60 thoughts on “LOL WUT”

1. 

   We are still watching you.

   ….ok maybe not. Can I see some boobs?

   #1 | Comment by The FBI — December 10, 2010 @ 4:34 am

2. 

   “I like that your name links to a site that doesn’t exist.”

   #2 | Comment by Ryu — December 10, 2010 @ 4:50 am

3. 

   My boobs?

   #3 | Comment by Miley Cyrus — December 10, 2010 @ 4:51 am

4. 

   Dear Justin,

   No one gives a shit about your worthless website about female deodorant.

   Signed,
   The Internet.

   #4 | Comment by dex — December 10, 2010 @ 6:05 am

5. 

   also, whats up with this video by sacredtutu? lol

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p901j7oZLgw

   and this one too:

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-VQ220NMmQ

   #5 | Comment by Justin — December 10, 2010 @ 6:08 am

6. 

   I’d think I should have been pretty clear what happened from my message to kewtr video and my posts in the “depressing” and “this will have to do” threads here.

   #6 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 10, 2010 @ 6:10 am

7. 

   “..or fame”

   YES! we doin it all for the fame! *happydance*

   ;D

   #7 | Comment by Anonymous — December 10, 2010 @ 7:04 am

8. 

   http://web.archive.org fails at retrieving cybercrimes.us but kewtr.com still lives in its archives

   “Kewtr.com does not host any of the videos that can be viewed through its interface. Anything inappropriate or offensive to you can be taken up with the originating site, as listed above each video.”

   hoho

   #8 | Comment by Justin — December 10, 2010 @ 9:24 am

9. 

   http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.cybercrimes.us I don’t have any problem seeing it. Though it’s not particularly special, it never ceases to amaze me how the antis go after political sites but never bother the 50 or so sites with real child abuse I can find easily within a half minute.

   #9 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 10, 2010 @ 10:12 am

10. 

    huhh. looks like it is archived after all. must’ve been a glitch in the system earlier when i tried looking it up, came up with no records found for some reason.

    also, http://web.archive.org/web/20080221225746/cybercrimes.us/Investigations.html

    classic.

    #10 | Comment by Justin — December 10, 2010 @ 10:25 am

11. 

    Not one site with child porn. Of the millions of such sites out there then and now!

    #11 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 10, 2010 @ 10:35 am

12. 

    lulz cybercrimes.us

    those were the days.

    #12 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 10, 2010 @ 3:13 pm

13. 

    It´s Christmas time pedophiles, time to find the hottest toys

    http://www.hottestchristmastoys.co.uk/christmas-gifts-for-tween-girls/

    #13 | Comment by (*) — December 10, 2010 @ 4:56 pm

14. 

    Kewtr = unwarranted self-importance

    Needs moar Selena Gomez fakes:

    http://www.imagebam.com/image/aa680a110319610

    #14 | Comment by cobalt — December 10, 2010 @ 5:15 pm

15. 

    >>13
    http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/8585/dongsc.jpg

    #15 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 10, 2010 @ 6:07 pm

16. 

    I don’t really wanna pull a Chicken Little here, but is this really what the site has become? Posts about guys wearing women’s deodorant and happy thoughts of yesteryear about being investigated?

    #16 | Comment by Mr. Bojangles — December 11, 2010 @ 12:03 am

17. 

    #13- Go castrate yourself with a box cutter, you worthless sack of shit.

    #17 | Comment by death to pedos — December 11, 2010 @ 2:50 am

18. 

    #17 – Can’t we all just get along?

    #18 | Comment by Pedobear — December 11, 2010 @ 2:54 am

19. 

    @18
    You can´t get along with a person that wants to kill you, this is a lesson you have to learn
    @17
    Hey assfag, can´t find the box cutter, must be still in your ass along with the Magnum 44
    @13
    LOLS

    #19 | Comment by (*) — December 11, 2010 @ 4:09 am

20. 

    #14

    is it “unwarranted” if everyone else is posting about it? it even made front page here.

    tip of the day, if we want more posts from Justin, continue with more topics of “unwarranted self-importance”

    now, im off to the wayback machine to find real childpron on anonib

    #20 | Comment by kiki doright — December 11, 2010 @ 9:32 am

21. 

    “i don’t remember it being what people in the comments are saying it to be (a real pedo central) or whatever (unlike this site, which only pretends to be)”

    So this isn’t a “real pedo central”? Then why the fuck isn’t it?

    Here’s some yummy Elle Fanning: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1337100/Elle-Fanning-puts-party-shoes-super-stylish-Somewhere-premiere.html

    I want be part of a nasty threesome with Elle & Dakota. Yeah, I said it. C’mon get me, cybercrimes.us!

    #21 | Comment by Hambubger — December 11, 2010 @ 2:29 pm

22. 

    Ewwww. 12 year olds aren’t supposed to have granny legs. Seriously, don’t fap to her, she’s disgusting.

    #22 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 11, 2010 @ 6:25 pm

23. 

    I would salad tossing her anytime anyplace anyway

    #23 | Comment by (-) — December 11, 2010 @ 6:55 pm

24. 

    impersonating known minor celebrities

    So I guess they were going after my impersonation of Ben Affleck on the old site?

    #24 | Comment by Umgawa — December 12, 2010 @ 4:29 am

25. 

    First of all if the FBI or the US gov was to create a site, it sure as hell wouldnt be a .US top level domain. It would be a .gov, any fucking idiot can register a .us and call it what they want.

    #25 | Comment by pirho — December 12, 2010 @ 5:36 am

26. 

    Impersonating Ben Affleck should be a crime, Umgawa.

    #26 | Comment by smash — December 12, 2010 @ 8:28 am

27. 

    A new post? Great, now I have to scroll down if I want to fap to the deoderant.

    #27 | Comment by Blumpkin — December 12, 2010 @ 1:48 pm

28. 

    I wonder if the dorks on that site realize that impersonating law enforcement is also a federal crime. And they came really close to pretending like LOLWUTBRBFBIBANHAMMER.

    #28 | Comment by Confuzzled — December 12, 2010 @ 1:57 pm

29. 

    There are real CP sites, one of which is listed on Wikileaks’ mirror page.

    #29 | Comment by tool — December 13, 2010 @ 1:09 am

30. 

    #29 >> where???

    #30 | Comment by Woot — December 13, 2010 @ 3:51 am

31. 

    lol, “one” child porn site. Come back when you have news.

    #31 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 13, 2010 @ 7:29 am

32. 

    Justin, a couple of related posts later from your post in #5 brings you to this….

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pnSpRGqvro

    #32 | Comment by bbr — December 13, 2010 @ 12:33 pm

33. 

    Hey everybody! I’ll just post a quick history of Kewtr for anyone that even cares, it was a fun run and whatever anyone thinks, we had no CP, We embedded videos from off-site and commented on them.

    Started it because I’d look in the popular vids in Tinypic and there were literally the cutest chicks doing the dumbest shit. Thought other people might like it as well. Blah blah blah, eventually there were visitors, and with them came people that don’t understand embedded videos. Eventually I worried the private registration wouldn’t be enough to keep my name out of things, so I passed it of to a moderator. Eventually the abuse was too much for him as well and he bailed, I didn’t blame him.

    The low point of it all was when the site originally had a video cache feature and every damn thing anyone even partially submitted got saved. Well that was sick, so I made a torrent of it and threw it away. But again, it was all sourced from Tinypic or Youtube so I don’t feel bad about it.

    The people hounding Kewtr, I don’t know what their deal was, and the YouTube videos either except for the girl’s belly. There was also a screenshot of Kewtr in a local FoxNews report somewhere with something like ‘best organized perv website on the net’ highlighted.

    It was fun and I am sorry to have spilled discussion on over here, I have spoken to you before Justin so you could always just spill my real identity, but I suppose I’d rather you not. But I wouldn’t blame you since I helped not-at-all on that computer issue way back.

    If anyone is ever interested in something like this, the complete list of URLs Kewtr had before shutdown is still saved, I could always pass them to Justin or something. A lot of deads but a lot of nice videos. A Christmas Miracle!

    #33 | Comment by god — December 13, 2010 @ 2:27 pm

34. 

    Oh and I don’t totally know what’s up with Kirstie, I did try to be polite and remove video embeds when she asked, as I did with anyone that seemed legit. She seemed alright but obviously everyone is pissed about everything.

    That was my main role on the site, trying to get everyone to quit being pissed. It was so awesome I would recommend it highly to anyone with Internet access.

    #34 | Comment by god — December 13, 2010 @ 2:50 pm

35. 

    @32
    Woot ! Fapping fodder par excellence

    #35 | Comment by (-) — December 13, 2010 @ 2:53 pm

36. 

    Last thing, to save everyone and especially Justin, I’ll just not post anymore on the issue, if he wants the URls of all the videos he’s welcome to them for kicks, otherwise this little secret identity is smoked. So long!

    #36 | Comment by god — December 13, 2010 @ 3:02 pm

37. 

    You could always just release stuff in torrents or urls parsed out of sharebee/multiupload and practice self-control like I do. Kewtr’s cache was hardly too large to check for child porn. Furthermore, the antis get a serious setback if they don’t know which active girls we’re saving stuff from until they’re already too old. It wouldn’t hurt if everyone stopped commenting, favoriting, subscribing and so forth with obvious pedo accounts either. Am I the only pedophile with a brain?

    #37 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 13, 2010 @ 4:43 pm

38. 

    @37

    “Am I the only pedophile with a brain?”

    emphasis on “the only pedophile”, I believe the point of previous posts was/is that they are not pedophiles.

    so, yes, you are the only pedophile!

    #38 | Comment by kiki doright — December 13, 2010 @ 8:21 pm

39. 

    >>> 32

    If those teen bitches are dumb enough to post shit like that, I’m all for exploiting them. Restart Kewtr!

    #39 | Comment by I.M. Hung — December 13, 2010 @ 10:24 pm

40. 

    @38
    Maybe he´s “the only pedophile here” who admits it ?

    #40 | Comment by (-) — December 14, 2010 @ 3:04 am

41. 

    What kind of asshole calls them URIs? Next you can tell us how many mebibytes the site used.

    #41 | Comment by zomg — December 14, 2010 @ 6:13 am

42. 

    #32: Good find. Kind of reminds me how annoying teenage girls are, and why I’m glad I spent most of my junior high days playing vidya games and painting space marines.

    #42 | Comment by cobalt — December 14, 2010 @ 6:55 am

43. 

    I remember nothing from kewtr that I didn’t see IRL; it was just a convenient place to find cute similar stuff.

    The booty dances got old, though.

    Thanks for the effort, God@kewtr!

    #43 | Comment by tool — December 14, 2010 @ 3:08 pm

44. 

    p.s.

    Ephebophelia is not pedophelia!

    #44 | Comment by tool — December 14, 2010 @ 3:08 pm

45. 

    That´s a shitty term to describe a pedosexual fag

    #45 | Comment by (^^) — December 14, 2010 @ 4:15 pm

46. 

    @44 “I said that, it was said before, ephebophilia is reasonable, and only unhealthy if taken to an extreme. I mean, if I rape a 15-year-old, how is it worse than if I rape a 20-year-old. Rape is rape, if mature and intelligent consent is given, who the fuck cares. You can say ‘high school kids aren’t mature enough to make that blah blah blah…’ That’s bullshit, they do it anyway, and I know parents of my friends who are way less mature than my best friend who just turned 18.”

    #46 | Comment by Ryu — December 14, 2010 @ 5:42 pm

47. 

    Skittles anyone….?

    http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/44579-epic-skittles-thread-part-deux.html

    #47 | Comment by bbr — December 15, 2010 @ 9:40 am

48. 

    >>47
    This isn’t like 2005, we don’t have to settle for weak-ass old “jailbait” pics anymore.

    #48 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 15, 2010 @ 10:46 am

49. 

    @36

    Can i get a link to all the videos. 😀

    #49 | Comment by General — December 20, 2010 @ 3:40 pm

50. 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zaUGz5-Q7A

    Wow, you really can get everything at Wal-Mart.

    #50 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 20, 2010 @ 7:55 pm

51. 

    Solution for kewtr:

    1) allow only registered users to view videos
    2) when a user submits a video kewtr will grab download and host it on the site without any link to the actual video itself so no-one can troll the creator
    3) ????
    4) Profit

    #51 | Comment by psyper — December 27, 2010 @ 8:45 pm

52. 

    It’s bad enough of a bandwidth situation to run a site without hosting videos on it. There already was a site like that called Candylandgurl – and it costed more to run than I used to make at my last job.
    Here is why it won’t prevent the girls from getting ruined:
    1. Girls will make references to their accounts in their videos. You can edit that out, but I’m the only one I’ve ever seen edit the videos (or make any permanent collection for that matter).
    2. The songs, other info can be searched on Youtube.
    3. Antis spend a lot of time following the comments idiots make and they’ll likely recognize some of the girls on there. I’ve already been trying to get them to shut up for half a year and I doubt anyone else can.
    4. It gives antis a clue what we like that is being presently made and they can take measures to prevent it however innocent it is and however much we’re not grooming the girls to do it, because it “attracts pedophiles”.
    The only solution if kewtr wants to continue to exist without discouraging the development of new material is pretty much to do exactly what I said. There’s no other way.

    #52 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 28, 2010 @ 12:08 am

53. 

    I want to clarify something so you all can understand the source of the real problem here. What scares the girls away the most are the old virgins who think they can game little girls. When the best they can do is ask for sexual/fetish requests while sounding like an annoying chantard. Girls attract us, we don’t attract them. You will scarcely find any girl on youtube that wants so much as subscriptions from old men.
    Without these idiots, pedophiles are merely a theoretical, invisible thing and the girls will just laugh at the antis and continue as they were. If you’re going to groom the girls at least do it properly, generally that is neither detectable by the antis nor resembling unwanted old men in any way. I’d much rather you succeed at blackmailing them in private than fail in making bizarre public fetish requests as is generally the case.
    I’ve been gradually getting into asking the girls to report the idiots that make the worst of the comments. Either they are complete idiots or perhaps even antis in a scheme to scare the girls – either way, I want them gone. I want the girls to stay on Youtube and continue making beautiful videos, not make one lousy short disgusting illegal video then get scared away forever. And what the groomers and antis don’t know about, they can’t ruin.

    #53 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 28, 2010 @ 12:29 am

54. 

    Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
    Thats probably as far as my latin goes and thats only from watching west wing!!

    There are plenty of unlimited bw and webspace accounts out there but as you say they cost a lot of money and probably the best way would be to find someone who already has an account and is willing to share out some of it for you use.
    would a flv downloader not strip out any of the youtube overlays and links – firefox’s download helper seems to do the trick but I’ve not really used any of them for youtube so wouldn’t really know for sure.
    if there is a way to get hold of the email addys for sensible kewtr users and perhaps set up a hidden kewtr site – front page is a 404 error but a link to the actual site is hidden and you have to know the username and password of a valid account to get to it.
    new accounts can only be invited in by active members – those members are responsible for the new member. – theres gonna be problems with anti’s using different usernames to access their kewtr account and spam youtube vids but if there’s a way for the publisher of a youtube vid to get the ip of the offender perhaps?? are antis too stupid to use fake ip’s???
    another way like you suggested is to have sharebe zips with password protection at least then your using sharebe as storage – the urls and pass’s are stored on kewtr’s hidden store??

    Its a shame to see kewtr and its ilk lost because of this. We can’t let the anti’s win!!

    #54 | Comment by psyper — December 28, 2010 @ 6:21 pm

55. 

    The antis already lost though. Their primary supply depots (kewtr, candylandgurl, anonib) are gone. Shakinit is probably not a problem because they have bad taste in girls. Now all they have to go by are the idiots that make public comments from obvious pedo accounts.
    You will not be getting anywhere by picking and choosing members because it is not a child molester community. You can’t prove you’re one of us by posting oc of kids you’re abusing. Anyone can link attractive girls without going afoul of the law. Both antis and groomers will ruin the girls.
    Just assume everywhere is infiltrated and do things the right way.

    #55 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 28, 2010 @ 7:16 pm

56. 

    are we still talking about this!?

    tutu, the only one who has an archive? KingHenryThe9th and I have been archiving for some time. And if anyone remembers KHT9th’s archive… : 0

    as for both of your solutions, what makes you think they have not moved on to a site that only the few and trusted know about?

    #56 | Comment by glitter — December 28, 2010 @ 8:19 pm

57. 

    Easy. There aren’t any urls appearing in the video stats for the girls they’re commenting on.
    My stuff’s better than everyone else’s combined. Probably because I don’t wave a “Groom Me” flag in front of the girls.
    If they ever did go to such a place I’d advise they ditch Nawtnood The Public Groomer if they want their girls to stay.

    #57 | Comment by SacredTutu — December 29, 2010 @ 4:54 pm

58. 

    Now here’s an example of what I’m talking about. A 35 year old has the gall to try to get into a girl’s collab group but I think this just speaks for itself
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PZVQhh3C-o
    This is on an account with subscriptions to hardly anything but little girls who he comments to “watch his videos”. He’s also building up a network of sock accounts like justaguyk did – lusiphur, wickedndlovely69, tomkatt742, probably many others.
    Now’s an opportunity to do something about this problem, if you want the girls to stay there I’d advise helping me to get rid of people like him.

    #58 | Comment by SacredTutu — February 11, 2011 @ 2:14 am

59. 

    Every once in a while I look at my old posts to see how I’ve changed and it’s amazing how little has changed since justaguyk got v&. Even then all that did was make me incredibly unwilling to work with people who groom the girls and share child porn.
    Anyway, an interesting update – that guy’s getting assrammed in prison because of me. Pedophilia is serious business 🙂

    #59 | Comment by SacredTutu — February 6, 2013 @ 11:40 pm

60. 

    Oh and I’m not referring to justaguyk to those certainly watching who might differ

    #60 | Comment by SacredTutu — February 6, 2013 @ 11:41 pm