β,
β¦.,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,ββ¦β¦.βββ,-~β ; ; ; ; ; ,β
β¦,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;β~-,,,,,–~~ββββββ~-,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,ββ¦..,-~ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-
β¦| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,ββ¦,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-β
β¦β, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,ββ¦.β, ; ; ; ; _,,-ββ
β¦.β, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,ββ¦β¦.ββ~~ββΒ―
β¦..ββ-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;_,,-ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-β
β¦β¦β¦ββ~-,,_ ; ; ; ; _,,,-~ββ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-β
β¦β¦β¦..| ; ; ;Β―Β―ββββΒ― ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-β
β¦β¦β¦..β, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-β
β¦β¦β¦β¦| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;|
β¦β¦β¦β¦β, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ~-,,___ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;β,
β¦β¦β¦β¦.β, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-ββ¦.ββ-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β,
β¦β¦β¦..,β β- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-βββ¦β¦β¦.β-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β,
β¦β¦β¦.,β ; ;β ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-ββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.β, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;β,
β¦β¦β¦,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-βββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦ββ-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; |
β¦β¦..,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,,-ββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦ββ, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; |
β¦β¦..| ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,ββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,β
β¦β¦..| ; ; ; ; ; ; ,ββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦..,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,ββ
β¦β¦..| ; ; ; ; ; ;,ββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.,-β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-β
β¦β¦..β,_ , ; , ;,ββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.,β ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-β
β¦β¦β¦β,,β,Β―,β,ββ|β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦.| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; β–,,
β¦β¦β¦β¦.Β―β¦βββ¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦..β-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;ββ~,,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦ββ-,, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;ββ~-,,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦..ββ-, ; ; ; ; ; ,,_ ; ;β-,ββ-,
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦..β, ; ; ; ; ; ; β-,__,–.
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β-, ; ; ;,,-~βββ , ,|, |
β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦ββ~-ββ_ , , ,,β,_/–β
GTFO!
#19 | Comment by cobalt — May 3, 2009 @ 4:42 pm
Pedo-bear knows best.
#20 | Comment by Phil says, "huh?" — May 3, 2009 @ 7:50 pm
Pedobear just raped Dakota Fanning and has her bloody panties to prove it.
#21 | Comment by Big Daddy Balls — May 4, 2009 @ 4:37 am
And now for something completely different. Our darling Haydon.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_qcWjCO8idGo/SUBZihv2HAI/AAAAAAAAFHM/OuyBdnJotlw/s1600-h/hayden_panettiere_out_2_big.jpg
#22 | Comment by Pirho — May 4, 2009 @ 7:15 am
Midget hookers suck.
#23 | Comment by Franc — May 4, 2009 @ 11:41 am
# 18
Oh Thank you so much Mr. “Anonymous”, all i want
is becoming a better person, but i think i need a
good person as an inspiring example. What about
George Bush ? How many underage girls did he kill
by his completely unnecessary oil-wars? Or what
about Robert Oppenheimer, he invented the atomic
bomb, he always was a respected and honored
person. How many underage girls did his invention
kill, what do you think? Ten thousand ? A hundred
thousand ? , but that doesnΒ΄t matter , if nobody
shows their naked corpses everything is okay.
These are the rules of your society . You can be a
greedy oil tycoon and kill hundredthousands of
people and youΒ΄re still the president of the country
You can invent a mass destruction weapon that kills
millions of people and you get the Enrico Fermi
award from Kennedy for it. But if you want sex with
an underage girl youΒ΄re a monster. Ah, i forgot that
is a pedo-argument..but isnΒ΄t each argument
against the 18-years line a pedo argument? Even if
the pope would say it it would be a pedo argument
for people like you. Thanks again Mr. “Anonymous”
iΒ΄m not anonymous btw. you can watch my pedo –
face on my Youtube account. We all are pedos here
btw, why do you think has this site a pedo-counter
label ? ItΒ΄s a present from your “good people”, i
think you shouldnΒ΄t post here since youΒ΄re one of
them, is that the reason why youΒ΄re anonymous?
A good person like you that posts here..isnΒ΄t that
suspicious ?
#24 | Comment by walker4409 — May 4, 2009 @ 12:21 pm
lol?
#25 | Comment by lawl — May 4, 2009 @ 6:25 pm
walker4409, I’ve got 2 questions 1) Do you consider yourself more of a pedo than most men, or do you think all men are pedos? And 2) At what age do you think it’s O.K. for an adult man to fuck a girl (what age of the girl)? Just wondering.
#26 | Comment by Dude — May 4, 2009 @ 7:20 pm
thats 4 questions
#27 | Comment by Pirho — May 5, 2009 @ 7:18 am
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2412468.ece
megan fox everyone!
#28 | Comment by wa — May 5, 2009 @ 11:07 am
#26
Hey Dude, you know what, weΒ΄re currently 104
pedos right now. About question one : IΒ΄ve no
idea how many men are pedos but when i see
how many rich old men choose a young, a VERY
young woman, iΒ΄m thinking my part. About the
age : that depends on the person. Some girls
are ready with 13, others not even with 20. The
average is somewhere in the middle but no
person is exactly average. The jurists try to
regulate nature by a law book but genes and
hormones canΒ΄t read, it will never work that
way, it didnΒ΄t work in the past and it wonΒ΄t
work in future. The victorian age with its strict
notions of demureness brought an explosion of
sexual diseases and nothing else.
The prohibition brought the worst alcohol
excesses of all times. The people who pester
the population with their narrow minded laws
believe to protect the youth but in fact they
protect nothing. Criminals find always a way
to circumvent laws otherwise they werenΒ΄t
criminals. All these puritan laws can only
pester harmless love couples who are together
Β΄cause they love each other, but the law knows
no love it knows only birth dates and articles
and haphazard invented rules made by people
with hearts of stone..or shit..or whatever
#29 | Comment by walker4409 — May 5, 2009 @ 11:13 am
Walker employing the fairly unorthodox Robert Oppenheimer defense there.
That’s some pretty deep shit man, I’m impressed. I mean, I just visit here to fap to jailbait, but I’ve gained so much more in the process.
#30 | Comment by cobalt — May 5, 2009 @ 11:16 am
Holy shit I want what you guys are smoking.
Unless you can change society or society’s major outlook on these somewhat controversial topics, regardless of where you live, who gives a fuck.
Petra is oldnuz.
#31 | Comment by asdf — May 5, 2009 @ 12:14 pm
#18…what a douche. Ironic posting number though.
It’s all fucking stupid. The real question is whether there’s consent. If a girl really wants to do something and is aware of the possible consequences I think that should take precedence. Biology says prime sex time starts at 16-17 for a lot of people. Laws are just that, laws. They don’t necessarily have to be based on common sense, science, or anything; you just need the political clout to get them passed.
#32 | Comment by anonymous's stalker — May 5, 2009 @ 10:49 pm
Watch this
http://www.theync.com/media.php?name=5248-horrific-footage
#33 | Comment by walker4409 — May 6, 2009 @ 11:08 am
and this
http://www.theync.com/media.php?name=7694-female-bicyclist–emptied-out-by-a-semi
#34 | Comment by walker4409 — May 6, 2009 @ 11:10 am
and this ( if the link works )
http://www.theync.com/media.php?name=9335-extraordinary
#35 | Comment by walker4409 — May 6, 2009 @ 11:13 am
However, you can find all that stuff on
http://www.theync.com/index.php
It shows perfectly the moral standards of
the “good people”
#36 | Comment by walker4409 — May 6, 2009 @ 11:23 am