64 thoughts on “Keira Knightley keeping cool”

  1. Kinda skinny, but she’s still hot.

    #1 | Comment by ThatGuy — January 8, 2007 @ 7:34 pm

  2. nice work

    #2 | Comment by sammy — January 8, 2007 @ 7:39 pm

  3. not really…

    #3 | Comment by Xan — January 8, 2007 @ 7:43 pm

  4. needs about 25lbs still do her though

    #4 | Comment by Myself — January 8, 2007 @ 7:55 pm

  5. I haven’t seen thin like that since Nicole Richie and Callista Flockheart.

    #5 | Comment by Mage — January 8, 2007 @ 8:15 pm

  6. A little thin but you’ve got to admit she’s very attractive.

    #6 | Comment by Smiley — January 8, 2007 @ 8:16 pm

  7. Still Hit It =D

    #7 | Comment by Rapnix — January 8, 2007 @ 8:22 pm

  8. Does she really need the top? I mean come on..

    #8 | Comment by rye — January 8, 2007 @ 8:32 pm

  9. #8, I second that

    #9 | Comment by Tony — January 8, 2007 @ 8:46 pm

  10. I love her abs. Normally I’m not into thin chicks but she looks pretty darn good do me.

    #10 | Comment by spankmonkey — January 8, 2007 @ 8:54 pm

  11. Ugh. I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

    #11 | Comment by Osama bin Laden — January 8, 2007 @ 9:16 pm

  12. I think she’s got a beautiful face, but she needs to add 15-25 pounds.

    #12 | Comment by Jaquio — January 8, 2007 @ 9:33 pm

  13. She has a six pack in that last pic.

    All she needs are some silicone double d’s.

    #13 | Comment by Bank Locater — January 8, 2007 @ 9:46 pm

  14. Too thin.

    Sasha Grey > Kiera Knightly

    #14 | Comment by dex — January 8, 2007 @ 9:51 pm

  15. when the abs are bigger than the boobs, something is wrong.

    #15 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — January 8, 2007 @ 10:16 pm

  16. all she needs is her head replaced by a teenage boy’s head and she’s a boy!

    and truthily… she has hot abs, but needs to eat a few cheeseburgers

    #16 | Comment by Adam — January 8, 2007 @ 10:44 pm

  17. its official keira knightley has no boobies, at all. might as well be a man.

    #17 | Comment by ryan adams — January 8, 2007 @ 10:45 pm

  18. EAT SOMETHING! THEN CALL ME!!

    #18 | Comment by Tyler D — January 8, 2007 @ 11:04 pm

  19. Is there such thing as a butterbody? Because she has one of the most beautiful faces in film and the body of a twelve year old boy.

    #19 | Comment by Burnsy — January 8, 2007 @ 11:04 pm

  20. Naw, I saw these earlier and I like it. All of it.

    I wouldn’t even change the chest. It works for her.

    Maybe her face just throws me off cause damn is she ever beautiful.

    #20 | Comment by Eamon Angelface — January 8, 2007 @ 11:08 pm

  21. Keira Knightley has no boobs, but for some reason… I dunno, I’d still hit it like the fist of an angry god. She’s got a charm to her. Still think she needs to get some food in her though (although, apparently, she eats plenty but has a high metabolism). If she were just gaunt and waif-ish, she wouldn’t have those abs.

    I’d hit it.

    #21 | Comment by Duffman — January 8, 2007 @ 11:40 pm

  22. Her size looks right. Not like the anorexic brigade.

    #22 | Comment by tool — January 9, 2007 @ 12:19 am

  23. eww.

    #23 | Comment by AngelBaby — January 9, 2007 @ 12:41 am

  24. She’s pretty thin but not toooo bad. If it weren’t for her ghastly lack of boobies…..

    #24 | Comment by sosomuchfun — January 9, 2007 @ 12:55 am

  25. The thighs look good – not too thin, good muscle on them. She could use a little more to the rest of her. She is still, though, a very pretty woman.

    Red blooded, hetero male = I’d hit it!

    #25 | Comment by Webpager — January 9, 2007 @ 1:33 am

  26. MILF!

    (Man I’d Like to Fuck)

    #26 | Comment by Rich — January 9, 2007 @ 1:46 am

  27. Wtf.. why does that dude have bigger tits than she does?

    #27 | Comment by whocares — January 9, 2007 @ 3:01 am

  28. bleh, not hot..

    #28 | Comment by Careful_With_That_Axe_Eugene — January 9, 2007 @ 3:04 am

  29. Come on now Keira, finish that cheesburger young lady !

    #29 | Comment by ohnotyoudont — January 9, 2007 @ 4:05 am

  30. “when the abs are bigger than the boobs, something is wrong.”

    Quoted For Truth!

    #30 | Comment by Holla! — January 9, 2007 @ 4:09 am

  31. Not fappable. Hot ass, but that’s not enough.

    #31 | Comment by Logan T. — January 9, 2007 @ 4:24 am

  32. get this fat bitch off my intarweb

    #32 | Comment by euterschaf — January 9, 2007 @ 4:36 am

  33. perfection. jealous bitches.

    i’ll bet she leaves little pebble deer shits in the toilet.

    #33 | Comment by tehpunk — January 9, 2007 @ 5:03 am

  34. She’s got the body of a middle-distance track athlete, thin but muscular. And great abs!

    Absolute Hotness.

    #34 | Comment by greyhound133 — January 9, 2007 @ 5:41 am

  35. nothing sexier than a bag of antlers.

    #35 | Comment by d00d — January 9, 2007 @ 7:22 am

  36. for a girl who says she has no ass the third pic doesn’t look half bad (not big either but not bad)

    needs a sammich

    I’ll provide the meat and the mayo
    fap fap fap

    P.S. Where’s Waldo?

    #36 | Comment by mo-boobies — January 9, 2007 @ 8:33 am

  37. she’s no Alba!!

    ALBA > KNIGHTLY (FACT!!!!)

    Shakira > Alba & Knightly (Indesputable FACT!!)

    #37 | Comment by MacDaddy — January 9, 2007 @ 8:54 am

  38. face, abs and ass are very nice but she needs to eat more to get bigger boobies!! 😀

    she is very attractive but no alba!

    #38 | Comment by daho — January 9, 2007 @ 3:10 pm

  39. Sorry, I’m not into teenage boys. Needs more fat.

    #39 | Comment by devnull — January 9, 2007 @ 3:37 pm

  40. She only needs a little bit of cellulite on her ass.

    #40 | Comment by kiko — January 9, 2007 @ 4:38 pm

  41. AB thought I rode the fence about my opinion of her…which I didn’t. She looks almost skeletal, which is never good. Well, unless you are into necrophelia, which, for the record, I am not.

    #41 | Comment by smash — January 9, 2007 @ 5:19 pm

  42. #41 necrophelia is dead boring

    #42 | Comment by mo-boobies — January 9, 2007 @ 6:12 pm

  43. I thought it was dead boning

    #43 | Comment by zomg — January 9, 2007 @ 6:53 pm

  44. Oh, wait. Now I get it. /shame

    #44 | Comment by zomg — January 9, 2007 @ 6:54 pm

  45. LAME!

    #45 | Comment by Sharon — January 9, 2007 @ 8:32 pm

  46. You can see almost every bone in her body, except for one…..MINE!

    I’d hit it, take time for tea and crumpets, and then hit it again.

    #46 | Comment by Intrepid — January 9, 2007 @ 11:41 pm

  47. Almost a slip.

    And what is happening ?

    Smash? Yea.

    #47 | Comment by Whits — January 9, 2007 @ 11:50 pm

  48. A woman needs curves.

    That, my friends, is a bumpy stick.

    #48 | Comment by Lithium — January 10, 2007 @ 4:04 pm

  49. She looks better with clothes on.

    I can’t believe I just said that about someone on this site.

    #49 | Comment by The Pope — January 10, 2007 @ 6:53 pm

  50. Wow, Tyler Durden had these on the site like two days ago…….at least keep it fresh.

    #50 | Comment by wwjd — January 10, 2007 @ 7:49 pm

  51. i like how these fools talk like they’d even get close to that piece of ass. but hey, it’s the internet and on here EVERYONE’s hot. so we can cretique the people who get paid to get filmed.

    ps. i’d give both my balls to hit it

    #51 | Comment by tibbar — January 10, 2007 @ 8:19 pm

  52. #50 – are you too lazy to read or just too retarded.

    Tyler Durden had them on his site dated 01-08-2007. Look at the date of my post. Zomg! It’s dated the same! DURRRR!

    Maybe you should have came here two days ago? Better yet, go climb back under the rock from whence you came.

    #52 | Comment by smash — January 10, 2007 @ 8:24 pm

  53. Running a celebrity obsessed website is totally what Tyler Durden would do.

    #53 | Comment by zomg — January 10, 2007 @ 9:05 pm

  54. Yes, can I get a BigMac, Large Fries and a Coke please with my Keira Knightley please. Oh uh…I think I’m gonna Super Size that. Thank you.

    #54 | Comment by Fandango — January 10, 2007 @ 9:22 pm

  55. She looks perfect. I love a good ribcage. Never change.

    #55 | Comment by Gumberculees — January 11, 2007 @ 1:53 am

  56. Umm. Too bad site is Farked, Was looking fwd to Fapping

    #56 | Comment by Dankferter — January 11, 2007 @ 3:17 am

  57. damn. the pix does not load. amf.

    #57 | Comment by merkx101 — January 11, 2007 @ 4:27 am

  58. Eek. Overloaded my bandwidth! Fixt!!!

    #58 | Comment by smash — January 11, 2007 @ 6:02 am

  59. Put up some new pics of some non stick-girl quick!

    #59 | Comment by roscoe — January 11, 2007 @ 9:19 am

  60. Absolutely disgusting! Please remove the pictures!

    #60 | Comment by Bumpers — January 11, 2007 @ 9:44 am

  61. #50 foolish boy!

    of course if you want “fresh” stuff all the time you could go elsewhere. We come here for the Justin and the Angelbaby and the funny.

    Oh and watching the FBI, watch us, watch people posting about watching Julianna.

    #61 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — January 11, 2007 @ 2:18 pm

  62. Too skinny… too bad…! She used to be so hot… She used to have incredible legs…

    I´d still hit it, though…

    #62 | Comment by Chris — January 11, 2007 @ 5:47 pm

  63. #61 – yeah. I come for the pics, but I stay for the Julianna threads

    #63 | Comment by zomg — January 11, 2007 @ 7:24 pm

  64. Personally, she’s perfect for sitting on my cock and then grinding into it. You dorks don’t know how to have mad love with celebrities. Haha.

    #64 | Comment by Myna — January 12, 2007 @ 8:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *