54 thoughts on “Lohan’s LIPS?!”

  1. first

    #1 | Comment by knightfall — September 5, 2006 @ 11:33 pm

  2. first! nice lips!

    #2 | Comment by californiabao — September 5, 2006 @ 11:57 pm

  3. totally her lips! Rock on Lindsey!

    #3 | Comment by LB — September 5, 2006 @ 11:57 pm

  4. I think I can see the syphilis from here. Ahoy!

    #4 | Comment by Duffman — September 5, 2006 @ 11:58 pm

  5. Shaved! YES!!!

    #5 | Comment by Bill Clay — September 5, 2006 @ 11:59 pm

  6. I always knew she was an alien and now these lips give us the proof!!

    #6 | Comment by BoyDharma — September 6, 2006 @ 12:21 am

  7. photoshopped

    #7 | Comment by Zorak — September 6, 2006 @ 12:32 am

  8. #5 – Not shaved. The syphilis scared the pubes away.

    #8 | Comment by Smiley — September 6, 2006 @ 12:34 am

  9. *agrees with #7*

    She has pubic hair. Fire crotch.

    #9 | Comment by kiko — September 6, 2006 @ 12:35 am

  10. That is the weirdest looking vagina I have ever seen.

    Can this even be classified as a vag?

    #10 | Comment by rye — September 6, 2006 @ 12:56 am

  11. ew.

    #11 | Comment by AngelBaby — September 6, 2006 @ 1:24 am

  12. by all acounts this seems to be legit.

    #12 | Comment by longhonrn — September 6, 2006 @ 1:27 am

  13. i think it’s safe to say that #10 has never seen a real vagina.

    look at the position she’s in. dumbass.

    #13 | Comment by heapy — September 6, 2006 @ 1:29 am

  14. y’know, i was waiting for the day i’d get to see Lohan’s vaginal area.

    it may just be the position she’s in, it may be the context of the photo… but i’m not all that impressed.

    it’s like opening that Cracker Jack box and getting the plastic ring… again.

    perhaps if she was spread on a bed of feathers i’d be more intrigued.

    #14 | Comment by 2wenty6ix — September 6, 2006 @ 1:58 am

  15. Still looks fake.

    She needs to do a Hustler layout to prove me wrong!

    #15 | Comment by Phife — September 6, 2006 @ 2:48 am

  16. #11

    that’s exactly what my girlfriend said

    #16 | Comment by Justin — September 6, 2006 @ 4:17 am

  17. Thanks for posting this. You just reminded me that I have a leftover ham sandwhich in the fridge…

    #17 | Comment by Puzzlehead — September 6, 2006 @ 6:03 am

  18. Is Angelbaby your girlfriend?

    #18 | Comment by smash — September 6, 2006 @ 7:51 am

  19. that’s not the best way to promote the movie…

    but i’d hit that fake firecrotch…

    #19 | Comment by iamthedevil60 — September 6, 2006 @ 8:15 am

  20. Looks real to me. Wow, almost little girlish. Goes with her attitude, I suppose.

    #20 | Comment by exelis — September 6, 2006 @ 9:40 am

  21. Why didnt it happen back when it coulda been a good pic D:

    #21 | Comment by Flyperte — September 6, 2006 @ 11:14 am

  22. puffy nips
    puffy lips
    inflated asshole?

    #22 | Comment by pevee — September 6, 2006 @ 1:16 pm

  23. it was a fake ta da the real pic

    http://www.thesuperficial.com/2006/09/06/lindsay_lohan_shows_off_undies.jpg

    #23 | Comment by Walker Texas Ranger — September 6, 2006 @ 4:29 pm

  24. I say the the nude was photoshopped, but that pic with panties is photoshopped, because someone wanted to “prove” the nude was photoshopped. Just a coincidence that it really was photoshopped.

    #24 | Comment by Tanzarian — September 6, 2006 @ 4:36 pm

  25. Still fake.

    #25 | Comment by Phife — September 6, 2006 @ 4:55 pm

  26. Looks like she could crack walnuts with that thing.

    …if it were real.

    #26 | Comment by The Pope — September 6, 2006 @ 5:35 pm

  27. fake. Not enough freckles. Looks too human, should be more lizard like.

    #27 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — September 6, 2006 @ 6:15 pm

  28. ick. I don’t care if it is a fake, those legs only show she isn’t eating enough food!! big thighs not twigs!!

