Attack of the Yumb

Yeah, yeah…so she didn’t pose full nude or show nip in her Playboy pics. Boo-frickity-hoo. Olivia is still totally hawt in these pics, and they deserved a fresh post, so here it is.

I got these from Playboy’s Cyber Club in the largest size they offer. You’re welcome.

Psst…don’t let Hef know these are here, or Justin might get a nasty e-mail.

45 thoughts on “Attack of the Yumb

  1. YUMB +1

    #1 | Comment by dex — June 20, 2009 @ 4:03 am

  2. I dislike the usage of hair in this production.

    #2 | Comment by flip — June 20, 2009 @ 4:07 am

  3. +2

    Image 8 is FUBAR. See what I did there? But seriously, it’s messed up. Please fix.

    #3 | Comment by El Payo — June 20, 2009 @ 4:32 am

  4. ^ ^ ^

    How so? If you mean picture #8, which is;
    http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/oliviamunn8/pages/image7.html

    I don’t see a problem at all. If you mean actual image 8 (aka file name);
    http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/oliviamunn8/pages/image8.html

    That’s also fine.

    Are you using Internet Explorer? Are your glasses broken? Or is this a poor attempt at a joke, like “she should be naked, so the image is broken”? Either way, fail @ comment.

    #4 | Comment by dex — June 20, 2009 @ 4:47 am

  5. I dont Know why theey allow celebritie who argree to sign to pose for playboy and end up not getting naked if they want to wear skimpy bikinis or wear lingerie or cover her boobs somehow and wear undie why not just say naw n go pose for maxim

    #5 | Comment by Sleepless in Massachusetts — June 20, 2009 @ 5:22 am

  6. Those photos are a thousand times better than the normal fully nude big titted blonde trailer trash bimbo they usually have in the playboy. She looks really good there, even tho I bet they photoshopped her waist. They only thing I don’t like about her is the fake smile. I’ve never seen a photo or video where she really smiled, just this fake. Sad really.

    #6 | Comment by Franc — June 20, 2009 @ 7:54 am

  7. @ 2, I agree. Didn’t stop me from saving the whole set though 🙂

    Too bad they didn’t publish more photos like #7, #8, and #9. It’s like a story beginning and then abruptly stops. Leak the outtakes!

    #7 | Comment by Darkstar — June 20, 2009 @ 7:59 am

  8. Bland girl for a bland magazine.

    #6 gets it right for me. There’s always something real empty about her smile. Or is it an upside-down frown?

    #8 | Comment by cobalt — June 20, 2009 @ 9:01 am

  9. Very nice for a very hawt girl… she’s funny, has a brain, and she’s hawt…

    #9 | Comment by TheMan — June 20, 2009 @ 11:18 am

  10. Comming up next, Hugh Hefner presents…Good Housekeeping.

    #10 | Comment by Ravenx8706 — June 20, 2009 @ 1:13 pm

  11. Nice. Very nice.

    #11 | Comment by Nobody — June 20, 2009 @ 1:49 pm

  12. puffy nips!

    #12 | Comment by benderbendington — June 20, 2009 @ 3:08 pm

  13. I think my balls just exploded!!!!!

    #13 | Comment by UpInSmoke420 — June 20, 2009 @ 3:32 pm

  14. She is such a cocktease.

    #14 | Comment by Normo — June 20, 2009 @ 5:32 pm

  15. Maxim fotoshoot for the FAIL

    #15 | Comment by filthyfish — June 20, 2009 @ 7:15 pm

  16. no ass shots = fail

    #16 | Comment by roscoe — June 20, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

  17. I heard her Vadge is ugly. Like looking at a box of cow tongues.

    It would explain why she doesn’t get full nude in them.

    #17 | Comment by Mage — June 20, 2009 @ 8:59 pm

  18. She peaked in “Fly Away Home”. Still fapped to this several times though.

    #18 | Comment by OIB — June 20, 2009 @ 9:00 pm

  19. #17 – who did you hear that from? did a member of your WoW guild tell you he hit that? i suppose you’ll believe him when he describes Megan Fox’s cooter as well.

    gtfo.

    #19 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 21, 2009 @ 1:13 am

  20. Eh, 2 is the only one I really think is hot. Kinda sad.

    #20 | Comment by Topher — June 21, 2009 @ 2:23 am

  21. She is munderful. But alas, I must agree with everyone that said, if your not getting nude, then why bother with playboy?

    BTW she is going to be in Ironman II

    #21 | Comment by Pirho — June 21, 2009 @ 7:17 am

  22. I love her.

    #22 | Comment by een — June 21, 2009 @ 7:20 am

  23. Puffies!!

    #23 | Comment by mister — June 21, 2009 @ 9:15 am

  24. Munn Playboy photoshoot idea = awesomeness

    Munn Playboy photoshoot reality that shows nothing = epic fail

    I’m torn, because I think she’s really hot, and these pictures are really hot, too, but the fact that she’s not showing ANYTHING in a Playboy shoot pisses me off.

    #24 | Comment by pyronuc — June 21, 2009 @ 6:44 pm

  25. #19 The same person who told me that Chobot’s vadge is made of spoiled deli ham.

    The 2 are no different.

    #25 | Comment by Mage — June 21, 2009 @ 7:43 pm

  26. These pictures SUCK! If not for the obvious reason of no titties then for the even more obvious reason of crappy shooting angles and lighting that don’t show any curves. #2 and #8 are a good start but are only OK because they are being compared to the others which are woefully inadequate.

    Nice pictures of her legs but that’s it.

    #26 | Comment by Buddy the Elf — June 21, 2009 @ 8:00 pm

  27. I’ve sent an email to Playboy, hopefully they issue you a cease and desist. Pay for the magazine, it’s only a few bucks.

    #27 | Comment by ATF — June 21, 2009 @ 8:11 pm

  28. cooperate spy? munn’s dad? formal playmate?

    seriously, I hate you fucking nark bastards! you think your captain justice or some shit.

    showing the pics online, doesn’t stop fans from buying a printed copy of the magazine. least fans who are under the age of 18 can get a peek.

    narks should be beat with a rusty hammer that has AIDS

    #28 | Comment by mariokart64n — June 21, 2009 @ 9:14 pm

  29. #25 – aw…someone has an imaginary friend! how cute.

    #27 – welcome to the IP blacklist, douche.

    #29 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 21, 2009 @ 10:03 pm

  30. #27 obviously didn’t pay for the magazine. If he did, he would have known there’s only one actual picture in the magazine, the rest were posted online.

    #30 | Comment by Nobody — June 21, 2009 @ 10:52 pm

  31. hella nice puffies!

    #31 | Comment by idl3mind — June 21, 2009 @ 11:50 pm

  32. Munn on her back, thumbs looped through her bikini bottom for the win!
    (her standing holding the untied strings of her string bikini bottom was also excellent)

    #32 | Comment by ninja — June 21, 2009 @ 11:57 pm

  33. Have you all heard about this:

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1352824/

    Apparently there will be major Amanda Seyfried nudity in it. And a bit of Julianne Moore for Justin.

    #33 | Comment by cobalt — June 22, 2009 @ 6:19 am

  34. Now thats an odd pairing.

    #34 | Comment by Pirho — June 22, 2009 @ 7:13 am

  35. Damn she looks good in semi-nude. Can’t wait for the rest.

    #35 | Comment by Dave — June 22, 2009 @ 2:17 pm

  36. I miss the days when posing in Playboy actually meant something…that something being BOOBIES.

    #36 | Comment by Bard — June 22, 2009 @ 3:20 pm

  37. #33
    Just found a girlfriend for both of us,
    …………………..hey ho lets go !!!!!!

    http://wetpussygames.com/adult-games/super-mario-porno.html

    #37 | Comment by walker4409 — June 22, 2009 @ 4:46 pm

  38. I am sooo tired of her. “whoohoo! Look at me! Im special cause Im hot and Im flaunting myself for geeks! teehee!” “Im in playboy so Im super awesome!” yeah, so was Henry Kissenger. If you arent giving the goods in the mag get the hell off the cover.

    #38 | Comment by bob — June 22, 2009 @ 7:31 pm

  39. @27

    I’ll pay for the magazine when they start FORCING all cover stars to be naked.

    By using whips, cream and fruit.

    Especially if it’s Débora Nascimento or Hayley Williams.

    #39 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — June 23, 2009 @ 12:17 am

  40. @27

    I’ll pay for the magazine when… actually, I’ll never start paying for the magazine. At least not in the age of free porn all over the net. Not to mention the pics in the magazine are pretty much the most boring nudity you’ll see anyways. It’s always way too airbrushed, photoshopped and bland. No character to the pics. Plus why look at a photo of a girl just sitting there naked by herself, when you are one click away from vids of girls getting boned, or dyking it out. Playboy = FAIL.

    As far as these pics are concerned, if it was from Maxim I would be all for it. But since these are from Playboy, and have NO nudity, I can’t support them. I can fap to them. But I can’t support them.

    #40 | Comment by evil monkey — June 23, 2009 @ 12:54 am

  41. You people are seriously too uptight about this shit. She’s mega fucking hot. Take it or leave it.

    #41 | Comment by Charles Schneer — June 23, 2009 @ 1:18 am

  42. olivia has nice armpits

    #42 | Comment by adsf — June 23, 2009 @ 7:52 am

  43. she is so fucking lame and fake

    #43 | Comment by M — June 24, 2009 @ 9:39 am

  44. @Charles Schneer: LEAVE IT FAG

    #44 | Comment by anon — June 24, 2009 @ 6:50 pm

  45. S’alright. Some of us come from countries which actually ban http://www.p***b**.com, so thanks, Angelbaby!

    #45 | Comment by Anony Mouse — June 27, 2009 @ 11:20 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *