Catherine Bell with fellow Scientologist, Erica Christensen at the Scientology’s 38th Anniversary Gala.
Not liking the ‘do on Bell (needs more ‘The Triangle’ haircut) but get a load of Erica’s massive breasts! DAMN.
/wishes Swimfan was rated R
CATHERINE BELL
First goddamit!
#1 | Comment by een — August 7, 2007 @ 7:57 am
First.
Bell is definitely in my top 3! She’s hott, but I’ll never get that glitter shit.
There’s something about Erica… I think if she lost 10 pounds she’d be a ton hotter! She’s got great boobs either way!
#2 | Comment by Mike — August 7, 2007 @ 7:59 am
#1 – Fuck you.
#3 | Comment by Mike — August 7, 2007 @ 8:01 am
#3 – Fuck you.
#4 | Comment by Mad Escaper — August 7, 2007 @ 8:33 am
#2. you know if she lost 10 lbs, the first place to lose weight is always in a womens boobs.
+
WTF!? lose 10 lbs!? what is she? obese too you? i bet…
they both need to make sextapes.
#5 | Comment by Xan — August 7, 2007 @ 11:35 am
#5 – She could lose 50 pounds, and those things would still be huge! I don’t think she’s obese, but she does have a little extra weight(flabby arms). She ‘s pretty, but I bet 10 pounds would make her that much better.
#6 | Comment by Mike — August 7, 2007 @ 12:08 pm
the incredible thing about the picture of the two ladies side-by-side is that Catherine is quite bosomy, but looks like she’s in a training bra compared to Erika…damn.
and i had no idea both of them were looney Cruise-worshippers…FTL.
#7 | Comment by AngelBaby — August 7, 2007 @ 12:47 pm
I’m with Xan on Erica. Not one pound to lose for me. Anywhere.
As for Bell, it’s ridiculous she can still be kind of cute looking as well as hot at her age. The change in blood pressure of my erectile tissues would be so astronomical as to create a black hole and a supernova into another universe.
#8 | Comment by Kewtr — August 7, 2007 @ 12:50 pm
I’m with AB. Scientologist beliefs send them straight to the “do not want” pile. I already wasted too much of my life on girls with issues.
#9 | Comment by exelis — August 7, 2007 @ 1:16 pm
^^ #9
i read your comment too fast and thought it said “…I already wasted too much of my life on girls with TISSUES.”
i lol’d to myself.
#10 | Comment by sparkky — August 7, 2007 @ 1:45 pm
#7: Yeah, sad isn’t it. It almost makes me want to disqualify them from being fap fuel.
Naaaaaaaaa! 😀
#11 | Comment by EmJee — August 7, 2007 @ 2:19 pm
So, they’re into aliens. It just makes them all the more likely to want teh butt sex! Amirite?
#12 | Comment by Mike — August 7, 2007 @ 2:24 pm
http://images.celebritymoviearchive.com/members/thumbs/c/cma-ErikaChristensen&KatherineHeigl@WutheringHeights1.jpg
if only a little more lesbo
#13 | Comment by Evestay — August 7, 2007 @ 2:58 pm
Catherine Bell’s an overrated hag with fake tits.
Erica Christensen is an underrated hottie with real big tits. More pics of her, dammit!
And not Scientology ones cuz they’re killing my hard on.
#14 | Comment by Tony — August 7, 2007 @ 6:22 pm
Tony have you gotten a look at Bell’s? They are antying but fake in my opinion, they would be exactly what a ‘hanger’ fan is looking for. They aren’t perfect, but they are huge, and I believe they are real.
#15 | Comment by Kewtr — August 7, 2007 @ 6:49 pm
with reference to kewtr’s comment:
http://dontlinkthis.net/archives/2720/
#16 | Comment by Justin — August 8, 2007 @ 12:28 am
#8: Rofl.
#17 | Comment by jcdenton — August 8, 2007 @ 6:23 am
Kewtr have you gotten a look at Bell?
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/movie.php/1989
They’re fake. Catherine Bell’s boobs are from a boob job.
#18 | Comment by Tony — August 8, 2007 @ 6:41 pm
more SHU-BEAR.
#19 | Comment by monkey — August 8, 2007 @ 8:09 pm
If you thing Bell is a hag, you are a homo. She is more woman than any one man deserves. I’d fuck her with YOUR dick Tony, and that’s saying something.
#20 | Comment by mister — August 11, 2007 @ 1:58 pm
Here is a good look at at Erica’s Cleaveston
http://partyhopper.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/feuerstein_400x230.jpg
#21 | Comment by mister — August 11, 2007 @ 2:03 pm