    #28 | Comment by garth — September 6, 2006 @ 6:20 pm

  29. I would say both are fake atm…but i’m sure theres a real nude one somewhere!!!

    #29 | Comment by Rapnix — September 6, 2006 @ 7:07 pm

  30. FAKE

    #30 | Comment by sidewinder — September 6, 2006 @ 7:29 pm

  31. Ok if anyone has seen the paris hilton pics of her getting outa that car compare the 2. something looks a little similar in the 2

    #31 | Comment by Fake — September 7, 2006 @ 1:18 am

  32. Panties Version is FAKE. Whomever photoshopped it, forgot to remove the metadata.

    http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/179/fakesp6.jpg

    PICTURE BY:DANIELE VENTURELLI / MATRIXPHOTOS.COM
    PLEASE CREDIT ALL USES
    Looks like Lindsay Lohan fogot to put her knickers on before attentending Venice Film Festival. Linsay arrived by boat, when she stepped off she fashed a no-knicker shot!
    5TH SEPTEMBER 2006
    JOB: 40925
    TEL: +44 845 345 7072
    Canon
    Canon EOS-1D Mark II N

    #32 | Comment by Jeff — September 7, 2006 @ 6:40 am

  33. Speaking as someone with training in Photomanipulation, I’ve gotta say the nude one is fake. It’s not even a good fake, at that.

    #33 | Comment by alberach — September 7, 2006 @ 8:24 am

  34. Eww… I don’t want to look at Lindsay Lohan ever again… She’s gross… And stinks.

    #34 | Comment by Kaka — September 7, 2006 @ 2:31 pm

  35. #33 – Read #32’s post again. Then get some more training in Photomanipulation.

    #35 | Comment by Bill Clay — September 7, 2006 @ 3:32 pm

  36. BTW, I find it extremely distressing that some many people on this site have trouble recognizing what a vagina looks like.

    #36 | Comment by Bill Clay — September 7, 2006 @ 3:35 pm

  37. […] So, this NSFW picture of Lindsay Lohan came out yesterday and everyone thought it was real. Then this SFW picture came out that made everyone think the NSFW one was fake. But now it turns out the SFW one is the fake one and the NSFW one was actually real all along. Still no word on the veracity or SFWness of this one though: […]

    #37 | Pingback by Junkiness » Blog Archive » LiLoLips — September 7, 2006 @ 3:53 pm

  38. if that pussy is real then holy snap is it weird looking.

    #38 | Comment by sidewinder — September 7, 2006 @ 5:53 pm

  39. FIRECROTCH!

    #39 | Comment by AngelBaby — September 7, 2006 @ 7:12 pm

  40. Nice lips, shame about the nasty, skinny skank they’re attached to.

    #40 | Comment by Marcato — September 7, 2006 @ 7:44 pm

  41. Best comment ever…..
    “So, LiLo is clean shaven?”
    “Shaven? Yes. Clean? No.”

    #41 | Comment by Bill Clay — September 7, 2006 @ 8:39 pm

  42. She looks so much like Liz Taylor in that picture. Except for the nakedness.

    #42 | Comment by JM — September 7, 2006 @ 10:53 pm

  43. It’s not even a good fake. Why is the moose knuckle brighter than the rest of her thighs? Does she have a light shining down in there?

    #43 | Comment by smash — September 8, 2006 @ 4:06 am

  44. #39
    Because the moose knuckle doesn’t get as much sunlight? The girl lives in a bikini, so you’d expect her thighs to be a little darker than “the white meat”.

    #44 | Comment by cog — September 8, 2006 @ 1:30 pm

  45. knew it was fake

    #45 | Comment by skarastamonjamondudelee — September 8, 2006 @ 4:15 pm

  46. […] Lindsay Lohan’s junk has been all over the place as of late. From under her skirt to inside CGI panties to her face to a mysterious Russian sea-monster. And just when you thought her hoo-ha had been everywhere it pops up under Beyonce’s arm: […]

    #46 | Pingback by Junkiness » Blog Archive » The Continuing Adventures of LiLo’s Vag — September 11, 2006 @ 10:04 am

  47. Hey Mate…New Image over at my blog…give ya heads up like.

    #47 | Comment by Rapnix — September 12, 2006 @ 12:14 pm

  48. That is the underwear……….

    #48 | Comment by NoaZ — September 12, 2006 @ 9:09 pm

  49. That is nasty. She ruined her skin by baking way too much in the sun.

    #49 | Comment by wendy — September 13, 2006 @ 12:07 am

  50. woah
    thats one scary pair ‘o pink bits!!
    but
    we must admit.. compared to the rest of her. .
    is a bit of a relief.
    but thats not really saying much is it : S

    #50 | Comment by juggernaught — September 21, 2006 @ 6:17 am

  51. Lindsay has definately been overexposed lately and I think that’s going to hurt her career in the next year!

    #51 | Comment by mr skin — October 23, 2006 @ 4:42 pm

  52. That is not what you think it is.
    Her pink bits are higher up and can’t be seen here.
    What you are seeing is the very bottom outline of her asscheeks at an angle that you don’t normally see an ass.

    #52 | Comment by MREKINKMAN — December 30, 2006 @ 2:41 pm

  53. I you can’t tell that this is fake from the tones and spatial relationships, you haven’t been lookin’ at much in your life.

    #53 | Comment by Dman — April 30, 2007 @ 2:22 pm

  54. Truly a horrible and weird pussy… but I´d hit it!

    #54 | Comment by Leo — April 30, 2007 @ 9:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *