What the…

“Anyone who loves Lacey had also better love Trachtenberg, because they are basically the same chick.” – nerima

SURELY YOU JEST!!!!!!

Michelle ‘Clownface’ Tractenbusted is NOTHING compared to the oh so lovely oh SO fetch! Lacey “Sha-bear”.

Observe! Look at that! Michelle has a face only a carnie could love!

   <

And you know it!

46 thoughts on “What the…

  1. I’d hit it? First.

    #1 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 12:21 am

  2. i’d chop off its head first.

    then i’d hit it.

    #2 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 12:24 am

  3. Well yeah thats what I meant.

    Worthy of a donkey punch!

    #3 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 12:26 am

  4. Michelle Tractenberg is very very ugly.
    Lacey Chabert is very very hot.
    I don’t like shoes.

    #4 | Comment by The Deadly Superman — June 8, 2005 @ 12:27 am

  5. Oh, Sorry for double posting, but isn’t the “>” the wrong way?

    #5 | Comment by The Deadly Superman — June 8, 2005 @ 12:28 am

  6. exactly what I was about to say…

    #6 | Comment by Sentinel — June 8, 2005 @ 12:33 am

  7. curses!!!!!

    in my clownface induced rage, i got the > all wrong!

    #7 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 12:42 am

  8. Don’t worry, the logical operator is relative.

    So long as Clownface gets the pointy side then ClownfaceClownface (Sha-bear is greater than Clownface).

    Trust me, I’m a nerdy scientist.

    #8 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 1:04 am

  9. Oh, Sorry for double posting, but that comment made no sense. Message got parsed for HTML tags or something. Second attempt:

    Sha-bear > Clownface (Sha-bear is greater than Clownface)
    means the same as
    Clownface

    #9 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 1:09 am

  10. Bugger.

    Clownface is less than Sha-bear:

    Clownface < Sha-bear

    #10 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 1:13 am

  11. Both are ugly.

    Girls have cooties.

    #11 | Comment by Dex — June 8, 2005 @ 1:27 am

  12. You’re skewing the evidence!

    See, I can make one look hotter than the other too!

    #12 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 1:33 am

  13. Page cannot be found

    #13 | Comment by V Chip — June 8, 2005 @ 2:09 am

  14. Oh poot Should be

    Page cannot be found < The Other

    And if that doesn’t work,

    Page cannot be found IS LESS THAN The Other

    #14 | Comment by V Chip — June 8, 2005 @ 2:11 am

  15. you sooooo fail at math and html. Try &gt; or &lt;. Not only that, but i can see the damn pics! you fail at posting 🙁

    #15 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 2:11 am

  16. Fuckity fuck fuck fuck!

    #16 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 2:12 am

  17. and it seems i fail at english, i meant “i can’t see the damn pics”

    #17 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 2:13 am

  18. pale = ugly

    #18 | Comment by zecchino — June 8, 2005 @ 2:18 am

  19. Chabes is getting too tan and so will look like a handbag pretty soon. Trachy looks too pale so will look like Michael Jackson soon.

    I’d go for both of them depending on the lighting conditions.

    #19 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — June 8, 2005 @ 3:04 am

  20. they all look same to me!

    #20 | Comment by WP_LeGeNd — June 8, 2005 @ 3:04 am

  21. This whole post is based on a dirty lie.

    #21 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 8, 2005 @ 4:39 am

  22. I’d lick the sweat between sha-bears puppies. And trachktenburg can lick the sweat between my buns! 😮

    #22 | Comment by devnull — June 8, 2005 @ 5:19 am

  23. For once I agree with Justin

    Chabert is the hot. I’d definitely hit it.

    #23 | Comment by smash — June 8, 2005 @ 5:23 am

  24. due to my perverted intentions and the fact it wont be happening any time soon, i would tap em both, at the same time- with brook burke also, in a panda pit..

    #24 | Comment by Mr_SaMSA — June 8, 2005 @ 5:44 am

  25. Hey, Carnies are nice people too.

    *Did someone confirm if Trachenberg has two Toes yet?

    #25 | Comment by Crackpot Live — June 8, 2005 @ 6:23 am

  26. I beg to differ but imho Michelle > Lacey. Both are hot but Lacey has a little bit of a horsey face.

    clownface > horseface

    #26 | Comment by kiko — June 8, 2005 @ 6:27 am

  27. I must be a carnie then, because I’d go with Trachtenberg.

    #27 | Comment by Will — June 8, 2005 @ 6:40 am

  28. #26 & #27 wtfmates! you’re both deluded!!!

    #28 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 6:40 am

  29. 26 + 27 > 28

    #29 | Comment by AngelBaby — June 8, 2005 @ 8:05 am

  30. Trachtenberg allowed bikini shots and extreme closeups of her ass in “Road Trip.” She is all about full disclosure.

    What are you hiding, She-Bear?

    #30 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 8:22 am

  31. !!!!!

    It’s pronounced “SHA-BEAR”!!!

    #31 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 9:04 am

  32. michelle is quite hot, she’s just got bad taste in clothes. That’s probably the ugliest dress i’ve seen all year, i thought you were supposed to walk over the red carpet, not wear it and those shoes… good god! * shakes head *

    ps: this form needs a “preview” button

    #32 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 9:13 am

  33. geek fact:
    if you disable referrer on firefox (see about:config, network.http.sendRefererHeader), wordpress goes stupid on you after posting comments (ie: it will stop loading and leave you stuck on something-post.php).

    what a dumb

    #33 | Comment by vhw — June 8, 2005 @ 9:17 am

  34. #32 – You’d better either be female or homosexual, because you’re critiquing dresses and shoes.

    #34 | Comment by Nerima — June 8, 2005 @ 9:27 am

  35. Emma Watson in 3 years>ALL

    #35 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 9:31 am

  36. and you know emma will get naked too someday. she’s british!!!!!

    #36 | Comment by Justin — June 8, 2005 @ 9:57 am

  37. I love me some british!

    #37 | Comment by Alias — June 8, 2005 @ 10:02 am

  38. I saw some shot of clowngrill/girl and she looked exactly like Scarlett Johansson (sp). I was pretty shocked, because normally I’d say ‘I’d spank it like a bad stepchild” after saying, “ew, she’s so fuckin’ clownfaced, but ya know what? I’d hit it.” Lacey = teh hotness ya suckas

    The chef is very, very stoned

    #38 | Comment by TheChef — June 8, 2005 @ 10:53 am

  39. stoned chef > sha-bear > trachtenberg

    #39 | Comment by turtle — June 8, 2005 @ 11:11 am

  40. You see this? Hahahaha!

    http://unitedstatesofno.ytmnd.com/

    #40 | Comment by TheChef — June 8, 2005 @ 1:22 pm

  41. Michelle is ug in the face!

    #41 | Comment by sammy — June 8, 2005 @ 2:39 pm

  42. #32 is right… about needing a ‘preview’ button 😉

    I wouldn’t show this to little children.

    #42 | Comment by JVC — June 8, 2005 @ 3:56 pm

  43. My heart hates uggos.

    #43 | Comment by JustSumDude — June 8, 2005 @ 4:26 pm

  44. #29 > Michelle > Lacey

    #44 | Comment by kiko — June 9, 2005 @ 7:03 am

  45. Go on its really good http://manprison.servik.com

    #45 | Comment by prison horror stories — December 19, 2005 @ 8:35 am

  46. Funny, interresting, nice, … this is your blog http://doctorhorny.servik.com

    #46 | Comment by digital rectal exam pics — December 21, 2005 @ 5:12 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *