Ugh. I can’t believe you dis the lovely Devon Aoki while praising this chick. Is she actually cross-eyed in the movie (link from #6) or does it just look that way in those pix?
#9 |
Comment
by EndlessMike — July 2, 2005 @
12:56 am
Ugggghhhh what the hell is wrong with her freakin eyes I can’t figure it out but when she looks straight ahead and you can see both of them they look f-ed up. It’s the “what’s wrong with this picture” type of thing I don’t know what it is but I know it’s there. I’d hit it with a flyswatter if it got to close, that’s all.
I wouldn’t hit it. Not even a light spank. 1st.
#1 | Comment by JVC — July 1, 2005 @ 8:22 pm
She has a cut on her thumb. :O
This meaningless observation brought to you by JustSumDude.
#2 | Comment by JustSumDude — July 1, 2005 @ 8:24 pm
#1, YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVEN’T SEEN SCARY MOVIE 2 YET!!!!!!!!!
#3 | Comment by Justin — July 1, 2005 @ 8:37 pm
Also, by the way, I’m pretty sure Kathleen Robertson is naked in “XX/XY”. It’s been a while since I watched it, but she has some nice scenes in that.
#4 | Comment by TheMatt — July 1, 2005 @ 10:19 pm
#3 I will look into it.
#5 | Comment by JVC — July 1, 2005 @ 10:34 pm
http://celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/movie.php/7697
#6 | Comment by Justin — July 1, 2005 @ 10:53 pm
There is some Kathleen here as well (some NSFW):
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/name.php/1443
#7 | Comment by TheMatt — July 1, 2005 @ 11:33 pm
ach, nobody’s hotter than my katie.
#8 | Comment by tomcruise — July 2, 2005 @ 12:47 am
Ugh. I can’t believe you dis the lovely Devon Aoki while praising this chick. Is she actually cross-eyed in the movie (link from #6) or does it just look that way in those pix?
#9 | Comment by EndlessMike — July 2, 2005 @ 12:56 am
Ugggghhhh what the hell is wrong with her freakin eyes I can’t figure it out but when she looks straight ahead and you can see both of them they look f-ed up. It’s the “what’s wrong with this picture” type of thing I don’t know what it is but I know it’s there. I’d hit it with a flyswatter if it got to close, that’s all.
#10 | Comment by Skeezer — July 2, 2005 @ 2:55 am
lazy-eyed chicks rule
#11 | Comment by turtle — July 2, 2005 @ 3:12 am
She’s so hot I don’t even care about her freaky cross eyes.
#12 | Comment by smash — July 2, 2005 @ 3:44 am
She’d be hotter with a glass eye.
And being an amputee.
And a nun.
Oops – did I just say that?
#13 | Comment by steampunk — July 2, 2005 @ 4:49 am
OMG this post has absolutely nothing to do with Chobot! 😮
Justin are you feeling ok?
You’re not going to die right?
#14 | Comment by Crackpot Live — July 2, 2005 @ 5:41 am
Kathleen has ginormous ta-tas, but she doesn’t show them off there. 🙁
#15 | Comment by Nerima — July 2, 2005 @ 6:48 am
#6 PLEASE ask for a re-design of that bloody ‘Page 9’ advert.
That yellow bastard is ruining your nice pink-coloured theme.
#16 | Comment by JVC — July 2, 2005 @ 7:31 am
#16, right click adblock image.
#17 | Comment by heineken — July 2, 2005 @ 7:48 am
#16, Which yellow bastard are you talking about?
#18 | Comment by steampunk — July 2, 2005 @ 8:51 am
I clicked on the ad. I think Justin owes me money now.
#19 | Comment by Ruprecht Jones — July 2, 2005 @ 8:58 am
#17, hear hear. #16, step out of the 1800’s and join the revolution. even tom cruise uses mozilla.
#20 | Comment by tomcruise — July 2, 2005 @ 9:38 am
always naked but never showing =(
oh and she has sexy eyes!!!! what are you guys talking about????
#21 | Comment by Justin — July 2, 2005 @ 1:40 pm
#16 You make my penis sad.
#17 Adblock! Forgot about that!
#18 The Page 9 advertisement. Or Justin.
#19 Yes, he does.
#20 Non-IE browsers exist? 😉
#22 | Comment by JVC — July 2, 2005 @ 4:14 pm
The funny eye takes her down to 99% hotness. Still acceptable.
#23 | Comment by Jenesis — July 10, 2005 @ 3:25 pm